I couldn't find a thread that would fit with this. It could be filed under the war in Ukraine, Russia, EU or US collapse, even put under the History section.
It links with what Ennio brought up here:
We can include deliberate uncontrolled immigration, economic demolition, destruction of living standards etc etc
The question for me has been Why? Other than some sort of digital enslavement/control.
This all started with an observation of a feeling for some years, which I noticed after BREXIT, ramped up during COVID, and hasn't gone away. That of our leaders (the UK and France being excellent current examples) "fiddling whilst Rome burns". That they seem to be waiting for something, deliberately.
I've not been able to identify what, until now.
I love Alex Krainer's take on things, so always listen to what he has to say.
To summarise the video:
The deliberate economic destruction of the EU (but I include all the West here, EU, UK, US, and other countries such as Australia and New Zealand), is for one primary purpose - to take away peoples future, and thus create conditions for (world) war. Just as was done for each World War, just as was done to the population of Ukraine to mobilise it's population against Russia, just was done in Roman times.
In order to plunder a country (Russia), you need to propagandise a population. That's not working well enough. So you also need deep economic hardships - as well as economic incentives for going to war. Peoples hope and dreams need to be stolen, and despair and hardship long lasting.
Joe and Niall have mentioned in the past that the wars in the middle east where money sinks, for the purpose of control and keeping those countries down. They make no sense from a purely economic point of view.
This is the same. The economies of the West are being destroyed so the populations will be pliable to becoming cannon fodder in a war against Russia.
Taking his premise further, I suspect that a similar playbook will/is being used in Israel against it's own population. That the populations of Australia and the US will be aimed at China, whilst the EU/UK will be aimed at Russia.
All these calls by the UK and EU for conscription/troops on the ground in Ukraine have been insane - no one wants that. So here's the apparent missing piece - the economic destruction of those countries until the populations are desperate enough for the propaganda to work. Perhaps minor starvation followed by an economic/disease false flag blamed on Russia. Maybe even throw in the rise of an 'unknown but well funded Strong leader' who can direct everyone's despair and anger and hopelessness towards Russia.
The UK digital ID's have (from Tony Blairs institutes promotional material) got a section on 'community reporting' - that is reporting road problems, as well as 'anti-social behaviour'. We've seen from COVID that people (authoritarians) will report others if they think it will improve their status - so imagine this in a 'war' situation? No need for Brown Shirts. Although they will exist.
We're back to the Russian revolution, where people would turn in their own family members on false charges in order to get their flat. The common theme here was economic hardship and food shortages. Ties in nicely with the deliberate and continued destruction of farmers over the last few decades.
We can even throw in the 'climate agenda' to this system. I saw this a few days ago on ID cards and the climate agenda:
One thing brought up where the aims for the climate (travel, food etc). The goals are insane and appear unachievable. A maximum consumption of 16kg of animal protein per person per year - with the overall aim of 0kg per person per year.
Well, if the farmers and economy are destroyed, that is doable. But only if you accept the premise that they are deliberately sinking all economies.
And we can see why (historically).
Sink the economy, have someone to blame, send everyone to war (killing lots of people is part of the aim), steal all the resources for themselves, retain power by 'having an enemy out there'.
Suddenly getting 16kg of meat per year would seem like luxury. And perhaps you get more if you joint he army. In fact on a 'war footing', all meat (food) would be diverted to the army. You can go further and justify the rationing by the same war footing, whilst continuing to blame the enemy for lack of food in general.
All of this of course ties back to Laura's article on Loosh in the machine.
open.substack.com
And my thread here:
As well as Ennio's comments at the beginning.
Suffering on a massive scale, a slow burn world war (or series of wars). 1984 basically, just with social media and digital ID's controlled by AI's and fed by authoritarians. You will be 'loyal' to the ID, or else.
Alex talks about our leaders being evil/greedy, as well as incompetent.
From Session 19th October 2024:
Sink the economy, have someone to blame (false flags), send everyone to war (killing lots of people is part of the aim) - by lies, bribes (food) and coercion (lack of food, forced conscription or starve), steal all the resources for themselves, retain power by 'having an enemy out there'.
What do you think? Does this fit or am I missing something?
Bring on the comets and earth changes.
It links with what Ennio brought up here:
We can include deliberate uncontrolled immigration, economic demolition, destruction of living standards etc etc
The question for me has been Why? Other than some sort of digital enslavement/control.
