I realize you said you won't reply to this thread any longer, but It's an interesting question, and I suppose we can dive deep into several abstract scenarios and discuss this forever. But I think it comes down to, does someone have the right take something because they disagree with the way a law has been written? in a way, sure they do, if they have a way. But on that same vein, does someone have the right to refuse that other someone from taking it? sure, they do as well, if they have a way. Like I said, it can be discussed forever.
But personally, I think it comes down to external consideration, generally speaking, who does one consider when choosing one way or the other?
