The Wonder of Girls by Michael Gurian

RyanX

The Living Force
The Wonder of Girls is not a book I planned on reading, but one that I'm glad I did. This is a book that's been sitting in my basement for a long time collecting dust. See, my Mom got the book for my wife and I just after the birth of our first daughter. I believe my wife may have read some of the book, but then put it down to move on to other things. After reading it now, I can understand why. There is really very little material in it about infant and toddler age girls, which was the stage our oldest daughter was going through at the time.

That said, the book is a wonderful guide for girls from the ages of 5-20, and possibly beyond. Being a father of two girls, I have been told since the time they were born that “girls are easy when they're young, but just wait until they're teenagers! Look out!” This warning has always conjured up a bit of dread for me. I was born into a family of boys, being the oldest of two. I never got a chance to really see first hand what a girl goes through growing up, so as you can imagine, the book was really enlightening to me.

I also decided to check out the Amazon reviews of this book. Strangely, it seems that people either love or hate this book. Some of the comments trashing this book sound like the readers really didn't read the book, but instead grabbed quotes and used them out of context. In other cases, I wondered whether the reviewers had actually taken the time to really read through what the author said or even had the ability to distill the finer points of the book. The book is written from the perspective of a man, but Gurian seems to be well educated in the subject matter and has read many books on this topic himself. He also has two daughters, so I'm sure a lot of his focus comes from first hand experience. I was deeply impressed by the depth of research he went through to write the book. I was especially impressed by his mention of Clarissa Pinkola Estes's book “Women who Run with Wolves”, which I regard as a classic and a must read for both men and women.

The negative reviews of the book may also be due to Gurian's excursion into the politics of feminism as well. I don't doubt this is the case since feminism can sometimes be a polarizing topic, especially when it comes to debates of nature verses nurture. Gurian tries to emphasize the importance of both nature and nurture and points out cases where each is applicable. He probably emphasizes the nature argument a little more that current political correctness dictates. From Gurian's own disclaimers about feminism and political correctness, I think he knew from the get-go that this would be a hot-button issue. Sadly, some of the negative reviewers choose to focus on his critique of feminist politics with the exclusion of the massive remainder of knowledge and research contained in the book.

So a father of two young girls (one of which is soon to hit puberty), what new or important things did I learn? Although, I was certainly aware of the female hormonal cycle, I wasn't aware of how deep a role this plays in the brain development of girls. I was also not aware of the ebb and flow of certain neural-chemicals that fluctuate on that monthly-cyclical basis. I'm sure I've seen the effects, but I've never understood the underlying physiology and Gurian does a good job explaining this. I would imagine that a lot of women probably don't even know this stuff, even though they feel it throughout most of their lives. I think knowing about the relationship between a girl's monthly cycle and her brain chemical balance will be useful information to share with my daughters. Having self knowledge about how one's feelings change on a monthly basis could really help mitigate a lot of adolescent pain. Now I'll know when to tell my daughters to “wait it out” or “act now” when an emotional crisis arises. Perhaps for some women this information lands in the category of “duh!”, but I thought the discussion was useful and insightful.

The discussion on discipline was helpful as well. Having read a number of books on narcissistic family dynamics, I've found the subject of child discipline to be an extremely complex issue. While a parent wishes to protect their children, a parent must also be on guard to not use their power of authority to coerce a child into thinking or feeling a certain way. We parents have a much greater power than we realize and sometimes just a look of disappointment can be enough to cause children much emotional turmoil. Any time we use our powers to cause a child to view the emotional needs of the parent to be greater than her own emotional needs, we are setting up a narcissistic, role-reversal dynamic. The problem is that young children are naturally narcissistic and it's our job as parents to guide them gently through the traumas of childhood to reverse this mindset in a healthy way. We must help them develop their own sense of empathy by setting the right example and using punishments in a wise way to bring their behavior in line with the ideal. This does not mean that we make our children into “performers”, it simply means that we keep them safe and show them that there are other “selves” out there, who like themselves, sometimes feel pain and need help. Basically we need to live and apply the “Golden Rule” and apply this in a multidimensional way when it comes to child discipline.

