Terrence Howard’s 1x1=2 , square root of 2 is 1

Steph_rivers

Jedi Master
FOTCM Member
Has anyone else in the forum heard of Terrence Howard’s (famously known for iron man character actor for war machine) “mathematical breakthrough”?

He states that 1x1=2 because it follows the law of conservation of energy, and that the square root of 2 is 1. He also came to the conclusion that it appears that there has been a great deception amongst our methods of arithmetic. This goes further to speak into the “true nature” of gravity as an effect of the “condensing” and spinning con caving effects of electrical energy, and that gravity is just the opposite of what scientists claim it to be. I’m no mathematician, so I’m viewing this information as information, and find it difficult to relate this to the geometry he claims to have discovered.

This initially appears absurd, but he goes very well into detail in his “initial public draft” to defend his case. Which I’ve attached below as well.

There also appears to be major “damage control” from all media claiming is method of thinking is “dangerous” with the same hit pieces of articles calling him an idiot or insane. This could all just be COINTELPRO of course, but maybe someone with a different perspective can view this and give a different opinion?

I’m still looking further into this

Here is the link to his website: tcotlc.com

Here is the link to his public draft.
 

Attachments

Math is a pure logic and it's seemingly not the strongest part of this dude's mind. Just take a look at the last page of that document:
2022-08-23_16-24.png

Where is an answer 1$² ? It reminded me this video:

 
This is grade school math.

Multiplication means to add a certain number of groups of a certain size. So, 2x3 means to add 3 groups of size 2, making it equivalent to 2+2+2 or 6. 1x1 means to 'add' 1 group of size 1. Since there's only 1 group, the sum of 1 is ... 1.
 
This reminds me of flat earth theory. As you said it could be COINTELPRO - not just with the media claiming this is 'dangerous thinking', but with the whole concept. Essentially creating a category of conspiracy theory as a trap.
it can very well be. It is indeed highly bizarre and was an entertaining read for the night, 160 pages of stuff, but I don’t see any means that I can personally replicate or apply to a real world scenario.
Just thought I’d share anyway :whistle:
 

I have already seen it in its entirety and the truth is that many things it says make sense and I agree with the way in which it resolves the geometric patterns and takes out its shapes and links it with electromagnetism and takes out the lynchpin, it gives a new explanation to the definition of gravity and I agree also, but he fails to believe that by understanding one thing he understands them all, he believes that he has the whole truth (a lot of ego) and he is missing many things, he ventures to conclude his investigations very quickly and does not know how to filter how to say things, ending up ridiculizing himself with anecdotes like "I remember since I was in the womb" or "I can change humanity with my discoveries" (Hey, don't tell that if you want people to take you seriously).

My two cents
 
Maybe I am reading too much into this, but it did pop in my mind that this guy's weird "insights," into the nature of reality, which have attracted a lot of attention, happen around the same time Laura's interviews are being rolled out.
 
Back
Top Bottom