The Black Sun - The Alchemy and Art of Darkness ( Sol Niger )

EmeraldHope

The Living Force
Review

"Marlan teaches us how to see in the dark." -- Murray Stein --

The black sun, an ages-old image of the darkness in individual lives and in life itself, has not been treated hospitably in the modern world. Modern psychology has seen darkness primarily as a negative force, something to move through and beyond, but it actually has an intrinsic importance to the human psyche. In this book, Jungian analyst Stanton Marlan reexamines the paradoxical image of the black sun and the meaning of darkness in Western culture.
In the image of the black sun, Marlan finds the hint of a darkness that shines. He draws upon his clinical experiences and on a wide range of literature and art to explore the influence of light and shadow on the fundamental structures of modern thought as well as the contemporary practice of analysis.

An important contribution to the understanding of alchemical psychology, this book draws on a postmodern sensibility to offer insight into modernity, the act of imagination, and the work of analysis in understanding depression, trauma, and transformation of the soul. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.


I just finished this book and it was an excellent read. It is based on Jungian and alchemical psychology. I was able, through this book, to see on an even greater level how the dark and light interact. I do not have a background deep in alchemy as many of you here do, but book gave me an even greater idea overall. The book is NOT cheap on Amazon. $70.00 used, 186.00 new.


I will put in the forward below to give an even better idea, for those who are interested:


foreword- David H. Rosen

As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being. —C. G. Jung

Nearly six months before Stan Marlan’s superb 2003 Fay Lecture series on the black sun, I had this dream: There was too much light and brightness everywhere. I gave a talk on the need for darkness and its healing value. I said I could always leave Star, a town at the periphery. I realized that I could break off and leave and go to the Texas hill country and write haiku. The dream is about enantiodromia and the restorative necessity of darkness and its nurturing solitude. I became aware that I could leave Star (a constant source of light) and end up alone in the Texas hill coun try writing haiku. This breaking off and leaving is what I call egocide (symbolic death), which leads to transformation (rebirth) through creativity. The black sun and the alchemy and art of darkness are subjects dear to my heart and soul. When I was in a psychic black hole contemplating suicide thirty-five years ago, my own darkness went through an alchemical process involving art. I was able to transcend my despair and later transform my depression, healing my soul through creativity. Art is healing, and the shadow of despair is the fuel for creativity. Darkness is critically needed in our too-well-lighted world.

As Stan Marlan outlines in this important book, the secret is to engage in the alchemy and art of darkness, which yields creative endeavors through Jung’s tech- nique of active imagination. Usually I do this through painting and writing, most recently by completing a book on The Healing Spirit of Haiku. Given my experience with and affinity for darkness, I eagerly read Marlan’s Black Sun, which explores darkness in vast and deep ways. Irvin Yalom states, “Everyone—and that includes therapists as well as patients—is destined to experience not only the exhilaration of life, but also its inevitable darkness: disillusionment, aging, illness, isolation, loss, meaninglessness, painful choices, and death.”Yalom also states that there is an “inbuilt despair in the life of every self-conscious individual.”

In the deep dark the person alone sees light. —Chuang Tzu

In the introduction, Marlan says that the black sun became a Zen koan for him. This got me thinking about the time I spent in Japan and the fact that in the Shinto religion the sun is considered a goddess. In other words, a black (yin) sun that glows and inspires creative works is Sol niger(black sun) functioning as a muse. Thus, in the land where darkness is praised, fear of the dark is overcome, and the black sun is a creativefire that heals.Most striking—and a testament of the truth of an inner shine of darkness—is that blind people see light in their dark interior. In chapter 1 Marlan begins with a focus on the sun as the source of light and its association with the King (a divine archetype). He gives several excellent alchemical examples of how the King must die in or- der to be born again. Closer to home, Elvis Presley, America’s “King,” illustrates the theme of this book in that he represents a dark King. He got stuck in thenigredo (darkness) and was poisoned. However, after Elvis died he continued to live on, reborn as a dark or blue King with an inner spiritual glow.9 In chapter 2 we descend with Marlan into the darkness and see the necessity of experiencing one’s own “dark night of the soul.”

A case of (x), a troubled woman is presented, which includes dramatic illustrations of the black sun. Her image of an “exploding black sun” is associated with “the madness of her suicidal feelings.” It may also have foretold an aneurysm in the anterior region of her brain. She survived this near-death experience but lost sight in one eye. This case underscores the danger involved in getting close to the black sun. Marlan presents another case, also of a woman in long-term analysis who creatively transforms her suicidal feelings based on contact with the black sun. This patient’s words and drawings are profound, and Marlan links the deep, dark work to powerful archetypal images from art, religion, and literature. Chapter 3 outlines how analysis (breaking apart) is like the alchemical processes of mortificatio and putrefaction. Marlan describes brilliantly—and reveals through his alchemical psychological approach— how analyzing the ego to death opens the psyche to creative transformations involving the deep art of darkness. In essence, Marlan shows us how darkness heals by shining through. In chapter 4 Marlan focuses on Jewish mysticism (primarily the kabbalah), Taoist alchemy, and illuminating pictures from artists and patients. Through these it becomes clear that darkness itself glows with a unique spiritual light. Marlan humbles us before a myriad of glimpses of Sol niger. The last chapter concerns the mystery of Self and non-Self as One or Not-One. I think his position would be acceptable to both Lao Tzu and Jung, although Jung was more comfortable with the dark side of the Self rather than non-Self. For Jungian analysts who are Buddhists, such as Polly Young-Eisendrath, the paradox of Self and non-Self makes particular sense. Jungian analysts who are Taoist in their spiritual orientation are also content with the irony of opposites: nothingness/ fullness, dark/light, and evil/good. Why? Because it is impossible to know one without the other. Transcendence of these opposites allows for the possibility of wholeness and emptiness. And, as we often see in this book, transformation of the opposites allows for creative art and healing. In the epilogue, Marlan distills the essence of the journey he has taken us on from light to darkness and then to the light of darkness it-
 
I was reading the preview pages in amazon and the following caught my eye
[quote author=The Black Sun]
In "C.G. Jung Speaking", Jung describes the alchemical process as "difficult and strewn with obstacles; the alchemical opus is dangerous. Right at the beginning you meet the 'dragon', the chthonic spirit, the 'devil' or, as the alchemists called it, the 'blackness', the nigredo, and this encounter produces suffering. " He goes on to say that in "psychological terms, the soul finds itself in the throes of melancholy locked in a struggle with the "shadow". The black sun, Sol niger, is one of the most important images representing this phase of the process and this condition of the soul. Usually this image is seen as phase specific to the early part of the opus and is said to disappear "when the dawn (aurora) emerges". Typically blackness is said to dissolve, and then the devil no longer has an autonomous existence but rejoins the profound unity of the psyche. Then the opus magnum is finished: the human soul is [said to be] completely integrated."
[/quote]
This view of Jung seems in line with the "state of bankruptcy" described by Gurdjieff and the concept of "positive disintegration" described by Dabrowski. In Dabrowski's theory, the disintegration process progresses through the stages of "unilevel disintegration", "spontaneous multilevel disintegration" and then "organized multilevel disintegration" to eventual reintegration. In Dabrowki's view, if someone is stuck in the "unilevel disintegration" phase (which is characterized by ambivalence, ambitendencies etc) for a sustained period of time, then serious psychological conditions develop.
Now the author says
[quote author=The Black Sun]
In my experience, this is an idealized goal of alchemy, and there is a danger in bypassing the autonomous core of darkness that always remains as an earmark of the condition of humanness. Thus, my approach to the image of the black sun pauses with the blackness itself and examines it in its own right, not simply as a stage in development of the soul. As such we see that blackness itself proves to contain in its own realm the gold we seek in our attempts to transcend it. This focus contributes to a new appreciation of the darkness within.
[/quote]
This struck me as "staring into the abyss" and the part about doing this "in its own right and not as a stage of development of the soul" raised a flag. Not having read the whole book, I cannot evaluate the fruits of this activity though.

The other thing that stuck me was the choice of the Black Sun or Sol niger as the representative of darkness.
[quote author=The Black Sun]
In all, there is an alchemy and art in darkness, an invisible design rendering and rending vision, calling it to sourceless possibility. The light of Western metaphysics has obscured darkness; sedimented reason has thrown it to the shadow, naming it only as its inferior counterpart. But darkness is also the Other that likewise shines; it is illuminated not by light but its own intrinsic luminosity. Its glow is that of the lumen naturae, the light of nature, whose sun is not the star of heaven but Sol niger, the black sun.
[/quote]
I am very far from being an expert on this but from my limited experience, I like the work of Clarissa Pinkola Estes which uses the "Mother Night" archetype (in contrast with the black sun) as the face of darkness which is knowledge-giving, playing the role of the feminine in contrast to the masculine aspect represented by the ordinary Sun.
In the black sun image, the light and darkness are both contained within its very name. An image strikes the emotional center first and in that regard, the feeling that the black sun evokes in me is that of discomfort and my gut instinct says that this image is the essence of STSness. But I could be totally wrong and do not want to "throw the baby out with the bathwater". So, I will be interested in parts of the book you found useful if you choose to share.
My first impressions on reading the preview pages of the book - fwiw.
 
obyvatel - I agree that it matches the states you list. That is why I posted it here, and it is what drew me to the book. I never really knew what the black sun was. :-[

I will say I also thought that perhaps it was STS, but then I thought that most likely, our deep associations with the " black sun" , are related to the Nazis, who were into the occult and magic. It it could very well be the case that they corrupted and perverted the original meaning. The black sun is much older than the Nazis.

That is why it alway important to take into account the following:

Quote from link below:
What makes magick so dangerous is that it offers almost a mirror image of real esoteric work.

Comparing magick's philosophies of aspiring to divinity and the higher self to those of Mouravieff, Gurdjieff, Ouspensky, Castaneda, and even the Cassiopaean material as expanded upon and added to by Laura and Ark, we see many similarities. And at first glance, the differences between the two philosophies seem only like surface detail, but in fact the differences are profound and mean nothing less than the difference between the STO path and the STS path. The devil is truly in the details. But it takes work and much contemplation to see it.

Magick touts the ancient expression to "Know Thyself" as a necessary process preceding any real magickal work. But the methods proposed for this exercise involve almost exclusively relying on divination techniques without comparing the knowledge gained this way to "outside" information and understandings. In fact, some others say that if the information from divination varies greatly from outside information, then we are to trust our intuitions instead of our intellect. The great problem with this is that many people are able to very easily substitute their own wishful thinking for intuition, not to mention the possibility of mental manipulation from external STS sources. Divination and intuition are not adequate and complete substitutes for the process of gathering external knowledge from many sources, thinking with a hammer, and finally letting our intuition contribute to our understanding.


http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=6873.msg67092#msg67092

I also think that in addition to Clarissa Pinkola Estes's Mother Night, we could also add the Indian goddess Kali Ma as a representation of this archetype.