Child discipline, in my experience, ends up being more of an art form than some parents make it out to be. It is a highly complex process of knowing one's children, especially their temperaments, being fully aware of the situation that calls for discipline, and not letting one's own emotional programs cloud their judgment of the situation. This is not an easy process, but Gurian presents a good rough guideline for child discipline. He mentions many creative ways of enforcing rules, but he also mentions that there may be situations that call for spanking or a small pinch. These punishments must be considered carefully, however. Overall, I thought his discussion on discipline was well balanced and doesn't lean towards any extreme parenting philosophies.

In the discussion on discipline, Gurian also points out that, on average, a young girls' brain development is such that she may develop a sophisticated moral compass or sense of empathy at a rather young age. It is not uncommon for girls between the ages of 5 and 10 to ask specific moralistic questions and form sophisticated moral opinions. This is in comparison to boys of the same age, who tend not to have as highly developed moral reasoning skills. Of course, Gurian correctly points out that there are always exceptions here. This is good to know and I think it's important that father's don't brush over these moral questions from their daughters, but show them that they are important things to think about. This is a big part of what make girls tick and what keeps our world a sane place!

Gurian also points out some of the ways our current socio-political system has failed us in raising proper boys and girls (as if this wasn't obvious in a lot of areas). He talks about the three family system, which is the traditional family system for raising children the world over in the pre-industrial age. The first level is composed of the immediate nuclear family; Mom, Dad, brothers, sisters, step-parents, step-sibilings, etc. The second tier consists of extended family members such as Grandparents, aunts, uncles, Godparents, etc. The their level consists of community pillars; people such as coaches, teachers, camp leaders and others who have access to our children through positions of authority. The great thing about the three-family system is that each level backs up and compliments the others when necessary, so the children have the ability to develop a wide-range of attachments throughout their young lives. Unfortunately in our modern society, one or two of these family levels is often missing in the lives of children. This can make the process of growing up more difficult and traumatic than it needs to be when attachments are few and far between for our daughters.

Another thing I learned is the importance of “rites of passage” and how important these are for young girls and that if positive “rites of passage” are not developed by the parents or community, it often leads to the children finding their own negative “rites of passage”. Gurian mentions the idea of developing certain celebrations or ceremonies for girls when they turn 10, 13, 16, 18, for their first menstruation and so on. Each rite composes a step of a young girls ascent into adulthood. These rites should be customized to the aptitudes and interest of the young girl and they should be attended by at least one or more members of family level two or three (such as a Grandmother or special aunt, for instance). Rites of passage are common in many archaic cultures and they seem to ease social trauma by allowing the young girl and members of her family and community to realize that she is on her way to becoming an adult. These rites are important to show girls that they are part of a community of females and that they have their own “culture” and identity in society. Without these rites of passage, young girls have a tenancy to show adults how grown up they are in less than honorable ways.

I appreciated Gurian's discussion on the art of mothering and fathering. My only bone to pick here is that in some cases the mothering advise can apply to the father and the fathering advise can apply to the mother and visa-versus. To be fair, he does try to point this out in some sections here. I did like the fact that he mentioned discipline techniques under the “art of mothering” section, since I've noticed this is often an area that some mothers lack - at least this has been my own experience. Overall, he makes some good points and shows how important it is for a child to have both a mother and a father attachment of some sort.

There is also a good section on discussing sexuality with teenagers. I think in this day and age it is vital to talk to both boys and girls about sex and sex myths. Gurian makes a good point that it is important to share your own experiences with your daughters and let them know that they don't have to suffer alone with their new feelings. Let them ask the questions, but first of all, let them know that you are comfortable talking about sex and that they can come to you about questions they may have. He even talks about guidelines for having a teenage, co-ed sleepover party, which in my opinion may be a bit much for some teenagers. However, he makes a good point that pulling off such a sleepover with appropriate ground-rules shows a high level of trust between parents and daughter and it helps the daughter bond with their friends in a healthy way outside of the high school “party” scene. Something to consider at least.

I was also really impressed with his analysis of the story of Cinderella and his take on the symbolic meaning of this well-known tale. He really shows how these fairy-tales are so important for girls from a spiritual perspective. The myths and stories we tell ourselves really help us define who we are and our purpose in the world. These stories basically describe the symbolic pathway a girl must take to find her Prince and attain True Love. This process involves knowing oneself, being in control of ones emotions, and on top of that, having some divine guidance or inspiration. There are very few writers I've found who managed to articulate this concept so well and in a way that is accessible to teenage girls and their parents. Like Gurian, I think having a sense for the spiritual is vital for everybody, especially the young girls of today who are growing up in a spiritual void created by mainstream religions and a culture bent towards materialism.

If I do have a beef with this book, it is the lack of knowledge on the “dark side” of raising girls, in other words, what happens when things go wrong. For instance, what about a soccer coach or neighborhood family friend that you discover is molesting your pre-teen daughter? What does one do in these situations and how do we prevent them in the first place? Of course nobody wants to think about this stuff, but it is also important to have this information in the back of your mind when reading this book. Gurian points out that his book is not meant to be an exhaustive list of any and all experience with daughters, but is solely meant as a development guide and one that fits the “majority of girls”, not the minority (albeit still large and significant) who come face to face with pathology. I would have to say that the thoughtful parent should also read some books on psychopathology and pedophiles to understand how to identify predators that may go after their daughters in various ways.

Aside from the lack of information on psychopathology, I think Gurian presents a great deal of useful knowledge and a huge list of references that are accessible to the layperson. I hope the negative reviewers will give this book a second peek and see that Gurian's knowledge is really quite balanced and not schizoidally skewed towards some ideological bent.
 
Thank you Ryan for that excellent synopsis. It has definitely peaked my interest! I don't have any children but it seems there's lots to be gleaned from this book regardless.
 
~Fabric~ said:
Thank you Ryan for that excellent synopsis. It has definitely peaked my interest! I don't have any children but it seems there's lots to be gleaned from this book regardless.

Agreed!
 
~Fabric~ said:
Thank you Ryan for that excellent synopsis. It has definitely peaked my interest! I don't have any children but it seems there's lots to be gleaned from this book regardless.

Very much thank You! I have two daughters(15 and 4) so I will have to get that book!
 
Thank you RyanX, you piqued my interest as well!
You had mentioned it in the Parenthood thread but this comprehensive synopsis really sold it to me.
 
Here is another review that outlines some of the differences between Gurian's views (which he coins with the word "womanism") and traditional feminist ideology. Like I mentioned, I think many reader/reviewers overemphasized this aspect of the book and disregarded the rest of the research because of it. But even his views on feminism seem to be well balanced and strike a chord with a lot of what I've read here on this forum.

_http://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/61300_girls08.shtml

Girl Wonders: Michael Gurian defines his post-feminist vision

Friday, March 8, 2002

By CECELIA GOODNOW
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

It's not Barbie's fault.

Early in adolescence, when girls grow self-conscious and unsure, when their self-esteem falters and their moods collide, it's easy to blame gender stereotypes for messing with our daughters.

Thanks to best sellers such as Mary Pipher's "Reviving Ophelia," a belief in the corrosive strength of media stereotypes has become cultural dogma.

But Spokane therapist Michael Gurian says that's a "distraction" from the larger forces at work -- rapid brain growth, hormonal changes and attachment issues.

"While the feminist idea that girls experience stereotypes and lose self-esteem is irrefutable," he says, "in most cases, gender stereotypes are not the primary cause of a girl's developmental issues."

So, for now, Barbie's off the hook.

"I don't worry about that at all," Gurian said with a chuckle. "My daughters have played with Barbies from the day they were born and they're such strong girls."

Gurian, who helped put the "boys' movement" on the map in the '90s, develops his theories in a post-feminist guide to girls that takes its cues from nature, not ideology.

In his provocative book, "The Wonder of Girls" -- counterpart to his 1996 best seller "The Wonder of Boys" -- Gurian looks to neurobiology, psychology and a cross-section of world cultures for a new understanding of how girls develop and what they need. In the process Gurian, father of 8- and 12-year-old daughters, respectfully shoots holes in parts of feminist theory that he says go against human nature.

Straying from his own feminist roots, he says the foremothers of the '70s overemphasized power and go-it-alone independence at the expense of women's deep need for emotional attachments, including the honorable pursuit of motherhood.

"It's not like the traditional way is the right way, but I don't think feminism gets it either," Gurian said in an interview in Seattle. "Maybe there's an approach now that can be more logical and more compromising."

He and his wife, family therapist Gail Reid-Gurian, have developed a concept they call "womanism," which supports girls' and women's right to equal opportunity but also their yearning for a "safe web of intimate relationships."

"Womanism," Gurian said, "is about absorbing the best of the past."

Unfortunately, Gurian upstages the thoughtful, nuanced tone of his book by including loaded phrases such as the "sacredness of motherhood" and women's "natural need for dependency on men" -- a rebuttal to Gloria Steinem's comment years ago that "women need men like a fish needs a bicycle."


Readers may bail before they get to Gurian's thoughtful amplication of the "dependency" clause, which actually speaks to mutual dependency.

"In most cases," he writes, "human females and males need to form intimate, long-lasting and symbiotic relationships in order to feel safe and personally fulfilled and in order to raise the next generation safely."

In a similar vein, he elaborates on the sacredness of motherhood by exploring cross-cultural connotations of "mother" as a "woman of authority."

"Women who never have children are still mothers," he writes. "They mother communities, other people's children, the earth itself."

"What I'm arguing," he said in an interview, "is that Mothering, with a capital M, is the primary goal of girls. I mean by that, mothering the world. My argument would be that females are wired to mother. Some may never have children, but they're still wired to mother."

A glance at amazon.com's reader reviews makes it clear these are love-'em-or-hate-'em propositions.

"The whole agenda is irresponsible," writes a Seattle reader, who gave the book a one-star rating. "Women will never attain equality in this society as long as bozos like this author are running around pandering to the biological differences between women and men."

"This book is a giant step backward for girls and women in our society," wrote a dad from Brookline, Mass.

But, in a criticism that could apply equally to the Brookline dad and Gurian, a Princeton woman reader wrote, "Men cannot live our lives and therefore cannot comprehend what happens biologically, socially or personally."

Other readers praised the book for its "new and fresh" ideas.

"As an erstwhile rabid Feminist, I have long since outgrown its angst," wrote a Clallam Bay woman. "'The Wonder of Girls' is a book for a lifetime and I heartily recommend it."

One Ballard mom said in an interview that she is so taken with the book, she can't wait to explore its ideas with others.

"I am very impressed with the book," said Therese MacDonald, 42, mother of three young girls. "There's so much to think about. I decided I was going to call some friends together and have a discussion group on the book."

Gurian's makeover of feminist theory may spark lively debate, but Gurian said his main interest in "womanism" is to give parents a framework for understanding what's really going on inside their daughters.

"What the book is about," Gurian said, "is teaching parents the nature of the child."

That's what parents in the trenches seem to respond to. Joan Schleh of Ballard has relied heavily on "The Wonder of Boys" to help her understand her sons, ages 4 and 7.

"Oh, my God, (it was) totally my lifesaver," said Schleh, who also has a daughter, who will be 10 next month. "On closing the back cover, I looked up at my husband and said, Now he has to write 'The Wonder of Girls.'"

Gurian begins by cataloging some of the sex-related differences in brain development, from conception to young adulthood. He says he examines research findings against a cross-section of societal values and practices in 30 countries, seven of which he has lived in.

Acknowledging that individual differences exist, he says:

# Girls' brains are coded to secrete more serotonin than boys' brains. Higher amounts of that brain chemical help with impulse control, which partly explains why toddler girls tend to be physically calmer than toddler boys.

# Female brains secrete more oxytocin, a hormone associated with nurture and connection -- and possibly the source of "maternal instinct."

For example, when little girls play with dolls -- or when women hear a baby cry in a crowded theater -- their brains secrete oxytocin. It's not that males don't care about the baby's cry, Gurian said, they're just slower to respond physiologically. He said oxytocin also stimulates a bonding effect in women during sex.

"Women secrete oxytocin when they have sex -- men almost none. That's one reason why it's harder for women to have one-night stands."

# The brain's hippocampus, a center for memory storage, is larger and works faster in girls than in boys, making it easier for girls to remember a string of input.

For instance, if you tell an 8-year-old boy and an 8-year-old girl to do three things -- clean up their room, take out their garbage and wipe the table -- typically the boy needs more reminding. Differences in hippocampal memory are one of several factors that may account for the difference.

# Brain imaging shows that at puberty the tendency of boys' brains to focus on one task at a time becomes more apparent, while girls' brains take in lots of information at once, leading to intuitive decisions. The drawback of this processing style is that young, adolescent girls may develop a "malleable self" and rely too much on others for decision-making.

# Female brains have 15 percent more blood flow -- and a broader distribution of blood flow -- than male brains. That's one reason girls and women tend to "think so many things out." It also may help explain why males are seven times more likely than females to be diagnosed with an attention deficit disorder.

The female drive for attachment is one of Gurian's main themes, one some parents are taking to heart. Having watched a teenage niece fall into serious problems after her parents' divorce, Schleh is heeding Gurian's advice to provide girls with a "three-family system."

Gurian defines this triad as nuclear family (including single parents and blended families), extended family (including day-care providers and mentors) and institutional "family," including church, school, neighborhood and other supports, based not just on attendance but on true bonding.

Schleh, who has a master's degree in adult education, said, "I think he's right when he says if a child is attached to this three-family system, she can survive anything."

Gurian also believes, however, that feminist theory is the best framework for the 10 to 20 percent of girls in crisis -- especially girls who are abused, disturbed or systematically disrespected.

Feminism, which promotes self-empowerment, has produced "miracles in the lives of many," Gurian says, but it's not the right model for the majority of girls who are doing well at any given moment.

Gurian's explanation of girls' developmental stages has proved helpful in MacDonald's relationship with 10-year-old daughter Katie, who is developing a typical preteen drive for independence.

The book helped MacDonald, a former social worker, see through the facade and recognize her daughter's strong need for attachment.

"If anything, you step forward and give them as much attention and interaction as you did your infant," said MacDonald, who also has 7-year-old and 5-month-old daughters. "As I stepped forward, she has responded."

Gurian, founder of a Missouri-based educational research and training center called the Gurian Institute, is a strong supporter of all-girl schools, especially in the vulnerable middle-school years, when girls feel pressure to "dumb themselves down" to win boys' approval.

But he said it was the "myth of the '90s" that schools favor boys at the expense of girls.

"Boys get 70 percent of the D's and F's," Gurian said. "They are 90 percent of the discipline problems."

While he applauds efforts to hook girls on math and science, he urges parents to keep their daughters' interests and abilities in mind.

"It's great that girls get the opportunities in math and science," Gurian said, "but we shouldn't push. If we're pushing from the outside, (from) the ideology, we may not be respecting the nature of the child."

MacDonald said Gurian's book is "very freeing and very liberating" because it respects individual choices.

Schleh, the Ballard mother of three, agreed.

"What he was trying to do was get away from an idea of drum-banging feminism," she said. "I ride both fences just fine. I had a very strong mother who had a career all her life."

Schleh, 40, said she grew up amid the sloganeering of 1970s feminism -- "death to the barefoot and pregnant" and all that.

"But I didn't have a new model," she said. "When I had children, I felt I was going it alone. I just felt I was letting everybody down."

Schleh said today's young women are looking for a new perspective.

"I totally believe," said Schleh, "there's a generation out there that says, 'Feminism does not talk to me.'"

Feminist position


# Our goal as a human race should be gender androgyny.

# Girls suffer more than boys. Males are more privileged than females.

# The non-working woman is not financially independent and thus is potentially a victim of men.

# Masculinity is defective and dangerous. Females must react against it.

# Marriage is an inherently flawed institution and secondary to the needs of women. Achieving female independence is the hardest work of our civilization.

# Key words: power and empowerment.

Womanist position

# Women and men by nature are not the same and do not function in the same way. Human life is passionate and progressive as much because of differences as similarities.

# Women and men are fellow victims of a fear- and violence-based social system and have different but equally painful wounds.

# The ideal situation for a woman is one in which she is valued equally for work within and outside of the home.

# Masculinity is mysterious and we need to understand, clarify, accept and shape it meaningfully rather than fearfully.

# Marriage is sacred and essential to human progress, especially when a couple is raising children. Achieving stable, healthy attachments is the hardest work of our civilization.

# Key words: self-knowledge and service.
 
Back
Top Bottom