This is just unbelievable. A very official study is blaming the unvaccinated for scaring the vaccinated so much, that the vaccinated develop blood clots and heart attacks!
...Fear mongering and misinformation being peddled by people with no scientific training to terrorise people into staying unvaccinated is not just causing people to remain susceptible to viral outbreaks, but could also be causing more side effects seen in the vaccination process. This brief review will offer data that may demonstrate that misinformation perpetuated by the anti-vaccination movement may be causing more deaths and side effects from any vaccine...Therefore, if subjects are panicked, concerned, stressed or scared of the vaccination, their arteries will constrict and become smaller in and around the time of receiving the vaccine. This biological mechanism (the constriction of veins, arteries and vessels under mental stress) is the most likely cause for where there has been blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, dizziness, fainting, blurred vision, loss of smell and taste that may have been experienced shortly after vaccine administration. The extreme mental stress of the patient could most likely be attributed to the fear mongering and scare tactics used by various anti-vaccination groups.
I know it should come as a surprise and yet does not, too, as they must feel they can get away with it after failing (or did they fail?) on other fronts.
One thing might be true, either side produces divided stress in the other, by design (one sees this in divided homes and families and friends). However, the professor of psychiatry, Steven Taylor (UBC - the same place that owns patents for part of the mRNA process) in his past presentations makes it sound as if the unvaccinated (hesitant) have Dark Triad traits, more or less gravitating to the conspiracy minded (which they like to remind), thus behaviours must be modified. Taylor is the author of
The Psychology of Pandemics, miraculously
released just months before the so-called pandemic in 2019. Very prophetic.
He was/is on the Canadian Federal Governments Advisory Group on Covid-19, wherein he was/is also the only psychologist in the group and reported directly to the deputy PM (you know, the deputy PM of the
War Measures Emergencies Act).
Form a slide presentation:
When the so-called pandemic was rolled out, there were people like Taylor who spoke to health, labor and industry groups well before vaccines were produced, and yet it became clear in the messaging that vaccines were on warp course and there would be uptake at any cost (again, behaviours need modifying).
Had addended one of these groups messaging sessions early on, which was truly jaw-dropping as they messaged and rallied pandemic group-think. Back then, nothing had been really addressed in the main either as fear and anxiety ramped up, while flatting the curve became the chief talking point. However, as super funded
behavioural scientists with many papers written, and being written with much wet ink at the time, they seemed to have had the populations minds well dialed in. All they needed was repetition, association, historical markers that they could flashback upon and spin, words that would become primers, carrots - the sticks would come later, and most importantly they used emotional guilt to apply pressure - save grannie and all the rest. They also spoke of altruism and empathy, which cycled back to the words guilt and those 'hesitant' and super spreaders of anti-propaganda (Fact Checkers to the rescue to turn it around to "misinformation"). One other thing they needed was a body count, real or manufactured (the latter i.e, helped along with the PCR test to create 'cases').
These behavioural people are not stupid as can be well seen from what they helped to archive across the globe; it is difficult to argue that they did not achieve it (from one dose and only a portion of the population required, to vaccine immunity only and now what, 5, 6 doses/boosters - including now children to 6 mos.) Of course, they would rely on the authoritarians holding public Orders and sticks to make it reality. For those initially watching the presentations, most seemed to be nodding their heads while adding emoji's of alignment in the chat room. As time moved along and people were locked down and shut out, this was in tandem to the press - twitter et al. locking out at risk scientific sources while controlling the outward messaging. The behavioral language changed along the way too - you know, "safe and effective" and all the rest.
All this is known through these now thousands of pages of the forum, most having a pretty good idea where it was going, especially after nations became outright thugs and fined, beat, imprisoned and experimentally poisoned their people. It is also know that a large statistical majority (if one believes the statistics) fell under the pressure (not all for the same reasons - some just to survive). So, it may not be unreasonable that these new studies of the unvaccinated causing accidents, cardiac arrests and whatever else they want, may be largely believed. Twitter may help to reverse the trends, so will have to see.
Anyway, here is a minor list of behavioural
papers (note the titles). Here also are the different YouTube examples of these behavioral sessions (disguised as pandemic information sessions), which only scratched the surface - see
here,
here,
here (that one is to the Telus communications corporation) and
here (a Spanish conference "A psicologia da pandemia covid-19" in English).
This is from another presentation from a UBC prof doing consulting work - with a blog (using empathy - see embedded
paper). Note, he pulls out all the stops - QAnon, Trump, Proud Boys, all becoming fair game to maximize the effect:
Here is one such Behavioural paper:
The Behavioural Immune System and Pandemic Psychology: The Evolved Psychology of Disease-Avoidance and its Implications for Attitudes, Behaviour, and Public Health during Epidemic Outbreaks
https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~schaller/SchallerMurrayHofer-ERSP.pdf
And here is a counter:
The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
Vaccination policies have shifted dramatically during COVID-19 with the rapid emergence of population-wide vaccine mandates, domestic vaccine passports and differential restrictions based on vaccination status. While these policies have prompted ethical, scientific, practical, legal and...
gh.bmj.com
Some screen shots from one presentation:
This one was hilarious, if not so sad:
Vaccine Hesitancy, Conspiracy Theories and Political Extremism | One Hour @ UBC
Lastly, and more in line with the thread title and applicable to India, is the review of statistics by Denis Rancourt:
2022-12-06 ::: Probable causal association between India’s extraordinary April-July 2021 excess-mortality event and the vaccine rollout
By Denis Rancourt
ABSTRACT: India experienced a unique, sudden, unprecedented and extraordinarily large excess all-cause mortality event in April-July 2021, which is not adequately explained as a “second wave” or as being caused by a new variant of concern. After an overview of four recently published studies that have quantified the April-July 2021 excess all-cause mortality event, we give ten numbered arguments as to why we conclude that the extraordinary mortality event was caused by India’s vaccine rollout in its early stages. Therefore, it appears that the early rollout of the vaccine in India in April-July 2021
was devastating, causing the deaths of approximately 3.7 million residents, on administering approximately 350 million doses of the vaccine.
Paper downloaded from here:
-------
Edit: One caveat to the initial above on behavioural modification. In a truly functioning society, responding to a true pandemic would require some reasonable social methods, including behavioural studies that would help and not hinder. None of the above was for a functioning society (people know this here, however adding the point).
www.mirror.co.uk
gazettesports.fr
www.chapeaumagazine.com