Here is an exerpt from Chapter 1:
The Dark Side of Light

When you see your matter going black, rejoice, for this is the beginning of the work. —Rosarium Philosophorum

Jung considered alchemy in a way that few people, if any, before him had imagined. Alchemy for the most part had been relegated to the status of a historical anachronism or hidden away within the confines of esoteric occultism. To the contemporary mind, alchemists were viewed as working in their laboratories, hopelessly trying to change lead into gold. At best, their practice was seen as a precursor to the modern science of chemistry. Jung began his reflections with a similar attitude, but as his inquiry grew deeper, he concluded that the alchemists were speaking in symbols about the human soul and were working as much with the imagination as with the literal materials of their art. The gold that they were trying to produce was not the common or vulgar gold but an aurum non vulgi or aurum philosophicum—a philosophical gold (Jung 1961). They were concerned with both the creation of the higher man and the perfection of nature. In a 1952 interview at the Eranos conference, Jung stated that “The alchemical operations were real, only this reality was not physical but psychological. Alchemy represents the projection of a drama both cosmic and spiritual in laboratory terms. The opus magnum had two aims: the rescue of the human soul and the salvation of the cosmos.”1 This move brought alchemy into the realm of contemporary thought and was the beginning of a sustained psychology of alchemy. To see alchemy in this way—as a psychological and symbolic art— was a major breakthrough for Jung and a key to unlocking its mysteries. The exploration and development of this insight led Jung eventually to see in alchemy a fundamental source, background, and confirmation of his psychology of the unconscious. His imagination was captured by the ideas and metaphors of alchemy, with its dragons, suffering matter, peacock’s tail, alembics, athanors, red and green lions, kings and queens, fishes’ eyes, inverted philosophical trees, salamanders and hermaphrodites, black suns and white earth, metals (lead, silver, and gold), colors (black, white, yellow, and red), distillations and coagulations, and a rich array of Latin terms. All of these images are, for Jung, the best possible expression of a psychic mystery that enunciated and amplified his maturing vision of the parallels between alchemy and his own psychology of the unconscious. Jung sees all of these as projected by the alchemists into matter. Their effort was to bring about unity from the disparate parts of the psyche, creating a “chemical wedding.” Jung saw as the moral task of alchemy the unification of the disparate elements of the soul, symbolically represented as the creation of the lapis, or philosopher’s stone. Likewise, Jung’s psychology works with the conflicts and dissociation of psychic life and attempts to bring about the mysterious “unification” he calls Wholeness. In C. G. Jung Speaking, Jung describes the alchemical process as “difficult and strewn with obstacles; the alchemical opus is dangerous. Right at the beginning you meet the ‘dragon,’ the chthonic spirit, the ‘devil’ or, as the alchemists called it, the ‘blackness,’ the nigredo, and this encounter produces suffering. He goes on to say that in “psychological terms, the soul finds itself in the throes of melancholy locked in a struggle with the ‘shadow.’” The black sun, Sol niger, is one of the most important images representing this phase of the process and this condition of the soul. Usually this image is seen as phase specific to the early part of the opus and is said to disappear “when the ‘dawn’ (aurora) emerges.” Typically blackness is said to dissolve, and then “the ‘devil’ no longer has an autonomous existence but rejoins the found unity of the psyche. Then the opus magnum is finished: the human soul is [said to be] completely integrated.” In my experience, this is an idealized goal of alchemy, and there is a danger in bypassing the autonomous core of darkness that always remains as an earmark of the condition of any humanness. Thus, my approach to the image of the black sun pauses with the blackness itself and examines it in its own right, not simply as a stage in the development of the soul. As such we see that blackness itself proves to contain in its own realm the gold we seek in our attempts to transcend it. This focus contributes to a new appreciation of the darkness within. Jung’s exploration was influenced by the seventeenth-century alchemist Mylius, who refers to the ancient philosophers as the source of our knowledge about Sol niger. In several places in his collected works, Jung writes of Sol niger as a powerful and important image of the unconscious. To consider the image in the context of the unconscious is both to recognize its vastness and unknown quality as well as to place it in the historical context of depth psychology and of the psyche’s attempt to represent the unrepresentable. Imagining Sol niger in this way is to see it in its most general sense, but Jung has also extracted from the alchemical literature a rich and complex, if scattered, phenomenology of the image. The black sun, blackness, putrefactio, mortificatio, the nigredo, poisoning, torture, killing, decomposition, rotting, and death all form a web of interrelationships that describe a terrifying, if most often provisional, eclipse of consciousness or of our conscious standpoint. The nigredo, the initial black stage of the alchemical opus, has been considered the most negative and difficult operation in alchemy. It is also one of the most numinous, but few authors other than Jung have explored the theme in its many facets. In addition to the aspects just described, Jung also finds in this image of blackness a nonmanifest latency, a shadow of the sun, as well as an Other Sun, linked to both Saturn and Yahweh, the primus anthropos. For the most part, Sol niger is equated with and understood only in its nigredo aspect, while its more sublime dimension—its shine, its dark illumination, its Eros and wisdom—remains in the unconscious. I imagine my work on the black sun as an experiment in alchemical psychology. It is concerned with this difficult and enigmatic image and The Dark Side of Light with our understanding of darkness. My contention is that darkness historically has not been treated hospitably and that it has remained in the unconscious and become a metaphor for it. It has been seen primarily in its negative aspect and as a secondary phenomenon, itself constituting a shadow—something to integrate, to move through and beyond. In so doing, its intrinsic importance is often passed over. This attitude has also been perpetuated in alchemy, which places darkness at the beginning of the work and sees it primarily in terms of the nigredo. Yet in its usage of the black sun there is a hint of a darkness that shines. It is this shine of the paradoxical image that captures my attention. How is it possible to imagine a darkness filled with light or a shine that contains the qualities of both light and darkness? Jung has noted that darkness “has its own peculiar intellect and its own logic which should be taken very seriously,” and it is my intent to give darkness its due—not to rush beyond it but to enter its realm to learn more about its mysteries. To turn toward darkness in this way is an odd reversal of our ordinary propensity. To more fully understand the turn toward darkness it is first important to pause and consider how much the historical primacy of light has infused our understanding of consciousness itself. The image of light and its corresponding metaphor of the sun are fundamentally intertwined with the history of consciousness. Our language demonstrates the pervasiveness of these images, and it is difficult to envision a way of thinking that does not rely on them. In myth, science, philosophy, religion, and alchemy we find these metaphors widely disseminated. Our language is filled with metaphors of illumination: to bring to light, to make clear, to enlighten, and so on, all serve in these and in many other contexts. In Memories, Dreams, Reflections Jung seems to have captured something of the primordial experience that must have been generative in the development of sun worship. While visiting the Elgonyi tribe of Africa, Jung writes, “the sunrise in these latitudes was a phenomenon that overwhelmed me anew every day. He goes on to describe his observations a little before dawn, when he was in the habit of watching the sunrise: At first, the contrasts between light and darkness would be extremely sharp. Then objects would assume contour and emerge into the light which seemed to fill the valley with a compact brightness. The horizon above became radiantly white. Gradually the swelling light seemed to penetrate into the very structure of objects, which became illuminated from within until at last they shone translucently, like bits of colored glass. Everything turned to flaming crystal. The cry of the bell bird rang around the horizon. At such moments I felt as if I were inside a temple. It was the most sacred hour of the day. I drank in this glory with insatiable delight, or rather in a timeless ecstasy. Jung goes on to say that “for untold ages men have worshiped the great god who redeems the world by rising out of darkness as a radiant light in the heavens. At the time, I understood that within the soul from its primordial beginnings there has been a desire for light and an irrepressible urge to rise out of the primal darkness. Against this background it is evident to Jung why for the Elgonyi “the moment in which the light comes is God. Jung recognizes the importance of the sun and light in his alchemical writings, where he states that the soul is “an eye destined to behold the light. Likewise, James Hillman, a Jungian analyst as well as the founder of archetypal psychology, wonders whether the “human eye prefers light to darkness” and whether human beings are “heliotropic, fundamentally adapted to light. The power of this image is also recognized by the postmodern philosopher Jacques Derrida, who comments, “each time there is a metaphor, there is doubtless a sun somewhere, but each time there is a sun, metaphor has begun. The importance of the sun metaphor is further traced by Mircea Eliade, historian and scholar of religion, who finds a parallel between sun worship and the spread of civilization and kings. Eliade documents the predominance of sun religions: “Where history is on the march thanks to kings, heroes or empires, the sun is supreme. The sun’s majesty lent its power to the signification of the person and the office of the king. Both the Sun and the King archetypes are highly complex, archetypal The Dark Side of Light images with multiple meanings. This theme has been extensively studied by Jungian analyst John Perry in his Lord of the Four Quarters: Myth of the Royal Father; Jungian analyst Robert Moore, and mythologist and therapist Douglas Gillette in The King Within; and more recently as the archetype of renewal in Psychological Reflections on the Aging, Death, and Rebirth of the King by Jungian analyst Stephenson Bond. The sun has traditionally been associated with masculine attributes in patriarchal culture, but this attribution has been relativized and destabilized by studies such as Janet McCritchard’s Eclipse of the Sun, which demonstrates a wide range of feminine attributes to the sun across time and culture. Still, with regard to the “masculine” psyche, the sun, particularly in relation to the king, has been considered a representation of God on earth. Kings were considered sacred. In general, the Sun King reflects a dominant force of historical, cultural, and psychic reality. As an inner figure, he is fundamental to life and a well-functioning psyche. There is a long tradition of the King and the Sun reflecting the qualities of rational order, stability, life force, vitality, blessing, joy, and light. The Sun and the King light up the world. The work of Moore and Gillette argues that the inner King as an expression of mature masculinity should not be equated with the abuses of patriarchy and power and with the shadow of the King as Tyrant. As archetypal principles, the Sun and the King are not in themselves destructive or problematic to culture or the psychic life of people. On the contrary, as noted earlier, they enhance life and are essential to psyche. The problem begins when these archetypal forces overwhelm a developing or immature ego, inflating and corrupting it. When the ego identifies with the transpersonal power of the King and the ego becomes King, the Tyrant is near, and the King’s energy can be devouring (cf. figure 1.2). In short, the King and the Tyrant are brothers in the archetypal psyche. The devouring and oppressive shadow side of the King’s energy has been linked in our time to patriarchy and to the one-sided Apollonian vision that has laid the groundwork for an angry critique of our psychological and cultural attitudes. If the Sun has led our way into the present, with all of the advances that have come with it, it has also led King Sol on his throne to a massive repression and devaluation of the dark side of psychic life. “There are as many ways to be lost in the light as in the dark,” says storyteller and poet Madronna Holden, who recognizes the peril that occurs when light loses touch with the principle of darkness. On the cultural level we all too often have become lost in our spiritual, Apollonian, patriarchal, male perspective. Our roots in European languages and a Cartesian worldview have led to a personal and cultural elitism that have fueled charges of racism and colonialism. To the extent that these judgments have validity, they reflect a collective, cultural, and philosophical shadow. Has the light the eye was “destined to behold” displayed a blind spot with regard to vision itself? Moore and Gillette have observed that, when the King sits on his throne and is the center of the world, “world” becomes defined as that part of reality that is organized and ordered by the King.” What is outside the boundaries of his influence is noncreation, chaos, the demonic and non-world. This situation sets the stage for a massive repression and devaluation of the “dark side” of psychic life. It creates a totality that rejects interruption and refuses the other from within its narcissistic enclosure. For a number of philosophers—Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida, and others—there is a dangerous tendency in modernity toward closure and tautological reductionism: “totalization, normalization and domination.” Levin has noted that behind our Western visionary tradition lies the shadow of phallocentrism, logocentrism, and a “heliopolitics” driven by the violence of Light. To put it more simply, the concern about modernity is that it is governed by male desire and power and by an egocentric rationality that serves political agendas that conceal intrinsic violence. In his work Writing and Difference, Derrida speaks of the violence of Light and the imperialism of theory associated with it. He notes that this kind of violence also troubled the philosopher Emmanuel Levinas, whose work was aimed at developing an ethical theory freed as much as possible from the violence implicit in Western metaphysical thinking.17 If one agrees with the philosophers and critics of our tradition, one might imagine our time as one locked into the tyrannical shadow of a Sun King who bears within himself the seeds of his own destruction. Is it possible to imagine this situation as rooted in an unconscious identification with the King and the Light? If so, such unconscious identification colors the psyche and has important personal and cultural consequences. On the most personal level, analysts have approached such concerns not so much philosophically but as they manifest themselves in clinical situations. In The Anatomy of the Psyche, Jungian analyst Edward Edinger, for instance, cites the expressions of unconscious kingly inflations in “outbursts of affect, resentment, pleasure or power demands.” The refinement of these affects is difficult. As an inner figure, the primitive King/ego must undergo a transformation not only in our culture but also in the lives of people. Alchemy recognizes this fact when it sees that the King is at the beginning—the raw matter of the philosopher’s stone—and that he must be purified and refined by undergoing a series of alchemical processes, eventually dying and being reborn. In alchemy, the process of dying, killing, and blackening is part of the operation of mortificatio. This operation is a necessary component of the transformative process of the King and other images of the prima materia such as the Sun, the Dragon, the Toad, and the condition of innocence. Edinger devotes a chapter of The Anatomy of the Psyche to this process. The mortificatio process was often thought of as tortuous and as the “most negative operation in alchemy. It has to do with darkness, defeat, torture, mutilation, death and rotting. The process of rotting is called putrefactio, the decomposition that breaks down organic bodies.





I also found a paper written on this book by another Jungian analyst, which is interesting as well, and gives another perspective, as well as quotes from the book:

-http://www.gregmogenson.com/BLACKSUN.pdf


Of interest as well, possibly, is the following in regards to an astrological black sun which also references Jungian and hermetic information, which I thought was interesting. I cannot speak for accuracy, but hopefully someone here may can add to the conversation.


The astrological Black Sun is not a physical body, but a mathematically defined point in space. Since the paths of the planets around our sun are elliptical rather than circular, each orbit has not a single center, but two foci. The Flash graphic below demonstrates this principle.

_http://www.horusset.com/RIKB/bsastro.htm

The first graphic shows a circle,defined as having a constant radius. The second graphic shows an ellipse with its two foci. In this case the sum of the lengths of the two lines extending from the foci to the rotating point on the ellipse is constant. Circles can be considered special cases of the ellipse, where the distance between the two foci is zero.

In the case of a planet orbiting the sun in an elliptical orbit, the sun usually occupies one of the foci of the planet's orbit. The second focus is an empty point in space. This empty focus is known as the "black sun" of that planet's orbit. There is also a "black moon" (although it should really be called the "black earth") defined as the second focus of the Moon's orbit around the earth. The black suns of earth and the planets within its orbit are very close to the sun itself -- so close that it is difficult to use them for any astrological purpose. The black sun for the orbit of Venus is actually inside the sun; since the orbit of Venus is very nearly a circle, the distance between the foci of its orbit is less than the radius of the sun.

The black sun for Saturn's orbit is the first black sun that is outside earth orbit. It lies approximately 162 million kilometers from the center of the sun, whereas the earth orbits at a mean distance of 149 million kilometers. The black suns for Mars and Jupiter may be useful for astrological purposes, but they are both very near the orbit of Mercury, and therefore always lie within a fairly small fixed range from the sun, considered from a geocentric position. The black sun for Saturn is the one whose positions are given in the ephemeris.

It can be misleading to calculate black suns for the planets beyond Saturn. This is because the sun is not really at one of the foci of these planets' orbits. Instead, because they move so slowly, they tend to orbit the center of mass of the solar system, which is known as the barycenter. This is especially troublesome for Neptune's orbit.

The decision to use the black sun of Saturn as the primary Black Sun was arrived at through astrological considerations and symbolic association. First, as a symbolic counterpoint to the Sun of light, it is desirable that the Black Sun should be able to enter into any of the possible tranditional astrological aspects with it. This is only possible if the Black Sun is placed outside earth orbit. This placement results in a rather odd zodiacal movement; this will be covered in more detail below.

The association between Saturn and the Black Sun as an alchemical and occult symbol is traditional. In alchemy, the Black Sun represents the nigredo stage of the alchemical operation, the stage of calcination or blackening of the first matter by burning. The color black has been associated with Saturn since ancient times, and is not merely a feature found in contemporary Western Occultism. "Clothed in Black" is one of the epithets of Saturn in Vedic scripture. Also, we find the crow or raven and the death's head (the totenkopf or skull and crossbones) associated with the nigredo stage of the alchemical operation, and in Vedic texts, Saturn is described as riding a crow and carrying a skull. Finally, another of the epithets of Saturn in ancient astrology is "Great Lord Dark Sun" and "Son of the Sun." In these symbols, the Black Sun is conflated with Saturn himself.

Mystic and psychoanalyst Carl Jung wrote about the Black Sun or Sol Niger as it pertained to psychology in his alchemical works. The psychiatrist and pioneering LSD therapist Stanislav Grof relates an anecdote of a client who spontaneously experienced a vision of the Black Sun during a session of holotropic breathing. He subsequently associated the symbol with the "core self" of the client, the hidden radiance underlying the "manifest sun" or ego. The alchemist Jean Dubuis, in a lecture before the Philosophers of Nature stated that "this black sun of Saturn is the one that emits all the mystical influences of Saturn. And at that time chances of contact with eternity are maximum." This is the meaning behind Crowley's reference in the Book of Thoth: "According to an ancient tradition, the sun is also black."

Contact with the Black Sun is associated with the experience of burning away the dross of the personality, leaving the gold or essential nature of the first matter. It is analogous in some ways to the Abyss that lies before Binah; in the thelemic holy book "Liber 231," the symbol of the Black Sun, whose Djinn is Chiva-abrahadabra-cadaxviii, is attributed to the path of Cheth, which crosses the Abyss. Much of the symbolism of Liber Cheth is appropriate to the Black Sun as a result. The pseudo-sephirah of Da'ath also resonates with the symbolism of the Black Sun. It is the invisible sun, or as Kenneth Grant refers to it, "Tiphareth Within." The planetary forces of the Tree of Life revolve around Tiphareth, but Da'ath is the empty second focus, not really a sephirah in its own right, but a void or space-mark in the Tree. This mystery is further alluded to in the God-Name of Tiphareth, "IHVH Aloah va-Da'ath." Yet further, we find the gematric result that Hebrew ThPhARTh = 1081 = Greek "Hê Abyssos," "the abyss." It would be disrespectful to the Secret Chiefs responsible for the keeping of this secret to comment further.

As to the motion of the Black Sun through the zodiac, it is unusual in comparison with the motions of other astrological points of interest. Considered from a Heliocentric position, the Black Sun is practically a fixed point (now at approimately 3º Capricorn), moving no more than .01973º in relation to the tropical zodiac each year. The Black Sun therefore makes one circuit of the zodiac in about 18,246 years. Since the Black Sun is very nearly stationary with respect to Earth orbit, its movement through the zodiac seen from a geocentric position is almost entirely due to the earth's movement around the sun. As a result, the Black Sun does not travel through the entire zodiac in a year, but shuttles back and forth between approximately 16º Pisces and 19º Libra. The following diagram should clarify this description (although it is obviously not to scale).
 
Here is another excerpt from the end of the book:

We began our exploration of the black sun as an experiment in alchemical psychology. It begins and ends with an enigma, with a movement from the nigredo of light to the mystery of an illuminated darkness. Imagined in juxtaposition to light, darkness casts a shadow and sets the stage for a new Faustian bargain, not with the forces of darkness but with the forces of light. In so doing, the primacy of light is declared, and the values of science, technology, rational order, patriarchy, and progress lead the way into modernity with its astonishing contributions to the spread of civilization and to consciousness itself. We have noted, however, that if light and the sun have led us into the present, it has also led to a massive repression and devaluation of the dark side of psychic and cultural life and displayed a blind spot with regard to vision itself. Philosophical and cultural critics of our time have pointed to the shadows of phallocentrism, logocentrism, and heliopolitics, driven by the violence of light, a condition we have considered psychologically and symbolized by a one-sided identification with King/ego and the tyrannical power of an undifferentiated, unconscious shadow. We have noted that the despotic King as prima materia must be relativized, and we have examined the alchemical phenomenology of the mortificatio in which this primitive King is tortured, beaten, humiliated, poisoned, drowned, dissolved, calcined, and killed. These alchemical operations lead to a nigredo, or descent into darkness, that ultimately empties the soul and leaves only skeletal remains and the infernal light of Sol niger. Sol niger has been a difficult image to throw light upon since, like a black hole, it sucks all light into itself. Thus, in alchemy and, following it, in the depth psychology of Jung, the black sun has been associated with darkness almost exclusively. Our strategy has been to stick with this image and to resist any salvationist attempt to reach beyond it. Rather, our work has been to hesitate before the darkness, to pause and enter its realm, following it in alchemy, literature, art, and clinical expressions. Entering this world of darkness, we have encountered Sol niger in its blacker-than-black aspects and seen its most literal and destructive dimensions associated with narcissistic mortification, humiliation, delusion, despair, depression, physiological and psychological decay, cancer, psychosis, suicide, murder, trauma, and death. In short, we have followed it into the heart of darkness, into the worlds of Hades and Ereshkigal, to Kali’s cremation ground and Dante’s world of ice, where puer visions of light and eternity give way to Saturnian time and the perils of night. Here, rational order breaks down, and traumatogenic defenses come into play to prevent the unthinkable, but the unthinkable itself presents us with a mystery, the mystery of a death that is not simply literal, but also symbolic. Alchemy portrays such mysteries in a strange and paradoxical confluence of images: corpses and coffins with sprouting grains and black suns that shine. It is a mystery that calls for more than defense and constellates a necessity that must be entered. As such, we have conceived of it as an ontological pivot point, marking a desubstantiation of the ego that exhibits both death and new life, light and darkness, presence and absence, the paradoxical play intrinsic to Sol niger as a black sun. For the alchemists, the unrepresentable can be perceived only by the inward person and was considered a mystery at the heart of nature itself. Its odd light, the lumen naturae, was considered to be a divine spark buried in darkness and could be found in both the prime matter of the alchemist’s art and in the soma pneumatikon, or subtle body. We have traced the images of the subtle body in many esoteric traditions as well as in the imagery of contemporary patients. For all of the traditions we have explored, the subtle body is a microcosm of a larger universe and an image of the divine in human form. This form has shown itself in symbols of the primordial human being, who, understood psychologically, is an expression of the Self. For Jung, the Self is an idea that attempts to reflect the wholeness of the human psyche. It is intended to designate a structure that includes both consciousness and the unconscious, light and dark, and was considered a central, ordering principle at the core of psychic life. The Self as a transcendental and superordinate structure cannot be made totally conscious. At its core, it was always considered to be an unknown mystery that disseminated itself in multiple archetypal images across time and culture. We have seen how these archetypal images more or less adequately represent the wholeness of the archetypal structure that they attempt to express. For Jung, the Self is a psychological lens through which to consider these expressions. These images, perhaps by necessity, always fall short of full expression of the archetype of wholeness. We have considered that the same limitations may apply to the concept of the Self. Concepts as well as symbols of wholeness and expressions of totality have a tendency to degenerate and move toward abstraction as idealized and rational conceptualizations that seduce us into forgetting that they fundamentally reflect an unknown. With regard to the psyche, Jung writes, “The concept of the unconscious posits nothing, it designates 1 only my unknowing.” We have noted the importance of preserving this mystery that constitutes the strangeness and miracle of perception at the heart of the mysterium coniunctionis. We have concluded that if we speak of unity or wholeness, it is important not to lose sight of stubborn differences and the monstrous complexities that, if true to the phenomenon, lead to humor, astonishment, and at times divine awe. As noted, the idea of the Self is Jung’s attempt to capture this complexity, but as his theories became assimilated and familiar, his concept is subject to the same fate as all fundamental ideas. That is, they soon lose their original profundity, mystery, and unknown quality. In our attempt to speak the unspeakable, we have noticed that the Self, too, casts a shadow, and we have focused on this shadow, recognizing the unnamable, invisible, and unthinkable core of the idea, which some have referred to as a Divine Darkness while others have called it a non-Self. The non-Self is not another name for the Self but is founded in the recognition of the problematics involved in any representation of wholeness and a mark for the profound expression of this mystery. All of the attempts to name this mystery might be said to leave traces in the language in which we have attempted to speak it. No Epilogue signifier proves to be adequate to capture the fullness of human experience. The idea of the Self, like a shooting star of darkness, leaves a trail of metaphor in a variety of images inscribed in the margins of our experience. One might imagine these images as traces of silence at the heart of what we have imagined as the Self. In an attempt to speak about the Self, we have sought to find innovative ways to preserve its mystery, paradox, and unknown quality. Borrowing from postmodern philosophy, the Self has been imagined as a Self under erasure, as an idea and image that has the mortificatio and self-deconstruction at its heart. Such a Self is always a non-Self also. It is a darkness that is light and a light that is darkness, and in this way of imagining it we have a glimpse of Sol niger. Experientially, these two poles of the archetype, light and dark, are in an eternal embrace, crossing one another in a dance that might look like the structure of DNA. It appears to me now that Sol niger might be considered an archetypal image of the non-Self, having two integrated poles and multiple differentiations. At one end, the non-Self can be seen in its most literal form locked into the nigredo and the mortification of the flesh. Here the non-Self leans toward physical annihilation and literal death. At its other pole, however, the archetypal image is no longer confined to the nigredo and reflects itself in a different light, where annihilation is linked to both the presence of the void understood as absence, Eros, and self-forgetting and a majesty that sets the soul on fire. In all, there is an alchemy and art in darkness, an invisible design rendering and rending vision, calling it to its sourceless possibility. The light of Western metaphysics has obscured darkness; sedimented reason has thrown it to the shadows, naming it only as its inferior counterpart. But darkness is also the Other that likewise shines; it is illuminated not by light but by its own intrinsic luminosity. Its glow is that of the lumen naturae, the light of nature, whose sun is not the star of heaven but Sol niger, the black sun
 
Quote from obyvatel:

This struck me as "staring into the abyss" and the part about doing this "in its own right and not as a stage of development of the soul" raised a flag. Not having read the whole book, I cannot evaluate the fruits of this activity though

The impression I got from the meaning of this is to look at it under a microscope, as maybe you could do with the moon, a part of the solar system, but separate in it's own right. Or, maybe the study of the psychopath, like we do here, different in it's own right, apart form the whole. Or, maybe the study of the appendix in the body- part of the body but separate in it's own right. It was meant as that was his approach for the purpose of writing this book. OSIT
 
One more excerpt that may be of interest:


The idea is that the raw solar energy must darken and undergo a mortificatio process that reduces it to its prime matter. Only then can the creative energies produce a purified product. In this image the sperm of gold refers not to the ordinary seminal fluid of man but rather to “a semi-material principle,” or aura seminales, the fertile potentiality that prepares the Sun for the sacred marriage with his counterpart, darkness, which is thought to produce a philosophical child or stone and is nourished by the mercurial blood that flows from the wounding encounter of the Lion and the Sun. The blood—called red mercury—is considered a great solvent. Psychologically, there is nourishment in wounding. When psychological blood flows, it can dissolve hardened defenses. This then can be the beginning of true productivity. In dreams the imagery of blood often connotes moments when real feeling and change are possible. The theme of the wound can also suggest a hidden innocence, which is also a subject of mortification. The green color of the lion, which is referred to as “green gold,” suggests something that is immature, unripe, or innocent, as well as growth and fertility. The alchemist imagined this innocence, sometimes called virgin’s milk, as a primary condition, something without Earth and not yet blackened. Typical virgin-milk fantasies are often maintained emotionally in otherwise intellectually sophisticated and developed people. Unconsciously held ideas might include sentiments such as “Life should be fair,” “God will protect and care for me like a good parent,” “Bad things won’t happen to me because I have lived according to this or that principle,” “I have been good or faithful, eat healthy foods, and exercise,” and so on. When life does not confirm such ideas, the innocent, weak, or immature ego is wounded and often overcome with feelings of hurt, self-pity, oppression, assault, and/or victimization. nocence The injured ego can carry this wounding in many ways. The darkening process can lead to a kind of blindness and dangerous stasis of the soul that then becomes locked in a wound, in hurt or rage, frozen in stone or ice, or fixed in fire. From the alchemical point of view, these innocent attitudes must undergo this mortificatio process—and innocent attitudes await the necessary work of alchemy. Hillman notes that the blackening begins in “scorching, hurting, cursing, rotting the inof soul and corrupting and depressing it into the nigredo, which we recognize by its stench [a mind lost in introspection about] its materialistic causes for what went wrong. Looking for what went wrong is often looking in the wrong place. What is not seen by the wounded soul is that what is happening under the surface and in the blackening process is a dying of immature innocence—a nigredo that holds a transformative possibility and an experience that opens the dark eye of the soul. As Edinger puts it, the soul “enters the gate of blackness. Jung refers to the descent into darkness as nekyia. In Psychology and Alchemy, Jung uses this Greek word to designate a “‘journey to Hades,’ a descent into the land of the dead.”33 Mythically, as is the case throughout Jungian literature, there are many examples of such journeys. Jung mentions Dante’s Divine Comedy, which Dante starts with a statement of the nigredo experience. He writes: Midway upon the journey of our life I found that I was in a dusky wood; For the right path, whence I had strayed, was lost. Ah me! How hard a thing it is to tell The wildness of that rough and savage place, The very thought of which brings back my fear! So bitter was it, death is little more so. Leaden depression of a Benedictine suffering death in a valley of fading stars. Jung also notes the classic Walpurgisnacht in Goethe’s Faust and apocryphal accounts of Christ’s descent into hell. Edinger gives further examples of the nekyia, citing descriptions from the book of Job, Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, and T. S. Eliot’s “The Wasteland.” His own contributions to this theme are in his study of Melville’s Moby Dick, which he subtitles An American Nekyia and which he refers to as an American Faust.35 Additional parallels are cited by Sylvia Perera, who notes the Japanese Izanami, the Greek Kore-Persephone, the Roman Psyche, and the fairy tale heroines who go to Mother Hulda or Baba Yaga. In Descent to the Goddess, her own work, she studies the theme from the perspective of the initiation of women and takes up the Sumerian story of Inanna and Ereshkigal, the Dark Goddess. One could go on citing numerous examples throughout history and across cultures. As Edinger notes, “the theme has no national or racial boundaries. It is found everywhere because it refers to an innate, necessary psychic movement . The nigredo which must take place sooner or later when the conscious ego has exhausted the resources and energies of a given life attitude. The nekyia ultimately leads to the fading of the ego’s light and a death that is captured in “The Hollow Men” by Eliot: This is the dead land This is the cactus land Here the stone images Are raised, here they receive The supplication of a dead man’s hand Under the twinkle of a fading star. The image of Eliot’s fading star or loss of light is given graphic representation in figure 1.6, which depicts a man in a “leaden depression” suffering death in a valley of fading stars. In alchemy, the loss of light renders the soul burnt out, dried up, and picked bare, leaving only skeletal remains. This is illustrated in figure 1.7, which Fabricius calls “The fears and horrors of the damned. In the alchemical text Splendor Solis (1582), death is portrayed by a black sun burning down on a desolate landscape . It is this burnt-out place of the soul that we must enter if we are to understand Sol niger and the nigredo process.

Abandon hope, all ye who enter here! —Dante, Inferno, Canto 3

What follows is difficult and uncomfortable. Hillman warns that the nigredo “speaks with the voice of the raven, foretelling dire happenings,and Dante tells us, “Abandon hope, all ye who enter here.” Yet, in addition to these warnings, I would like to provide some encouragement. The artist Ad Reinhardt pointed out that we have a natural tendency to rush away from such experiences, yet he encouraged us instead to “wait a minute,” to hold fast—because looking into blackness requires a period of adjustment. The reward for staying is available to those who have faith enough to withstand “infinite duration.” Staying with the darkness allows something to happen that escapes us if we are hasty. If we resist our natural tendency to take flight before painful experiences, we can descend into the dark aspects of the unconscious, which is necessary if we are to make contact with what Goethe calls “infinite nature.” Turning toward such darkness requires a willingness to stay with suffering and to make a descent into the unconscious. Goethe’s great work, Faust, was essential to Jung, who once said that “one cannot meditate enough about Faust.” Edinger also remarked that this work is of “major importance for the psychological understanding of modern man.” For Jung, Goethe was in the grip of a descent, an archetypal process, a process also alive and active within him as a living substance, the great dream of the mundus archetypus, the archetypal world. It was Goethe’s main business and essential to his goal of penetrating the dark secrets of the personality. In the opening of Faust, Goethe’s magnum opus, Faust reflects on the nigredo of “night”: I’ve studied now, to my regret, Philosophy, Law, Medicine, and—what is worst—Theology. from end to end with diligence. Yet, here I am, a wretched fool and still no wiser than before. I’ve become master, and Doctor as well, and for nearly ten years I have led my young students a merry chase. up, down, and every which way— and find we can’t have certitude. This is too much for heart to bear! I well may know more than all those dullards, those doctors, teachers, officials and priests, be unbothered by scruples or doubts, and fear neither hell nor its devils— but I get no joy from anything either, know nothing that I think worthwhile, and don’t imagine that what I teach could better mankind or make it godly . . . No dog would want to linger on like this! . . . Alas! I’m still confined to prison Accursed, musty hole of stone to which the sun’s fair light itself dimly penetrates through the painted glass. Restricted by this great mass of books that worms consume, that dust has covered and that up to the ceiling-vault are interspersed with grimy papers . . . And still you wonder why your heart is anxious and your breast constricted, why a pain you cannot account for inhibits your vitality completely! You are surrounded, not by the living world in which God placed mankind, but, amid smoke and mustiness, only by bones of beasts and of the dead . . . Sustained by hope, imagination once soared boldly on her boundless flights; now that our joys are wrecked in time’s abyss, she is content to have a narrow scope. Deep in our heart Care quickly makes her nest, there she engenders secret sorrows and, in that cradle restless, destroys all quiet joy; . . . You empty skull, why bare your teeth at me, unless to say that once, like mine, your addled brain sought buoyant light but, in its eagerness for truth, went wretchedly astray beneath the weight of darkness.6 It is in this condition of the soul, in this cradle of darkness where the Sun’s fair light barely penetrates, that we find Sol niger. My first encounter with the image of the black sun began innocuously enough. It occurred while working with a woman who related the following dream: I am standing on the Earth. I think: “Why should I do this when I can fly?” As I am flying I think I would like to find my spiritual guide. Then I notice, clinging to my waist, a person. I think this may be my guide. I reach behind me and pull the figure to the front so I can look it in the face. It is a young, borderline schizophrenic girl. I know this is not my guide. I put her aside and continue on my journey to the sun. Just before I get there, a wind comes and carries me back to Earth. The journey skyward and Sun-ward is a common, if not universal, theme. James Hillman tells us that “Human life cannot keep from flying. . . . As we breathe air and speak air, so we are bathed in its elemental imagination, necessarily illuminated, resounding, ascending. For him, “aspiration, inspiration, genius is structurally inherent, a pneumatic tension within each soul.” The function of the wing, Plato tells us, is to take what is heavy and raise it up into the regions above, Of all things connected with the body, the wing has the greatest affinity with the divine. Similar themes are confirmed in art, folklore, classical mythology, sculpture, and poetry. The movement up and out seems to have a universal quality. In the Feast of Icarus, Sam Hazo writes: The poet imitates Icarus. He is inspired to dare impossibility even if this means that he might and possibly will fail in the attempt. His fate is to try to find silence’s tongue, to say what is beyond saying, to mint from the air he breathes an alphabet that captivates like music. His victory, if it comes at all, must of necessity be a victory of the instant, a lyric split second of triumph, quick as a kiss. Hazo’s study of Icarus values the necessity of flight—if a soul is to a have a vibrant and creative life. It is important as an analyst to learn how to support such pneumatic and spiritual ascents, to know both the value of the puer spirit, while at the same time being aware of the dangers of inflation. Like a moth drawn to a flame, our Icarian souls are in peril when in our aspirations we forget our bodies on Earth and the call to an integrated life. For analysts, if not for poets, the “quick kiss” must be linked to a more stable relationship to our transcendent possibilities, so that our eyes are also fixed on waxen wings and on the danger of burnt souls and black holes. We have had the benefit of the myths of Phaethon, Ixion, Bellerephon, and Icarus to remind us of the dangerous side of flying too high and too close to the sun, of becoming the prey of Poseidon. The problem for Icarus is not that he wishes to fly (for that is a natural and healthy emanation of our constitutional potential) but that there is an important difference between a grounded bodily imagination and a defensive or naive Gnostic flight that leaves the body and the darkness behind. Analysts on the whole have learned to look at “flight” and “spirit” with Brueghel’s eye rather than that of Ovid. In the Metamorphoses, Ovid describes “the amazement of a fisherman, a shepherd and a ploughman when they saw Daedalus and Icarus flying through the sky, an event that was interpreted as an epiphany of the gods.”This amazement is illustrated in the Fall of Icarus by Petrus Stevens and Joos de Momper. Pieter Brueghel, on the other hand, in his “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” (1558, Royal Museum of Brussels), “inverted Ovid’s theme of placing the emphasis on the humble peasants who continue their labor without even a glance at the sky, or at Icarus, the latter reduced to an insignificant figure that had fallen into the sea.”12 For analysts to identify with either one of these perspectives has cyclopean consequences; it is important to look with two eyes, to see through the perspectives of both Ovid and Brueghel with an eye to epiphany and to earth-sea, or we ourselves are lost in one-sidedness. My patient’s desire to leave Earth may well have been spiritually motivated, but, if so, it was also a flight from the pain associated with the image of the borderline schizophrenic girl, a pathologized image of psychological distress. One might imagine the psyche saying to her, “Turn toward this figure of darkness that clings to you. That is your guide.” This turning was not imaginable, and her pneumatic dream ego was driven with a single intent: to go skyward, sunward. Confronting this direction was the wind-spirit which blew her back to Earth and for the moment gently grounded her. In alchemy, it is important that the pneumatic spirit remain in connection to Earth as imaged in Stolcius’s Viridarium Chymicum. In figure 2.3, the high-flying bird is linked to the small, slow-moving creature of the Earth, which keeps the spirit from flying away. When the link to the Earth is not honored, grounding may emerge unconsciously and harshly. I cannot say whether what followed was in any way actually related to the neglect of the dark side of the psyche or was a part of her biological and spiritual destiny, but as our work continued we encountered a most destructive side of the Sol niger image. In an analytic session my patient reported that she felt something ominous in her chest. She described it as a dark ball that had long strands reaching throughout her body. Her inclination was to reach down and pull it up. Between sessions, in an active imagination she drew the image that she felt was lodged in her chest. It was a brilliant sun with a dense black center and long, fibrous tentacles After drawing it, she felt the image was not menacing enough and felt a need to draw it again. She drew a second image, in which the black center had increased in size and the brightness of the yellow was replaced by a red field. The long, black fibers remained, and there were many circular black shapes that my patient described with horror as an explosion of dead, skeletal embryos . It was as if she had brought to the surface a compressed and exploding black sun that seemed to prefigure her ability to verbalize painful memories of her unassimilable distress and the madness of her suicidal feelings. In spite of this retrieval and the process that it initiated, the image, like a devouring demon, did not subside. Shortly afterward, she reported a dream in which she felt a nuclear war was inevitable. While grappling with these images, she suffered an aneurism of the anterior region of her brain and came close to death. She lost sight in one eye but survived. I could not help but feel some connection between the image of the black sun and the medical incident, which almost cost her her life and led to partial blindness. This led me to wonder whether there were any documented incidents of a similar kind. In researching the analytic literature, I came across the case of Robert, published by the Australian analyst Giles Clarke in Harvest (1983). His article is titled “A Black Hole in Psyche.” In it he describes the case of Robert, a twenty-nine-year-old man who was struggling with something that seemed impossible to integrate or explain in terms of conventional, psychodynamic theories. Clarke describes a dream of Robert’s in which there is an image of a black hole into which the whole world disappears. Astronomically, a black hole is a sun or star that has collapsed in on itself, creating a vacuum that sucks all matter into itself, a “scientific vision” of Sol niger. For Clarke, the psychology of the black hole is connected to the failure of psychic life and to something that is an inassimilable and intolerable object of anxiety and dread. He connects it with a kind of chronic, psychic atrophy that can sometimes be literally fatal. Robert’s dream was followed by a series of disturbing images and debilitating physical symptoms. Clarke reports images of a “stillborn baby,” a “mutant or monster birth,” abortions, and a “miscarriage.” Robert “developed migraines, his eyesight suffered, his sense of taste and smell atrophied, and his legs tingled and ached.” Finally Robert became seriously ill and died of cancer. Another encounter with the black sun is found in Ronald Laing’s book The Divided Self, where he speaks of the emergence of the black sun in his treatment of Julie, who was diagnosed with schizophrenia. On the one hand, Julie imagined herself to be any one of a large number of famous personalities, but inwardly she had no freedom, autonomy, or power in the “real world.” Since she could be anyone she cared to mention, she was no one. She was “terrified by life. . . . [L]ife would mash her to a pulp, burn her heart with a red hot iron, cut off her legs, hands, tongue, breasts.” Life was conceived in the most violent and fiercely destructive terms imaginable. She stated that she was “born under a black sun,” and the things that lived in her were wild beasts and rats that infested and ruined her inner city. Julie’s imagery is amplified in Von Franz’s description of Sol niger as the destructive side of the Sun god, reminding us that Apollo is the god not only of the Sun but also of mice, rats, and wolves and that the dark side of the Sun is demonic and his rays burn life to death. He is a god without justice and brings death to the living. Laing goes on to note that this ancient and very sinister image of the black sun arose, for Julie, quite independently of any reading; still, she described the way the rays of the black sun scorched and shriveled her, and under the black sun she existed as a dead thing. Her existence then was depicted in images of utterly barren, arid dissolution. This existential death, this death-in-life, was her prevailing mode of being in the world.19 In this death there was no hope, no future, no possibility. Everything had already happened. There was no pleasure, no source of possible satisfaction, for the world was as empty and as dead as she was. In Alchemy, von Franz writes about the shadow side of the Sun as destructive, unjust, and demonic. She refers to that aspect of Sol niger where the Sun is so hot that it destroys all plants. She recalls a story from Indochina that relates that a too-hot sun was shot at dawn by a hero figure linked to Saturn. For von Franz, the shadow of the Sun as “a Sun without justice, which is death for the living,” reflects “a wrongly functioning consciousness” that rejects the dark side of God.18 She states, “If consciousness works according to nature, the blackness is not so black or so destructive, but if the Sun stands still, it is stiffened, and burns life to death.” When the psyche loses its natural rhythm and fixates into complexes, the unconscious becomes destructive.
 
Thank you for the alchemical references EH. You may know the Anatomy of the Psyche-Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy by Edward F. Edinger. This work was important for me in a stage of despair and suffering a number of years ago. I will note some quick impression's of the image Black Sun.

The Black Sun is the bright light of the masculine sun eclipsed by the dark feminine of the moon. The eclipse is a transient phenomenon of descent into darkness of suffering and despair. For me, the Black Sun symbolizes the wedding of one who has experienced and embraced both the full measure of the physical limitations and the spiritual possibilities of our human life. Suffering, betrayal, illness, war, despair, and resistance are the dark reality of human life in the flesh. The light of the sun is the higher aspiration of service, joy, science, initiative, and spirit. The Black Sun is marriage of darkness and light.
 
Thanks for the further quotes EmeraldHope.
[quote author=EmeraldHope]
Quote from obyvatel:
This struck me as "staring into the abyss" and the part about doing this "in its own right and not as a stage of development of the soul" raised a flag. Not having read the whole book, I cannot evaluate the fruits of this activity though
The impression I got from the meaning of this is to look at it under a microscope, as maybe you could do with the moon, a part of the solar system, but separate in it's own right. Or, maybe the study of the psychopath, like we do here, different in it's own right, apart form the whole. Or, maybe the study of the appendix in the body- part of the body but separate in it's own right. It was meant as that was his approach for the purpose of writing this book. OSIT
[/quote]

The author of the book is an analyst who is analyzing the symbol of Sol niger as it appears in alchemical literature. So from his perspective (which is not that of someone attempting self-transformation - but I could be wrong), he could be separating or isolating one step (that of psychic disintegration or moral bankruptcy or symbolic death) of a process (positive disintegration, fusing magnetic center or journey of individuation) and putting it "under the microscope" as you put it.
[quote author=The Black Sun]
In C. G. Jung Speaking, Jung describes the alchemical process as “difficult and strewn with obstacles; the alchemical opus is dangerous. Right at the beginning you meet the ‘dragon,’ the chthonic spirit, the ‘devil’ or, as the alchemists called it, the ‘blackness,’ the nigredo, and this encounter produces suffering. He goes on to say that in “psychological terms, the soul finds itself in the throes of melancholy locked in a struggle with the ‘shadow.’” The black sun, Sol niger, is one of the most important images representing this phase of the process and this condition of the soul. Usually this image is seen as phase specific to the early part of the opus and is said to disappear “when the ‘dawn’ (aurora) emerges.” Typically blackness is said to dissolve, and then “the ‘devil’ no longer has an autonomous existence but rejoins the found unity of the psyche. Then the opus magnum is finished: the human soul is [said to be] completely integrated.” In my experience, this is an idealized goal of alchemy, and there is a danger in bypassing the autonomous core of darkness that always remains as an earmark of the condition of any humanness. Thus, my approach to the image of the black sun pauses with the blackness itself and examines it in its own right, not simply as a stage in the development of the soul. As such we see that blackness itself proves to contain in its own realm the gold we seek in our attempts to transcend it. This focus contributes to a new appreciation of the darkness within.
[/quote]
So, he started by studying a step in a process in isolation and came up with the conclusion that this step itself contains the desired result of the entire alchemical process. Thus, there appears to be a subtle redefining the goal of alchemy from the study of the stage of nigredo - which is why it was a flag for me.
Now, from the "gregmogenson" link that you provided, there is this (paraphrased?) quote from the original book
[quote author=The Black Sun]
the emergence of Sol niger requires a reflection on that which is beyond the humanism of ego psychology and which attempts to take on questions of the death of the ego or perhaps even the Self as part of psychic possibility.
[/quote]
It seems that the dissolution of the Self is being suggested here which is probably not in keeping (based on what I know so far) with Jung's idea of individuation and view of alchemy. It may not be possible to exactly match Jung's terminology with that of Gurdjieff/Mouravieff - but the idea that I have is that Jung's "Self" , after going through the process of individuation, is in essence the Real I after the fusing of the magnetic center in Work terms.
The process of bankruptcy which brings one face to face with the predator's mind in all its power and brings about the dark night of the soul seems like what is described as the stage of nigredo in alchemy. It seems to me that the Sol niger image is used to represent this abyss - also described as a sort of psychic black hole. It is here that a choice has to be made - a choice of fundamental alignment - one that Laura says "has the weight of a feather". After this, perhaps the process of reintegration proceeds in the direction of choice.
Now in the context of this book, if the author has come up with the death of the Jungian "Self" as a psychic possibility in light of the Sol niger, then it does increase the number of flags for me. In eastern religions, there are schools which do not clearly distinguish between the death of the false personality and the death of the ego-consciousness and hence take the dissolution of the individual self as the spiritual goal - T Illion wrote about this in detail in "Darkness Over Tibet". I am not sure whether the author of this book is proposing something similar in essence, but what I have read so far does give me a pause.
 
Obyvatal:
Now in the context of this book, if the author has come up with the death of the Jungian "Self" as a psychic possibility in light of the Sol niger, then it does increase the number of flags for me. In eastern religions, there are schools which do not clearly distinguish between the death of the false personality and the death of the ego-consciousness and hence take the dissolution of the individual self as the spiritual goal - T Illion wrote about this in detail in "Darkness Over Tibet". I am not sure whether the author of this book is proposing something similar in essence, but what I have read so far does give me a pause.


I understand what you are saying, but sol niger, as with Kali Ma and the other dark feminine archetypes, DO represent death in all of its' forms.


I outlined the alchemical aspects because I thought it in particular would be interesting here from a psychology perspective. Death of the ego in terms of death of the false self is also valid.

The death of the psychic or physical self is always a possibility, as long as we are a third dimensional being. We see that even in the C's material. Sol Niger represents that. If you refer to the 1st excerpt I quoted, you will find a reference to Elvis in this regard. He became stuck in the nigrido, much as psychopaths are, as another example. The book addresses it from all angles. Also, refer to the third excerpt I quoted above- there are people who dream of Sol Niger who are physically and mentally ill. They are outlining as many aspects as possible, not just one.


Perhaps you may be trying to make the whole concept, in all of it's different aspects, fit to just what we are trying to accomplish here? It is more than that, imho. To understand something, one must see all the faces, just as we must face all of our i's to know ourselves. A black magicians use of the sol niger archetype would be different from how one aiming for STO would use it and see it . ( subjective vs objective, or wishful thinking vs knowledge and being )

Alister Crowley reminds me of a good example of the wrong use.

I like to see things from all angles so I know the differences myself. Archetypes have different faces , and can be used in both a positive and negative fashion, as they have both positive and negative aspects. The third force determines the difference.

In it's representation of the unconscious, one either stays there, ( psychopaths, STS, sleeping humanity) or brings light from the darkness
( what we are trying to do).




There are references to the Eastern religions and the no self as well and the differences from the book's perspective. Here is an excerpt:
The theme of this debate has been taken up by transpersonal psychologist Sean Kelly.He contributes to this debate, positing what he calls “complex holism,” a view in part influenced by Hegel’s, Jung’s, and Morin’s idea of a dialectic that is a “symbiotic combination of two [or more] logics in a manner that is at once complementaryand antagonistic.”What’s important in Kelly’s position is not just the idea of bringing the two perspectives together in unity but also giving impor tance to their differences. This gives his vision nuance and complexity. In other words, the doctrine that holds the Self (the Hindu Atman/ Brahman) as the supreme principle and the doctrine that holds the No-Self (The Buddhist Annata) as a supreme principle are comple- mentary while at the same time remaining antagonistic. Kelly relativizes each fundamental idea by noting that both principles “must negate the truth of the other in order to point out its onesidedness and its missing complement.” It appears that Kelly’s idea is parallel to Jung’s. Jung’s psychology was originally called complex psychology, and later, as it developed, an important component of it was the idea that the unconscious compensates for the one-sided attitudes of the conscious mind with the intent of achieving balance and wholeness. For Jung, the “Self” was also a complex (w)holism, a self-regulating and balancing principle, but what is interesting in Kelly’s argument is that he applies the idea of comple- mentarity to the idea of the Self itself. He observes that the concept of the Self as Atman is prone to the kind of sterile hypostatization that impedes rather than facilitates psychic life. On the other hand, without the stability of the atmanic Self, the No-Self Annata doctrine is also prone to a sterile nihilism that leaves psychic life adrift. It is worth noting here that for each perspective, Hindu or Buddhist, the idea of a complementarity principle can be accounted for from within. The Atman/Brahman perspective has its own way of understanding theflux of the No-Self, just as the No-Self perspective of the Buddhists has its own way of understanding stability. Those who are committed to one perspective or another are likely to feel that the antagonistic other does not really understand its perspective, which from within its own point of view the ideas of its critics are already addressed. Those who hold to their own perspectives alone are traditionally considered orthodox, whereas those who seek to break with tradition may be seen as iconoclastic or even heretical, like Jung himself. The history of ideas and cultures seems to move by virtue of such a dialectic, though ultimately this may be a too-limited way to imagine the complexity of history. Kelly’s perspective of complex holism embraces both perspectives, Self and No-Self. To this dialogical complementarity he adds the either/ or of dialogic antagonism, which gives the debate a dynamic thrust that both affirms and relativizes at the same time. If we then imagine Jung’s idea of the Self as being subject to a similar critique, the Self would call for the complementarity principle of No-Self to keep it from stagnating into an hypostasized and fixed idea of order, as Hillman has observed. For Jung as well as Hillman, the Self as the archetype of meaning requires the anima or archetype of life to keep it from stagnation. Hill- man, however, prefers not to speak of the Self at all because of its tendency as a transcendental concept to lose connection with the body. For him, the problem with Jung’s idea of the Self is that it moves toward transcendence, both mathematical and geometric. Its analogies tend to be drawn from the realm of spirit, abstract philosophy, and mystical theology. Its principles tend to be expressed in terms such as self- actualization, entelechy, the principle of individuation, the monad, the totality, Atman, Brahman, and the Tao. For Hillman, all of this points to a vision of Self that is removed from life, and so it enters psychology “through the back door, disguised as synchronicity, magic, oracles, sciencefiction, self-symbolism, mandalas, tarot, astrology and other indiscriminations, equally prophetic, ahistorical and humorless.Here Hillman brings together a variety of ideas and images sacred to the orthodox Jungians, which, while not well differentiated, serves the purpose of painting a vision of the Self as an unconscious, abstract structure that has lost touch with the dynamics of the soul. This is a view of the Self that is not acceptable to the orthodox Jungian, for whom the Self is both structural, dynamic, and deeply connected to life. It is not surprising to find that fundamental concepts such as the Self are open to multiple interpretations. As noted, there are those who regard Jung’s Self as anything but static and others for whom it too easily loses itself in a hypostasized, outmoded, out of touch, and abstract con- ception that calls out for revision. As I interpret Kelly’s perspective of “complex holism,” the importance of the tension is to reveal how every fundamental concept has a shadow even when the concept is as wide ranging as the Self. In this sense, the complementary/antagonistic idea of the No-Self reveals the Self’s shadow as an esoteric and invisible other that is necessary to the animation of psychic life. Traditionally the shadow is considered to be the counterpart of consciousness, but the Self is said to embrace both the conscious and the unconscious dimensions of psychic life. However, if one follows Jung in the most radical sense while simultaneously giving credence to the perspectives of Miller and Kelly and to the importance of the idea of the No-Self as being both comple- mentary and antagonistic to Jung’s idea of the Self, then it is reasonable to imagine the Self as having a shadow, a dynamic and invisible Other- ness that is essential to it. Often for alchemy, Sol is the most precious thing, while Sol niger as its shadow is like Lacan’s “petite a.”This petite a is “more worthless than seaweed.”Yet without Sol niger there is no ring to consciousness, no dynamic Other that taints and tinctures the brilliance of the Sun. Following the alchemical tradition, Jung writes that “Consciousness re- quires as its necessary counterpart a dark, latent, non-manifest side.... So much did the alchemists sense the duality of his unconscious as- sumptions that, in the face of all astronomical evidence, he equipped the sun with a shadow [and stated]: ‘The sun and its shadow bring the work to perfection.’” Ultimately, I believe the notion of a shadow of the Self is supported by the paradoxical play of opposites in alchemy


Also, you referenced this part:


As such we see that blackness itself proves to contain in its own realm the gold we seek in our attempts to transcend it.

This is true, is it not? Are not aspects of our real selves not currently in the blackness, waiting to be reclaimed by the light of consciousness?
 
EmeraldHope said:
Perhaps you may be trying to make the whole concept, in all of it's different aspects, fit to just what we are trying to accomplish here? It is more than that, imho. To understand something, one must see all the faces, just as we must face all of our i's to know ourselves. A black magicians use of the sol niger archetype would be different from how one aiming for STO would use it and see it . ( subjective vs objective, or wishful thinking vs knowledge and being )

Alister Crowley reminds me of a good example of the wrong use.

I like to see things from all angels so I know the differences myself. Archetypes have different faces , and can be used in both a positive and negative fashion, as they have both positive and negative aspects. The third force determines the difference.

The book addresses it from all angles. Also, refer to the third excerpt I quoted above- there are people who dream of Sol Niger who are physically and mentally ill. They are outlining as many aspects as possible, not just one.

In it's representation of the unconscious, one either stays there, ( psychopaths, STS, sleeping humanity) or brings light from the darkness
( what we are trying to do).
EmeraldHope, I agree in principle to what you are saying. I may not have conveyed that in my previous posts. Texts such as these can be interpreted in more than one way - and I understand the author's perspective. The reason for sounding the note of caution is that when dealing with processes like alchemy, an intellectual description which an analyst is providing is incomplete as it is "third force blind" to a large extent. I agree that it is useful for initially surveying the whole landscape - like looking at an archetype in all its manifestations as you put it.
Jung did pioneering work for his time but he and his followers do not take into account the existence of a hyperdimensional, conscious dark force at work in nature. So in the Jungian model, individuation is about throwing light on the unconscious. In the Jungian model, there is little (if any at all) emphasis on a conscious choice of alignment with one of the two fundamental polarities of nature.
[quote author=EmeraldHope]
In it's representation of the unconscious, one either stays there, ( psychopaths, STS, sleeping humanity) or brings light from the darkness
( what we are trying to do).
[/quote]
Psychopaths and higher density STS are conscious in their choice of darkness (or entropy) which may be somewhat different from the darkness which confronts sleeping humanity who have not made their choice of alignment -osit.

