alkhemst said:
On a side not the US congress I noticed on a google search made the same error back in their 2001 calendar, making up November-31st by mistake. https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-US-Congress-accidentally-create-November-31st
Anyway, there's no other dates that could be made up of 11.3 11.5 in the future.
However this is kind of weird as on this date 15.11.13 two years ago this happened:
2013 Paris attacks:
On Friday morning, November 15, 2013, a gunman attacked the offices of the news channel BFM TV, in Paris. On Monday, November 18, 2013, a gunman attacked the offices of the newspaper Libération and the headquarters of the bank Société Générale. The gunman hijacked a motorist to drive him to Champs-Élysées before releasing him. The attacks set off a manhunt in search of the gunman.[1]
Apologies going into a bit of a coincidence theory territory right now. But interesting nonetheless
Hmm...that is very interesting. Like a pre-echo of events to come. Today, the 18th of Nov; man/woman hunt ends badly.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/18/us-france-shooting-idUSKCN0T22IU20151118#yPdflZhIObmEQsCU.97
I wanted to leave a few comments on the Economist. First, I didn't even know about the Economist until recently. Not surprising really, but now I understand the significance of this magazine and as you all know, the Cover of the January 2015 issue caused a large response from alternative media.
Before I go on to anything else involving the magazine, I first wanted to say that I believe the reason for black and white images, as opposed to the color images, has to do with a visual reference for who's a club member and who isn't. Napoleon is in color and widely considered the first anti-christ, something I doubt club members would bestow on their own, so I believe all the people in B&W are insiders. They are all in on whatever is going on in the world. All club members can only rise to power through approved channels, which evidently isn't how Napoleon came to power.
I think we have seen the passage of the arrows. We have had the November 13th Mystery Light off California, and now the Paris attacks. In line with the first is likely a preseeding of known event which was anticipated by the powers that be. Recall that back on the 8th of November 2010 a supposed missile was launched from a Chinese Jin Sub of the coast of California.
_https://www.truthorfiction.com/chinese-sub-catalina/
That incident is what I call a seeding incident. Almost always these visible propagandized incidents are crafted to cover as many possible uses as possible. Thus, the seeding of war fears in to the public mind is always an on-going meme feed to the public via the propaganda, and in this case I would imagine that the purpose was to begin planting a seed for another plausible explanation for the arrival of this mystery object on the 13th of November 2015. Whatever it might have been, I do think it was expected, and thus the purpose of the missile launch in 2010 was to "enable" shills to to respond with a plausible explanation.
I thought this was all worth mentioning since the contrail (seen at the previous link) illustrates the nature of a missile launch in general, but it is also significant since the storyline went that the missile originated from a submarine. Whereas, on the Nov 13th, 2015 the observation of the mysterious light in the sky, seen from Mexico to Oregon and inland as far away as Nevada, is something completely different and certainly not a missile launched from a Trident Submarine. An absurd explanation as far as I am concerned. My friend called me from San Diego freaked out and swore he thought he was looking at a Norway Spiral kind of thing.
Well I reviewed the video and it's not a spiral and it's certainly not a missile from a Trident. Anyone who's buying that story needs to look at the video's of the Saturn V Rocket launches. If a Saturn Rocket isn't visible from Georgia and Mississippi then I seriously doubt a Tridents Missile is gona be visible from Las Vegas Nevada, Mexico, and Oregon all at the same time.
So I'm saying that object seen in the sky on the 13th of November this year is the other arrow, and that, whatever it is, it was known and expected to arrive on that date, and that it was significant enough to be part of the cryptic cover of the Economist for 2015 seems to me to now be apparent.
These dates must hold significance in the frame of storytelling by the powers that be. One is the real story, the other the engineered story. I take this to mean that one is the important but hidden story, whilst the other is the one which will dominate the propaganda of the mainstream.
The next thing has nothing to do with anything of significance except to show that their agents are flung far and wide and know a lot of things about the oblivious proxy rulers, and I say this because though these people are insiders, club members as it were, they are probably not themselves aware of all things. Club member isn't even probably the right term, more likely controlled is probably more accurate a term.
The pig flying out of Camerons pocket has to do with loss of his financial backer whom he failed to appoint to a post, and the pig has a double meaning in that this individual was Cameron's piggy bank and that the pig itself refers to the revelation given about Cameron's college days with club members.
_http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/21/david-cameron-accused-of-sex-act-with-a-dead-pig.html
I would like to have some more discussion on the Economist's Predictions via their covers because I believe that an impending economic collapse is near and this has been communicated to the aware via this magazine for a very long time.
In 1988 the Economist announced there would be a return to a gold standard, or at least this what it looks like to me. In fact Sott.net did a story on this. _https://serbianfbreporter.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/2012.jpg