The Politics of Climate Change: Green New Deal And Other Madness

In 'Climate Change Reconsidered II - Fossil Fuels' (posted Dec 2018) the arguments are laid out by a host of authors and contributors:

- Lead Authors: Roger Bezdek, Craig D. Idso, David Legates, S. Fred Singer

- Chapter Lead Authors: Dennis Avery, Roger Bezdek, John D. Dunn, Craig D. Idso, David Legates, Christopher Monckton, Patrick Moore, S. Fred Singer, Charles N. Steele, Aaron Stover, Richard L. Stroup Chapter Contributing Authors Jerome Arnett, Jr., John Baden, Timothy Ball, Joseph L. Bast, Charles Battig, Edward Briggs, Barry Brill, Kevin Dayaratna, John D. Dunn, James E. Enstrom, Donald K. Forbes, Patrick Frank, Kenneth Haapala, Howard Hayden, Thomas B. Hayward, Jay Lehr, Bryan Leyland, Steve Milloy, Patrick Moore, Willie Soon, Richard Trzupek, Steve Welcenbach, S. Stanley Youngand

Fred Singer you know, Patric Moore denounced Greenpeace and Ball is ex professor from Winnipeg and many of the others are well known too.

The report is by the NIPCC aka Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (gotta love how they slanted the IPCC's name).

It was published by the THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE who some are familiar with.

The report is 657 pages, so it can be kept as background. http://climatechangereconsidered.or...e-Change-Reconsidered-II-Fossil-Fuels-new.pdf and there are many interesting things and counterpoints to be seen.

It opens with a few quotes from fellow scientists like;

“Rather than coming from a pre-determined politicized position that is typical of the IPCC, the NIPCC constrains itself to the scientific process so as to provide objective information. If we (scientists) are honest, we understand that the study of atmospheric processes/dynamics is in its infancy. Consequently, the work of the NIPCC and its most recent report is very important.”
- Bruce Borders, Professor of Forest Biometrics Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia

“The work of the NIPCC to present the evidence for natural climate warming and climate change is an essential counter-balance to the biased reporting of the IPCC. They have brought to focus a range of peer-reviewed publications showing that natural forces have in the past and continue today to dominate the climate signal.”
- Ian Clark, Department of Earth Sciences University of Ottawa, Canada

to name a few, and congratulations to these scientists who dare to go against the set agenda spanning from the likes of Maurice Strong and his Rockefeller/Rothschild masked Eugenics/Technocratic gangs.

The report is full of individual papers with full citations to scientific work. Here is the abbreviated Table of Content (read the main ToC in the report):

Abbreviated Table of Contents PART I.

FOUNDATIONS
1. Environmental Economics ................................................................................... 35
2. Climate Science .................................................................................................. 107

PART II. BENEFITS OF FOSSIL FUELS Introduction
3. Human Prosperity ............................................................................................... 219
4. Human Health Benefits ....................................................................................... 307
5. Environmental Benefits ...................................................................................... 373

PART III. COSTS OF FOSSIL FUELS Introduction
6. Air Quality............................................................................................................ 471
7. Human Security .................................................................................................. 523
8. Cost-Benefit Analysis ........................................................................................ 597

APPENDIX 1: Acronyms ........................................................................................... 683
APPENDIX 2: Authors, Contributors, and Reviewers .............................................. 687

In therms of the threads title 'Is the Green New Deal a trojan horse for the UN's totalitarian global warming agenda?'

The 'Deal' seems to have been woven in into our current and increasing global fabric by globalists since long ago, and AGW was the vehicle used to hitch their wagon to while having much of the world (and you can see the kids duped by it, let alone their parents) today not realizing the yoke being placed around their necks; welcoming it with glee and conteming anyone pointing it out.


If peeps here caught James Corbett's 'WHY BIG OIL CONQUERED THE WORLD’ Part II/II especially, it follows the threads of the aforementioned Maurice Strong, who was active in my country of birth - and remember him when he was appointed CEO of Petro-Canada, the oil man, while in the background he and his ilk were setting up a parallel oil divestment meme to be replaced with the carbon indexes that are picking peoples pockets clean.

The now departed Strong was instrumental in forming the IPCC, and this is interesting because he used mechanisms within to buffer the messages from the poloticians, scientists and of course the public e.g. after he commissioned 'The Global Management of Resources' document (still a bible) he then created the terms of conditions for the IPPC (this is Dr. Tim Ball talking) and he contrasted it by setting up a second division within called ‘Summary for Policy Makers and Technical Summary’ which he himself wrote (or guided). As Ball noted it was “Independent of the science report” thus everything coming out of the IPCC had to conform to the Policy Maker document or it was not released - in otherwords, make sure your science reports agrees with the Technical Summary report, was what I was getting.

