Superbrain Yoga

I did a set of 18 squats earlier today, and I found that my mind was clearer afterwards. I also breathed in through the nose going down, and out through the mouth on rising, which seemed to be the logical way to do it – also because we do that in EE :)

In Taoist Tai Chi there is particular squatting move called a Dan Yu. This is a slow squat and one stretches on rising. The theory behind this squat is that the acupuncture point on the sole of the foot (the bubbling spring, shown in the diagram below) . . .

Kidney%20One.gif


. . . is stimulated by the pressure exerted on the feet by the squat. Master Moy, who formulated Taoist Tai Chi, called the Dan Yu a 'chi pump'. This might have something to do with why the Superbrain manoeuvre is effective. I have found that squats are a very effective way to strengthen the legs, too.

The above diagram and the following brief quote about the bubbling spring point can be found at
_http://trueanduseful.eponym.com/blog/_archives/2006/10/24/2441267.html

True and useful said:
Acupressure Point: Bubbling Spring Point (K 1)
by A.G.Robinson on Tue 24 Oct 2006 03:00 AM PDT

According to the theory of Acupressure, the Bubbling Spring Point (K 1) can support recovery from fatigue and lethargy; it is considered a very important point on the kidney energy meridian for grounding, connecting with the earth, and rooting the energy downward.

Location: Below the ball of the foot in the central depression.

An effective way to work with the Bubbling Spring Point (K 1) is to place the thumb on the point and alternately press and release in a pumping motion for 30 seconds - 1 minute. Repeat this press and release pumping motion on the other foot.
 
SeekinTruth said:
Approaching Infinity said:
Mac said:
My knees are warning me about doing repeated, deep squats. So, I'll squat with the in-breath a little less deeply than is shown in the video.

That sounds like a good plan. All the stuff I've read or been taught says only to squat far enough so that your thighs are parallel to the ground. But if even that is too far, only go as far as is comfortable.

Yeah, it's usually not recommended to sqaut more than the shin and thigh being at a 90 degree angle and even less if you have joint problems, etc.

Actually that depends in how you squat. If you sit in between the legs, you should have no problems in reaching deep squats. However, most people have poor flexibility, and unlearned this pattern of movement, resulting in squating pushing the butt backwards, in a effort to not let the knees travel far ahead.

The "squats destroy the knees" is kinda a myth.

Take a look at this article and make your conclusions.

[quote author=Stumptuous]


The squat is, perhaps, the single best exercise for leg strength and development. Squatting significantly strengthens the muscles responsible for knee and hip extension: quadriceps, hamstrings, and glutes, as well as the smaller stabilizing muscles such as the torso musculature. The squatting motion and position is also the foundation for many other exercises, such as deadlifts, Olympic lifts, and even every day lifting tasks. I think it is a very worthwhile task to learn how to squat, and anyone who can get out of a chair can do it. It has benefits not just for your strength, but for balance, confidence, daily-life strength, cardiovascular capacity, and active flexibility.

Problem is, the squat is often taught incorrectly, and it’s stigmatized as difficult and dangerous. People warn that it is bad for your knees and back, inappropriate for beginners (or anyone not a male collegiate athlete), too hard to learn, blah blah the sky is falling, etc. So, let’s go through all the scary things we’ve heard about squatting, to debunk them one by one.

myth #1: squatting must not be done with a full range of motion or you will hurt your knees.

This is probably the worst myth of all. It’s one of those “well known facts” which is mysteriously unsupported in the research (it’s a well known fact that as soon as you say “it’s a well known fact”, you won’t be able to back it up). According to this myth, full squats (a squat in which the knee joint is taken through a full range of motion, so that at the bottom the hamstrings make contact with the calves) are inherently dangerous, particularly to the knee joint.

While biomechanical research does support the fact that forces on the connective tissues of the knee increase with the knee angle, particularly on the posterior cruciate ligament, there is no evidence that these increased forces actually lead to injury. There is no direct evidence that full squatting causes or even exacerbates knee pain nor damage. I do not know of a single documented case where full squatting led directly to knee injury. Not one! Which is pretty amazing, considering that the clinical literature is positively littered with injury narratives. You’d think we’d see some evidence, but there is nothing, nada, zero. Studies of Olympic weightlifters and powerlifters, both of whom squat with heavy loads, show no increased risk of knee damage in either population. Olympic lifters, in particular, regularly drop to full depth under hundreds of pounds, perhaps as often a hundred times a week or more, for years, and yet their knees are healthier than those of people such as skiiers, jumpers, or runners. No study, short or long term, has ever shown an increase in knee laxity from deep squatting.

“Anyone who says that full squats are ‘bad for the knees’ has, with that statement, demonstrated conclusively that they are not entitled to an opinion about the matter. People who know nothing about a topic, especially a very technical one that requires specific training, knowledge, and experience, are not due an opinion about that topic and are better served by being quiet when it is asked about or discussed. For example, when brain surgery, or string theory, or the NFL draft, or women’s dress sizes, or white wine is being discussed, I remain quiet… But seldom is this the case when orthopedic surgeons, athletic trainers, physical therapists, or nurses are asked about full squats. Most such people have absolutely no idea what a full squat even is, and they certainly have no concept of how it affects the knees, unless they have had additional training beyond their specialties, which for the professions mentioned does not include full squats. Because if these people knew anything about squatting and the difference between a full squat and any other kind of squat and what they do to the knees, they would know that ‘full squats are bad for the knees’ is wrong and thus would not be making such a ridiculous statement.”

