sToRmR1dR said:When drug violence worsens on the USA Mexico border the FBI sends an idealistic agent Kate Macer, on a mission to eradicate a drug cartel responsible for a bomb that had killed members of her team.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3397884/?ref_=nv_sr_1
Movie on how they want us to think they actually "fight" against cartels..?
Turgon said:I saw Sicario when it first came out in theatre's and it does promote they are fighting against cartels, but not in the usual good guys going after the bad guys type of scenario. It's worth watching and I thought it was one of the best movies of 2015. Although it is very tense and there is no happy ending. So in a sense it was realistic because you see psychopathic machinations in play and how it can ruin people and leave destruction in their wake.
SPOILER ALERT!
The movie plays out exactly like the article about the Sinaloa Cartel being aided by the CIA to take out other cartels, except the CIA works with the Colombian's to take out the major Mexican cartel in power. Emily Blunts character is essentially used and manipulated by the CIA in order to legalize their maneuvers and and she goes through a series of traumas as she's exposed to their manipulations and lies and starts to realize it but can't get out of the situation. They never implicitly mention CIA involvement in drug trafficking, but you do see a darker side than is shown in most other movies involving them.
Heimdallr said:sToRmR1dR said:When drug violence worsens on the USA Mexico border the FBI sends an idealistic agent Kate Macer, on a mission to eradicate a drug cartel responsible for a bomb that had killed members of her team.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3397884/?ref_=nv_sr_1
OK, but what did you think about the film?
Padme90 said:Living in Mexico it's awful to see how cartels practically rule over the country, yesterday the headlines of the main newspapers in Mexico were talking about how this new governor from a state has direct bonds with the Guerreros Unidos Cartel.
luke wilson said:It's one of those no happy ending type of movies that may act to manipulate our view of reality but the news constantly coming out of Mexico doesn't do much in the way of providing a counter balance. Another interesting scene in the movie is how life there continues as normal around all these cartel warfare. How people have essentially normalised it all... Accepted it as part of their reality.
luke wilson said:It's one of those no happy ending type of movies that may act to manipulate our view of reality but the news constantly coming out of Mexico doesn't do much in the way of providing a counter balance. Another interesting scene in the movie is how life there continues as normal around all these cartel warfare. How people have essentially normalised it all... Accepted it as part of their reality.
Eboard10 said:What I also didn't like about the movie was how the CIA is being portrayed as the good guys having to do the dirty work to stop or at least limit drug trafficking into the country. Despite all the evidence of the contrary in real life, the movie didn't even try to imply the possibility of corrupt elements within the agency that work with the cartels and support them.
Turgon said:I got the impression that Alejandro, Benecio Del Toro's character, was part of the Colombian cartel. Throughout most of the movie he is always referred to as the lawyer, but near the end of the movie I remember a scene where either him or Josh Brolin's character admits to Emily Blunt that the whole thing was about bringing some sort of balance of power back into the Colombian's hand. That somehow they would be more easily controlled by the CIA.
... so it is worrying how "normalized" it could be down here, my brother also brought something on the table, about how this could be other way to program people, so I do believe this, I really can't bare the idea of how people invest money to do this tv shows about cartels, for me it's non sense really.. i'll prepare myself to watch the movie this weekend :)