the case for one (objective) reality

[darksai]

In conversation I just had, i explained why i take it that there is only one reality, and i thought it might interesting to share, since it ended up as a kind of 'proof' via reducto ad absurdom, which goes like this:

the assumption first is that 'a reality' is everything that is 'real'. i personally cannot conceive of how it could be otherwise.
the second is that there are multiple realities.

for there to be multiple realities, they must be different. we can see this if take the usual mathematical definition of a set to describe a reality.
now, take one of said realities
by the first assumption, it contains everything that is real.
therefore, everything it does not contain must be unreal
since the 'other' realities are different, they must contain SOMETHING thats not in the first reality which has 'everything real'
this then implies that all 'other' realities are not realities by our definition of 'a' reality.
the first reality is therefore the only one, contradicting the second assumption.

just wanted to share my thoughts, feel free to add your own, or challenges if you have any :)

 

[ana]

More food for thought here :)

Perpendicular Realities

This is a Cassiopaean term for paths that cross. We could see this as a word play on the more common concept of parallel realities. While parallel realities do not touch, perpendicular ones eventually do.

The idea is that reality is divided into realms inside realms. A realm is a division 'vertically' as in density and 'horizontally' as in location in space/time and in terms of choosing one out of a number of possible scenarios. Individuals themselves along with their possible life paths are realms embedded into larger realms. The intersection of these realities is at the point of the Wave, when the different densities and perpendicular scenarios intersect in a sort of multidimensional overlap. This is a sort of cosmic crossroads where passage between densities and influencing the relative probability of diverse pasts/presents/futures is more possible than otherwise.

The idea of crossing paths and colinearity are related. Paths that are 'collinear,' i.e. going in the same direction are more likely to cross or form perpendicular realities. These can be pictured as lines converging towards a common center, for example all traveling due north on a sphere will meet at the north pole, where the seemingly parallel northbound tracks actually cross.

Evolution of Souls

A: The perpendicular reality primarily, though not exclusively,
refers to one's life path and how one's life path fits together in
the cycle or in a wheel when connected with those of a similar
life path. And, oddly enough, relates very closely to the
previous question involving synchronicity... [(J) Yeah...] If you
can picture an inlaid wheel formed by a circle within a circle,
and adjoining partitions in a perfect balance, that would be the
best representation of perpendicular reality for it does not
completely involve one individual's experience, but rather a
group of individual's experience for the progression of a
greater purpose, if you understand what we mean. This is
what we mean when we say: perpendicular reality. Picture
again, a circle within a circle adjoined by equally spaced
partitions in a perfect cycle. That is perpendicular reality.