Why Did Creusot News Delay Covering the #10septembre2025 Mobilization?
Some of you might have wondered why a citizen media outlet like
Creusot News took so long to address the calls for mobilization around #10septembre2025. The truth is, your humble narrator isn’t the type to rush in headfirst. I wanted to dig deeper before discussing it, because while "mobilization" sounds noble, critical questions remain:
What does this mobilization entail? Protests? Civil disobedience?
Who is behind it? Or at least, who claims leadership?
Is it politicized? If so, whose agenda does it serve?
After some research, I’ve answered these questions—and let me spoil it upfront:
this mobilization reeks of suspicion.
First, for those unaware, the call to action is a total consumer boycott. Participants are urged to stop all spending starting September 10 until the Bayrou government resigns (presumably). The idea isn’t bad—unlike the Yellow Vest protests, which faced brutal state repression, a spending boycott is physically risk-free!
Next, the origins. These remain murky, but a website and an X (ex-Twitter) account claim semi-official status. Recently, a Telegram channel (a more secure platform than WhatsApp) was created by the same anonymous author behind the site and X account. So, there’s minimal structure… but led by a total stranger hiding behind anonymity. Are we really supposed to trust a faceless figure? You decide.
Before addressing politicization, let me highlight what makes this movement deeply suspect:
the baffling media benevolence toward it. Major outlets (like
JSL) reported on it neutrally, without criticism. Given the media’s usual subservience to power, it’s bizarre to see them promote a movement aimed at overthrowing the very government they protect! Compare this to the overwhelmingly negative coverage of the Yellow Vests, a genuine grassroots movement years earlier—it’s night and day.
But the suspicion doesn’t end there. The movement claims to be “apolitical” (or “non-partisan”), yet clear left-wing signals abound. First, the use of
inclusive writing—like “folx” instead of “fools”—a hallmark of the left since 2017. The Telegram channel only deepens suspicions: it glorifies tyrants like Stalin and Mao, while comparing the fiscally frustrated #NicolasQuiPaie movement (a middle-class tax revolt) to… Nazis. The more you dig, the clearer the politicization becomes. This is no “apolitical” movement.
Let me be clear: a left-wing alignment isn’t inherently bad. The issue is
denying the politicization. Lying about such a critical detail—especially for a movement targeting an “unjust government”—is ugly. At least, that’s my take as a fed-up citizen.
Feel free to draw your own conclusions. Will
you boycott spending on September 10 (a Wednesday, incidentally)? Share your thoughts below. If you agree with my analysis, hit “like” and share—it helps boost visibility!