Strong ran Rio 1992 and the rest of the AGW wave has kept coming on strong, no pun intended, to this very day.

 
This children's climate change strike/movement is just immense! James Corbett does an excellent breakdown of it but focuses mostly on the propaganda value of children coming out and marching in such droves - which is definitely not as organic as the bought-and-paid-for shills in the media would have us believe.

 
which is definitely not as organic as the bought-and-paid-for shills in the media would have us believe.

The following article explains why, and seems to connect A LOT of the dots covered here so far.

 
The United Nations 2030 Agenda decoded: It's a blueprint for the global enslavement of humanity under the boot of corporate masters


30099

That article references this UN "2030 Agenda" document that pushes a blueprint for so-called "sustainable development" around the world.

This document describes nothing less than a global government takeover of every nation across the planet. The "goals" of this document are nothing more than code words for a corporate-government fascist agenda that will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the world's most powerful globalist corporations like Monsanto and DuPont.

In the interests of helping wake up humanity, I've decided to translate the 17 points of this 2030 agenda so that readers everywhere can understand what this document is really calling for. To perform this translation, you have to understand how globalists disguise their monopolistic agendas in "feel good" language.

Here's the point-by-point translation. Notice carefully that nowhere does this document state that "achieving human freedom" is one of its goals. Nor does it explain HOW these goals are to be achieved. As you'll see here, every single point in this UN agenda is to be achieved through centralized government control and totalitarian mandates that resemble communism.

Translation of the UN's "2030 Agenda blueprint for globalist government" (controlled by corporate interests)
Nazi-Camp-Prison-Ww2.jpg

Goal 1) End poverty in all its forms everywhere

Translation: Put everyone on government welfare, food stamps, housing subsidies and handouts that make them obedient slaves to global government. Never allow people upward mobility to help themselves. Instead, teach mass victimization and obedience to a government that provides monthly "allowance" money for basic essentials like food and medicine. Label it "ending poverty."

Goal 2) End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture

Translation: Invade the entire planet with GMOs and Monsanto's patented seeds while increasing the use of deadly herbicides under the false claim of "increased output" of food crops. Engineer genetically modified plants to boost specific vitamin chemicals while having no idea of the long-term consequences of genetic pollution or cross-species genetic experiments carried out openly in a fragile ecosystem.

Goal 3) Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

Translation: Mandate 100+ vaccines for all children and adults at gunpoint, threatening parents with arrest and imprisonment if they refuse to cooperate. Push heavy medication use on children and teens while rolling out "screening" programs. Call mass medication "prevention" programs and claim they improve the health of citizens.

Goal 4) Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all

Translation: Push a false history and a dumbed-down education under "Common Core" education standards that produce obedient workers rather than independent thinkers. Never let people learn real history, or else they might realize they don't want to repeat it.

Goal 5) Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

Translation: Criminalize Christianity, marginalize heterosexuality, demonize males and promote the LGBT agenda everywhere. The real goal is never "equality" but rather the marginalization and shaming of anyone who expresses any male characteristics whatsoever. The ultimate goal is to feminize society, creating widespread acceptance of "gentle obedience" along with the self-weakening ideas of communal property and "sharing" everything. Because only male energy has the strength to rise up against oppression and fight for human rights, the suppression of male energy is key to keeping the population in a state of eternal acquiescence.

Goal 6) Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

Translation: Allow powerful corporations to seize control of the world's water supplies and charge monopoly prices to "build new water delivery infrastructure" that "ensures availability."

Goal 7) Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

Translation: Penalize coal, gas and oil while pushing doomed-to-fail "green" energy subsidies to brain-dead startups headed by friends of the White House who all go bankrupt in five years or less. The green startups make for impressive speeches and media coverage, but because these companies are led by corrupt idiots rather than capable entrepreneurs, they always go broke. (And the media hopes you don't remember all the fanfare surrounding their original launch.)

Goal 8) Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all

Translation: Regulate small business out of existence with government-mandated minimum wages that bankrupt entire sectors of the economy. Force employers to meet hiring quotas of LGBT workers while mandating wage tiers under a centrally planned work economy dictated by the government. Destroy free market economics and deny permits and licenses to those companies that don't obey government dictates.

Goal 9) Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation

Translation: Put nations into extreme debt with the World Bank, spending debt money to hire corrupt American corporations to build large-scale infrastructure projects that trap developing nations in an endless spiral of debt. See the book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins to understand the details of how this scheme has been repeated countless times over the last several decades.

Goal 10) Reduce inequality within and among countries

Translation: Punish the rich, the entrepreneurs and the innovators, confiscating nearly all gains by those who choose to work and excel. Redistribute the confiscated wealth to the masses of non-working human parasites that feed off a productive economy while contributing nothing to it... all while screaming about "equality!"

