Tiny 'Black Hole Atoms' as Elusive Dark Matter?

[Esote]

Dark matter, the invisible and mysterious stuff that makes up most of the material universe, might be hiding itself in microscopic black holes, says a team of Russian astrophysicists.
http://www.space.com/25691-dark-matter-black-hole-atoms.html

Dark matter is an invisible material that emits or absorbs no light but betrays its presence by interacting gravitationally with visible matter. This image from Dark Universe shows the distribution of dark matter in the universe, as simulated with a novel, high-resolution algorithm at the Kavli Institute of Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology at Stanford University and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

 

[Esote]

Nevertheless, it's possible that black matter doesn't even exist.
It could just be an optical effect from the fact that the past is changing, in the hypothesis of a flexible space-time coming from the permanent retro-causality recreation of an imprecise past due to the macroscopic indeterminism...
Then black matter would be ordinary matter having emitted a radiance which became invisible, because it has been absorbed in an ancient past by obstacles which disappeared in the "present" (current) past, where it's now detectable from the Earth !

 

[mkrnhr]

Dark matter may or may not exist. If it exists, it's not for the postulated reasons, it would be just a matter of chance. When it was found that gravitational interaction was insufficient to describe the gallactic dynamics, the most logical next step would have been to introduce the neglected known interactions, the electromagnetic interaction to try to make sense of the observations. However, speculative astrophysics (which became a mainstream pseudoscience) prefers dealing with more exotic concepts and inventing extraordinary stuff out of thin air.

 

[John G]

Yeah I think electric universe aka longitudinal photons (related I think to Ark's conformal group work) would explain galactic dynamics. I do think dark matter is needed to explain the WMAP analysis of the background radiation and I also think tiny black holes (Planck mass) are a good possibility for this dark matter.

 

[Buddy]

However, speculative astrophysics (which became a mainstream pseudoscience) prefers dealing with more exotic concepts and inventing extraordinary stuff out of thin air.

Very well said, IMO. This stuff usually sends me into Ren and Stimpy mode: eeeediots!

When I become more serious, though, it's just saddening that scientists won't simply go back and find/fix the errors that crept into classical physics from the time period represented when Rev. Bayes was arguing for Newton's classical mechanics. Today's astrophysics just seems like an airplane without a landing strip.

 

[Esote]

Actually, what I have been referring to isn't invented out of thin air by a speculative pseudo-astrophysicist.
It comes from a very well trained physicist, who is mainly working about retro-causality nowadays...
Weird for sure, but certainly not from an idiot !
Sometimes these scientists are very difficult to understand, if not hardly believable

 

[Buddy]

Actually, what I have been referring to isn't invented out of thin air by a speculative pseudo-astrophysicist.
It comes from a very well trained physicist, who is mainly working about retro-causality nowadays...
Weird for sure, but certainly not from an idiot !

Maybe not, but it doesn't seem to matter how well-trained someone is for the purpose of being believable.

By way of example, check this out: most folks would say Stephen Hawking is a very well trained physicist but many are now saying he is practically signalling the end of modern physics which is mostly a mish-mash of no-data assumptions anyway:

Stephen Hawking: 'There are no black holes'
Notion of an 'event horizon', from which nothing can escape, is incompatible with quantum theory, physicist claims.
_http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-1.14583
_http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5761

Hawking doesn't actually say that so directly in the article; you have to read it to understand that message.

And check out the propaganda piece from Scientific American:

One Thing Is Certain: Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle Is Not Dead
Experimenters violate Heisenberg's original version of the famous maxim, but confirm a newer, clearer formulation.
_http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heisenbergs-uncertainty-principle-is-not-dead/

Unfortunately, the content of their own article proved the opposite. Even the subtitle contradicts the title and the content? Well, let's just say they must be checking to see if anybody is paying attention because the implications for the extent to which so many people have been indoctrinated over the last 80 years is outrageous!

Sometimes these scientists are very difficult to understand, if not hardly believable

Yep, that's putting it mildly, fer sure! So now, I hope it's clearer that it doesn't really matter so much how well trained someone is for believability purposes.

 

[mkrnhr]

The most tragic thing is that they are not intrinsically idiots. Most of them are smart enough to be able to deal with complicated mathematical models. It is just that their intellect is diverted to deal with nonsense, and somehow they lack that basic intuitive self-doubt to ask theselves "what if all of this is wrong? What if I check the basic assumptions from the beginning?". They become therefore guardians of a temple, not only protecting its dogma, but also protecting their own sense of self-importance that they inevitably come to identify with those dogma.

 

[Esote]

Thank you Buddy and Mkrnhr for your inputs.
Guardians of a dogma temple... a long story !

 

[Esote]

Something else about black holes : They are sometimes described as "giant vacuum cleaners in the sky", sucking in everything around them, but this description is highly inaccurate. First off, black holes emanate as much information as they absorb, so a better visualization would be that of a whirlpool or tornado curling like water going down the drain to stillness (singularity) with energy being flung back out again, mainly in a disc shape spinning out from the center along the equator of the dynamic of two polar-opposite toriodial vortexes (like a doughnut and a doughnut with the singularity between them).

The creators Spirit Science videos just released a new video describing Nassim Haramein's work on black holes and how to properly visualize the structure of the vacuum:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jcl0kgOg4I