Trump Re-elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

Here is another example of Congress and the Senate taking money from an Iranian group the NIAC. For some who are supporters of Massey and Rand Paul this could present a quandary. These are mostly Democrats and one can see the Iranian influence in the way they present their objectives. Iran (NIAC) vs. Israel (AIPAC) another example of picking a side that divides people. Adding to the details here, Israel and Iran are both controlled by globalists so it appears to be a case of controlled opposition. The details are buried deeper.

Do you mind explaining a bit more why you posted this and what you were attempting to point out?

Maybe I'm missing something but I don't understand what makes this Iranian-American organization's scorecard ranking U.S. representatives important.
 
Here is another example of Congress and the Senate taking money from an Iranian group the NIAC. For some who are supporters of Massey and Rand Paul this could present a quandary. These are mostly Democrats and one can see the Iranian influence in the way they present their objectives. Iran (NIAC) vs. Israel (AIPAC) another example of picking a side that divides people. Adding to the details here, Israel and Iran are both controlled by globalists so it appears to be a case of controlled opposition. The details are buried deeper.
I think there's a bit of a difference, even if both sides are lying, confabulating, or hiding truth. You can even have a look at NIAC's financials if you want to. From what I can see, NIAC is attempting to 'rank' politicians on this basis of how they vote on the following:

NIAC Action is dedicated to building political power for the Iranian-American community to advance peace & diplomacy, secure equitable immigration policies, and protect the civil rights of all Americans. NIAC, the 501(c)(3) sister organization of NIAC Action, is dedicated to educating & engaging the Iranian-American community in order to further advance these priorities.
This is their website:


Personally, I would find it VERY interesting if NIAC's rankings for each politician would include -next to their names - the amount of money each have received from AIPAC. That would be really informative because you would have the opportunity to potentially compare two different perspectives.
 
This is terrible and how your government treats you if you're a person of conscience?

Highest ranking Navy Seal who supposedly "committed suicide" was actually murdered and the cover up goes right into the Trump Administration (Pete Hegseth and Don Jr who knew the problem or knew the person and his family, now in a position to do something and do - nothing). Video is 1 hr 20 minutes, so it's long.

 
I have been personally "befuddled" (puzzled, wondering etc) by Trump's actions.

Hypothesis:

We know things & events, down there on the Big Blue Marble - have a share of, let's say, "4D". 4D STS, higher densities, battles, etc.

Once, C's even said: "the economy is entirely manufactured / artificial".

>> Instead of staring at the usual facade ("political theater"), we have seen glimpses of what's really taking place behind the scenes...

That's my hypothesis! I think it's important for us, our mind, to be able to make sense of things, events - and be able to come by with a cohesive whole, so as to not loose the thread, and be able to move on, predict things.

It could be that Trump's actions were featuring more "behind-the-scene" actions than usual.

One point remains: people have free will, and even if we are so-called "low-level 3D STS pawns" - we have opportunities, some range for acting, etc. I think Trump has been kind of on the good side of the fence since he appeared some time ago. That's to say he's not exactly a facade... Political leaders may not be, fully, "facades" or front people.

So overall my idea would be that we have been seeing some urges coming from 4th D STS, or even from the STS strata allegedly ruling the world ("The Cabal", "The One world government" - you just name it).

I have been trying to make sense of Trump's actions, for instance - but it has been hard than to be able to come up with a continuous explanation. I think the recent activities kind of show that sort of "behind-the-scene" political dynamic (power dynamic). It showed us things were not bound to the motions we believe. It seemed so, for instance "the USA", "money", "war" etc. There is a share of it, which is correct. But overall I think we have been noticing different "goals", different actions. A sort of "Third man"?

We perhaps saw the Deep state more clearly: a structure, located we-dont-know-where (USA, Israel being some end-points) - because its goals have manifested more boldly. Trump is in-between, which has been the puzzling element.