Goal 11) Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

Translation: Ban all gun ownership by private citizens, concentrating guns into the hands of obedient government enforcers who rule over an unarmed, enslaved class of impoverished workers. Criminalize living in most rural areas by instituting Hunger Games-style "protected areas" which the government will claim are owned by "the People" even though no people are allowed to live there. Force all humans into densely packed, tightly controlled cities where they are under 24/7 surveillance and subject to easy manipulation by government.

Goal 12) Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

Translation: Begin levying punitive taxes on the consumption of fossil fuels and electricity, forcing people to live under conditions of worsening standards of living that increasingly resemble Third World conditions. Use social influence campaigns in TV, movies and social media to shame people who use gasoline, water or electricity, establishing a social construct of ninnies and tattlers who rat out their neighbors in exchange for food credit rewards.

Goal 13) Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts

Translation: Set energy consumption quotas on each human being and start punishing or even criminalizing "lifestyle decisions" that exceed energy usage limits set by governments. Institute total surveillance of individuals in order to track and calculate their energy consumption. Penalize private vehicle ownership and force the masses onto public transit, where TSA grunts and facial recognition cameras can monitor and record the movement of every person in society, like a scene ripped right out of Minority Report.

Goal 14) Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development

Translation: Ban most ocean fishing, plunging the food supply into an extreme shortage and causing runaway food price inflation that puts even more people into economic desperation. Criminalize the operation of private fishing vessels and place all ocean fishing operations under the control of government central planning. Only allow favored corporations to conduct ocean fishing operations (and make this decision based entirely on which corporations give the most campaign contributions to corrupt lawmakers).

Goal 15) Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

Translation: Roll out Agenda 21 and force humans off the land and into controlled cities. Criminalize private land ownership, including ranches and agricultural tracts. Tightly control all agriculture through a corporate-corrupted government bureaucracy whose policies are determined almost entirely by Monsanto while being rubber-stamped by the USDA. Ban woodstoves, rainwater collection and home gardening in order to criminalize self-reliance and force total dependence on government.

Goal 16) Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

Translation: Grant legal immunity to illegal aliens and "protected" minority groups, which will be free to engage in any illegal activity -- including openly calling for the mass murder of police officers -- because they are the new protected class in society. "Inclusive institutions" means granting favorable tax structures and government grants to corporations that hire LGBT workers or whatever groups are currently in favor with the central planners in government. Use the IRS and other federal agencies to selectively punish unfavorable groups with punitive audits and regulatory harassment, all while ignoring the criminal activities of favored corporations that are friends of the political elite.

Goal 17) Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

Translation: Enact global trade mandates that override national laws while granting unrestricted imperialism powers to companies like Monsanto, Dow Chemical, RJ Reynolds, Coca-Cola and Merck. Pass global trade pacts that bypass a nation's lawmakers and override intellectual property laws to make sure the world's most powerful corporations maintain total monopolies over drugs, seeds, chemicals and technology. Nullify national laws and demand total global obedience to trade agreements authored by powerful corporations and rubber-stamped by the UN.

Total enslavement of the planet by 2030
As the UN document says, "We commit ourselves to working tirelessly for the full implementation of this Agenda by 2030."

If you read the full document and can read beyond the fluffery and public relations phrases, you'll quickly realize that this UN agenda is going to be forced upon all the citizens of the world through the invocation of government coercion. Nowhere does this document state that the rights of the individual will be protected. Nor does it even acknowledge the existence of human rights granted to individuals by the Creator. Even the so-called "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" utterly denies individuals the right to self defense, the right to medical choice and the right to parental control over their own children.

The UN is planning nothing less than a global government tyranny that enslaves all of humanity while calling the scheme "sustainable development" and "equality."

1984 has finally arrived. And of course it's all being rolled out under the fraudulent label of "progress."
 
They are in their world of illusion. Absolutely and totally unaware of "our world", the world of the "soldier".

They think they know them, but in reality they have no chance. They are so far from the "normal people" that we are literally another "species".

They do not understand that a "soldier" on receiving an order says "to order", but then the "soldier" does what he thinks fit.

In short, they to theirs and we to ours.

Always, always, something can always be done.:cool:
 
Ocean,
What I understand from the UN’s Agenda and also from keeping up with the financial and market news is that there are going to be changes affecting the type of relationship between the Central Banks and Governments. The UN goals are admirable however what might become perhaps unpleasant could be the implementation mechanism. I’m thinking along loans conditions linked to creating and implementing policies related to the Agenda goals, or different types of public / private / social enterprise financing, or public investment schemes into infrastructure that would support the main street economy. The biggest problem is that democratic political enterprises (government and opposition) are very happy to contest and and argument any new required piece of legislation making political governance cumbersome and administration and social and economic development nearly impossible. Not only that, but some countries adhere to the UN goals, some do not and some only selectively do so. Imho, at the moment it is very difficult to actually quantify negative any effects solely produced by the 2030 UN Agenda.
 
