Stories of Covid vaccination side effects or worse

another source for covid topics i recommend and follow my self:


DR Chankara has proven to be correct over and over ... and his 8 day protocol works (zero death on his list)
 
another source for covid topics i recommend and follow my self:


DR Chankara has proven to be correct over and over ... and his 8 day protocol works (zero death on his list)
heres a link to his protocol -imo alot of these approaches have been discussed prviously in this thread .

https://emlct.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/COVID-Rx-4-DR-CHETTY-8th_day_therapy_may_12_2021.pdf

also Kadam303 in regard to the video you shared here is a brief breakdown on the subjects discovered(it would be helpful for you to post a brief synopsis to what youre posting as it saves time and unecessary viewing of long videos :)

0:00 – Welcome & why this first interview of 2026 matters2:10 – Why 2026 is unlikely to be a stable or “post-pandemic” year4:30 – Who Dr. Shankara Chetty is and why his outcomes matter7:15 – COVID has changed: why Omicron no longer looks like a typical virus10:05 – Neurotropic symptoms, subtle infections, and delayed deterioration13:40 – Immune dysregulation explained: mast cells, macrophages, and cycles17:25 – The concept of “weak points” and why each person reacts differently21:10 – Vaccinated vs unvaccinated patterns emerging in reinfection25:05 – Persistent spike protein and cumulative immune exposure29:20 – Case study: seizures, vaccines, and dramatic recovery34:45 – Microclotting, silent ischemia, and sudden cardiac events39:10 – Why normal tests don’t mean normal health anymore44:20 – When protocol-driven medicine fails patients49:30 – Excess mortality, denial, and why the dots aren’t being connected55:10 – What preparation actually means for individuals in 20261:00:20 – Final reflections: awakening, responsibility, and what comes next
 
heres a link to his protocol -imo alot of these approaches have been discussed prviously in this thread .

https://emlct.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/COVID-Rx-4-DR-CHETTY-8th_day_therapy_may_12_2021.pdf
Yeah, this protocol is basically mainstream treatment with no one really having "a rightful claim" one way or another. It's just what it boils down to by logic to manage people's problems and symptoms. Some countries have access to some old school stuff that might reduce the need for that type of medication, but they're exceptional. Oral glycerol (part of the Revici protocol), off the shelf streptokinase (varidasa), oral sodium cromoglycate, ambroxol and NAC as coughing syrups, and the like.
 
Take a look at Hulscher's latest substack:


For several years now, clinicians, pathologists, and independent researchers have been documenting turbo cancers following COVID-19 vaccination: sudden relapses, explosive disease acceleration, rare malignancies appearing out of nowhere, and tumors localizing to injection sites or draining lymph nodes. These signals have been visible for some time — but deliberately fragmented, dismissed as coincidence, or buried under claims that “case reports don’t count.”

That excuse has now completely collapsed.

A newly published peer-reviewed systematic review in Oncotarget — authored by Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD, and Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD — is the first to formally assemble and analyze the entire published literature on cancer temporally associated with COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

They're reduced to cyberattacks to prevent indexation of the publication. That is so low.

Importantly, while this article has been accepted, published, and assigned a publication date, the journal has disclosed that it is currently unable to add the paper to its live journal index due to an ongoing malicious cyberattack on its servers. According to a statement now posted on Oncotarget’s website — and relayed directly to us by Dr. El-Deiry — the journal experienced sustained cyber intrusions in December 2025 and January 2026, which were reported to the FBI, with attacks continuing into the present. In the meantime, Dr. El-Deiry has provided a link to access this important paper. You can read it here.

The journal further states that it is investigating whether individuals associated with PubPeer (PubSmear Mob) may have engaged in or facilitated cybercriminal activity, including server hacking, taking journal websites offline, and manipulating Google search results to suppress journals and scientists. Oncotarget reports that it is currently in contact with federal law-enforcement agencies regarding identified suspects.
It is the most complete assessment up-to-date:

The authors conducted a global, multi-database search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, React19) covering January 2020 through October 2025, explicitly hunting for cancer diagnoses, recurrences, or aggressive progression following vaccination or infection.

What they ultimately identified is not trivial:
  • 69 peer-reviewed publications
  • 333 individual cancer cases
  • 27 countries
  • 66 article-level case reports and series
  • 2 large population-level cohort studies
  • 1 longitudinal U.S. military cancer surveillance analysis
  • Multiple mechanistic and translational studies
Taken together, this constitutes the most comprehensive oncologic safety assessment related to COVID-19 vaccination published to date.

These is the gist of it:

Across all 66 case reports/case series (333 cancer cases), cancers were distributed as follows:

  • Lymphoma: ~38%
  • Carcinoma: ~16%
  • Other tumors: ~16%
  • Melanoma: ~9%
  • Sarcoma: ~9%
  • Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~7%
  • Leukemia: ~6%
Among COVID-19 vaccination–associated cases, lymphoid malignancies were even more prominent:

  • Lymphoma: ~43%
  • Carcinoma: ~16%
  • Sarcoma: ~11%
  • Other tumors: ~16%
  • Melanoma: ~5%
  • Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~4%
  • Leukemia: ~5%
SARS-CoV-2 infection–only cases were rare and showed a limited tumor spectrum:

  • Carcinoma: ~40%
  • Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~40%
  • Melanoma: ~20%
Cases involving both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination showed a broader distribution:
  • Melanoma: ~29%
  • Other tumors: ~29%
  • Lymphoma: ~14%
  • Leukemia: ~14%
  • Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~14%
Overall, this demonstrates that vaccination-associated reports dominate the dataset, while infection-only cancer reports are comparatively few, and that lymphoid malignancies account for the largest proportion of cases, particularly in the vaccination-associated group.

I still feel like I haven't caught my breath after the COVID-19 era. For a post of 1500 patients, I used to have a mortality rate of 1 to 3 elderly persons per year maximum. Now, I don't have access to my own data regarding the mortality rate per year. Nevertheless, the memorable patients that I lost last year were to colon cancer, rectal cancer, lung cancer, Lou Gehrig's disease, a complex kidney cancer that expressed itself in the spinal cord (as opposed to the kidneys), breast cancer, liver cirrhosis, and on it goes. Plus half a dozen to natural elderly causes. The ones with Hodgkin's lymphoma, melanoma, blood cancers, several others with breast cancer and colon cancer, are still alive. The one with the rare spinal cord cancer never got vaxxed, but got sick after getting sick with COVID-19.

RIP.
 
chankaras protocol treats covid as blood poisoning , which result in clots. but can affect nervous system or any other system to be frank.
he focuses on making sure his patients observe how they feel on 8th day of first symptoms.

the medicine token in order as he found out make sure that the inflammation process is stopped and reversed. so body is at peace.
covid is bioweapon its like an allergic reaction driven by blood.


hi is unvexed and twice had blood clots already just from treating 10000x patients, his protocol works if you can get the meds and have at hand. with this bioweapon no one is safe who is exposed to spike ...
if others are not lying hi lost zero patients from covid and vaxed. of course i cant confirm.

also my self i am unable to gather all his meds. i have few
 
Back
Top Bottom