I hope this post is clear! Many lines for a simple idea: the real power dynamic (at least for "USA") pertains to something articulated - a structure - in which Trump still has some room & free will - but which is not exactly representative of a known cohesive whole - for example "The USA".

(The recent article from ponerology.substack.com hints at a third power of some sort - and I believe that this power has been variable, so that it kind of fluctuates)
 
The people literally spoke at the Dallas CPAC event


I posted this in Iran war thread, and Beau’s post is an example of what I mean so adding this here also:
I don’t think the messaging from the media is working anymore, they have entirely discredited themselves. I’m hearing people say that they don’t know what to believe anymore. The media can try to construct a specific narrative but the people are going rogue. It’s like a modern secessio plebia.
 
I would like to quote a couple of things on the Biden administration so as to show a possible continuity up to today:

1)

The story of how our government was captured by a foreign cartel (Epstein) is the only thing that now matters. Everything else is a shiny object, and totally meaningless if we don’t overthrow our captors and achieve our sovereignty.

'Politburo' secretly ran Biden White House as aides were willing to do 'undemocratic things' to stop Trump
… asserting that a secretive cadre of aides ran the White House like a shadowy "politburo"

THIRD witness pleads Fifth in House Oversight investigation of covering up Biden's mental decline
Comer had issued a subpoena to Tomasini for allegedly "running interference" for Biden as his mental state declined. Tomasini — along with former chief of staff to first lady Jill Biden Anthony Bernal — were part of the "politburo," as described in Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper's book, Original Sin, that allegedly shielded Biden from questions about his health.

2)

Andrew M. LOBACZEWSKI - “Political ponerology”
In nations with pathocratic systems, supervision over scientific and cultural organizations is assigned to a special department of especially trusted people, a “Nameless Office”

3)


Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote this recently:
I’ve been on the phone with some of the top America First Conservative leaders.

We are all in agreement.

The admin and Republican Party is going in the wrong direction on key issues, like the war, Epstein, and especially domestic issues, and has been completely hijacked by the Lindsey Grahams, Mark Levin, and the neocon establishment Republicans we all voted against.

And

But it’s more than just the war. Tucker asked Weinstein:
Why would someone try and stoke that [a religious war]? What’s the game here?

Well, I mean, this is again this haunting sense that this is about somebody’s interest that has not been publicly shared and that we are being steered as pawns on a chessboard.

And

Earlier, Weinstein had said this (a long excerpt, but worth reading):
The reason that the Epstein phenomenon, whatever it was, is so important is that it suggests a hidden power structure that was there for leverage. … Logically, it is implied that it was connected to intelligence services, ours, likely Israel’s, who knows who else. But when you see your government, your president functioning in ways that do not add up, it’s like watching a planet behave oddly because of the gravity of some object you haven’t found yet. Right? There’s the implication that there’s something with power in this system that is undeclared. As far as we know, it’s unnamed.

And the central question is what is it?

I have been trying (point 1) and 2)), than to show something was around during Bidens - "a politburo", or that there was an external source of power. Guy Weinstein paraphrases this. Now it's interesting to note the follow-up to the above, by Harrison Koehli, in his article:

It’s even more fundamental than that, as Weinstein himself intuited

<> People don't recognize the problem as it really is

These are the problems that exercised Lobaczewski’s mind after his work
The modern form of democracy, in other words, is contrary to very basic facts about human nature
This type of person—completely indifferent to everyone around them, not just people outside their community or nation, and sadistic as well—is psychopathic. Whether it is Pharma, the deep state, or the Israel Lobby, the “hidden power” Weinstein is seeing the outlines of is an entrenched network of indifference and malevolence.

I personally see it, either as "alien influence interefring with human structures", or psychopathic energies trying to take over normal human structures. I think psychopaths are born 3D with some specs that tie them to 4D STS - and that aliens are fully 4D (or partly, perhaps more 4D than psychopaths).

