The United Kingdom has gotten this bad. Truly sickening.

[Ruth]

I’m 15min into the interview and I like it already so I thought I’d share it.

Short description by AI:
The video features former British MP Andrew Bridgen discussing alleged systemic corruption, child trafficking, satanism references, and abuse cover-ups. In the interview, he claims that cases of child trafficking and abuse were suppressed or ignored by UK authorities, including the police and intelligence services, despite detailed information being provided. He talks about intimidation of whistleblowers and suggests that powerful networks protect those involved, tying it into broader claims of corruption and abuse of power.

Let's not forget that it's not just Britain, but the whole world, more importantly world superpowers now.

 

[SOTTREADER]

...funded by.... millionaires/ billionaires... of the US kind... who are pro-zio... need one say more.

 

[Ruth]

...funded by.... millionaires/ billionaires... of the US kind... who are pro-zio... need one say more.

The "why" of it is because he spreads anti-muslim sentiment. That is specifically something the zionists are interested in.

 

[Ant22]

You may have seen the news elsewhere but I thought I'd mention it here in the context of the state of the UK police force. Barron Trump has recently called the 999 police emergency line as a female friend of his was being beat up. Here's the transcript:

Operator: "City of London Police, how can I help you?"
Barron: "Oh I'm calling from the US, uh I just got a call from a girl, you know, she's getting beat up. The address is (redacted).
Operator: "Yeah."
Barron: "(Redacted). This was happening about eight minutes ago. I just figured out how to, how to call someone. Uh, uh it's really an emergency."
Operator: "What's her name?"
Barron: "Her name is (redacted)."
Operator: "Her date of birth?"
Barron: "She's (inaudible), she's (inaudible), it's really an emergency please."
Operator: "Yeah I know, what's her age?"
Barron: "(Redacted)."
Operator: "(Redacted) how do you know her?"
Barron: "I mean these details don't matter, she's getting beat up like I-"
Operator: "Yeah I know but I need to take information from you, so how have you come by this information?"
Barron: "Uh I got a call from her with a guy beating her up."
Operator: "Okay how do you know her?"
Barron: "I don't think these details matter she's getting beat up but okay fine, also I met her on social media, I don't think that matters."
Operator: "You know I can-"
Barron: "She's getting beat up."
Operator: "Can you stop being rude and actually answer my questions. If you want to help the person, you'll answer my questions clearly and precisely, thank you. So how do you know her?"
Barron: "I met her on social media."
Operator: "OK."
Operator: "Know the partner's name or the person that's beating her up at all?"
Barron: "No."
Operator: "And they're at home, they're not out into the street?"
Barron: "Yes, correct."
Barron: "She's getting really badly beat up and the call was about eight minutes ago, I don't know what could have happened by now."
Operator: "OK."
Barron: "So, sorry for being rude."
Operator: "(Inaudible)".
Barron: "(Inaudible)."
Barron: "For a reason I don't know (inaudible)."
Operator: "You saw a video on social media, what like a video call?"
Barron: "No, No, I (inaudible) a video call."

You can read about the case here: Barron Trump's full call with London 999 operator who told him 'stop being rude'

What caught my attention is how weird the operator's attitude was. Instead of dispatching a car immediately they repeatedly asked how young Trump knew this person, her date of birth, age, etc. I get that they probably get hoax calls and need to filter them out somehow but dang, surely they can work out the age from the date of birth to save time? And how he met that girl surely wasn't a factor determining whether she deserves to be helped.

And there's this accusation of being rude. To me, Barron was impatient rather than rude, and it's quite difficult to be be calm and collected when reporting a crime like that.

This resonates with my own experience of the police in the UK. God forbid you raise your voice to convey urgency even slightly and you get a lecture about your manners. I even wonder if their training tells them to disregard a report of a crime if it's delivered in the wrong tone of voice.

In this Facebook post about the case people reported similar experiences, for example:

Called the police about a possible intruder at my home, in the middle of a 999 call they asked me if I owned the house or rented it. Before they asked me the description of the person or why I was alarmed

Also on his side, I think some of the questions the operators ask are unnecessary. I lived abroad and had to call once when I was back here on holiday. A woman was acting erratically and running into traffic. They were asking me all kinds of questions about myself and demanding to know why I didn't have a UK number or a UK address, no idea why that was relevant in an emergency?

Dunno, this process is pretty strange to me. Maybe because in my head I contrast it with my experience with the 999 operator in Poland when they dispatched a car as soon as they had the details and address but asked me to stay on the line and answer additional questions. I was shaken up and probably sounded overly panicky but their attitude was calming rather than judgemental of my tone of voice.

And it doesn't seem to me like it has always been the case in the UK either. When I first arrived in London with a friend nearly 17 years ago we ended up in a really strange place that didn't look like a residential apartment we booked online. I called the police as soon as we noticed the door was closed and the person on the other side of the line guided us on how to get out with a calm and reassuring, yet decisive voice. And she confirmed a car was dispatched as soon as I gave her the address. No additional questions were asked, just: "a police car is on the way, stay on the line and let's see if we can get you girls out of there before they arrive. If not, they'll be with you in under 10 minutes, so don't worry, you'll be fine." She did take my details in case the call was disconnected, that's all.

I guess when you spend your days chasing people for "offensive" social media posts that oppose genocide it's easy to think that anything less than a peaceful voice is rude.

 

[Huila]

A Walk Through London, UK and at the public placement of Live Facial Recognition Systems.

The Live Facial Recognition (LFR) system is marketed as a way to combat crime. Facewatch a UK-based facial recognition security system is used by retailers and businesses to prevent theft, violence, and anti-social behaviour. When in places signed up to the FaceWatch program (they often proudly advertise a notice leaflets/ posters before you enter their premises); one can ask for a data subject access request. If they don't give it to you, you may sue for the removal of your property without consent.

FaceWatch poster informing you that Facial Recognition is Operational - to protect employees, customers and stock. "Our legal basis for processing your data is our legitmate interest and the substantial public interest of preventing and detecting crime." - such a poster will read.

"When they rolled out Live Facial Recognition (LFR), they crafted a PR campaign to go along with it. They say that they have a Watch List and the camera extracts a Biometric Signature from your face, which it compares with the Watch List to see if you need to be kidnapped and thrown in a cell. But don't worry, if you're not on the list, the system forgets you instantly in the blink of an eye, like nothing ever happened. You didn't feel their fingers forcing their way into your pockets. So, what's the problem? But whether the checking of papers is done physically or by an AI machine blinking at you for a split second, the moral framework is actually the same. It's not a moral activity. If it were, people would actually enjoy it, but they don't."

FaceWatch:- the Facial Recognition System used in high street shops. Also known as a BCRP- Business Crime Reduction Partnership. If you subscribe to FaceWatch, they'll send somebody to help improve your lighting and to advise you on the best way to position your CCTV cameras to capture excellent Biometric Data. They use your existing cameras and FaceWatch does provide an AI Black Box to plug your CCTV into. Facewatch doesn't actually record any video. They process the video locally inside their black box and they only transmit any Biometric Signatures that they have discovered. The FaceWatch Cloud has a Subject of Interest List which is shared amongst other shops within a certain geographical area. If they suspect somebody of theft or antisocial behavior, they can upload an image to the FaceWatch cloud that is then shared with all of the other shops so that a person will flag on all of their systems.

FaceWatch has a provision for the Metropolitan Police. The police can add images to the FaceWatch cloud, but if someone on the police watch list gets flagged by any shop using Facewatch, the alert actually gets sent directly to the police and the person in the shop running the system won't even know that that person has been flagged. This allows the surveillance cameras to access/ connect to a secondary Facial Recognition Database held by the police. The shop has effectively become a police Live Facial Recognition van that is totally covert and almost invisible. The state has just gained a whole load more CCTV coverage without having to pay for any infrastructure.

British Transport Police (BTP) and Train Operating Companies (TOCs) operate under a formal Information Sharing Protocol (BTP-TOC-ISP-001) to facilitate crime prevention, detection, and investigation across the UK rail network. BTP shares information with TOCs for fraud prevention, security, and operational safety, including the use of shared CCTV systems and digital evidence.

Train operating companies are private companies. Like a shop, except they sell travel rather than goods. Every single camera in their entire jurisdictional area of the British Transport Police goes live to their control center. Every single train platform, every single stairwell, every corridor, every entrance way.

Axon Body Cameras (by Axon Enterprise, Inc) on UK Police Officers
The latest is the Axon Body 4 (2023). Capabilities 2K large field of view, 4G live streaming, GPS, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. Includes AI assistance. Thousands of body cameras streaming live to the cloud of Axon. Imagine what it must feel like to sit in one of their control rooms and be able to switch on any camera on any police officer in the city. At the moment, the Met are underfunded enough that they don't have that.

"Axon also have an AI Black Box that they provide to large companies that they can plug their CCTV into. It's called the Axon Fusus Core. Setting up Axon Fusus Core is fast, requires minimal hardware, and has no activation fees. You simply plug a Fus Core into your existing camera or network and within seconds the video feed is analyzed, securely encrypted and transmitted either by an Ongoing Live Stream or On Demand Based on an Alert. On Demand Based on an Alert means that the authorities can look through the camera whenever they want. It's a bit like agents of the matrix. If you were a person of interest, they could inhabit any camera near you. It's actually really creepy. Doorbell cameras, street cameras, shop cameras, even cameras at posh hotels, all controlled under one system. The FaceWatch cloud, the Rail Transport Cloud, the Axon Cloud, and maybe in the future, the local councils are forced to have their CCTV on a cloud. It's when you start to tie all of those systems together, when you have all of those systems bound under a common blanket data sharing agreement that you'll really start to see the beginnings of an All-Seeing, All-Knowing Digital God."

All these systems remind one of...