The Peoples Trust

Leo40

Jedi Master
Why is Sott.net not reporting on the above issue?

See: http://peoplestrust1776.org/

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.ca/
 
Leo40 said:
Why is Sott.net not reporting on the above issue?

See: http://peoplestrust1776.org/

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.ca/

Hi Leo40. Could you provide the larger picture that gives that linked info more context? I'm no stranger to the concept of Trusts--especially the several common law based types, yet I'm not getting what this is about as you understand it. Thanks.
 
Hi, Buddy:

This is a very complex story. As far as I can discern there was an official UCC filing
in the name of all people which claimed the wealth of the entire globe belongs to the people.
All corporations were forclosed and all assets frozen, this also includes all governments.
On the main website are all the legal documents.

Of course there is no mainstream comment.

It would require a legal expert to validate this filing.
 
Leo40 said:
This is a very complex story. As far as I can discern there was an official UCC filing
in the name of all people which claimed the wealth of the entire globe belongs to the people.
All corporations were forclosed and all assets frozen, this also includes all governments.

Given what we know about the control system, both in terms of 4d STS influence and 3d pathocracy, what do you imagine will happen in this case?
 
This presentation sums it up Basically it is the "Law of one" aprox. 5 min.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=drTbA-S2xhw#!
 
Leo40 said:
Why is Sott.net not reporting on the above issue?

See: http://peoplestrust1776.org/

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.ca/

What's with the accusatory tone Leo40?
 
Today's update from "removing the shackles":

...Both Boehner and Obama have ordered the Media to NOT report on the UCC filings or OPPT. The petition to the Government, that was filed TWICE in the last two days with regards to The People's Trust has been removed both times within hours if it being uploaded. Boehner called a national press conference the other night at 5pm est- he walked up to the podium then walked away for an hour and showed up with a rag tag group of congressmen and women and talked about the budget. Then it was said that he'd be on live TV on CNN at 11pm that same night to make an important announcement..... and never appeared.

These puppets are desperately trying to continue the ruse that they planned to play on the people of the planet... yet they CAN'T. They are in Stalemate. Obama was "sworn in" because they couldn't even sort out THAT part of the issue and were forced to keep playing the role that the public expects to see.

They know what the OPPT filings have done- that they are now officially foreclosed on and powerless. More than that though, is the fact that they don't have the MONEY to move ahead!!
 
Leo40 said:
Today's update from "removing the shackles":

...Both Boehner and Obama have ordered the Media to NOT report on the UCC filings or OPPT. The petition to the Government, that was filed TWICE in the last two days with regards to The People's Trust has been removed both times within hours if it being uploaded. Boehner called a national press conference the other night at 5pm est- he walked up to the podium then walked away for an hour and showed up with a rag tag group of congressmen and women and talked about the budget. Then it was said that he'd be on live TV on CNN at 11pm that same night to make an important announcement..... and never appeared.

These puppets are desperately trying to continue the ruse that they planned to play on the people of the planet... yet they CAN'T. They are in Stalemate. Obama was "sworn in" because they couldn't even sort out THAT part of the issue and were forced to keep playing the role that the public expects to see.

They know what the OPPT filings have done- that they are now officially foreclosed on and powerless. More than that though, is the fact that they don't have the MONEY to move ahead!!

Leo, this is nonsense and you've bought into it, swallowing the bait hook line and sinker. It's the exact same story as the newage ascension nonsense, only for the financial/freedom sector. Same program, different dressing. It's a vector, a distraction and completely and totally irrelevant. You may as well have posted that the Galactic Federation has just freed us from the electromagnetic matrix and positive energy is flowing in right now to ascend everyone in record time, so Obama has twice ordered the mainstream media not to report on it since he's desperately trying to continue the ruse.

The entire global governmental system is fully controlled - there is no magic movement or law suit that is going to fix anything - but they sure do catch a lot of people with this fantasy due to their lack of discernment and wishful thinking. Why is sott.net not covering this? Because it's nonsense.
 
Leo40 said:
Today's update from "removing the shackles":

...Both Boehner and Obama have ordered the Media to NOT report on the UCC filings or OPPT. The petition to the Government, that was filed TWICE in the last two days with regards to The People's Trust has been removed both times within hours if it being uploaded. Boehner called a national press conference the other night at 5pm est- he walked up to the podium then walked away for an hour and showed up with a rag tag group of congressmen and women and talked about the budget. Then it was said that he'd be on live TV on CNN at 11pm that same night to make an important announcement..... and never appeared.

These puppets are desperately trying to continue the ruse that they planned to play on the people of the planet... yet they CAN'T. They are in Stalemate. Obama was "sworn in" because they couldn't even sort out THAT part of the issue and were forced to keep playing the role that the public expects to see.