Some writers expressed the following, on Biden:

John CARTER - “The Blitzkrieg Through the Institutions”
For years now we’ve talked of the left ... the process has been more similar to the creeping spread of an invasive fungus

I think he was describing the pathological / alien "beast" that was running the White House.

From what I can say, the Capitalist ideology has been slowly infiltrated, and then morphed into "Neoconservatism" once the host was sufficiently inside it. So, one day we got Capitalism popping up:

Harrison KOEHLI - "Pathocracy Rising: How Economic Systems Breed Deviants"
The current system developed as financial capitalism
On the one hand there is financial capitalism and usury. On the other: traditional Western conservatism based on productive labor.
In this sense financial capitalism is very similar to communism. As the system gains supremacy, those running the system will become progressively more saturated with those for whom the system works on a fundamental level, value-wise.
Communism and financial capitalism attract psychopaths of all descriptions.
The recent revelations about USAID demonstrate this perfectly. The CIA, after adopting political/psychological warfare strategies, weaponized this playbook worldwide to spread “democracy” and “liberalism.”

And so, when Trump was elected again, it had the ability to "Kill" that "beast" that was infiltrating the White House (probably via Capitalism - well, the West because it's the ideology that the West decided to adopt - it's not wrong but it has been hijacked):

Depathologizing America
It has been barely two weeks and already we’re living in another world, one that to me at least seemed remote and unimaginable just two months ago. The change has the potential to be as big—or bigger—than the fall of communism over thirty years ago. John Carter calls it the Second American Revolution. Pundits are saying that Trump has done more in two weeks than Biden did in four years. I’ll go further than that. He is dismantling a pathological system which took decades to build.



Conclusion:

I think the White House is being the target by something that is difficult to illustrate. We could look at Biden because it was more cristallized.

Alien or not, psychopaths or not, Epstein or not - seems there was an invasive fungus at the time of Biden.

It died when Trump arrived. Epstein is not new and was already in motion for a decade or two.

Now, Trump is being blackmailed so as to serve that beast again. It will certainly start again than to manifest and act, because Trump has no choice. We can thus more or less predict the future and duplicate "Biden", with safety. (That's unless the Divine intervenes)

The politburo is rebuilding, and dictating its will. During Biden, it was easier because Biden was put to unconsciousness by it - and used as a puppet. Result is the same - the agenda of the fungus, whatever this stuff is - will pop up back.

That has been the dots & stones that I was able to gather, here and there, during the recent years & months, and the above is the sort of summing-up that I can present to the reader. I don't know if my few conclusions are right - but I think you see how I've been trying to simply assmble a couple of things, without taking too many risks in terms of subjectivity.

Overall there is a sort of "invader" relentlessly trying to put its hands on the US apparatuses. There may be a continuity in this. Look at JFK, then look at Bush, Obama, Hillary - then Biden & the above quotes - and Trump today acting out of reason. Capitalism as a binder; knowing that it's a stable ideology that turned out to be infiltrated, Capitalism being the main "vector" of that "stuff".
 
A lengthy article on Jared Kushner and the Epstein class!

Benjamin Netanyahu regularly stayed at the Kushner family home and slept in Jared Kushner’s room. That intimacy is not trivia. It’s the seed of an influence channel that later plugged directly into U.S. policymaking.

 
A lengthy article on Jared Kushner and the Epstein class!



I understand the son of Trump may have had an affair with Netanyahu himself (!)

We recently learned how Trump was "terrified" - most probably due to a blackmailing scheme.

This blackmailing scheme, as we know, is shady but more or less originates from Israel ("Epstein"). What are the links between Netanyahu & this dark ring of power?!

At a first glance, we may be tempted to assert "Netanyahu = Epstein = leveraging Jared & then Trump".

Netanyahu has a slight chance of being caught in the same blackmailing machine, as a pawn. I wouldn't exclude this possibility. Perhaps Jared Kushner & Netanyahu were... in love.

In any case, this information is very interesting (and surprizing) if true! Thank you for having relayed it.