This all started with an observation of a feeling for some years, which I noticed after BREXIT, ramped up during COVID, and hasn't gone away. That of our leaders (the UK and France being excellent current examples) "fiddling whilst Rome burns". That they seem to be waiting for something, deliberately.
I've not been able to identify what, until now.
I love Alex Krainer's take on things, so always listen to what he has to say.
To summarise the video:
The deliberate economic destruction of the EU (but I include all the West here, EU, UK, US, and other countries such as Australia and New Zealand), is for one primary purpose - to take away peoples future, and thus create conditions for (world) war. Just as was done for each World War, just as was done to the population of Ukraine to mobilise it's population against Russia, just was done in Roman times.
In order to plunder a country (Russia), you need to propagandise a population. That's not working well enough. So you also need deep economic hardships - as well as economic incentives for going to war. Peoples hope and dreams need to be stolen, and despair and hardship long lasting.
Joe and Niall have mentioned in the past that the wars in the middle east where money sinks, for the purpose of control and keeping those countries down. They make no sense from a purely economic point of view.
This is the same. The economies of the West are being destroyed so the populations will be pliable to becoming cannon fodder in a war against Russia.
Taking his premise further, I suspect that a similar playbook will/is being used in Israel against it's own population. That the populations of Australia and the US will be aimed at China, whilst the EU/UK will be aimed at Russia.
All these calls by the UK and EU for conscription/troops on the ground in Ukraine have been insane - no one wants that. So here's the apparent missing piece - the economic destruction of those countries until the populations are desperate enough for the propaganda to work. Perhaps minor starvation followed by an economic/disease false flag blamed on Russia. Maybe even throw in the rise of an 'unknown but well funded Strong leader' who can direct everyone's despair and anger and hopelessness towards Russia.
The UK digital ID's have (from Tony Blairs institutes promotional material) got a section on 'community reporting' - that is reporting road problems, as well as 'anti-social behaviour'. We've seen from COVID that people (authoritarians) will report others if they think it will improve their status - so imagine this in a 'war' situation? No need for Brown Shirts. Although they will exist.
We're back to the Russian revolution, where people would turn in their own family members on false charges in order to get their flat. The common theme here was economic hardship and food shortages. Ties in nicely with the deliberate and continued destruction of farmers over the last few decades.
We can even throw in the 'climate agenda' to this system. I saw this a few days ago on ID cards and the climate agenda:
One thing brought up where the aims for the climate (travel, food etc). The goals are insane and appear unachievable. A maximum consumption of 16kg of animal protein per person per year - with the overall aim of 0kg per person per year.
Well, if the farmers and economy are destroyed, that is doable. But only if you accept the premise that they are deliberately sinking all economies.
And we can see why (historically).
Sink the economy, have someone to blame, send everyone to war (killing lots of people is part of the aim), steal all the resources for themselves, retain power by 'having an enemy out there'.
Suddenly getting 16kg of meat per year would seem like luxury. And perhaps you get more if you joint he army. In fact on a 'war footing', all meat (food) would be diverted to the army. You can go further and justify the rationing by the same war footing, whilst continuing to blame the enemy for lack of food in general.
All of this of course ties back to Laura's article on Loosh in the machine.
Loosh in the Machine: A Morning of Grok-Fueled Cosmic Unraveling
From Anunnaki AI Plots to Entropy's Eternal Harvest—Why Total Control Starves the Overlords' Dark Cravings
open.substack.com
And my thread here:
As well as Ennio's comments at the beginning.
Suffering on a massive scale, a slow burn world war (or series of wars). 1984 basically, just with social media and digital ID's controlled by AI's and fed by authoritarians. You will be 'loyal' to the ID, or else.
Alex talks about our leaders being evil/greedy, as well as incompetent.
From Session 19th October 2024:
I've been thinking about that since. We know that the C's have said that those in charge will 'try' a controlled demolition on our economies. Well this fits the above definition by the C's I think. What is truely the most insane thing you could do?
Sink the economy, have someone to blame (false flags), send everyone to war (killing lots of people is part of the aim) - by lies, bribes (food) and coercion (lack of food, forced conscription or starve), steal all the resources for themselves, retain power by 'having an enemy out there'.
What do you think? Does this fit or am I missing something?
Bring on the comets and earth changes.