[quote author=EmeraldHope]
As such we see that blackness itself proves to contain in its own realm the gold we seek in our attempts to transcend it.
This is true, is it not? Are not aspects of our real selves not currently in the blackness, waiting to be reclaimed by the light of consciousness?
[/quote]
Yes, if the darkness represented by Sol niger is taken as the unconscious parts of ourselves. If on the other hand, the Sol niger is taken as a manifestation of conscious STS energy, then "its own realm of gold" is a light that does not bring illumination of the type desired by STO aspirants.

[quote author=EmeraldHope]
A black magicians use of the sol niger archetype would be different from how one aiming for STO would use it and see it.
[/quote]
I understand your perspective. The question I have is this: is it possible that symbols like the Sol niger have an objective existence above and beyond how we try to interpret/use it? What I mean by objective existence is that what we see as a symbol at our level could be a reflection of something which exists by itself at a different level and has its own intrinsic properties. I do not know the answer to this question, but I think it may be worthwhile to consider this possibility. Otherwise, one may end up being used by the symbol instead of it being the other way round. I also feel that to resolve such questions relating to symbols, one needs the guidance of a relatively well-developed emotional center working with the intellectual center.
fwiw
 
obvaytal:
Jung did pioneering work for his time but he and his followers do not take into account the existence of a hyperdimensional, conscious dark force at work in nature. So in the Jungian model, individuation is about throwing light on the unconscious. In the Jungian model, there is little (if any at all) emphasis on a conscious choice of alignment with one of the two fundamental polarities of nature.

Agreed 100%. I never proposed here that he did, or that the text did. If I was not clear, or if that was ambiguous, my apologies.


obvaytal:
Psychopaths and higher density STS are conscious in their choice of darkness (or entropy) which may be somewhat different from the darkness which confronts sleeping humanity who have not made their choice of alignment -osit.

Higher density STS are conscious of their choice, from what I understand. Psychopaths, I do not think are,from what I understand. They just know that they are different. The darkness is different, both in its' aspects and its' use, but they are both still aspects of the same darkness.


obvaytal:
Yes, if the darkness represented by Sol niger is taken as the unconscious parts of ourselves. If on the other hand, the Sol niger is taken as a manifestation of conscious STS energy, then "its own realm of gold" is a light that does not bring illumination of the type desired by STO aspirants.

Exactly.


obvaytal:
I understand your perspective. The question I have is this: is it possible that symbols like the Sol niger have an objective existence above and beyond how we try to interpret/use it? What I mean by objective existence is that what we see as a symbol at our level could be a reflection of something which exists by itself at a different level and has its own intrinsic properties. I do not know the answer to this question, but I think it may be worthwhile to consider this possibility. Otherwise, one may end up being used by the symbol instead of it being the other way round. I also feel that to resolve such questions relating to symbols, one needs the guidance of a relatively well-developed emotional center working with the intellectual center.
fwiw

Sure, it is possible. I would say probable, actually, as it is an archetype.

We here are not aiming to stay in " nigredo", whatever it is.

I guess my perspective is in seeing this as a whole, or trying to understand it as a whole. What I mean by that is, for example, at 7th density all is one. Then at 6th density there is STO thought center and STS thought center. Then at 4th, there is STO and then STS.

Here on third density, once one has made a choice, one can either use a symbol to understand and progress towards " light" ( sto), or one can use a symbol to align further with "darkness" ( sts). Ultimately it is the choice that matters here, and the doing. OSIT But none the less, it would appear that the "darkness" is necessary as an opposite to the light, for one to progress. My understanding is that STO sees ALL. STS can only see what they want to see, wishfully thinking. But nonetheless, darkness and light, or positive and negative, interact with each other at all levels except 7th ( and 5th ). It is that interplay that most interests me here. I even stated that in my OP:

EH:
I was able, through this book, to see on an even greater level how the dark and light interact.


But, as I said, it was never my intention that this text should be used as a guidebook for what we are trying to do here.
 
What's going on in this thread?

Looks like speculation heavily based on interpreted symbols being exchanged between flawed and/or incomplete models of reality using limited senses.

What am I not seeing?
 
Azur said:
What's going on in this thread?

Looks like speculation heavily based on interpreted symbols being exchanged between flawed and/or incomplete models of reality using limited senses.

What am I not seeing?


Can you help to point out the flaws, since I am guessing by your post you must see more than we do, and point out the errors?

This is the first time I have looked deeper into this symbol, as I stated earlier, and I think the same can be said for Obyvatal, based on his posts. How else can one learn if not by trying to suss things out? That is what I thought we were doing- having a discussion, and stating what we were seeing. If I am wrong or way off base in my perceptions I surely hope someone who can see the error will tell me.

Please advise what you see as flawed/incomplete. Also which senses are limited, that you can see?




Add: After giving this some more thought I have to question your intention of this post you made, and how it was worded. The impression I got from it, reminded me of how I used to feel when I was little, and I was interested in something new, and was told it, or I, was ridiculous or stupid. My enthusiasm just zapped and fizzled.

Now, I am not saying that is how you meant it. That was just the "flavor" your post reminded me of . I cannot shake the feeling that there was more implied here beneath the surface.
 
In our attempt to speak the unspeakable, we have noticed that the Self, too, casts a shadow, and we have focused on this shadow, recognizing the unnamable, invisible, and unthinkable core of the idea, which some have referred to as a Divine Darkness while others have called it a non-Self. The non-Self is not another name for the Self but is founded in the recognition of the problematics involved in any representation of wholeness and a mark for the profound expression of this mystery. All of the attempts to name this mystery might be said to leave traces in the language in which we have attempted to speak it. No Epilogue signifier proves to be adequate to capture the fullness of human experience. The idea of the Self, like a shooting star of darkness, leaves a trail of metaphor in a variety of images inscribed in the margins of our experience. One might imagine these images as traces of silence at the heart of what we have imagined as the Self. In an attempt to speak about the Self, we have sought to find innovative ways to preserve its mystery, paradox, and unknown quality. Borrowing from postmodern philosophy, the Self has been imagined as a Self under erasure, as an idea and image that has the mortificatio and self-deconstruction at its heart. Such a Self is always a non-Self also. It is a darkness that is light and a light that is darkness, and in this way of imagining it we have a glimpse of Sol niger. Experientially, these two poles of the archetype, light and dark, are in an eternal embrace, crossing one another in a dance that might look like the structure of DNA. It appears to me now that Sol niger might be considered an archetypal image of the non-Self, having two integrated poles and multiple differentiations.At one end, the non-Self can be seen in its most literal form locked into the nigredo and the mortification of the flesh. Here the non-Self leans toward physical annihilation and literal death. At its other pole, however, the archetypal image is no longer confined to the nigredo and reflects itself in a different light, where annihilation is linked to both the presence of the void understood as absence, Eros, and self-forgetting and a majesty that sets the soul on fire. In all, there is an alchemy and art in darkness, an invisible design rendering and rending vision, calling it to its sourceless possibility

Maybe the non-self or black sun, this "eternal embrace"symbolizes the absolute non being in its contracted and latent state of "non manifested" Infinite Potential.
A"darkness that is light and a light that is darkness" means there is no diferentiation, nothing is manifested. This wholeness, this silence are the symbolic means of the sleeping one, the non being, osit.

Cassiopaea Glossary- Being vs. Non-Being said:
We can see the universe as an interplay of two opposite absolutes: One represents all possible being in the sense of organized, intelligent creation, the other represents its opposite in the sense of all inertness, lack of organization and lack of information or intelligence. These two can be seen as emerging from an ineffable 'One' by a process of spontaneous differentiation which we cannot represent to ourselves.

The absolutes of being and non-being have varying manifestations at different levels of the universe. Depending on the context and level, the reflection of these absolutes can be called STO/STS, creation/entropy, order/chaos, spirit/matter, consciousness/sleep. All these words have their distinct meanings and fields of application but can be seen in the most abstract sense as relating to being in its broadest expression vs. non-being is its broadest expression.
One excellent description is given by Laura Knight-Jadczyk in her book Secret History. The following except describes these concepts very well:

From Secret History on Being and Non-Being:

The great Sufi Shaykh Ibn al-'Arabi explains that "imperfection" exists in Creation because "were there no imperfection, the perfection of existence would be imperfect." From the point of view of Sheer Being, there is nothing but good.But Infinite Potential to BE includes - by definition of the word "infinite" -the potential to not be. And so, Infinite Potential "splits" into Thought Centers of Creation and Thought Centers of non-being. It can be said that Infinite Potential is fundamentally Binary - on or off - to be or not to be. That is the first "division."

Since absolute non-being is an impossible paradox in terms of the source of Infinite Potential to BE, the half of the consciousness of Infinite Potential that constitute the IDEAS of non-being - for every idea of manifestation, there is a corresponding idea for that item of creation to NOT manifest - "falls asleep" for lack of a better term. Its "self observation" is predicated upon consciousness that can only "mimic" death. Consciousness that mimics death then "falls" and becomes Primal Matter. What this means is that the "self observing self" at the level of the Master of the Universe is constituted of this initial division between Being and Non-being which is, again, only the initial division - the on/off, the yes/no - of creation. You could picture this as an open eye observing a closed eye. It has been represented for millennia in the yin-yang symbol, which, even on the black half that represents "sleeping consciousness that is matter," you can see the small white dot of "being" that represents to us that absolute non-existence is not possible. There is only "relative" non-existence.

These "thoughts of being and non-being" interact with one another - the observer and the observed - like a viewer looking into a mirror. Creation manifests between the viewer and the mirror. It is at once real - because it consists of matter informed by consciousness - and unreal because it is ultimately composed of only consciousness acting on consciousness.

At our level of reality, the understanding that "nothing is real," as has been promulgated by gurus and teachers down through history, is as useless as saying "gravity isn't real." Such considerations are useful only for expansion of perception. They are not useful for practical application since the energies of creation apparently transduce through several "levels" before they meet in the middle, so to say, in our third density reality. Organic life exists at the "crossroads" of the myriad ideas or thought centers of being and non-being. As such, they have the capacity to transduce energies "up" or "down" depending on the "consciousness energy directors" of that unit. And again, there are apparently two broad divisions: directed toward being/ observing, or directed toward non-being/ mirroring. This division manifests across all levels of organic life, including human beings. Human beings exist to transduce cosmic energies of creation via organic life. Our "higher selves" are the directors of this transducing of cosmic energies, and the direction in which the energy "flows" is determined by the activities of these higher selves. Against the opposition of those forces seeking to "capture" energy of consciousness and induce it to the "sleep of non-being," which is gravitational in a certain sense, the energies of consciousness seek to "inform" matter via awakening the self-awareness of those organic units on earth that are capable of resistance to the gravity of non-being.

As self-aware "transducing units," the human being has the potential for going either way - toward intensified being, or toward intensified non-being. […]

Ibn al-'Arabi tells us that Goodness is Being; to which all positive and beautiful attributes or "names" of God belong. Evil is the lack of good, so it is "nonexistence." In other words, at the root, Being dwells in "non-existence" which is evil. Here is the sticking point: Human beings at our level of reality exist at the crossroads of the Thoughts of Being and Non-being - Good and Evil. Mankind is made in the form of all the names of God - those of Being and Non-being. Assuming the traits of the Names is synonymous with manifesting their properties. The Science of Ascension is to obtain deep knowledge of all the Names and their true properties, the high and the low, the pleasant and the loathsome, the light and the darkness, in differentiated detail, so as to be able to CHOOSE which traits will be assumed. It is only with a full field of vision that a man can discover if what he subjectively thinks is good actually is good and leads to Being, or if it is a deception that induces to Non-being by pretense.

God is the root of ALL Names, noble and base. The task of the seeker of ascension is to bring the Noble traits from latency into actuality and to discover the positive applications of the base traits - even if that application is to "overcome" or transmute. The Shaykh tells us "noble character traits are only those connected to interaction with others." In other words: DOing. If you SEE the illusion of separation, that is certainly the first thing. The lie is smuggled in by suggesting that this is all that is necessary, that if you just "see it" everything will "change" for you.

God creates the good and the evil, the ugly and the beautiful, the straight and the crooked, the moral and the immoral. Between these traits lie the manifold dangers of the path of the seeker of Truth. Many modern day "teachers" and "gurus" tell us "Since there is only One Being which permeates all things, all we have to do is see everything as only light", and that will transmute the darkness, and we will "create our own reality of light." Such a statement ignores the fact that the statement "God is One" describes a reality that is a higher level from which our own "mixed being" manifests. The man who assumes that he can become like God at this level just by thinking it, ignores the facts of Being vs. Non-being which outrays from "God is One" at a level of existence that is clearly several levels above our own.

Evil is REAL on its own level, and the task of man is to navigate the Cosmic Maze without being defiled by the Evil therein. This is the root of Free Will. Man faces a predicament as REAL as himself: he is forced to choose - to utilize his knowledge by applying it - between the straight path which leads to Being, and the crooked paths which lead to Non-Being. Human beings are required to discern between good and evil - consciousness energy directors - at every stage of their existence in this reality. Because, in fact, they must understand that God is consciousness and God is matter. God is good, and God is evil. The Creation assumes all the different properties of the many "Names of God." The Cosmos is full of Life-giving and Slaying, Forgiveness and Vengeance, Exaltation and Abasement, Guidance and Deception. To attempt to assume God's point of view and "mix everything" at this level, results only in STAYING at this level. Therefore, human beings must always separate God's point of view from their own point of view and the fact that all creation assumes the divine Names and Traits.

Thus, the first Divine Command is BE! And that includes Being and Non-being instantaneously. Therefore, the second law is "follow Being or Non-being according to your choice and your inherent nature." All creation is a result of the engendering command. So, in this respect, there is no Evil. But the second, prescriptive law determines to which "Face of God" one will return: Life or Death.

If the engendering command alone is considered, there is no imperfection in the cosmos, since all creatures follow what God desires for them. In this respect, what is normally called "imperfection" is in fact perfection, since it allows for the actualization of the various levels of existence and knowledge. In other words, were there no imperfections - in the sense of diminishment, decrease, and lack - there would be no creation. Were there no creation, the Hidden Treasure would remain hidden. Hence Being would be unseen in every respect. There would be no self-disclosure of the Divine Reality, Light would not shine, and God would be the Nonmanifest but not the Manifest. But all this is absurd, since it demands the imperfection of Being Itself, which by definition is nondelimited perfection. Being's perfection requires the manifestation of Its properties. The effects of the Names and Attributes must be displayed for God to be God. [...] In other words, Imperfection is demanded by existence itself. To be "other than God" is to be imperfect. ...But it is precisely the "otherness" which allows the cosmos and all the creatures within it to exist. If things were perfect in every respect, they would be identical with God Himself, and there would be nothing "other than God." But then we could not even speak about the cosmos, since there would be no cosmos and no speakers. ...So, imperfection is a kind of perfection. [Chittick] At the particular stage of existence in which man finds himself, he is equally "receptive" toward the Two primary Faces of God: Being and Non-being. The Shaykh tells us that whatever property, or trait, any human being ultimately "chooses" is what it originally possessed in its state of immutability. The task of the Seeker is to discover what is immutable within, and to purify and amplify it. This is the development of Will. Will is a relationship, which follows knowledge while knowledge follows the object of knowledge. In the process of "ascension," the object of knowledge is YOU. Knowledge, in and of itself, has no effects. YOU, however, the seeker, can give to knowledge what you actually are, in yourself, thereby displaying YOURSELF in knowledge by your actions in concert with your knowledge.

As noted, there are many Names of God that call to us in our present state of existence. But you are not required to answer every one that calls. The fact that human beings are, in general, ignorant of their own true "essence" gives them the illusion of freedom. And the fact is, all paths come from God, and all paths Lead back to God, but again, it can be via different faces. As the Shaykh says: "Unto Allah all things come home, and he is the end of every path. However, the important thing is which divine name you will reach and to which you will come home?"

And this brings us to what the Shaykh calls "perspicacity." This is the special development of the "eye of insight," or "seeing the unseen" that is crucial to the Seeker. Just as the physical eye, with the refraction of light from the Sun, can discern between the large and the small, the beautiful and the ugly, colors, the moving from the still, high and low, the ability to see the unseen is a property of an "inner light." This light reveals to the seeker things about external objects that are NOT apparent to the five senses. It reveals to its possessor when a choice that may appear to be benevolent, is a step on the path of Evil. It reveals when a choice that may appear to human estimation as negative is actually a difficult step to felicity for all involved. The Sufis tell us that some individuals have achieved such a level of "seeing" that - upon seeing a person's footprint on the ground, even if the person is not present - they are able to say whether he is following a life of felicity or wretchedness.

The light of perspicacity seems to be a gift that not everyone has, and those who do have it, may not have developed it to the same degree. What is evident is that those who have it possess an immutable nature of Being which is able to "see" good and evil - they do not see "only good." Thus, they are able to discern between the "calls" of Nonbeing and Being, and therefore, are able to strengthen their Will along the path of intrinsic Being. It then follows that individuals who are not able to see - or who choose not to see - both Good and Evil, are formed in the mold of subjectivity, which is the human expression of the Call of Non-being.

A human being whose immutable nature is that of Being can strengthen the light of perspicacity by "assuming the traits" of the Names of Being. This does not mean that a person comes to possess traits that do not already belong to him. It means that these traits are amplified and "cultivated." The Ruling property of an individual is determined by what Face of God is disclosed to him, and this is determined by his preparedness. Felicity can only be disclosed when Evil has been turned away from, rejected; which can only be achieved by a long period of "testing" or being challenged to SEE and then to choose Being over Non-being in order to grow the Will or alignment to Being in a feedback loop. As the Seeker travels this path, he must not see these traits as his own, but rather that he is a locus of God's manifestation of an ontological attribute. […]

So it is that different paths can produce different effects for different individuals according to their immutable nature within. Those whose intrinsic nature is toward Being, follow the path of the developing the ability to SEE and to choose alignment with infinite potential of creation, thereby being conduits of Being as GOD chooses to manifest through them. They not only see that limitation is illusion, they consciously ACT - they utilize that knowledge to generate energy and light.

Those whose intrinsic nature is toward Non-being, follow the path of limitation of Infinite Being by assuming that they, in their state of ignorance and subjectivity, know better than God how Creation ought to be fixed. They pray for change, they perform rituals, they chant mantras and repeat endless visualizations of "magickal forms" that are supposed to "change" reality. They bomb others with "Love and Light," (their subjective version of it, of course), and they seek to fix the world "out there" by projecting their subjective view of reality onto the infinite wisdom of Creation. This "consciousness energy direction" even includes the assumption that just knowing that all division is illusion will accomplish the goal of "Ascension," and that is the most cunning lie of all.

Each approach "ties a knot" in the heart of the believer and fixes him on a path, the object of his belief being the end of the path. All beliefs are equivalent in that God - of one sort or another - is their ultimate objective. But each belief is different in that it leads to a different name of God, or Thought Center. Even materialistic skepticism is a "belief" and leads to "matterizing" of the consciousness that follows this belief. What is more difficult to discern are the many mixed up "spiritual" paths that twist and distort the concepts of Being to engage the seeker on a path to Non-Being. […]

The natural field of view for the organic unit alone - with no connection to the higher self - is that of the material and/or mechanical interpretation of all phenomena. The influences of the Thought Center of non-being - the source of matter - have been increasing through the manifestation of billions of such units at a single point in time: the present.

The Thought Center of non-being is of a certain nature - contractile subjectivity - that exerts a more or less "gravitational" pull - a desire to absorb and assimilate the soul energies of Being - so as to feed its own contracting nature. Even if it promotes a full field of awareness in principle, it can only view Being as a traitor to its own need to not exist. This results in an individual who may proclaim that all is illusion, but whose actions - or rather lack thereof - betray the deeper immutable state of being. Due to its intrinsic nature, there is a powerful exertion of non-being to destroy and obviate Being and Creation - all the while it is unable to achieve the awareness that it only exists by virtue of Being and Creation IN ACTION!

The powerful exertion of the Thought Center of non-being to absorb and assimilate all of creation, powered by its own contractile subjectivity, poses certain problems both for itself and for Being. Since the fundament of non-being is a LIE - that is to say, the state of absolute non-being that it promotes is a paradoxical impossibility - and the fundament of Being is the objective fact that Existence simply IS via ACTION - or utilization of knowledge which generates light, the essential conflict is between lies and truth. The Thought Center of non-being tells itself the biggest lie of all - that it does not exist - and goes to sleep in pretense. And from this essential point, we see that the nature of subjectivity is that of lies. Lies and belief in lies -whether or not the believer is aware that they are believing a lie - all partake of the same essence - subjectivity and non-being.

The Thought Center of non-being - in its expression as matter - being "impressed" by Creative consciousness in ACTION which partially awakens it and draws it into the creation of the organic world - wraps itself around this awakened consciousness. Its intrinsic nature of pretense to non-being acts "gravitationally" on consciousness, and twists and distorts it into varying degrees of subjectivity. It is this interaction of the energy of all possibility, lensed through subjectivity of matter, that produces the myriad manifestations of the material universe.

In the realm of the Thought Center of non-being, there are many manifestations -or ways - of seeking annihilation - the "Base Names of God." These modes act in a gravitational way to engage, enfold, and distort consciousness to their ends. This results in the formation of consciousness units of great power and depth of cunning - far beyond anything imaginable in our own reality.

These consciousness units use their wiles to assimilate weaker consciousness units so as to accrue more contractile power. Obviously, the more "dense" the consciousness units "consumed," the more "nutritious" they are. And so they seek, by great cunning, to carefully, and with great patience, manipulate the consciousness units selected for assimilation. It is, effectively, trans- millennial stalking.
 
Also, there is a mention of the Black Sun in this session:

921202 said:
Q: (L) Among the things that were discussed among the Germans in the Thule Society and the Vril Society, was the "Black Sun That Illuminates the Interior." Can you tell us what this "Black Sun" is?
A: Ultimate destiny of STS orientation.
Q: (L) Is this Black Sun an actual astronomical phenomenon?
A: In essence.
Q: (L) What would we know this Black Sun as? A black hole?
A: Good possibility
 
Back
Top Bottom