EDITED: it would more or less show how Donald Trump got into his mess
 
Now, Trump is being blackmailed so as to serve that beast again.
Was he blackmailed:
- when he called for military intervention in Iran in 1980?
- Obviously, you're advocating that we should have gone in there [Iran] with troops, etc., and brought our boys out.
- I absolutely feel that. Yes. I don't think there's any question. There's no question in my mind. I think *right now we'd be an oil rich nation.

- in 2010 when he wanted Kuwait to reimburse the US for liberating it in 1991 "for some a few very wealthy people" who despite this, didn't come to invest in the US"?

- in 2011 when he criticized the Obama administration's approach for not being aggressive enough and said "I would take the oil and stop this baby stuff. I’m only interested in Libya if we take the oil. If we don’t take the oil, I’m not interested."? Or when he bragged about screwing Qaddafi on a land lease, making him paid a fortune and not letting him use it? Or when he wanted to keep American troops in Iraq to grab their $1.5 trillion worth of oil as a "payment for the cost of the war" because otherwise "Iran would take it"?

- in 2013, when he made his views on the upcoming Israeli election and released a video with a glowing endorsement of Netanyahu?
“My name is Donald Trump and I’m a big fan of Israel. And frankly, a strong prime minister is a strong Israel. You truly have a great prime minister in Benjamin Netanyahu, there’s nobody like him. He’s a winner. He’s highly respected. He’s highly thought of by all. And people really do have great, great respect for what’s happened in Israel. So vote for Benjamin. Terrific guy, terrific leader. Great for Israel.”

- in 2015, when he said he would go after the oil fields in Iraq and Syria that nets the terrorist group millions of dollars a
week, "I would bomb the s--- out of them, I would just bomb those suckers"? Or when he slammed the just brokered Iran nuclear deal as "so bad for Israel and so dangerous"?

- in 2016 when he broke the embargo and started selling weapons to Ukraine?
Or when he said "They have suckered us" about Iran and that "the Iran nuclear deal is a disgrace"?

- in 2026 when he invaded Venezuela and kidnapped its President?

There was a good reason for All Israel News senior Washington contributor David Brody to prize Trump for his consistency on Iran, from 1980's call for intervention in Iran through nuclear "negotiations" to withdrawal from treaties, to military threats and, finally, invasion.
 
Was he blackmailed:
- when he called for military intervention in Iran in 1980?


- in 2010 when he wanted Kuwait to reimburse the US for liberating it in 1991 "for some a few very wealthy people" who despite this, didn't come to invest in the US"?

- in 2011 when he criticized the Obama administration's approach for not being aggressive enough and said "I would take the oil and stop this baby stuff. I’m only interested in Libya if we take the oil. If we don’t take the oil, I’m not interested."? Or when he bragged about screwing Qaddafi on a land lease, making him paid a fortune and not letting him use it? Or when he wanted to keep American troops in Iraq to grab their $1.5 trillion worth of oil as a "payment for the cost of the war" because otherwise "Iran would take it"?

- in 2013, when he made his views on the upcoming Israeli election and released a video with a glowing endorsement of Netanyahu?


- in 2015, when he said he would go after the oil fields in Iraq and Syria that nets the terrorist group millions of dollars a
week, "I would bomb the s--- out of them, I would just bomb those suckers"? Or when he slammed the just brokered Iran nuclear deal as "so bad for Israel and so dangerous"?

- in 2016 when he broke the embargo and started selling weapons to Ukraine?
Or when he said "They have suckered us" about Iran and that "the Iran nuclear deal is a disgrace"?

- in 2026 when he invaded Venezuela and kidnapped its President?

There was a good reason for All Israel News senior Washington contributor David Brody to prize Trump for his consistency on Iran, from 1980's call for intervention in Iran through nuclear "negotiations" to withdrawal from treaties, to military threats and, finally, invasion.

I believe that, same as indulging for his mistakes & wrongdoings, the opposite attitude can happen, which would be wrong too in terms of objectivity. Selecting a normal person's flaws & mistakes, and painting a whole from it (when it's not the case).

I have a positive feeling for him, so I would be more on the side of indulgence for his wrongdoings - but overall I am trying to look at the big picture, so, somehow, that he's "more or less not that negative" is sufficient for me. That's is due to the fact that he has been quite a stable President in the past.

So I think we must overall discern what is, and not over-indulge either his flaws or his positive traits - because it puts us off-track in both cases. It has been especially hard to do lately, because Trump has been a stable President during his first mandate. The problem IMO lies within the idea of putting into the box of the dark side so to speak. At worse, he would be a sort of STO/STS balancer I believe, if we were eager to attach some darkness to him. Take Hillary: she would be a more cristallized STS balancer.

Overall I am stunned to see Trump's popularity plunging like that. It is unusual. I think in looking at it makes us forget the real STS cristallizations.

I had a look back at the article @Vulcan59 posted. I think it is interesting in the oddity of the relationship Jared Kushner seemingly had with Netanyahu, but that the author conflates all & everything and ends up putting all in the same bag.

For instance:

1774868385358.png


... become straight affiliated with

1774868419138.png


Which is very Kennedy-ish. I think it is Kennedy-ish because it is.

So the question would be to separate Trump from the contact with Rothschild.

Perhaps, what the USA needs is as simple as a sexologist.

1774868539133.png


(Is the above the illustration of "humans consorting with the bad side", as stated by the C's? Is Netanyahu a "Lizzie"?)

I agree with you that the things you've said on Trump are not okay. You know, that Russian guy, Medvedev... He said, not that long ago something going by "those freaking Westerners, inundated by immigration... Let them die by the murdering immigrates and we will spectate it, let them die and let Westerner women (...)". Same for the intellectual who lost his daughter... A. Dugin: "let the West die, explode and disintegrate... Good riddance they are all morons".

Honestly, those statement are as criminal as Trump's ones. Perhaps this is stupidity overall and the effect of a lack of coordination, or simply the effect of the pressure STS does - it turns people against each others and we loose track of the real problems.

When I read the Russian statements, I feel required to lower my standards on politics: no perfect guys, stupid people, absolutely uncaring of the people of the world. I am very disappointed.

I wanted to defend my point on Trump, but I accept that it would be strategical than to opt for your point of view. Somehow, when somebody is "touched by STS" he can become a vector and it requires quarantine. So, despite my endorsements of Trump, I think people ought to listen to themselves, follow their ideas and see where it leads to. I think listening to one self is the best thing to do, even when we are mistaking.

Honestly, the last session saying "he's terrified" gave me the last strength to support him again. If not, I would have perhaps left him. I cannot accept to put him in the "rubbish". I simply cannot proceed because there are elements attesting from a sort of mecanic pointing out to things that would deserve scrutiny, inquiries & things. Overall it would lead to an external root cause. So I think I will follow that road and see what comes up.
 
Honestly, those statement are as criminal as Trump's ones.
No, they are not. Russia has a historical right to say things like that, the USofA has not.

Which is very Kennedy-ish.
Don't judge a book by its cover. What about the baroquesque 90,000 square feet Ball Room, is it Kennedy-ish? What about naming half of the world and multiple high-sky investments around the world after himself? Is it? What about putting a yarmulke on during his daughter wedding? What about his humongous sense of entitlement? Kennedy-ish too?
What about withdrawing from, or breaking peace treaties and negotiations instead of pursuing them? Is it Kennedy-ish?

Psychiatrist EXPOSES the Sickness of Collective West Leadership | Niall McLaren
 
Hello back

No, they are not. Russia has a historical right to say things like that, the USofA has not.