–Mark Rippetoe, author of Starting Strength, “Going Deep”. Crossfit Journal September 2006: 6.

In fact, there is strong evidence that squatting actually improves knee stability! The increased strength, balance, and proprioception from regular squatting can make a substantial contribution to keeping knees healthy. Progressive overload (beginning with a light load, then increasing gradually as the trainee is able) assists in strengthening connective tissues and muscles surrounding the joint.

Most interesting to me is the problem with what is usually recommended as “safe”: squatting to parallel. At parallel (where the thigh is parallel to the floor, higher than the depth of a full squat by about 30 degrees), the compressive forces on the patella (kneecap) are actually at their highest (Huberti & Hayes, Journal of Bone Joint Surgery, 1984: 715-724). Decelerating, stopping, and reversing direction at this angle can inspire significant knee pain in even healthy people, whereas full squats present no problem. Another exercise which is supposedly “safer” is the leg extension, even though patellar tension and shear forces on the knee joint are demonstrably higher with such an exercise.

It is worthwhile at this point to comment on the things that do cause knee injury. The primary causes of knee injury involve:

twisting under a load
too much load (for example, I knew a guy who boasted that he could squat 800 lbs. He had never done it before, and couldn’t even full squat half that much, but he decided that 800 was a good round number, and he was going to attempt to quarter squat it. Long story short, knee ligaments did not agree with his assessment)
landing unevenly from a jump, especially with straightened rather than bent legs (this is a big problem for folks like basketball and volleyball players)
being in a situation where one part of the leg is held stationary while the other is moving (for example, stepping in a gopher hole while running: shin stays in place while the thigh keeps moving)
impact to the knee (such as a hit from the side or front in football)
squatting in a Smith machine which does not allow proper shifts in weight through the movement, and results in shear on knee and spine
In other words, knee injury usually results from varus or valgus force (twisting of the joint in either direction), inappropriate loading, or forcible shear across the joint. It does not occur simply from taking the knee joint through a full range of motion, using correct technique, and using a weight which is appropriate to the abilities of the trainee.
[/quote]

When I started squating deep years ago, I actually healed some knee problems I had from kung fu Practice of years prior.
 
Iron said:
Actually that depends in how you squat. If you sit in between the legs, you should have no problems in reaching deep squats. However, most people have poor flexibility, and unlearned this pattern of movement, resulting in squating pushing the butt backwards, in a effort to not let the knees travel far ahead.

The "squats destroy the knees" is kinda a myth.

Take a look at this article and make your conclusions.

When I started squating deep years ago, I actually healed some knee problems I had from kung fu Practice of years prior.

Hi, Iron: So if I understand you correctly, you "sit" between your legs and squat fully down not stopping with the thigh parallel. As I picture it would have to be with the feet a ways apart. Is that the idea?

Mac
 
Yes, the feet would be somewhat apart, a little wider than the shouders. The feet points toward the direction of the knees. In other words, if your knees point outside, the feet follow suit. As you squat, your knees should naturally travel to the outsides.
You should find the feet position more comfortable.

This video is kinda of a joke, but it shows well the botton position, and bio-mechanics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWTmg4dHiKg
 
[quote author=Endymion]

In Taoist Tai Chi there is particular squatting move called a Dan Yu. This is a slow squat and one stretches on rising. The theory behind this squat is that the acupuncture point on the sole of the foot (the bubbling spring, shown in the diagram below) . . .

Kidney%20One.gif


. . . is stimulated by the pressure exerted on the feet by the squat. Master Moy, who formulated Taoist Tai Chi, called the Dan Yu a 'chi pump'. This might have something to do with why the Superbrain manoeuvre is effective. I have found that squats are a very effective way to strengthen the legs, too.

The above diagram and the following brief quote about the bubbling spring point can be found at
_http://trueanduseful.eponym.com/blog/_archives/2006/10/24/2441267.html

True and useful said:
Acupressure Point: Bubbling Spring Point (K 1)
by A.G.Robinson on Tue 24 Oct 2006 03:00 AM PDT

According to the theory of Acupressure, the Bubbling Spring Point (K 1) can support recovery from fatigue and lethargy; it is considered a very important point on the kidney energy meridian for grounding, connecting with the earth, and rooting the energy downward.

Location: Below the ball of the foot in the central depression.

An effective way to work with the Bubbling Spring Point (K 1) is to place the thumb on the point and alternately press and release in a pumping motion for 30 seconds - 1 minute. Repeat this press and release pumping motion on the other foot.
[/quote]

Will add this to the trial - thanks.
 
