The Pyramid Code
- Thread starter pinkredpurple
- Start date
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
----------------spoiler alert----------------------
I was intrigued by the discussion of humans formerly having 360 senses as opposed to our current 5 along with the visual graphic of the human encased by a grid that surrounded the body up and down and then continuing into a sphere shape (like a magnetic field?) surrounding the body as well. It really made me think that it could be a description of 4D perception - being able to "see" in 360 degrees and such. Also, the definition of Paleochristianity kept coming to mind - the knowledge of realms all humans knew before the "fall". Additionally, the "wave" line undulating between the golden ages with the inevitable "fall" into the iron (dark) ages was rather interesting as well. The possibility that the pyramids at Giza, when they were fully activated and functional, produced energetic fields enabling access to higher consciousness on a global basis is certainly something I wasn't expecting to discover.
----------------spoiler alert----------------------
I was intrigued by the discussion of humans formerly having 360 senses as opposed to our current 5 along with the visual graphic of the human encased by a grid that surrounded the body up and down and then continuing into a sphere shape (like a magnetic field?) surrounding the body as well. It really made me think that it could be a description of 4D perception - being able to "see" in 360 degrees and such. Also, the definition of Paleochristianity kept coming to mind - the knowledge of realms all humans knew before the "fall". Additionally, the "wave" line undulating between the golden ages with the inevitable "fall" into the iron (dark) ages was rather interesting as well. The possibility that the pyramids at Giza, when they were fully activated and functional, produced energetic fields enabling access to higher consciousness on a global basis is certainly something I wasn't expecting to discover.
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
Actually I first understood that the main topic of the documentary was that the positions and the materials used can suggest some sort of domestication of telluric electric fields to produce and store energy. However, i didn't undestand how they jumped into "spiritual" stuff from that basis.
Actually I first understood that the main topic of the documentary was that the positions and the materials used can suggest some sort of domestication of telluric electric fields to produce and store energy. However, i didn't undestand how they jumped into "spiritual" stuff from that basis.
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
Yes this review was proper for this series being viewed.
So finished the series and throughout could not help but layer what was recalled during reading of TSHotW and multiple C transcripts.
Interesting theory discussion on aquifers, water use and electrical conduction and insulation of stones etc. including the use of sound waves. Also some nice video of the stones, rock and inscriptions in the series.
The series seemed to built to the usual N/age crescendo of 2012 where we suddenly ascend out of the D/age becoming once again enlightened; or so some seemed to suggest, but other just don't know. There were references to earth upheavals but generally nothing to suggest how often and how fast. Localized, the Nile was depicted as moving away (8km.) from the pyramids slowly and desertification to the east was slow too; not so sure about this.
It seems this subject is the one that the control systems will forever have their hands; little probable truths layered with subjective and disinformation - can one ever get to the bottom of this deteriorating, perhaps stolen and hidden archeological riddle? Of the control system, this seems necessary if for no other reason than to bolster their religious belief systems which the Egyptian message is enmeshed and well utilized, osis.
The older Egyptian in the series gave a line that was made note of;
Navigator said:
Yes this review was proper for this series being viewed.
So finished the series and throughout could not help but layer what was recalled during reading of TSHotW and multiple C transcripts.
Interesting theory discussion on aquifers, water use and electrical conduction and insulation of stones etc. including the use of sound waves. Also some nice video of the stones, rock and inscriptions in the series.
The series seemed to built to the usual N/age crescendo of 2012 where we suddenly ascend out of the D/age becoming once again enlightened; or so some seemed to suggest, but other just don't know. There were references to earth upheavals but generally nothing to suggest how often and how fast. Localized, the Nile was depicted as moving away (8km.) from the pyramids slowly and desertification to the east was slow too; not so sure about this.
It seems this subject is the one that the control systems will forever have their hands; little probable truths layered with subjective and disinformation - can one ever get to the bottom of this deteriorating, perhaps stolen and hidden archeological riddle? Of the control system, this seems necessary if for no other reason than to bolster their religious belief systems which the Egyptian message is enmeshed and well utilized, osis.
The older Egyptian in the series gave a line that was made note of;
This was in reference to the weighing of hearts and the patriarchal priests takeover of this task; rather apt in our time in the hear and now - some things never change.
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
Yes, I was disappointed in this after all the early enthusiasm. It's weird. On the one hand, they diss the mainstream for their interpretations, and then they turn around and put just as whacky wishful thinking interpretations on everything only from a New Age point of view. And what do both views have in common? That it was "religion" that drove the ancients to do whatever they did. Doesn't it ever occur to them that a highly technological society that could produce the pyramids might have had technological interests/perspectives?
There's such a disconnect between what they are claiming for the ancients in terms of abilities and how they see the minds/concerns of the ancients.
Weird.
Yes, I was disappointed in this after all the early enthusiasm. It's weird. On the one hand, they diss the mainstream for their interpretations, and then they turn around and put just as whacky wishful thinking interpretations on everything only from a New Age point of view. And what do both views have in common? That it was "religion" that drove the ancients to do whatever they did. Doesn't it ever occur to them that a highly technological society that could produce the pyramids might have had technological interests/perspectives?
There's such a disconnect between what they are claiming for the ancients in terms of abilities and how they see the minds/concerns of the ancients.
Weird.
StrangeCaptain
Jedi Council Member
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
Honestly, I got so bored with this documentary that I could not get past 15 parts or so. I am a little embarassed about having negative opinions, so I did not write anything.
For one thing, the idea of cycles is not in and of itself novel. Mainstream scientists have been acquainted with this idea for a long time, but for various reasons that others can discuss better then me, the idea that these cycles are gentle and uniform has dominated science. There is a massive amount of evidence that some of these cycles are sudden and catastrophic. The documentary does not really discuss at all this distinction that I noticed. And as a side note... This is is certainly a point of departure from official science for a serious truth seeker because it is indicative of the schizoid, maybe I should say ponerized, nature of modern culture that there can be this massive body of evidence of the catastophic nature of geological history that is just simply ignored or even suppressed.
There were these odd little contradictions too that would occur within like 2 minutes of each other that bothered me. For example, they made a big deal out of saying that we can not understand the Egyptians if we are thinking about them with our own ideas of how religion and science should look, but then the next few minutes are spent talking about ancient Egyptian spiritual beliefs through the lens of what seemed to be new age philosophy. Somewhere in this section they state that the ancient Egyptians had a matriarchal society and that in such a society the genders would be equal, then within 2-5 minutes, they state that women had a higher status in ancient Egypt according to artwork and the like. This implies either their ideas of a practical matriarchy are wrong or their conclusions about the Egyptians are wrong.
Another example of mistranslating egyptian artwork because of our own ideas of science is the depiction of an airplane and a helicopter in the egyptian relief sculptures. Why would a science that is so radically different from ours as to create the pyramids in the first place create airplanes and helicopters that would be recognizable as such to us? Sure... Aerodynamics would be the same for them as us, but maybe they had different ways of satisfying the role that these tools satisfy.
I did think the discussion of the underground waterways and their possible connection to the functions of the pyramids was pretty interesting. I thought it was a nice lateral confirmation of the work by that English guy who experimented heavily with pendulums. Man... I can't remember his name, but Laura has referenced him a few times. Anybody know who I am talking about?
An interesting thing was the mention of the 3 pharaohs who were scratched out of history. Maybe this wave of Egyptians had their own Kennedys!
Another thing that bugged me was how everybody in the documentary was just kind of lumped together as if everybody referenced had ideas of the same worth. We have a geologist who says that the water erosion marks on the sphinx tell a very different story about its age. We get maybe 30 seconds of him. THAT would be interesting to hear a little more about. Then we get tons of commentary from the Egyptian guy who makes no effort to express which of his ideas are lore passed to him directly from the elders of his tribe, which are ideas picked up from his training as an archaeologist, and which are ideas that represent a fusion of the two. On top of this, they mention Schwaller de Lubicz. For more on him... http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/schwaller_de_lubicz_1.htm
Plus, Laura uses the idea in her work that the people who built the pyramids were not the same as the people who lived there later but are called the ancient Egyptians. If this is true, it is another thing that changes everything about trying to figure out the mysteries of the pyramids.
I think I am going to shut up now. For me, if I am going to define what it was like to read SHOTW as mind-blowing, then this documentary was really not that for me. However, it might be a decent introduction to some segment of the population to the idea that history is radically different from what popular culture believes it to be.
Honestly, I got so bored with this documentary that I could not get past 15 parts or so. I am a little embarassed about having negative opinions, so I did not write anything.
For one thing, the idea of cycles is not in and of itself novel. Mainstream scientists have been acquainted with this idea for a long time, but for various reasons that others can discuss better then me, the idea that these cycles are gentle and uniform has dominated science. There is a massive amount of evidence that some of these cycles are sudden and catastrophic. The documentary does not really discuss at all this distinction that I noticed. And as a side note... This is is certainly a point of departure from official science for a serious truth seeker because it is indicative of the schizoid, maybe I should say ponerized, nature of modern culture that there can be this massive body of evidence of the catastophic nature of geological history that is just simply ignored or even suppressed.
There were these odd little contradictions too that would occur within like 2 minutes of each other that bothered me. For example, they made a big deal out of saying that we can not understand the Egyptians if we are thinking about them with our own ideas of how religion and science should look, but then the next few minutes are spent talking about ancient Egyptian spiritual beliefs through the lens of what seemed to be new age philosophy. Somewhere in this section they state that the ancient Egyptians had a matriarchal society and that in such a society the genders would be equal, then within 2-5 minutes, they state that women had a higher status in ancient Egypt according to artwork and the like. This implies either their ideas of a practical matriarchy are wrong or their conclusions about the Egyptians are wrong.
Another example of mistranslating egyptian artwork because of our own ideas of science is the depiction of an airplane and a helicopter in the egyptian relief sculptures. Why would a science that is so radically different from ours as to create the pyramids in the first place create airplanes and helicopters that would be recognizable as such to us? Sure... Aerodynamics would be the same for them as us, but maybe they had different ways of satisfying the role that these tools satisfy.
I did think the discussion of the underground waterways and their possible connection to the functions of the pyramids was pretty interesting. I thought it was a nice lateral confirmation of the work by that English guy who experimented heavily with pendulums. Man... I can't remember his name, but Laura has referenced him a few times. Anybody know who I am talking about?
An interesting thing was the mention of the 3 pharaohs who were scratched out of history. Maybe this wave of Egyptians had their own Kennedys!
Another thing that bugged me was how everybody in the documentary was just kind of lumped together as if everybody referenced had ideas of the same worth. We have a geologist who says that the water erosion marks on the sphinx tell a very different story about its age. We get maybe 30 seconds of him. THAT would be interesting to hear a little more about. Then we get tons of commentary from the Egyptian guy who makes no effort to express which of his ideas are lore passed to him directly from the elders of his tribe, which are ideas picked up from his training as an archaeologist, and which are ideas that represent a fusion of the two. On top of this, they mention Schwaller de Lubicz. For more on him... http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/schwaller_de_lubicz_1.htm
Plus, Laura uses the idea in her work that the people who built the pyramids were not the same as the people who lived there later but are called the ancient Egyptians. If this is true, it is another thing that changes everything about trying to figure out the mysteries of the pyramids.
I think I am going to shut up now. For me, if I am going to define what it was like to read SHOTW as mind-blowing, then this documentary was really not that for me. However, it might be a decent introduction to some segment of the population to the idea that history is radically different from what popular culture believes it to be.
Iconoclast
Jedi Master
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
i think you are referring to T.C. Lethbridge
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Charles_Lethbridge
Patience said:
i think you are referring to T.C. Lethbridge
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Charles_Lethbridge
StrangeCaptain
Jedi Council Member
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
That's it. Thanks.
Iconoclast said:
That's it. Thanks.
durabone
Jedi Council Member
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
Hey what about the idea of a conducting inner stone with a more insulating outer stone casing on the Great Pyramid (& others)? This film is the first I'd heard of it. The cap stone itself may have been a conductor, or magnet, etc. I'm after any other references to these ideas, but they are not in any of the books I have. Anyone know anything more? Thanks!
Hey what about the idea of a conducting inner stone with a more insulating outer stone casing on the Great Pyramid (& others)? This film is the first I'd heard of it. The cap stone itself may have been a conductor, or magnet, etc. I'm after any other references to these ideas, but they are not in any of the books I have. Anyone know anything more? Thanks!
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
Watching the documentary reminded of the transcripts mentioning crystals in Atlantean pyramids, then I wondered if the cap stone might not be a crystal? That's a mere hypothesis however.
Potamus said:
Watching the documentary reminded of the transcripts mentioning crystals in Atlantean pyramids, then I wondered if the cap stone might not be a crystal? That's a mere hypothesis however.
cholas
Dagobah Resident
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
My thoughts after 13 or so run parallel to Patience's review. It became increasingly difficult to watch.
Another questionable aspect had to do with their rather new-agey take on Nefertiti/Akhenaten. That they wrangled power away from the priests and restored it to the people. It seems like in many new age circles, this couple is thought of in a very positive light.
My thoughts after 13 or so run parallel to Patience's review. It became increasingly difficult to watch.
Another questionable aspect had to do with their rather new-agey take on Nefertiti/Akhenaten. That they wrangled power away from the priests and restored it to the people. It seems like in many new age circles, this couple is thought of in a very positive light.
clerck de bonk
Dagobah Resident
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
I think the makers of this "documentary" have done the same thing to Christopher Dunn as was done to Laura by Vincent et al.
Meaning; take a sound theory(somebody else's of course) and proclaim it your own, while skewing it or as in this case dumbing it down and muddling it.
--http://www.gizapower.com/
His book is something to recommend, osit.
edit
...Had to check his book(The Giza power plant; technologies of ancient Egypt, ISBN 1-879181-50-9) again and yes it is really something to recommend even for someone like Laura(with precious little time). He is very thorough, imo.
I think the makers of this "documentary" have done the same thing to Christopher Dunn as was done to Laura by Vincent et al.
Meaning; take a sound theory(somebody else's of course) and proclaim it your own, while skewing it or as in this case dumbing it down and muddling it.
--http://www.gizapower.com/
His book is something to recommend, osit.
edit
...Had to check his book(The Giza power plant; technologies of ancient Egypt, ISBN 1-879181-50-9) again and yes it is really something to recommend even for someone like Laura(with precious little time). He is very thorough, imo.
durabone
Jedi Council Member
Re: mind blowing documentary about ancient egypt
Thanks clerck for the lead!
I woke up this AM with images of this electric current in the Nile inducing currents in the pyramid, so I tried to connect the dots for a couple of hours, found the Russian Physicist who amplifies the idea, read his stuff.
Dissolving salts in water does not generally produce a net electrical charge, and I can't easily envision how passing salted water through the Earth's magnetic field would cause a river to generate a net magnetic field like current in a conductor.
It is possible I guess, but if commonplace, then rivers would tip compass needles in proportion to current density etc., and this would be perhaps a common effect seen in water navigation. Apparently, we don't.
Could the water molecules line up and produce a net dipole moment? Again my guess: Maybe. Does the Nile tip a compass today?
Let's propose for a moment, yes. The river carries an electrical current, and like a wire, the mag field circles the axis of the river. Then the mag flux is either out of the ground up into the pyramid or vice versa, depending on the direction of current flow.
And it is at more of an angle back toward the river as one increases height, because the river is below ground level and the pyramid above.