I understand this idea but the consideration of the specific statements I referred to are pathological (rather than something that is to be put on "normal statements"). I think sometimes our words bypass our reason, that is something that can happen, so I am not judging it too harshly. I am simply disgusted by the low-level of the ideas & the words. I feel to see people who let themselves go to the most easiest way of judging. The point is that I was a fervent supporter of Russia (and still am). I am, too, a number in the West. A simple useless pawn and slave. That is why I sincerely standed & supported Russia ... to then hear those words... It was a shock! This showed me there was discrepancy in my - let's say - relationship (or the appreciation of it) with Russia. Somehow, the "love" was not that bi-directionnal! Of course it is, but honestly, their words were pure "just let them die and have their women raped by migrants". I condemn such statements and consider those outside of the acceptable range. but, I can, myself, let myself go, too, so that I would consider a sort of possibility of repentance. The main point being that the mentality changes and that Russia sincerely changes its minds. That is because peraps 50 up to 90 % of Western citizens are pure slaves to a system manipulating those (I don't make you a picture, you know how things are in the wonderful world of STS).

Psychiatrist EXPOSES the Sickness of Collective West Leadership | Niall McLaren

I think rather than glueing Trump's troubled behaviors straight to him, like a loop-end-point consideration, I would indeed try to see if some psychiatry could be untangled; I understand some pathology is and has been at work for a while now, especially in the US, and that this psychopathology (pathocracy) has recurring patterns & laws. This makes me think things aren't that simple as Trump being the start & the end-point of all troubles. To me, the pathology that stick to him comes from elsewhere and I am trying to keep an eye on this. One fact is that this pathocracy is a stuff that takes time to propagate, and something that is like a sort of trend, or a wave. It can contaminate and spread and affect much. It becomes difficult to untangle it in the context of Trump. Somehow he has been featuring plain STS attitudes, lately (and I understand your focus is more general, as a sort of final exam, or assessment. I think I respect that and would not want to interfere with this assessment; after all, what is is, and the things you've listed "are"). - and I would be tempted to believe that he is more suffering from the affection potential of this "wave".

I think the pathology is present, and exists. That would be a fact - but, Gosh, look at the Clinton's especially Hillary... Girl is embed into the mutilation and murder of children, and we would now enter the second decade during which citizen casually chit-chat on her affinity for pizzas. I think some "share", in regard of Trump, could me made, and that it is clear cut. I appreciate you are perhaps seeking for perfection, or perhaps that you have a high standard for people. I would say that I respect this, and that this is indeed a way that I would consider: people who are "mild" - must "leave" (and this would be the case for Trump). After all, any sort of "war", any sort of criminal action - is - so it must meet the appropriate consequence. STO has specific criterions so if it is not, it is not. (I would think Trump has big potential and that there is a huge fringe of elite that is rotten to the core)

So, the pathology is sneaky, it's something scrambling the equation in pointing out to the wrong enemy, while at the same time having the potential of affecting normal people. If Trump is terrified, he is still afloat, I believe, and the pathology would primarily come from the people doing the things and putting the USA & its President to its knees. Once Trump is gone - those activities will still remain to be adressed.

So what to do? You seem to have decided to discard Trump. It is perhaps a way, especially because he has been cornered; Trump seems now neutered and nothing good will come out of him. In fact, if nothing is done, each day will be worse and it won't take much time to stare at a bloody mess. I believe each day he is loosing some assets to foreign & unknown negative hands. That would be the reason why we would have to seek for a new leader IMO, and not because other reasons. Kind of strategical. I would be the utmost happy to have, in fact, a better President than Trump. Can we? Trump wouldn't even be able to set a new President, because he is locked. What is the solution to the lock? I think damage must happen because it's a now-win situation and damage control. I think an option, as usual, is to let go, and the cosmos will take care of things. But in this case we shouldn't expect a good future in the short term. I accept that road, things are how they are!

(Sorry for the Kennedy mention which seems to be irrelevant to you; I am remaining at the old era with JFK... Trump electing RFK... and so "serving the old cause" - symbolic; I think some pooed in their pants when they saw a Kennedy walking on the lawn of the White House!)
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom