wanderer33 said:
Now, if this had happened to someone else, and they described what happened, I'd be highly skeptical, I always am skeptical and logical when examining other people's experiences. When it happens to me, I try to contextualise it, if I can't, I just leave it with no explanation. Open.
I'm sure this is going to cause a stir.
Well, you won't get a stir from the folks here because many of them have experienced such events - and more. We used to joke that we have to raise the bizarre bar every so often because high strangeness just keeps upping the ante.
The case you describe is familiar to me. It generally results from a gap in awareness. Your "blind spot in the mind," i.e. "wishful thinking" about this woman left you open to attack. I would also suggest that what is contained in this paragraph is a little problematical:
This will really lift a few lids...about 18 months ago after my third vision, which I have never described to date, I was meditating/praying at a place where the ocean meets volcanic rock, I am intuitively led to believe this is a good place to commune. Well, I had finished this communion and was walking toward a cafe, about 200m away as I'd planned to meet a friend with whom I was in a relationship. I had, after the vision some days before, declared in prayer, or meditation, or whatever you want to call it, that I would fully engage with the light and never ever allow the darkness to take me. After I'd done this, I had a feeling of foreboding, like I'd angered something or someone....big. I let it ride, but it was in the back of my mind.
Let me break it down and explain:
>>about 18 months ago after my third vision, which I have never described to date,<<
First, "where was the vision from?" would be a good question to ask. I have dealt with several individuals who have had visions that were generated from STS sources for the express purpose of misleading.
>> I was meditating/praying at a place where the ocean meets volcanic rock, I am intuitively led to believe this is a good place to commune. <<<
The events that transpired after this meditation would give me pause to consider as to whether or not this was a positive intuition or you were led there to make you vulnerable. However, it's not what happens to us but what we do with it that really matters. If you decide, upon deeper reflection, that you were being "toyed" with, and learn to be more perspicacious, then the attempt has failed and you have overcome.
>> I had, after the vision some days before, declared in prayer, or meditation, or whatever you want to call it, that I would fully engage with the light and never ever allow the darkness to take me. <<
Ummm... well, excuse me but this is like waving a red flag at a bull. It is also loaded with hubris toward the Universe. Remember, the Universe blinks neither at the dark nor the light and it definitely has a tendency to make us eat our words when we assume that we can see "as God sees" and make such declarations. Let me just put it this way: I've made such declarations and have learned the hard way that one does not engage in a staring contest with the Universe or those forces greater than I am... it's a contest that mere mortals cannot win.
>>After I'd done this, I had a feeling of foreboding, like I'd angered something or someone....big. I let it ride, but it was in the back of my mind. <<
At this point, it seems that instinctive awareness was trying to get through but you "let it ride." You should have taken your words back immediately and said something like "I want TRUTH and I will try with all my might if the Universe sees fit to grant that to me." And then you could have resolved to do whatever possible to learn what Truth was. Here, in this statement, you have assumed that you know and for some reason, the Universe reacts to such assumptions in rather unpleasant ways.
Remember, "dark" and "light" are relative terms. Some clever STS entity can be convinced that it is bringing you "light" and since "light" is what you asked for, that it is not violating your free will (if it is even concerned about that.) Also remember this:
Cs 19 July 97 said:
Q: ... In a previous
session I asked a question about the 'sons of Belial' and
the 'sons of the law of One,' as explicated by Edgar
Cayce, and whether these were philosophical or racial
divisions. You said that they were initially racial, and
then philosophical and religious. Now, from putting the
information about religions together throughout the
centuries, I am coming to a rather difficult realization
that the whole monotheistic idea, which is obviously the
basic concept of the 'sons of the law of One,' is the most
clever and devious and cunning means of control I have
ever encountered in my life. No matter where it comes
from, the religionists say "we have the ONE god, WE are
his agents, you pay us your money, and we'll tell him to
be nice to you in the next world!"
A: Clever if one is deceived. Silly truffle if one is not.
Q: Well, I know! But, uncovering this decption, this lie
that the 'power' is 'out there' is unbelievable. So, the
Kantekkians were the 'Sons of Belial,' which is not the
negative thing that I interpreted it as at the time. So,
the 'Sons of the Law of One,' was perverted to the
monotheistic Judaism, which then was then transformed into
the Christian religious mythos, and has been an ongoing
theme since Atlantean times.
A: Woven of those who portray the lights.
Q: And that is always the way it has been. They appear as
'angels of light.' And, essentially, everything in
history has been rewritten by this group.
A: Under the influence of others. And whom do you suppose?
Q: Well, the Orion STS.
A: Sending pillars of light and chariots of fire to deliver
the message.
So, as you can see, (and here I do not intend to be insulting, I just want you to be aware), making ignorant declarations about light and dark, and meddling in the affairs of dragons without proper preparation, can get one eaten... with catsup.
As to what followed, as I said, it all strikes me as vulnerability due to lack of awareness as well as some level of invitation. The man in black is a bit worrisome too, as whether or not he was real in 3D terms, he seems to symbolize the proximity of "dark forces". We even jokingly refer to them (following Marciniak) as "dark tee shirts."
The blow to the head is definitely NOT a psycho-kinetic warning to the self but rather a consequence of the gap in awareness.