My morning 'after shower' exercises end on 10 squats, so I'll convert ordinary squats to these ones from tomorrow. I'll definately need a wall to balance against initially as I'm not sure about no free hands :)

Iron, thanks, I enjoyed the 'how to squat video', it was instructive and entertaining, made it look so easy.
 
Iron said:
Yes, the feet would be somewhat apart, a little wider than the shouders. The feet points toward the direction of the knees. In other words, if your knees point outside, the feet follow suit. As you squat, your knees should naturally travel to the outsides.
You should find the feet position more comfortable.

This video is kinda of a joke, but it shows well the botton position, and bio-mechanics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWTmg4dHiKg

Thanks, Iron: It is easier on my knees, feels ok. And better balance.

Mac
 
Lindenlea said:
My morning 'after shower' exercises end on 10 squats, so I'll convert ordinary squats to these ones from tomorrow. I'll definately need a wall to balance against initially as I'm not sure about no free hands :)

Iron, thanks, I enjoyed the 'how to squat video', it was instructive and entertaining, made it look so easy.

Instead of balancing or leaning against a wall for support, you may find it easier to put both hands palm down on the edge of a table. This is how students learn the Dan Yu in Taoist Tai Chi classes.
 
I think that if we want to do a little experiment with this as a group, we have to come to a consensus as to which test we all will be doing before and after, and during the experiment. But everyone doing their own thing, is an option too I'd think.

I checked out the video, mkrnhr, and I thought that we could do an arithmetic test, and I see that parallel posted a website where such a test can be done. So we can do Hesper's test at the very beginning of the experiment, and at the end of the experiment. And the arithmetic test can be done every day from the first day of practice until the last day of practice (4 weeks in total). All data should of course be saved.

Hesper's test: _http://health.howstuffworks.com/human-body/systems/nervous-system/how-to-test-your-memory1.htm
Arithmetic test (checking Addition, Substraction and Triplet): _http://www.thatquiz.org/tq-1/math/arithmetic/

What do you guys think?
 
I agree to the consensus set timeframe, a month sounds good, don't know if we should make test categories individual or f.ex pick 5 and make each participant choose her/his level?

here are the options from "thatquiz"
thatquizUdklip.png


EDIT:Reread Oxajil's and "how-to-test-your-memory" and deleted unecessary question.
 
parallel said:
I agree to the consensus set timeframe, a month sounds good, don't know if we should make test categories individual or f.ex pick 5 and make each participant choose her/his level?

Yea I guess each participant can choose her/his own level, and pick their own tests. As long as they save the data from each day, to see if there is any improvement.
 
I would like to address a little point. How to do to be sure one is not consciously or unconsciously pushing the results one way or another?
For example: I do the tests everyday. It gets better, but that may be just by training. It would happen with or without the exercise.
Another example: I do the squat with the hands on my ears, I do the exercise fully and trying to do the best. I do the squat without the ear thing, but somehow I expect myself to be slower/less "intelligent" and that expectation may show up in the test.
Question, how can we trick our expectation in this experiment? :)
 
mkrnhr said:
I would like to address a little point. How to do to be sure one is not consciously or unconsciously pushing the results one way or another?
For example: I do the tests everyday. It gets better, but that may be just by training. It would happen with or without the exercise.
Another example: I do the squat with the hands on my ears, I do the exercise fully and trying to do the best. I do the squat without the ear thing, but somehow I expect myself to be slower/less "intelligent" and that expectation may show up in the test.
Question, how can we trick our expectation in this experiment? :)

As hard as it is, try not to have expectations? Also, maybe people should have a period of time where the quizes / tests are taken without the Superbrain Yoga being practiced and recording the results. Then after a period of practicing (and still practicing) take the tests again and record the results. Then have a long enough period where you don't practice, after which you take the tests again. If the last tests show diminishing performance on the tests, then it may be an indication that the yoga practice enhanced performance? This should take out the effect of training from the results, shouldn't it?
 
mkrnhr said:
I would like to address a little point. How to do to be sure one is not consciously or unconsciously pushing the results one way or another?
For example: I do the tests everyday. It gets better, but that may be just by training. It would happen with or without the exercise.
Another example: I do the squat with the hands on my ears, I do the exercise fully and trying to do the best. I do the squat without the ear thing, but somehow I expect myself to be slower/less "intelligent" and that expectation may show up in the test.
Question, how can we trick our expectation in this experiment? :)

Two groups: A group squats without hands in the earlobes, another squats with the hands on ears.
Both groups would have to test before exercise, during the weeks of practice, and after.
We could find more than one test, and do different tests at different moments of the experiment ex: test one prior practice, test two during, and test three in the weeks after.

Depending on the results, afterwards we will have to change groups. The ones who served as control would squat with hands on earlobes, to account of the possibility that the changes experienced by the experimental group in the first phase were just adaptations with no relation with the exercise. In other words, if the control group, afterwards experience rise in cognitive abilities we can settle for sure that it was the exercise. If, of course the cognitive abilites improve.
 
Well, there are far too many variables here to carry out a controlled experiment - so - my advice, if you want to do this, would be to do it for fun, while being fully aware that the outcome might have zero bearing on the objective usefulness of the exercise! ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom