Last night I put a couple of hours into digging around re: this Nova Scotia shooting story since a lot of important information comes out immediately after an event like this, which then gets covered up -- unless someone starts collecting the pieces of the puzzle right away. One thing I noticed is that all the varying news sources had a different take as to whether the shooter had been apprehended or killed. Both versions of the story were reported with a sense of certainty. Eventually, I listened to the entire official statement by a higher up at the RCMP, seeing that eventually -- somewhat diffidently -- he offered that the assailant was dead.
However, all of the earlier versions of the story state clearly that the assailant was apprehended, and not dead. An eye witness even took a picture of the assailant's SUV (the second car mentioned in this scenario) entirely surrounded not by the RCMP necessarily (since they didn't look like mounties at all), but by guerilla type operatives.
What I speculate happened was that the assailant/patsy was apprehended, but was killed after being taken in. This would account for the two distinct versions of the story -- the earlier version with him being apprehended (since word got out, and the media reported it as such), and the later version with him being "dead" (which became the official version). This also seems to account for the manner in which the RCMP disclosed the fact of his being deceased. The man talking wasn't at all forthcoming as to how or when the assailant was killed. But then to kill an apprehended alleged assailant is entirely illegal, so you wouldn't want to be too forthcoming about that (!).
Moving on... one version of the story had it that the assailant's ex (either wife or girlfriend) along with her boyfriend were among those killed.
Also: as noted already on this thread, there was initially spotted a police vehicle with the alleged assailant wearing a police uniform, only the assailant, by some accounts, exchanged this vehicle for a silver SUV type vehicle. This had me wondering whether there wasn't a seasoned operative driving the police vehicle, and the patsy/assailant driving the other vehicle. I also wonder whether -- and, again, this is pure speculation -- but perhaps there was a real argument between the assailant and his ex ending in murder or at least some sort of violence. The rest of the shootings and fires may have then been improvised, with the entire mess blamed on the patsy denturist, who, as I understand it, has no criminal record.
It's sort of like this whole pandemic situation. It starts out as possibly an accident whereby this virus gets out into the population, infecting those in Wuhan, then the rest of the world, as the WHO/CDC, etc., eventually decide to improvise, blowing it up into a global pandemic, even though it's not the "real" pandemic they were seemingly planning (as per Fauci's own claim). I suppose that's what gave me the idea re: the Nova Scotia situation. It might have started out as one kind of crime, but it was decided that it could be used to improvise a mass shooting as well.
This idea might work even if the assailant/potential patsy was a programmed assassin who got triggered and killed his ex and her boyfriend. But even if he was programmed, I still think the one dressed as a police officer was an operative who, as I already mentioned, probably did the majority of the shootings, and the fires as well. I think this largely because all such incidents utilize professional sharp shooters and agents.
Oh, something else suspicious about this whole event is how the officials knew straight away that one assailant did all these shootings. It seems premature of them to state this with such certainty. And yet, similar to what happened on 9/ll when CNN was reporting that day that Osama Bin Laden was responsible, these officials seem to know the entire story in advance. So, it's a pattern with these operations, this impossible disclosing of the facts of the case instantaneously.
Also: there's this automatic move to the mourning/memorializing phase -- before any vital questions are answered, or any real investigation pursued.
So, that's where my mind went to as I tried to sort things out immediately after hearing about the incident. Time may tell where I might be right, and where I'm missing something, or where I've gotten it entirely wrong. If anyone here would like to add to what I've got here, or suggest an alternative version, etc., we could piece it together more as more comes out on all this.
I think it's interesting that a shooting should happen in the midst of the Coronavirus lock down. I mean, it would start to seem strange if what the public considers "random" shootings were to suddenly stop just because our countries are in lock down. After all, that would be to suggest that these "crazy" shooters were taking a break for a while, sticking to their homes, and practicing social distancing (!).