They know what the OPPT filings have done- that they are now officially foreclosed on and powerless. More than that though, is the fact that they don't have the MONEY to move ahead!!

Leo40, I'm sure you're aware the above editorial doesn't really relate to the stated purposes of this forum. The first paragraph contains a few apparent unconfirmed events or facts that could just as well be unrelated. If they are directly related, they could also be meaningful in some other context. Going strictly by the info you provide, we don't know because of the way you arrange the information. You then interpret these events and conjecture an implied state of desperation related to the political PTB?

Could you provide some evidence that anyone in positions of political power or financial control over the economy would interpret UCC filings as threatening in the same manner you believe them to be? If that were true, it could possibly be useful in some contexts.

FWIW, I am aware that the history of Jurisprudence in the U.S. is said to provide examples of legal cases against defendents that were dismissed in order to prevent public awareness of certain older precedents based on common law and the U.C.C.--precedents established by U.S. Supreme Court rulings currently believed to be still in force due to not having been overturned. If memory serves, one example involves a tax case (Hale vs Henkel) where it was recognized that a government 'official' can be guilty of illegally acting as a "person" while performing his "official" duties and therefore liable to being sued for relief or damages of some sort.

Resulting from the several historical cases that fit the concept I'm talking about is a belief held by some people that the government would do just about anything to keep certain "secrets" out of public view.

I have not tried any of the above. Nor do I necessarily subscribe to any belief or conclusion so derived, but the above stuff does compel me to ask if this is the kind of thing that underpins your reporting of all the above?
 
Buddy said:
Could you provide some evidence that anyone in positions of political power or financial control over the economy would interpret UCC filings as threatening in the same manner you believe them to be? If that were true, it could possibly be useful in some contexts.

I'm also interested in the same question with this OPPT thing. It seems to me that a UCC filing is just a filing, like a proposal, which wouldn't appear to be a direct threat to anyone. There's a bit of new age stuff wrapped up with OPPT as well as knowing about similar fizzled hot air balloons like Nesara, but I read this article and appears more even keeled on the subject than others. _http://wakeup-world.com/2013/02/18/all-corporations-banks-and-governments-lawfully-foreclosed-by-oppt/

It was mentioned there that some real life cases of reprisal (where governments stopped pursuing) can be seen through the work of a guy called Scott Bartle. He basically asked the Australian government arms to prove they were who they say they were and not a corporate entity of the US ( _http://www.truth-now.net/cases.htm ). It seems like you mention Buddy they step back to keep things out of the public eye.

In the end I'm of course interested if this is just wishful thinking on parade or something more substantial. I guess it's the case of wait and see.
 
This one is for Anart:


“the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district’s municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.”

New Hampshire House Bill 638

Bill Title: Recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Track Bill

Status: 2013-03-20 – Laid on Table (Rep Vaillancourt): Motion Adopted Division Vote 275-64; House Journal 27, PG.890
 
Leo40 said:
This one is for Anart:


“the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district’s municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.”

New Hampshire House Bill 638

Bill Title: Recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Track Bill

Status: 2013-03-20 – Laid on Table (Rep Vaillancourt): Motion Adopted Division Vote 275-64; House Journal 27, PG.890

I guess Leo you want to be banned when you show you can't be bothered to convey things properly. Anyhow, I've looked into OPPT a bit more and my opinion is it's very fishy, here's not a bad article that goes into why OPPT is something to be wary of: _http://www.zengardner.com/oppt-or-co-oped-look-before-you-leap/

The legitimacy of some of their claims speak for themselves:
- we foreclosed on all corporations and governments by writing some documents
- without everyone on the planet's consent, we made a trust for all everyone
- we have 6 billion in gold stored for you but you won't get it till your know your value
- don't worry about all your debt payments, just BE and DO, send out our documents, it will be OK
 
Leo40 said:
This one is for Anart:


“the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district’s municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.”

New Hampshire House Bill 638

Bill Title: Recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Track Bill

Status: 2013-03-20 – Laid on Table (Rep Vaillancourt): Motion Adopted Division Vote 275-64; House Journal 27, PG.890

I'm not anart, but I'm curious as to what exactly this means? To who or what is it valuable and how?
 
Buddy said:
Leo40 said:
This one is for Anart:


“the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district’s municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.”

New Hampshire House Bill 638

Bill Title: Recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Track Bill

Status: 2013-03-20 – Laid on Table (Rep Vaillancourt): Motion Adopted Division Vote 275-64; House Journal 27, PG.890

I'm not anart,

Well, we've never been seen in the same room together either... so the jury is still out. ;)

b said:
but I'm curious as to what exactly this means? To who or what is it valuable and how?

Good question. Leo tends to hold onto things for a long time and look for evidence to support his previously accepted conclusions, whether those conclusions are objectively reasonable or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom