This fully operational deathstar.....

[Johnno]

......seems to be fully operational again.

 

[Mark]

We used the force

 

[peche]

thanks SOTT!!!
I was going crazy!!

 

[T.C.]

I've never really taken the time to read the articles on the signs page. More than anything, I just use the forum.

But now, after these two days of not having SOTT, I have seen what I'm missing!

There are never enough hours in a day, but I hope from now on, I appreciate more, the articles written for this site, and READ MORE OF THEM, because by studying the objective truth about the world, we see more of the objective truth about ourselves.

 

[the rabbit]

Wow now there was a hyperdimensional something or other. Was´nt it?

Good to see you back

 

[Devar]

Yes, good to see SOTT back up and running. What has been learned from the latest hack-attack (as referenced in LKJ's blog)?

 

[Cyre2067]

72 hours was it? I was beginning to get nervous

 

[Akopirnas]

Suggestion: New Webhosting Mirror

 

[Justin]

Nice to see SOTT back!

I think there is a minor bug with the forum post counts...looks like a decimal was added to some people's total posts...or perhaps they just posted quite a bit recently and I only now noticed :P

 

[Renaissance]

Nice to see SOTT back!

I think there is a minor bug with the forum post counts...looks like a decimal was added to some people's total posts...or perhaps they just posted quite a bit recently and I only now noticed :P

yeah, I should have less than a third of what my total number says.

Great to see everything back and running!

 

[Mikey]

Good that SOTT is back!

Just want to report what sott.net said yesterday:

Site Temporarily Unavailable

We apologize for the inconvenience. Please contact the webmaster/tech support immediately to have them rectify this.

error id: "bad_httpd_conf"

 

[Ryan]

In your face, entropy. :P

 

[Tigersoap]

Glad to see you're back !

 

[Zadius Sky]

Ditto! We keep on doing!

 

[Laura]

Yes, good to see SOTT back up and running. What has been learned from the latest hack-attack (as referenced in LKJ's blog)?

Well, we can kind of eliminate small time hackers from the equation. We noted the constant obfuscation of the service provider which suggested pressure was being put on them from somewhere. I guess that means we must really make some people nervous enough for them to decide to annoy the heck out of us or "send a message".

At least that's how it looks to me at the moment.