Threat of imminent nuclear war?

Sol Logos

The Living Force
Recently, Mike Adams talked about the escalating and imminent threat of nuclear war. This was after Zelenski called for NATO to preemptively strike Russia with nuclear weapons. I also came across a commentator on an Alex Jones show who said that this will be triggered by a false flag nuclear attack in Ukraine, used by the people who want to start a war to justify attacking Russia. I don’t know if it’s just something overblown for click bait or if it’s something really set in motion as described.

Mike Adams: ‎The Health Ranger Report: Situation Update EMERGENCY EDITION - Oct 8, 2022 - Ukraine's Zelensky calls for NATO NUCLEAR STRIKE on Russia on Apple Podcasts

Infowars: The First Shots of Nuclear War Have Been Fired, Steve Quayle Issues Emergency Warning
 
Q: Yet, you said the United States would be bombed, and on another occasion you said there would not be a nuclear war.

A: "Bombs" are not all "nuclear." And, there are "natural bombs."
(Perceval) There's something I've been saying to various people, and I'm wondering if it's true or not. The stories in Richard Dolan's books about US nuclear missile sites being disabled by UFOs at various places so that they couldn't fire anything way back in the 60's at the height of the Cold War. Was that a message to the Powers that Be that no nuclear war would ever be allowed? Did 4D STS send a message in that way that nobody would be allowed to push the button because you'd kill everybody. Since this world is like a farm, their cattle would all be killed. Is that anywhere close to the truth?

A: Close.
The view on this forum is that there will never be any kind of nuclear war, in the sense of a nuclear WW3.
Even though the Cs have said "no nuclear war", they have also said that there could be some suitcase nuke type incidents. Also, things can change.

Prouty gives the most compelling argument for why there will be no all-out nuclear war in his book "The Secret Team".
 
I just read a post from a telegram channel which begins with the sentence: “What if Putin presses a button and launches missiles at London?” and he goes on to describe what is stated further in the article. The article was published by The Daily Mail, but I can’t read it because I’m not subscribed. The post on Tg explains what is said in it and I read the post, I started thinking: well, this is posted for a reason, then I started thinking about the reasons why it might be published and I thought of: to scare people; to make more implanting of an opinion that Russia is evil, and so on. But than I started thinking that this post has a deeper meaning and that it is related to millitary,war,catastrophe and while I was thinking that and when I looked at the picture on that Tg post, a Deja vu just hit me and that has not happend for a very long time, so my questions would be: Do you think that has any purpose? If so what is it? Why would they publish that?

This is a copy of the text of that Tg post:

Political scientist Vladimir Kornilov: ❗"What if Putin presses a button and launches missiles at London?"
The Daily Mail suddenly asked itself this question. And even set a date for the strike: January 20, 2025! So not much time left!
The newspaper predicts that at 7.30 am Putin will give the order to strike, and at 8.08 the first warheads will explode in Trafalgar Square. I especially liked this important point of the scenario: "A bottle of single malt whiskey stored in a bunker is opened by the Minister of Defense." Why single malt? Why not blended? Or will it be saved for the second day of the war?
This colorful description ends on February 3, 2025: "Scientists disagree about when London will become habitable again - if at all. But one thing is for sure: this once great city, founded by the Romans two millennia ago, is now nothing more than a terrible monument to the darkest day in human history." Remember these dates. Let's check... But seriously, it's even very useful that they started publishing such things. Maybe they will treat the threat of nuclear war differently and will think more often about whether it is worth pushing the world towards it. Well, except for the British Defense Minister - he has already uncorked his whiskey, he doesn't care anymore...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0447.png
    IMG_0447.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 2
  • IMG_0448.png
    IMG_0448.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 2
  • IMG_0449.png
    IMG_0449.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 2
I just read a post from a telegram channel which begins with the sentence: “What if Putin presses a button and launches missiles at London?” and he goes on to describe what is stated further in the article. The article was published by The Daily Mail, but I can’t read it because I’m not subscribed. The post on Tg explains what is said in it and I read the post, I started thinking: well, this is posted for a reason, then I started thinking about the reasons why it might be published and I thought of: to scare people; to make more implanting of an opinion that Russia is evil, and so on. But than I started thinking that this post has a deeper meaning and that it is related to millitary,war,catastrophe and while I was thinking that and when I looked at the picture on that Tg post, a Deja vu just hit me and that has not happend for a very long time, so my questions would be: Do you think that has any purpose? If so what is it? Why would they publish that?

This is a copy of the text of that Tg post:

Political scientist Vladimir Kornilov: ❗"What if Putin presses a button and launches missiles at London?"
The Daily Mail suddenly asked itself this question. And even set a date for the strike: January 20, 2025! So not much time left!
The newspaper predicts that at 7.30 am Putin will give the order to strike, and at 8.08 the first warheads will explode in Trafalgar Square. I especially liked this important point of the scenario: "A bottle of single malt whiskey stored in a bunker is opened by the Minister of Defense." Why single malt? Why not blended? Or will it be saved for the second day of the war?
This colorful description ends on February 3, 2025: "Scientists disagree about when London will become habitable again - if at all. But one thing is for sure: this once great city, founded by the Romans two millennia ago, is now nothing more than a terrible monument to the darkest day in human history." Remember these dates. Let's check... But seriously, it's even very useful that they started publishing such things. Maybe they will treat the threat of nuclear war differently and will think more often about whether it is worth pushing the world towards it. Well, except for the British Defense Minister - he has already uncorked his whiskey, he doesn't care anymore...
And I don't think Putin will nuke UK, but what caught my attention were those dates, and I thought: well, maybe UK actually wants to.....do something? somewhere around those days? I don't know. I posted this because of that Deja vu which was so weird. Suggestions/opinions?
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom