The Alex Constantine School of Resentment

[lonenutter]

Greetings,

My name is Jaye Beldo and I wrtie an e-zine called Lone Nutter News (_www.lonenutternews.blogspot.com) I received the following from Alex Constantine recently and thought I'd post it to this forum for discussion. Ironic that I got this from Alex considering I used to promote his books on mainstream radio. I won't be doing that again. Here's his rant:

Jaye: This may come as a big revelation to you, but I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I write about fascism, and it's impossible to write about fascism and not describe conspiracies. Only the ignorant think of me as a conspiracy theorist, but there are some around who still do. I'm not so concerned with that, but I'm defining terms and clarifying here.

I've written about Jadczyk, Cooper, other fascist conspiracy theorists who you promote. Jadczyk draws her 9/11 information from the National Alliance, it's mostly and demonstrably false (I disproved her false statement that Ariel Sharon claimed Jews run the US, and that's why she's angry at me), and she writes constantly about Jewish people, who, she claims, control media and the government. Constantly, but I guess somehow you missed all that ... or did you?

This illustrates that these frauds make my life more difficult because I have to work overtime to counter their CRAP.

Why are you promoting these people? My own life is about saving lives. This is what I've done for 20 years. I believe that my Nutrasweet research alone saved thousands. How can I do that when you and others are promoting fascists like Cooper and Jadczyk? My own publisher puts out LeVey - he thinks it's all very amusing too. Well, he did until he was thrown in a mental institution for publishing a book of mine and the CIA turned someone he admired into a vegetable. His eyes turned red from crying over that one.

Have a good laugh. I resent what you are doing, even though I treat you with respect because I don't believe you are actually evil. But you make my life harder by not discriminating between the real and the false, which you seem to embrace. How should I feel? How can I feel any other way? "Life-affirming" fills a gap, is badly needed, but only if you don't promote life-denying frauds. Why are you making my life harder? - AC

 

[Laura]

Question: What is the "National Alliance." I draw my information from research and thinking.

she writes constantly about Jewish people, who, she claims, control media and the government

A good example of Constantine's ignorance.

Kevin MacDonald did extensive research in this matter, and anyone who has their eyes open and two firing neurons can see the extent of the Jewish control of the media if they make only a half-hearted effort to check things out. MacDonald writes:

The present Judaized cultural imperium in the West is maintained by a pervasive thought control propagated by the mass media and extending to self-censorship by academics, politicians, and others well aware of the dire personal and professional consequences of crossing the boundaries of acceptable thought and speech about Jews and Jewish issues. It is maintained by zealously promulgated, self-serving, and essentially false theories of the nature and history of Judaism and the nature and causes of anti-Semitism. [...]

By all accounts, ethnic Jews have a powerful influence in the American media-far larger than any other identifiable group. The extent of Jewish ownership and influence on the popular media in the United States is remarkable given the relatively small proportion of the population that is Jewish. [The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements

MacDonald then goes on to LIST all the Zionist owned or run media outlets, so it's pretty hard to ignore the evidence.

But, ignore the evidence Constantine does. He even makes up some pathetic excuse that I am "mad at him" because he "disproved" something that he never actually disproved. More than that, there is a load of the "pity ploy" that we know so well from our studies in psychopathy in his message. If he can't intimidate, he's going to try to make us cry for him and his poor pal who was weeping...

Thing is, I've never seen any evidence of any real attacks on Alex Constantine such as we have experienced at the hands of ADL backed internet psycho-terrorists. All we have are his sad stories about how they "torture" him for "telling the truth."

Lemme tell ya Alex, they don't torture people for telling the truth. They usually don't kill them either unless they are a real danger, like Dr. David Kelly. And they certainly don't give them "official sanction" as they have Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, Christopher Bollyn, etc. If the person is a real pain, they send people like you and the Black Magic Satanist squad out to defame them.

I just love his pathetic "life-affirming" nonsense at the end. Indeed, it is "life-affirming" for psychopaths.

 

[Laura]

A few pros and cons about Jewish control of the media:

Graham warned Nixon about 'Jewish control' of media, tape reveals

Church & State, Apr 2002

Popular Christian evangelist Billy Graham told President Richard M. Nixon in 1972 that Jews have a "stranglehold" on the U.S. media and urged him to put a stop to it if he were reelected later that year.

The conversation, taped without Graham's knowledge, was made public Feb. 28 by the National Archives. The exchange between the Baptist preacher and Nixon took place in February of 1972 after a prayer breakfast presided over by Graham. On the tape, Nixon is heard praising Graham for his remarks during the event.

"There were a lot of people in tears when you finished this morning, and it's very moving," observed the president. "That's the best I've heard you at one of those prayer breakfast things."

Graham and Nixon then talked about the president's reelection effort. When Graham mentioned he had a meeting coming up with the editors of Time, Nixon aide H.R. Haldeman, who was also in the room, interjected, "You meet with all their editors, you better take your Jewish beanie."

Graham, laughing, asked, "Is that right? I don't know any of them now."

Now, keep in mind that this was Billy Graham and Richard Nixon being recorded when they didn't know they were being recorded.

Everyone in America has been programmed to hate the "eeeevil, lying Richard Nixon," but one can't help but wonder about this. Consider what Douglas Reed has to say about Nixon:

This undermining of the West was not confined to the United States; it was general throughout the Western world and this chapter dwells on the American case only because, in the conditions of today, the strength and wealth of America are so great that their use or misuse probably will decide the issue. A similar condition was shown to exist in the country, Britain, from which the great overseas nations originally sprang, and in the two greatest of these, Canada and Australia.

The first exposure came in Canada, immediately after the war's end, and this is the only one of the four Cases in which full governmental investigation and full public disclosure of the results followed; also, it lit the fuse which in time led to all the other exposures, in America, Australia and Britain. A Russian, at the risk of his life, disclosed to the Canadian Government the network of governmental infestation and espionage of which the Soviet Embassy at Ottawa was the centre (despite the leading part taken by Russians in this process of warning Western politicians and the press continued to incite their peoples against "Russians", not against the revolutionary conspiracy of which Russia was the captive). The full public investigation, which would otherwise be surprising, seems to be accounted for by the fact that the Canadian Prime Minister of that day, Mr. Mackenzie King, although a wily politician, was in all else a simple man, more interested in communing with the spirit world than anything else. When he was convinced by documents of the truth of Igor Gouzenko's statements he saw that they revealed "as serious a situation as ever existed in Canada at any time" and flew at once to inform the American president (Mr. Roosevelt's successor) and the British Prime Minister (then Mr. Clement Attlee) that this situation was shown by them to be "even more serious in the United States and England".

At that time Mr. Whittaker Chambers' documentary proof that Mr. Alger Hiss was the centre of a Soviet network in the American State Department had been available to, but ignored by, two American presidents for six years, and three years later Mr. Truman was publicly to deride all such stories as "a Red herring". The exposure of Mr. Hiss and his associates followed in a trial which was entirely the result of efforts by individual patriots (including Mr. Richard Nixon, a later Vice-President) to wring the truth from a reluctant government and to compel exposure. In the sequence to the Hiss affair a mass of disclosures followed, which showed American government departments to have been riddled with Soviet agents at all levels. The literature of this period and subject is now too great even to summarize here, but it is conclusive, and much of it is official, though reluctant. [...]

The Republican Party programme, on which President Eisenhower was unanimously elected candidate, said: "We regard the preservation of Israel as an important tenet of American foreign policy. We are determined that the integrity of an independent Jewish state shall be maintained. We shall support the independence of Israel against armed aggression".

The Democratic Party programme said: "The Democratic Party will act to redress the dangerous imbalance of arms in the area created by the shipment of Communist arms to Egypt, by selling or supplying defensive weapons to Israel, and will take such steps, including security guarantees, as may be required to deter aggression and war in the area". (The phrase, "dangerous imbalance of arms", reflected the propagandist fiction that Israel was "defenceless" and the Arab countries strong; the truth, a little earlier established by Mr. Hanson Baldwin was that Israel was stronger in arms than all seven Arab countries together).

These two policy statements gave the picture of a world in the Zionist thrall, and complemented the statements then being made by the British Government. They had no relation to any native American interest but reflected simply Zionist control of the election-machine, or the unshakeable belief of the party-managers in that control. (On this occasion events appeared to justify that belief; the Democratic Party, the higher bidder, captured Congress, although the nominal "Republican" was re-elected President).

The only other event of importance in the two conventions was one which may appear to have little bearing on the theme of this book, but in the later sequel might prove to be of direct significance; the re-nomination of Mr. Richard Nixon as President Eisenhower's running-mate (and in effect as Vice-President). Mr. Eisenhower's state of health made the Vice-Presidency more important than usual, and the possibility that Mr. Nixon might succeed to the Presidency between 1956 and 1960 was evidently regarded as a major danger by the powers that govern America today, so that a supreme effort was made to prevent his nomination. That was not remarkable, in this century; what was remarkable is that the attempt failed. At some time men will obviously emerge who will break the thrall that lies on American and British political life, and this failure was a portent of that coming liberation, so that the person of Mr. Richard Nixon gains a symbolic importance in our day, even though he, if he became President, might find himself unable to break the bonds.

The reason for this powerful enmity to Mr. Nixon is that he is not an "internationalist". Far from it, he played the decisive part in the unmasking and conviction of Mr. Alger Hiss, the Soviet agent in Mr. Roosevelt's administration. This is the true reason why he has ever since had a uniformly bad "press", not only in America but elsewhere in the Western world. Having that black mark against him, he is held to be a man who, in the chief office, might conceivably rebel against the constraints to which American Presidents and British Prime Ministers, almost without exception, have submitted in the last fifty years and which Vice-President's automatically incur.

Hence a campaign of great force and ingenuity was begun to prevent his nomination. A member of the President's own political household (and nominal party) was released from duty for some weeks to conduct a nationwide "Stop Nixon" offensive, with committee-rooms, placards and meetings. This had no effect on the general public, with whom Mr. Nixon appears to be popular. Then, for his particular discomfiture, new tactics were introduced at the convention of the rival, Democratic party. Instead of the elected nominee (Mr. Adlai Stevenson) choosing his own vice-presidential "running mate" as on former occasions, the selection of a "running mate" was thrown open to vote and of various competitors Senator Estes Kefauver (an exceptionally zealous Zionist) received the nomination as vice-presidential candidate.

The aim of the manoeuvre was to force the Republican Party's convention to follow this "democratic procedure" and also to submit the choice of the vice-presidential candidate to vote. It did so and Mr. Nixon, like Mr. Eisenhower, received a unanimous vote. This event, and his deportment during President Eisenhower's illnesses, made Mr. Nixon's prospects of becoming President in his own right one day much better than they had ever been deemed before. His story up to now makes him a hopeful figure (as Mr. Eden appeared to be in 1938), and in the chief office he might conceivably produce a sanative effect on American policy and foreign relations.

After the nominations America sat back with relief, for Mr. Eisenhower's re-election was held sure and he had been given a rousing build-up in the press as "the man who kept us out of war". The phrase was reminiscent of similar phrases used about Mr. Woodrow Wilson in 1916 and Mr. Roosevelt in 1940, but by 1956 a respite of three years was held to be a boon and he was given credit for this period of "peace", such as it was.

I was a witness of this election, as of the one in 1952, and realized that in fact war, localized or general, was near. I felt that a respite, at least, would be gained if election day (Nov. 6) passed without the eruption in the Middle East which for months obviously had been preparing (once the election is over the Zionist power to exert pressure diminishes, for a little while). I remember saying to an American friend on October 20 that if the next seventeen days could be got over without war the world might be spared it for another three or four years.

On October 29, eight days before the election, war came, by obvious predetermination of the moment held most suitable to cause consternation in Washington and London. From that moment events swept along on a tide of elemental forces let loose and only much later will mankind be able to see what was destroyed and what survived. For Britain and the family of oversea nations offsprung from it, this was nearly ruin, the foreseeable end of the involvement in Zionism.

Again, considering what happened to Nixon for a LOT less than what Bush has done, and also considering what happened to Clinton for a lot less than Bush has done, we have to stop and use our noggins here and connect some firing neurons, something that, apparently, Alex Constantine is unable to do.

It's also useful to have a look at Alexander Cockburn's article about the Billy Graham/ Richard Nixon exchange:

When Billy Graham Planned To Kill One Million Peopleb

There's a piquant contrast in the press coverage across the decades of Billy Graham's various private dealings with Nixon, as displayed on the tapes gradually released from the National Archive or disclosed from Nixon's papers. I'll come shortly to the recent flap over Graham and Nixon's closet palaverings about the Jews, but first let's visit another interaction between the great evangelist and his commander in chief Back in April, l989 a Graham memo to Nixon was made public. It took the form of a secret letter from Graham, dated April 15, 1969, drafted after Graham met in Bangkok with missionaries from Vietnam. These men of God said that if the peace talks in Paris were to fail, Nixon should step up the war and bomb the dikes. Such an act, Graham wrote excitedly, "could overnight destroy the economy of North Vietnam".

Graham lent his imprimatur to this recommendation. Thus the preacher was advocating a policy to the US Commander in Chief that on Nixon's own estimate would have killed a million people. The German high commissioner in occupied Holland, Seyss-Inquart, was sentenced to death at Nuremberg for breaching dikes in Holland in World War Two. (His execution did not deter the USAF from destroying the Toksan dam in North Korea, in 1953, thus deliberately wrecking the system that irrigated 75 per cent of North Korea's rice farms.)

This disclosure of Graham as an aspirant war criminal did not excite any commotion when it became public in 1989, twenty years after it was written. I recall finding a small story in the Syracuse Herald-Journal. No one thought to chide Graham or even question him on the matter. Very different has been the reception of a new tape revealing Graham, Nixon and Haldeman palavering about Jewish domination of the media and Graham invoking the "stranglehold" Jews have on the media.

On the account of James Warren in the Chicago Tribune, who has filed excellent stories down the years in Nixon's tapes, media, in this 1972 Oval Office session between Nixon, Haldeman and Graham, the President raises a topic about which "we can't talk about it publicly," namely Jewish influence in Hollywood and the media.

Nixon cites Paul Keyes, a political conservative who is executive producer of the NBC hit, "Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In," as telling him that "11 of the 12 writers are Jewish." "That right?" says Graham, prompting Nixon to claim that Life magazine, Newsweek, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and others, are "totally dominated by the Jews." Nixon says network TV anchors Howard K. Smith, David Brinkley and Walter Cronkite "front men who may not be of that persuasion," but that their writers are "95 percent Jewish."

"This stranglehold has got to be broken or the country's going down the drain," the nation's best-known preacher declares "You believe that?" Nixon says. "Yes, sir," Graham says. "Oh, boy," replies Nixon. "So do I. I can't ever say that but I believe it." "No, but if you get elected a second time, then we might be able to do something," Graham replies.

Magnanimously Nixon concedes that this does not mean "that all the Jews are bad" but that most are left-wing radicals who want "peace at any price except where support for Israel is concerned. The best Jews are actually the Israeli Jews." "That's right," agrees Graham, who later concurs with a Nixon assertion that a "powerful bloc" of Jews confronts Nixon in the media. "And they're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff," Graham adds.

Later Graham says that "a lot of the Jews are great friends of mine. They swarm around me and are friendly to me. Because they know I am friendly to Israel and so forth. They don't know how I really feel about what they're doing to this country." After Graham's departure Nixon says Haldeman, "You know it was good we got this point about the Jews across." "It's a shocking point," Haldeman replies, "Well," says Nixon, "it's also, the Jews are irreligious, atheistic, immoral bunch of bastards."

Within days of these exchanges becoming public the 83-year old Graham was hauled from his semi-dotage, and impelled to express public contrition. "Experts" on Graham were duly cited as expressing their "shock" at Graham's White House table talk.

Why the shock? Don't they know that this sort of stuff is consonant with the standard conversational bill of fare at 75 per cent of the country clubs in America, not to mention many a Baptist soiree. Nixon thought American Jews were lefty peaceniks who dominated the Democratic Party and were behind the attacks on him. Graham reckoned it was Hollywood Jews who had sunk the nation in porn. Haldeman agreed with both of them. At whatever level of fantasy they were all acknowledging power. But they didn't say they wanted to kill a million Jews. That's what Graham said about the Vietnamese and no one raised a bleat.

It's supposedly the third rail in journalism even to have a discussion of how much the Jews do control the media. Since three of the prime founders of Hollywood, were Polish Jews who grew up within fifty miles of each other in Galicia, it's reckoned as not so utterly beyond the bounds of propriety to talk about Jewish power in Hollywood, though people still stir uneasily. The economic and political commentator Jude Wanniski remarked last week in his web newsletter that even if the Jews don't control the media overall, it iscertainly true to say that they control discussion of Israel in the media here.

Certainly, there are a number of stories sloshing around the news now that have raised discussion of Israel and of the posture of American Jews to an acrid level. The purveyor of anthrax may have been a former government scientist, Jewish, with a record of baiting a colleague of Arab origins, and with the intent to blame the anthrax on Muslim terrorists. Rocketing around the web and spilling into the press are many stories about Israeli spies in America at the time of 9/11. On various accounts, they were trailing Atta and his associates, knew what was going to happen but did nothing about it, or were simply spying on US facilities. Some, posing as art students have been expelled, according to AP. Finally, there's Sharon's bloody repression of the Palestinians, and Israel's apparently powerful role in Bush's foreign policy, urging him into action against at least two of the axes of evil, Iraq and Iran.

And then a piece that attempts to refute what Cockburn has said above:

Cockburn on Jewish Control of the Media

By Brian Carnell

Thursday, March 28, 2002

Sometimes people on the Left write such bizarre things it is hard to know what to think, especially when they come from a normally level-headed source like Alexander Cockburn. But Cockburn's comments about the flap over anti-Semitic comments made in recently released tapes of Richard Nixon and The Rev. Billy Graham leave even me speechless. Cockburn notes that commentators have said they were shocked at hearing such rank anti-Semitism from Nixon and Graham. Cockburn then continues,

Why the shock? Don't they know that this sort of stuff is consonant with the standard conversational bill of fare at 75 per cent of the country clubs in America, not to mention many a Baptist soiree. Nixon thought American Jews were lefty peaceniks who dominated the Democratic Party and were behind the attacks on him. Graham reckoned it was Hollywood Jews who had sunk the nation in porn. Haldeman agreed with both of them. At whatever level of fantasy they were all acknowledging power. But they didn't say they wanted to kill a million Jews. That's what Graham said about the Vietnamese [because Graham urged Nixon to destroy dikes in North Vietnam] and no one raised a bleat.

It's supposedly the third rail in journalism even to have a discussion of how much the Jews do control the media. Since three of the prime founders of Hollywood, were Polish Jews who grew up within fifty miles of each other in Galicia, it's reckoned as not so utterly beyond the bounds of propriety to talk about Jewish power in Hollywood, though people still stir uneasily. The economic and political commentator Jude Wanniski remarked last week in his web newsletter that even if the Jews don't control the media overall, it is certainly true to say that they control discussion of Israel in the media here.

Certainly, there are a number of stories sloshing around the news now that have raised discussion of Israel and of the posture of American Jews to an acrid level. The purveyor of anthrax may have been a former government scientist, Jewish, with a record of baiting a colleague of Arab origins, and with the intent to blame the anthrax on Muslim terrorists. Rocketing around the web and spilling into the press are many stories about Israeli spies in America at the time of 9/11. On various accounts, they were trailing Atta and his associates, knew what was going to happen but did nothing about it, or were simply spying on US facilities. Some, posing as art students have been expelled, according to AP. Finally, there's Sharon's bloody repression of the Palestinians, and Israel's apparently powerful role in Bush's foreign policy, urging him into action against at least two of the axes of evil, Iraq and Iran.

Wow. Notice it is not whether or not Jews control the media that cannot be discussed, according to Cockburn, but rather the extent to which they control it which is the "third rail in journalism." The claim that "Jews do control the media" is simply assumed to be true by Cockburn, which gets repeated in the form that "it is certainly true to say that they [Jews] control discussion of Israel in the media here."

Cockburn follows this with paragraph filled with a litany of rumors, conjectures, and conspiracy related to "Israel and of the posture of American Jews." And then the essay just stops.

Cockburn's apparent approval of Jude Wanniski's nonsensical article is also troubling. According to Wanniski, the fact that publisher Mortimer Zuckerman refused to have a face-to-face meeting with Louis Farrakhan proves that Jews control the media coverage of Israel (Wanniski, in fact, asserts that if Zuckerman had met with Farrakhan, "9-11 might not have happened.")

Notice that the above is published on a site called "leftwatch." We might assume that any organization that "watches the Left," is on the Right, right? And it's pretty safe to say that Fascism is just EXTREME Right. So, how does Alex Constantine get off saying he "writes about Fascism" when he is clearly part of the Fascist Right?

Then, there is Shimon Peres exulting in the Jewish Control of America:

Sharon to Peres: "We Control America"

Congressional Pandering to Israel proves him Rightb

On October 3, 2001, I.A.P. News reported that according to Israel Radio (in Hebrew) Kol Yisrael an acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres. Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and "turn the US against us. "Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying "don't worry about American pressure, we the Jewish people control America."

"The Israelis control the policy in the congress and the senate."

-- Senator Fullbright, Chair of Senate Foreign Relations Committee: 10/07/1973 on CBS' "Face the Nation".

"I am aware how almost impossible it is in this country to carry out a foreign policy [in the Middle East] not approved by the Jews..... terrific control the Jews have over the news media and the barrage the Jews have built up on congressmen .... I am very much concerned over the fact that the Jewish influence here is completely dominating the scene and making it almost impossible to get congress to do anything they don't approve of. The Israeli embassy is practically dictating to the congress through influential Jewish people in the country"

-----Sec. of State John Foster Dulles quoted on p.99 of Fallen Pillars by Donald Neff

How come Alex Constantine, great "exposer of truths and saver of lives" isn't aware of the biggest threat to the most lives on this planet today???

But, there is MORE:

Seven Jewish Americans Control Most US Media

From John Whitley
11-21-3

Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

- Protocol 12: 4. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, see Protocol 12 titled: Control of the Press



"Today, seven Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following seven individuals:

Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner

Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company

Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd

Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios

Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc

Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric

Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited

Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.

Most of the larger independent newspapers are owned by Jewish interests as well. An example is media mogul is Samuel I. "Si" Newhouse, who owns two dozen daily newspapers from Staten Island to Oregon, plus the Sunday supplement Parade; the Conde Nast collection of magazines, including Vogue, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, Allure, GQ, and Self; the publishing firms of Random House, Knopf, Crown, and Ballantine, among other imprints; and cable franchises with over one million subscribers."

I could add that Michael Eisner could depart Disney tomorrow but the company will remain in the hands of Shamrock Holdings, whose principal office is now located in Israel".



Bronfman Group Buys Time Warner Music

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Time Warner Inc. (TWX.N: Quote, Profile, Research) on Monday said it would sell its Warner Music business to a group led by media mogul Edgar Bronfman Jr. for $2.6 billion, in a move to trim the media group's debts and signaling a return of the former Seagram chairman to the music business.

The Bronfman group beat out a bid by EMI (EMI.L: Quote, Profile, Research) for the recorded music portion of the business for an estimated $1 billion.

By choosing the Bronfman bid, Time Warner is forsaking $250 million to $300 million in cost savings it could have realized by combining with EMI, home to such acts as The Beatles and Radiohead. Warner Music artists include Madonna, Led Zeppelin and R.E.M.

On the other hand, Time Warner is getting more cash up front by selling the entire business, which includes the music publishing company, and will have an easier path to regulatory approval. In the past, European and U.S. regulators have frowned on consolidation within the music business.

Bronfman's team, backed by some of America's biggest private equity houses including Thomas H. Lee Partners, is betting it can slash costs and turn Warner Music around ahead of a comeback in sales, a major challenge in an industry currently in decline.

Bronfman has had long ties to the music business, first as a songwriter for the likes of Dionne Warwick and Celine Dion, and later as head of Seagram when he bought entertainment group MCA from Japan's Matsushita for $5.7 billion. On his watch, the renamed Universal Music bought Polygram, creating the world's largest record company.

Bronfman merged his family's entertainment empire with France's Vivendi three years ago, only to see the family fortune disintegrate. When Vivendi put its entertainment assets on the block earlier this year, Bronfman led a group to buy the assets back but was ultimately outbid by NBC.

Hit by rampant piracy and competition from other entertainment such as video games, music sales are expected to fall for the fourth year in a row in 2004.

Earlier this month Sony Music (6758.T: Quote, Profile, Research) agreed to merge with Bertelsmann AG's (BERT.UL: Quote, Profile, Research) BMG.

And then, of course there is the matter of...

Jewish Control of the British Mediab

Abstract

Even though the Jews are only 0.5% of the population in Britain, they have an almost total grip on the media here, systematically, constantly and intensely feeding their propaganda and example to almost everyone in Britain, which is nothing new. With this media, they are uniformly, deliberately, systematically, constantly and intensely promoting both the transformation and permanent destruction of Britain into a multiracial, "multicultural" state, and also the interests of the so-called "state of Israel", against the wishes and interests of the native British people. The television media that they control broadcast into almost every home in Britain, all day, every day. BBC television under the Jew Alan Yentob broadcasts into almost every home all day, every day. Likewise ITV, which is controlled by Carlton Communications plc under the Jew Michael Green and by Granada plc under the Jew Steve Morrison, each of which broadcasts to regions of 26 million, half of the population, or more, all day, every day. Daytime television across the ITV network, which is broadcasted to the whole of Britain, every day, is mainly provided by Granada's Anglia Television under the Jew Graham Creelman, while the rest of the time it is controlled by the other regions controlled by Carlton Communications plc and Granada plc. Likewise ITN, which provides the news for the ITV network every day, is controlled by the Jew Michael Green and its programmes are broadcast to the whole of Britain, while Carlton and Granada jointly own the London News Network. Channel 4 under the Jew Giovanni Treves accounts for 10% of all television viewing in Britain. Further, BSkyB controlled by the suspected Jew and obsessively Zionist Rupert Murdoch broadcasts to over 10 million subscribers and their families every day. Meanwhile, the main two production studios in Britain, including the largest one in Europe, are controlled by Pinewood-Shepperton Limited, controlled by the Jew Michael Grade. The situation is similar in radio, with all BBC radio stations controlled by the Jewess Jenny Abramsky, alone accounting for 49% of all radio listening in Britain, every day. Further, in total, over 85 million copies of Jewish controlled newspapers are sold in Britain every week, controlled by the Jewish pornographer, Richard Desmond, the suspected Jew and obsessively Zionist Rupert Murdoch, the Jew Guy Zitter, the openly Shabbat Goy and rabidly Zionist Conrad Black and "Mrs Black", who is the Jewess Barbara Amiel. They deliberately, constantly, systematically and intensely use this media to promote the multiracial and "multicultural" transformation of Britain against the wishes of the British people. That is treachery, treason, of a terrific magnitude. Along with mass, coloured immigration, they are also deliberately encouraging mass inter-racial marriage, race-mixing, which will mean the extinction of our race. It is genocide. We must break the Jewish yoke if our race is to survive.

We shall first consider their control of television and of radio, and then of the press; finally we shall give a summary of our findings. All data contained in the study are accurate as of June 2002. CONTINUE READING...

Finally, supporting the view of Alex Constantine, there is the well-known Bushista/Fascist, Daniel Pipes:

Jewish Control - Between Reality and Myth

by Daniel Pipes
October 18, 1998

(1) It is said that the Jewish control of America is so tight. Is that reality or myth?

The notion of Jewish control of the United States is utter nonsense. Jews are a capable people who have, through hard-work, gained a disproportionate role in some aspects of American life. But they in no way dominate the country. Further, they could not, for Jews differ greatly among themselves; the notion of a single Jewish viewpoint organized by a single Jewish group is pure fantasy. On any topic-from education to foreign policy-they disagree vociferously and intensely among themselves.

(2) The Arab press talks about Jewish control of money, media and politics in America. Is this an undisputed fact?

No, there is no Jewish control of the media and politics in the United States. Jews do have a larger role than their 2 percent of the population might suggest, but it is far from monolithic or organized. Jews compete with each other as much or more than they cooperate-whether for business or for votes.

(3) Has the political Jewish control originated from the active role in elections as a well organised minority?

For starters, there is no "political Jewish control." For evident historical reasons, Jews have an intense interest in politics. They have had a tumultuous and sometimes terrible history: to protect themselves from future disasters, Jews in the United States and elsewhere tend to pay close attention to politics. They vote in larger percentages than almost any other element of the population. They give money to political candidates in larger amounts. They write and speak more about politics. None of this amounts to Jewish "control" of politics in the United States, but it does help explain the prominent place of Jews in American public life.

(4) What about religious and cultural alliances of American Jews with the rest of America?

In the entire history of the Jews, they have never lived in a country as securely and as successfully as in the United States today. It is a golden age. The secularism of the United States offers Jews the opportunity to purse their religion without any interference from the state. The openness of the country allows them the chance to flourish economically and express themselves intellectually. Its democratic nature permits Jews to integrate into public life. In all, Jews have become a full-fledged part of American life. They have both influenced the country and been influenced by it. In this sense, Jews cannot be distinguished from other Americans, even if they retain a distinctive set of characteristics.

(5) If there were such control, how can America liberate itself from it?

The notion of America liberating itself from Jews is absurd. Jews are full citizens of the United States with political, economic and personal rights and responsibilities precisely like any other citizens. This may be difficult for Arabs to comprehend, for the premises of American life are utterly different from those in the Middle East; as a result, Arabs in many cases simply do not understand how things work in the United States. It is key not to assume that the United States resembles Arab countries; I urge your readers not to see the United States in terms of their own experience. It takes much information and imagination to understand how this truly revolutionary country functions. Do not presume: learn. Do not project from what you know but take the time to find out how things work there. Only by such a process of investigating will Arabs come to comprehend the United States in general and specifically the role of Jews within it.

So, there you have it: Alex Constantine claiming that he is against Fascism, and yet he espouses the same views as one of the chief fascists of our time.

Sorry Alex, you can't have it both ways. I think you've just been busted for "Double-Talk."

 

[moonwalker]

Thanks Laura for posting that article on Jewish control of the British media. Ever since I was 6 or 7 I've been a Jew spotter I remember I used to ask my parents after watching tv and the credits rolled "Why does everyones name end in Berg or Stein?"

Saying all that I'm absolutely shocked and appalled by this. I had no idea of the extent of Jewish control of British tv or Kosher tv

It gets worse too. I noticed the UK's 5th terrestial channel wasn't mentioned in the article so I did some digging and found this:

Channel 5: The winning syndicate for the licence for this new channel includes several of the supposed "rivals" whose Jewish links have already been noted. These include MAI, Pearson and the US-based Warburg Pincus. Their successful application promised "presenters whose faces, voices, ages and regional and ethnic backgrounds reflect the diversity of Britain in 1996." We won't be able to say we weren't warned! Former BBC 1 Scheduler David Berg is now Controller of Planning and Organisation at C 5, while the Controller of news, current affairs and documentaries is Tim Gardam.

The real power at Channel 5, in any case, is its Chief Executive, David Elstein. According to the Jewish Chronicle of January 3rd, 1997, Elstein has a "vast executive and programme-making background with most of Britain's major networks."

Unbelievable considering in 1998 the BoD gives a Jewish population of 285,000 which is roughly the 0.5%

 

[Alana]

Hi,

I don't know who Alex Constantine is, but doing a little search, i discovered his blog, where on Monday, Octomber 16, he dedicated a little of his time to write a piece to defame Laura and Ark. I don't know whether you are aware of it.

http://alexconstantine(dot)blogspot(dot)com/2006/10/laura-knight-jadczyk-creature-from.html

Monday, October 16, 2006
LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK, Creature from the Cyber-Sphere's Occult Black Lagoon

 

[the rabbit]

Yeps just took a look the usual suspects have left comments storm bear and yours truly cascult.commyroony.

Winter is drawing in,the weather gets colder and these dudes have to get their kicks from somewhere while being confined to the indoors.

here we go

 

[Laura]

Yeps just took a look the usual suspects have left comments storm bear and yours truly cascult.commyroony.

What's so interesting is to see that Alex Constantine has, effectively, aligned himself with the Enochian/Golden Dawn/Crowley crowd and with the fascist crowd by taking the same points of view even if he tries to disguise himself as a "Christian" and "anti-Black Magic" and anti-Fascist researcher.

This is an important thing to remember. It is not the position a person CLAIMS for themselves that is important, it is what they DO FROM that position. Do they really exemplify such a position?

The same is true about today's so-called Christians clamoring for more sacrificial blood.

I feel a Biblical moment comin' on!

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

and:

And he was casting out a devil, and it was dumb. And it came to pass, when the devil was gone out, the dumb spake; and the people wondered.

But some of them said, He casteth out devils through Beelzebub the chief of the devils.
And others, tempting him, sought of him a sign from heaven.

But he, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house divided against a house falleth.

If Satan also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand? because ye say that I cast out devils through Beelzebub.

And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your sons cast them out? therefore shall they be your judges.
But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you.

These recent revelations of the true alignment of Alex Constantine also place in question all the work he has done in the past; one begins to perceive the glimmer of an agenda. In Alex Constantine's "world," it's all about the Illuminati and Satanic rituals. A perfect cover, I think...

 

[Lisa Guliani]

Another day in the psycho bin....

On a daily basis, clear lines are being drawn and defined.
It does seem to me that we have a HIGH number of psychopaths that have gravitated into this "alternative media" and 9-11/patriot illusion of a "movement".

The thing with Alex Constantine is, Laura got the better of him in a back and forth email exchange. Constantine was obviously sent in to take up the sword when Laura and SOTT members effectively handed 9-11 disinfo artist Gerard Holmgren, his virtual hat in a previous exchange.
Constantine then arose out of the cyber-woodwork to pick up where Holmgren left off when he was forced to hightail it out of the discussion because Laura achieved what I've seen very few people accomplish with respect to Holmgren. She made him back off with the excellent arguments she posed to counter his nonsense.

So, a new reinforcement was necessary, apparently.
Thus, the rabid Alex Constantine.

This psycho bin seems to have no bottom.

 

[ark]

Alex Constantine wrote:

[...]The page talks about "the Way" the "androgyne" and "Alpha and Omega" as well as other themes of Gnostic Christianity. There is also a reference to Mouravieff's book Gnosis: Studies and Commentary on the Esoteric Tradition of Eastern Orthodoxy. Book 1, Exoteric Cycle.

The link for "Signs of the Times" does not work.[...]

I guess he is talking about

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/mouravieff.htm

Well, I checked, and the link to "Signs of the Times" works for me. Please, if someone will find a link that is not working, let me know :)

 

[noise]

Alex Constantine wrote:

Jaye: This may come as a big revelation to you, but I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I write about fascism, and it's impossible to write about fascism and not describe conspiracies. Only the ignorant think of me as a conspiracy theorist, but there are some around who still do. I'm not so concerned with that, but I'm defining terms and clarifying here.

I've written about Jadczyk, Cooper, other fascist conspiracy theorists who you promote. Jadczyk draws her 9/11 information from the National Alliance, it's mostly and demonstrably false (I disproved her false statement that Ariel Sharon claimed Jews run the US, and that's why she's angry at me), and she writes constantly about Jewish people, who, she claims, control media and the government. Constantly, but I guess somehow you missed all that ... or did you?

This illustrates that these frauds make my life more difficult because I have to work overtime to counter their CRAP.
------------------------
"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
-- Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001.
-------------------------
I wonder who is making whos job harder by twisting the facts. I know there are several people here who could add alot of similar quotes. I was hoping to add more but I seem to have lost a series of quotes I had that were similar. The above quote is varifiable.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Jaye: This may come as a big revelation to you, but I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I write about fascism, and it's impossible to write about fascism and not describe conspiracies. Only the ignorant think of me as a conspiracy theorist, but there are some around who still do. I'm not so concerned with that, but I'm defining terms and clarifying here.

Splitting a hair four ways. Pejoratively, Constantine is a conspiracy theorist whether he likes the term or not. He admits the 'conspiracy' part, but objects to the 'theorist' part, perhaps. Because to a psychopath there is no 'theory', only absolute certainty.

I've written about Jadczyk, Cooper, other fascist conspiracy theorists who you promote. Jadczyk draws her 9/11 information from the National Alliance,

Constantine attempting to create a false association for people who cannot think. Laura, the sott team, etc. trust no one source for their information. If Constantine is a psychopath, it should be fairly easy to 'reverse' his speech to find the truth. Who is Constantine's 'source'?

it's mostly and demonstrably false (I disproved her false statement that Ariel Sharon claimed Jews run the US, and that's why she's angry at me),

All Constantine 'proved' was that Israeli sources deny Sharon said those words. No more.

and she writes constantly about Jewish people,

No, she writes constantly about religion, ideology, psychology, history, etc. because these are important issues. If you cannot see that Zionism is near the apex of these subjects, you are food, plainly put. Here Constantine is using the tried and true method of using suggestive smear words to awaken well-worn associations in unthinking peoples' minds. "Jew-baiter" is a term used for anyone opposing world revolution. It's easy to see the source of Constantine's source.

who, she claims, control media and the government.

It isn't Laura that claims it. It is credible researchers (Jewish and non-Jewish) who point out the glaringly obvious control that a Jewish minority wield over the media and government. It's like saying "most politicians in the States are white males." It's a simple fact. And you can either see it, or by cheap disinfo like what Constantine is spreading.

Constantly, but I guess somehow you missed all that ... or did you?

Constantine is here using psychological terror in a petty insult.

This illustrates that these frauds make my life more difficult because I have to work overtime to counter their CRAP.

:( Poor Alex.

Why are you promoting these people? My own life is about saving lives. This is what I've done for 20 years. I believe that my Nutrasweet research alone saved thousands.

You see, Constantine is just trying to be a nice guy, saving peoples' lives (is this guy delusional?), while ignoring Zionist atrocities and the plan they have to murder billions.

How can I do that when you and others are promoting fascists like Cooper and Jadczyk?

:( Poor pitiful Constantine.

Have a good laugh. I resent what you are doing, even though I treat you with respect because I don't believe you are actually evil. But you make my life harder by not discriminating between the real and the false, which you seem to embrace.

Translation: I'm a nice guy, I swear! But you have to stop telling the truth! We psychos really can't get anything done with all this truth-telling business!

How should I feel? How can I feel any other way? "Life-affirming" fills a gap, is badly needed, but only if you don't promote life-denying frauds. Why are you making my life harder? - AC

:( Poor pitiful Constantine. If only his life wasn't made so hard by those exposing psychopaths. Let's all feel sorry for Constantine, because that's obviously what he wants.

 

[the rabbit]

What i couldnt find out is how fast Storm Williams and co,(there were only two comments when i last looked) where in posting there comment,1 day,two days what? Any one know how to date their comments? I may be missing the obviouse way of doing so.

 

[Lisa Guliani]

Constantine says: "...and she writes constantly about Jewish people"

No, Laura writes about many subjects and issues, which is inclusive of the gravest danger to us all:

PSYCHOPATHS

 

[Erna]

I try hard to stay up to date with alternative news. I practically have less than an hour a day at my disposal for this luxury. So where do I spend this precious time of mine. Here of course. I have exeptional radar when it comes to people.

Thanks Laura and team! There is no such thing as bad publicity :) Ask any Hollywood star's PR company! It will only draw more traffic to this site, which is what we want, right? I guess this Alex chap can do with some bad publicity, cause I also haven't heard of him :)

 

[lonenutter]

Thanks for all the great feedback. As a book reviewer I all too often receive bizarre doublespeak communique's like Constantine's -intended to undermine me in myraids of ways-none of which have worked so far. The desire to initiate constructive dialogue is a rarity sad to say. Mark Phillips threatened to put me in prison-after I wrote a disfavorable review of Trance Formation of America, Jack Sarfatti threatened to sic the mafia on me after I trashed his very suspect Destiny Matrix-none of them offered to broaden my perspective on their work whatsover. I find this unwillingness to dialogue rather infantile-for lack of a better word. I don't know where Constantine got the idea I was promoting William Cooper either considering that the guy lashed out at me as well in similar fashion-esp. after I suggested that he turn down the fear dial and integrate some love and light into his world.

I forwarded Constantine's rant to his publisher who responded to me that Alex must have been "very very very high" when he wrote it. Whatever the reason for his unsolicited diatribe-it is a part of an all too recognizable pattern, i.e. it looks like he's being taken over by something and that he's going the deep end way of John Kaminski and Kenn Thomas as well.