If one the buys the argument that relativistic curvature is less at the apex of the pyramid than at the base, producing a steady state electric field gradient inside the pyramid, the resultant current flow inside the pyramid then might be a spiral with a vertical axis. But that is only a qualitative guess on top of un-verifiability.
Interestingly I also picked up Edgar Cayce's book on Atlantis this AM for unrelated reasons, and the passage it flipped open to was about the Atlantean's purported use of conductive stones in their power generation facility. I'm slowly getting accustomed to these odd little coincidences!
This documentary despite some excellent imagery and ideas and hard work does not close well. Sometimes I think that the"Loose Change" guys have it right. Keep the production staff active after the release so that at least one revision is planned for - to incorporate what is fast becoming more highly informed vlewer feedback.
Thanks clerck for the lead!
I woke up this AM with images of this electric current in the Nile inducing currents in the pyramid, so I tried to connect the dots for a couple of hours, found the Russian Physicist who amplifies the idea, read his stuff.
Dissolving salts in water does not generally produce a net electrical charge, and I can't easily envision how passing salted water through the Earth's magnetic field would cause a river to generate a net magnetic field like current in a conductor.
It is possible I guess, but if commonplace, then rivers would tip compass needles in proportion to current density etc., and this would be perhaps a common effect seen in water navigation. Apparently, we don't.
Could the water molecules line up and produce a net dipole moment? Again my guess: Maybe. Does the Nile tip a compass today?
Let's propose for a moment, yes. The river carries an electrical current, and like a wire, the mag field circles the axis of the river. Then the mag flux is either out of the ground up into the pyramid or vice versa, depending on the direction of current flow.
And it is at more of an angle back toward the river as one increases height, because the river is below ground level and the pyramid above.
If one the buys the argument that relativistic curvature is less at the apex of the pyramid than at the base, producing a steady state electric field gradient inside the pyramid, the resultant current flow inside the pyramid then might be a spiral with a vertical axis. But that is only a qualitative guess on top of un-verifiability.
Interestingly I also picked up Edgar Cayce's book on Atlantis this AM for unrelated reasons, and the passage it flipped open to was about the Atlantean's purported use of conductive stones in their power generation facility. I'm slowly getting accustomed to these odd little coincidences!
This documentary despite some excellent imagery and ideas and hard work does not close well. Sometimes I think that the"Loose Change" guys have it right. Keep the production staff active after the release so that at least one revision is planned for - to incorporate what is fast becoming more highly informed vlewer feedback.
I just finished watching The Pyramid Code which is divided into 5 episodes on Youtube. I found it to be very interesting. According to this documentary the ancients, be they Egyptians or not, who lived in that area, were very knowledgeable about the matriarchal society/feminine principle. They were very spiritual and knew the possibility of accessing spiritual/higher realms, as if they were dong 'the work'. I found it interesting that one of the ways they accessed these higher energies is through the use of rythmic dances.
The hieroglyphs contain several layers of meanings, just as some of the more modern writers have hidden meanings in their writings (e.g., Fulcanelli). Much of this spiritual work is hidden within these older hieroglyphs. Over time, as the society converted to a patriarchal society, the priests gained control and their lust for power and control caused them to bury this ancient information.
The history included was very enlightening to me. It was not tainted (too much) by the "established" Egyptology of present day history psychopaths and their minions. At least this is my opinion for what it is worth, and would like to hear any other opinions on these documentaries.
The hieroglyphs contain several layers of meanings, just as some of the more modern writers have hidden meanings in their writings (e.g., Fulcanelli). Much of this spiritual work is hidden within these older hieroglyphs. Over time, as the society converted to a patriarchal society, the priests gained control and their lust for power and control caused them to bury this ancient information.
The history included was very enlightening to me. It was not tainted (too much) by the "established" Egyptology of present day history psychopaths and their minions. At least this is my opinion for what it is worth, and would like to hear any other opinions on these documentaries.
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
Thread 'Chinese actor murdered sparks nationwide online outrage - CCP goes full censorship'- meadow_wind
Replies: 36
