Jtucker
Jedi Master
You always draw me back into this debate, @stellar - just when I think I'm out for good...
This particular video does come across as a You Tube creative project trying to piggy back on the growing trend of the "Tartaria Mythos". You can see the author's earlier videos are of a completely different content - that didn't work in terms of generating views. And then about a month ago - he suddenly switches to the Tartaria world and the views explode.
The presenter isn't a researcher and doesn't claim to be. Many YT channels on "Elohim", "Annunaki" and other esoterica are presented as facts that a YouTuber has noticed and no one can explain. But in reality they are for purely entertainment purposes and there are no actual claims otherwise.
This is definitely one of them.
Some early red flags:
He says he started by visiting a late Victoria structure in New Orleans:
At :14, he inserts a stock clip of a Russian secretary flipping through Russian records. In New Orleans? In Russian?
At :32, while describing the same building in New Orleans, he inserts stock footage of the Monandock Building in Chicago (very modernist)
At, :42, then shows a "sub-arch" on a completely different building that isn't even below grade.
You can see where this is all going. No researcher would toss all this together and expect to be taking seriously.
I doubt the presenter has ever visited these locations. Nor has any knowledge of engineering or architecture. He just tosses around terms and makes bold generalizations - then flashes records in the wrong language that aren't related to what he's describing.
To quote him, "Yet the stone dimensions and curvature ratios, did not belong to any recorded 1880's construction methods."
That is a completely ridiculous statement. It would take decades to review all the available construction records from the 1880's - never mind find them - in English alone. No one on earth can make a statement that broad.
Where's the proof something weird is going on? He answers definitively:
"It mirrored a structural pattern I had only seen in early Tartarian infrastructure maps. The kind researchers link to hydraulic pressure systems."
Now we're getting somewhere. The late Tartarian infrastructure maps can't be trusted. The early ones are they key. So why not show them? Written in Tartarian. Showing New Orleans. And how they relate to this building.
If this supposed sub-arch is so precise and can't have been made in the 1880's - then why not show actual footage of it? There's just random images from all different time periods inter cut with claims that can't be substantiated.
At 4:17, he claims he found a mysterious note regarding some annex being bricked over etc - then shows a 1939 document to back that claim up apparently. Freeze on the document - it is a 1939 memo on school lunch programs in the city of Washington DC.
I could do this for the whole video, but its beyond ludicrous.
Would any serious researcher on lost civilizations or architectural anomalies leave the video below on their page from a month ago if they wanted to be taken seriously?
"My Straight Roommate Said “We Can Share the Blanket” Then She Surprised Me | Lesbian Love | LGBTQ"
Who would have thought that a You Tuber could go from clickbait softcore LGBTQS+ content, to miraculously gaining encyclopedic knowledge of Victorian building techniques and delving into Russian and Austro-Hungarian empire building plans that aren't available on the internet, nor in English, in less than a month?
This whole subject is getting wilder every time some new You Tuber posts a new video...