Imho, at the moment it is very difficult to actually quantify negative any effects solely produced by the 2030 UN Agenda.

I think you would benefit from reading this thread from the beginning, Ina. Agenda 21 - now called Agenda 2030 - appears to be a comprehensive and across-the-board economic, political, and cultural re-structuring of the Western world that is solely based on lies - and with "solutions" offered that will clearly worsen the problems the presented policies are supposed to alleviate. The following is an excellent article that summarizes a lot of what's been posted here as well.

 
Ennio,
I truly appreciated the article. I live in South Africa and the carbon tax will be brought up as legislation by the new parliament after the elections. That financial aspect is the only one that will affect directly the non-western society down here. Apart from that, I would like for the moment, to sustain my opinion, personal that is.
 
Of course, Ina. You can sustain your opinion, and keep it personal if that's what you wish. Its just that (as you might imagine!) for some of us following this story there seems to be very little to no upside given the information we have so far. So, if someone such as yourself sees how this UN policy plan does have a beneficial or constructive part to it, one would naturally want to know what it may be. And this is a forum for learning after all.
 
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, now wants to ban petrol- and diesel-driven cars:

Amsterdam brings in 'bizarre' plan to ban all but electric cars by 2030 - DutchNews.nl

The Green Deal is also marching on over here. Farmland is now used for solar panels and people will most likely be forced to spend thousands of euros on new heating equipment because the government wants to get rid of gas (heating systems). However, 'sustainable' fuel prices are still tied to gas and oil prices (at least that applies to wood chips), which means that no matter how well your house is insulated heating costs are still rising and you can't really win by saving energy because of all these flat rates that these new so-called sustainable energy companies charge. It really ticks me off. :curse:

Interestingly, all this coincides with court-cases against oil giant Shell.
 
A press release from the UN may reflect on future policies along the same lines as Agenda 21: Media Release: Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’; Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’ | IPBES
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)
Media Release
(Cliquez ici pour le texte en Français)
  • Summary for Policymakers, photos, ‘B-roll’, other media resources: bit.ly/IPBESReport
  • Media launch webcast live from #IPBES7 (Paris, France): bit.ly/IPBESWebcast starts at 1p.m. (Paris time – CEST) / 7 a.m. (US EDT) / noon (London – BST)
  • For interviews: media@ipbes.net or French: +33 62520-0281 English: +1-416-878-8712 or +1- 415-290-5516 or +49- 176-2538-2223 (After 7 May: +49-152-3830-0667
Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’
Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’
Current global response insufficient;
‘Transformative changes’ needed to restore and protect nature;
Opposition from vested interests can be overcome for public good
Most comprehensive assessment of its kind;
1,000,000 species threatened with extinction
Nature is declining globally at rates unprecedented in human history — and the rate of species extinctions is accelerating, with grave impacts on people around the world now likely, warns a landmark new report from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), the summary of which was approved at the 7th session of the IPBES Plenary, meeting last week (29 April – 4 May) in Paris.

“The overwhelming evidence of the IPBES Global Assessment, from a wide range of different fields of knowledge, presents an ominous picture,” said IPBES Chair, Sir Robert Watson. “The health of ecosystems on which we and all other species depend is deteriorating more rapidly than ever. We are eroding the very foundations of our economies, livelihoods, food security, health and quality of life worldwide.”

“The Report also tells us that it is not too late to make a difference, but only if we start now at every level from local to global,” he said. “Through ‘transformative change’, nature can still be conserved, restored and used sustainably – this is also key to meeting most other global goals. By transformative change, we mean a fundamental, system-wide reorganization across technological, economic and social factors, including paradigms, goals and values.”

“The member States of IPBES Plenary have now acknowledged that, by its very nature, transformative change can expect opposition from those with interests vested in the status quo, but also that such opposition can be overcome for the broader public good,” Watson said.[...]
BTW interesting this took place in Paris, in France in consideration of how Macron's Government has responded to the Yellow Vests.
 
Australia would like to introduce an insane climate policy, and PM-hopeful Bill Shorten has avoided the question (asked by the media 69+ times) of how much his plan would cost Australian taxpayers. They have a goal of half of the cars on the road being electric by 2030, but claim that they aren't going to force it, they'll just use encourage it with things like tax breaks and subsidies.

Meanwhile they're in the process of closing down the 6 remaining coal fire plants, while China is currently building over 1,000 more.
 
Back
Top Bottom