Omega said:
in Re: There is no time in any frame of reference.
:As for the time travel, I think in Laura's work we can find explanations. There
was a part in the wave series (volume 1 ?) talking about multiple realities and
universe. I the car accident example given by RS, I think even if someone would
go back in time to prevent the accident, the original situation would still
exist in another reality, the person changing the past having simply created
another parallele branch of that reality and thus all realities continue onword
with their journey. Thus, one continues with the persone having learned the
lesson, in the other, the lesson is not learned.
What do you think ? Makes sense ?"
While thought = Consciousness, maybe it is possible to UNTHINK the Titanic.
I thought your argument needed to be noted as containing very deep concepts, as if time is like walking through a door into another reality, a reality in which the lesson has been learned.
in Re: There is no time in any frame of reference.
:As for the time travel, I think in Laura's work we can find explanations. There
was a part in the wave series (volume 1 ?) talking about multiple realities and
universe. I the car accident example given by RS, I think even if someone would
go back in time to prevent the accident, the original situation would still
exist in another reality, the person changing the past having simply created
another parallele branch of that reality and thus all realities continue onword
with their journey. Thus, one continues with the persone having learned the
lesson, in the other, the lesson is not learned.
What do you think ? Makes sense ?"
While thought = Consciousness, maybe it is possible to UNTHINK the Titanic.
I thought your argument needed to be noted as containing very deep concepts, as if time is like walking through a door into another reality, a reality in which the lesson has been learned.