"Sirius" documentary by Dr. Stephen Greer

The long-hyped "Sirius" documentary created by the egotistical disinformation profiteer Dr. Stephen Greer was a total bust. Surprise surprise.

It was a jumbled salad of topics - free energy, UFOs, secret government, the banking system, 9-11, the little humanoid body (which remained inconclusive, even though they paraded it throughout the entire film), and an exhaustive self-aggrandizing montage for Stephen Greer- all jumbled together in a confusing, repetitive, and non-linear order.

It's the ol' "truth mixed with lies" that "sound good" to lure in ignorant, well-meaning people and slip in his agenda with obvious emotional hooks (a la "Thrive", "Wayseers", and "Kony"), stringing the viewer along for 2 hours with sob stories, sappy music, and blatant (sometimes exploitatively manipulative, with no relevance to the topic of the documentary) personal appeals to emotion relating to how Steven Greer's been the poor underdog, and how everyone else who feels like they're the underdog should get on board with Dr. Greer because he's THE pioneer for truth.

For a prime example, from the intro:

We see Dr. Greer sitting alone, waiting, in a locker room drinking Coke-a-Cola from a can. (isn't he supposed to be a medical professional?!)

Narrator opens in a gruff, overly-dramatic voiceover, spewing this jumble of pseudo-macho nonsense: "Most people don't know what a dead man's trigger is. And even fewer need one. A dead man's trigger is a safety valve. For reasons of security, a person prepares a recourse of such severe action, that if harmed, they will release a cache of damaging evidence against those enemies. Given his situation, Dr. Steven Greer is one of those rare men. "

To which he walks out on to a stage, cheered by a crowd, holding his hands together in prayer fashion while bowing, giving a hypocritical spiritual gesture of humility and respect after a contrived and pompous introduction.

It even goes insofar as to show Greer leading people in prayer in the desert, many of them young impressionable youngsters and New Age seekers, holding their hands in mudra, chanting in (what sounded like) Hindi, then giving his ol' shtick about asking the ET "saviors" to help humanity before they "signal the UFOs to show themselves".

I could go on, but pointing out ALL the logical fallacies, dubious connections behind his support, and fallacies behind his wishful assumptions based on lack of objective research in to the extraterrestrial phenomenon would take more time and energy than he's worth. :thdown:
 
I agree with you HumbertoLVX, I had same thoughts on this. I did not see it, but it smelled so bad, I decided to wait what the mainstream say about it.
Then Bingo... H.Post published this.

But now that the film is available to everybody, and DNA analysis shows that Ata was human, was that early PR hype about the humanoid a bit premature?

_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/23/sirius-documentary-dna-re_n_3135628.html
 
I watched about the first half of it and had to click the X on the top right.

A whole lot of Greer style "Aliens are good" stuff and even recommendations how to get in contact with them through meditating and new age stuff.
When David Willcock and other disinfo agent appeared (besides Greer) as "experts" I wasn't terribly surprised either.
It sure tells you a lot about the movie and Greers delusional approach.

I do think that that "Alien" looking little humanoid certainly could be a "Grey" but with Greer getting the rights on inverstigating it, it already has lost any possible bigger revealing factor IMO.

By the way that "Alien" came first to my attention through the work of Klaus Dona who presented it a few years ago.
So Greer wasn't the first person who exposed it to a wider audience.

In a recent interview Dona seemed not all that happy that Greer has the hands on it now. He said they hadn't tried to make a DNA analysis because they did not want to disturb the specimen. He said the only way DNA could have been extracted would have been to distroy parts of that body. As it turns out that is exactly what Greer did. He drilled a big hole into the back of the skull and did cut off a rip to get the DNA. You can actually see in the movie that Greer himself gathered those DNA samples from that body.
 
Thanks for the "review" H. I don't think I can stomach it to watch the whole thing, although maybe I should as a learning experience, testing my discernment. :shock:

Btw, HumbertoLVX and I are in the process of rendering an updated version of "UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact". Not any new content/footage in there, just some minor fixes (spellings and visual things, as well as a title and full song list to give the artists credit). However, we'll upload it as the 2.0 version on youtube soon and hopefully more people will watch it once it's out, considering that Greer's film is spreading like a wild fire on the web (from what I've seen). It may be the perfect timing to re-release our film since more people may be be open to watch it right now, osit. We'll let you all know once it's uploaded.
 
Spiral Out and I have recently re-released our documentary, "UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact" (with minor spelling & video corrections) to coincide with the release of "Sirius" by Dr. Stephen Greer. Hopefully it'll help provide perspective, objectivity, and clarity to Greer's ego and disinformation. Please share.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-Ss-HIhixw
 
HumbertoLVX said:
Spiral Out and I have recently re-released our documentary, "UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact" (with minor spelling & video corrections) to coincide with the release of "Sirius" by Dr. Stephen Greer. Hopefully it'll help provide perspective, objectivity, and clarity to Greer's ego and disinformation. Please share.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-Ss-HIhixw

It does need to be shared. I wonder if writing a more thorough review of the new Greer flick for SOTT, and embedding your film in the review may be one way to go?
 
Tiny human-like skeleton found in the Atacama Desert, Chile a decade ago.

_http://news.discovery.com/human/alien-looking-skeleton-poses-medical-mystery-130430.htm#mkcpgn=fbsci1
 
HumbertoLVX said:
The long-hyped "Sirius" documentary created by the egotistical disinformation profiteer Dr. Stephen Greer was a total bust. Surprise surprise.

It was a jumbled salad of topics...

Sounds like perfect ingredients for a short satire video titled "Serious?" and offered for anyone who wants to respond to "Sirius."
 
Re: Tiny human-like skeleton found in the Atacama Desert, Chile a decade ago.

_http://news.discovery.com/human/alien-looking-skeleton-poses-medical-mystery-130430.htm#mkcpgn=fbsci1

They say, the tiny creature shares 91% of DNA with humans,
if I'm not mistaken advanced reptiles and primitive birds share ~90% DNA with humans,
mice and humans share 98 % of their DNA,
chimpanzees and humans share 99.95% of their DNA.

So, it could be a gray alien/probe, made from reptilian DNA. :)
Or maybe a hybrid. :shock:
 
Ennio said:
HumbertoLVX said:
Spiral Out and I have recently re-released our documentary, "UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact" (with minor spelling & video corrections) to coincide with the release of "Sirius" by Dr. Stephen Greer. Hopefully it'll help provide perspective, objectivity, and clarity to Greer's ego and disinformation. Please share.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-Ss-HIhixw

It does need to be shared. I wonder if writing a more thorough review of the new Greer flick for SOTT, and embedding your film in the review may be one way to go?

Very good video my friends!

Thanks a lot for your time and efforts! :thup:
 
JayMark said:
Ennio said:
HumbertoLVX said:
Spiral Out and I have recently re-released our documentary, "UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact" (with minor spelling & video corrections) to coincide with the release of "Sirius" by Dr. Stephen Greer. Hopefully it'll help provide perspective, objectivity, and clarity to Greer's ego and disinformation. Please share.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-Ss-HIhixw

It does need to be shared. I wonder if writing a more thorough review of the new Greer flick for SOTT, and embedding your film in the review may be one way to go?

Very good video my friends!

Thanks a lot for your time and efforts! :thup:

I saw some adverts & the trailer for this but haven't seen the entire film - it was pretty hyped up. Thanks for the review(s) & re-released documentary :)
 
Here is a quote describing a specimen of a similar size, from Biological Anomalies: Humans III. A Catalog of Biological Anomalies. Compiled by William R. Corliss. Glen Arm, MD: The Sourcebook Project, 1994. Pages 50-52.

Section BHE9 - X5:

Wyoming's mystery mummies. Wyoming's mummies naturally follow the "diminutive" Indian skeleton just mentioned. F. Edwards, the popular science writer, seems to have been the first to inject these bizarre, shrivelled mummies into the literature. His account in Stranger Than Science was responsible for at least two repetitions of the tale, namely, R13 and R16. Edwards provides no scientific references, neither do R13 and R16.

Contrasting sharply with the Edwards version of the Wyoming mummy story is the account by C. J. Cazeau and S. D. Scott in their Book Exploring the Unknown. Cazeau and Scott "reexamined" the Wyoming mummy and have a radically different story to tell. Unfortunately, they give no references either. However, since Cazeau and Scott are established scientists, we must tentatively accord their version priority. They began by remarking that the Shoshone and Crow Indians of central Wyoming have long contended that a race of miniature humanas, the "Little People," inhabited the nearby mountains. Some local cowboys go along with this story.

The modern part of the tale begins with two prospectors, C. Main and F. Carr, who when blasting unintentionally opened up a sealed cave passage leading to a cavern. In this cavern, seated on a ledge, they found a small mummified human measuring only 6 1/2 inches in height. Now follows the information that Cazeau and Scott emplyed in their unravelling of what would seem to be a sensational discovery.

Could this be one of the "Little People"? Scientists examined it in detail, taking both photographs and X-rays. George Gill of the University of Wyoming agrees with other scientists that, despite its "old age" appearance, the mummy is that of an infant or fetus.

This mummy, called Pedro, is only one of several that have now been found, averaging 14-15 inches in height. Physicians and anthropologists diagnosed these infants as probably suffering from anencephaly at the time of their birth: an absence of part or all of the brain. This malady also imparts to the victim the appearance of a tiny old man rather than that of an infant.

It is speculated that a tribe with a high incidence of anencephaly might have left these infants in caves where they underwent mummification. Later tribes might have discovered them many years later, giving rise to the legend of a race of tiny people somewhere in the mountains.
- (R14)

The Edwards' version departs radically from that above in several respects, as the following excerpts will demonstrate:

Perhaps it wasn't a living creature. . . a hoax perhaps. . . the X-ray would tell, of course, and an X-ray did tell. It showed unmistakeably that here was a creature that had been a man, or man-like. Its tiny skull, the vertebrae of its spine, the rib cage, the bones of the arms and legs were readily discernible.

. . .

The X-rays show a full set of teeth. Biologists who have examined it declare that the creature was about 65 years old at time of death.

. . .

The anthropological Department of Harvard says there is no doubt of the genuineness of the mummy. Dr. Henry Shapiro, head of the Anthropology Department of the American Museum of Natural History, said that the X-rays revealed a very small skeletal structure covered by dried skin, obviously of extremely great age, historically speaking, and of unknown type and origin. The mystery mummy, said Dr. Shapiro, is much smaller than any human types known to man.

Is it the body of a mummified infant? Anthropologists who have examined it are of the opinion that, whatever it is, it was full grown at the time of death.
- (R13, R16)

Which account is correct? We have here, it seems, conflicting testimony from experts. Obviously, some unbiased researcher must dig into this matter further.

References:

R13. Anonymous; "Wyoming's Mystery Mummy." Rocks and Minerals. 49: 514. 1974.

R14. Cazeau, Charles J., and Scott, Stuart D.; Exploring the Unknown. New York, 1979.

R16. Childress, David Hatcher; Lost Cities of North & Central America, Stelle, 1992.
 
Back
Top Bottom