Trump Re-elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

FWIW, lengthy article at Gold and Geopolitics on 'Connecting dots that don't connect'.



I personally appreciate the "5D" qualificative: it became a trend, to get "likes"; not that long ago, I stumbled upon a New Agy website teaching about "5D meditations".

I am referring here to 5D being the contemplation one, as taught by the C's, so nothing to really "meditate on"; unles 5D chess means "chess to death".

Wondering if one day there will be a Substack named "5D Quantum complexity simplified" :lol:
 
Interesting lecture by Jiang Xueqin about Trump. The general idea is “what if Trump wants to accelerate the fall of the American Empire to have greater control over the process?” It’s kind of 3.5‑D chess, but an interesting thought process to consider.

"What If Trump Is a Genius?" — Game Theory of the Iran War
The Setup

Trump addressed the nation saying the war continues, promising to "bomb Iran back to the stone ages" over the next 2-3 weeks. Ground invasion rumors are circulating — Polymarket bets surging ($200k bet on invasion paying $1M+), Pentagon pizza index spiking, reserves being called up with a letter from Leonard Anderson telling them to "get ready to deploy, fight and win."

Peter Hegseth (Secretary of War) unveiled a "Greater North America" strategic map — everything from Greenland to Ecuador is now America's "security perimeter." The Monroe Doctrine on steroids.

Conventional wisdom: a ground invasion of Iran is suicidal. Mountains (Zagros range allows guerrilla warfare + drone/artillery strikes), deserts blocking eastern approach from Pakistan, only ~50,000 troops deployed. The consensus is Americans first want to control the Strait of Hormuz to relieve pressure on the global economy — but the strait is narrow, close to Iranian coastline and mountains, and easily mined.

UK PM Starmer and Australian PM Albanese both addressed their nations warning of rising fuel/gas prices and economic pain. Trump instead said "our economy is strong" and will be "roaring back like never before."


The Game Theory Flip

Jiang's core thesis: what if Trump wants to lose in Iran? What if the goal isn't winning the war but destroying the Middle Eastern oil system so the world becomes dependent on North American resources?

The logic chain:
  1. 20% of world oil flows through the Middle East, primarily to East Asia and Europe. Japan gets 75% of its oil from the Middle East.
  2. War collapses GCC oil production → world doesn't run out of oil, it shifts dependency to North America (US, Canada, Venezuela) and Russia.
  3. It's not just energy — the Hormuz blockage kills phosphate, ammonium, sulfur, urea (fertilizers = food production) and helium/sulfuric acid (semiconductors = AI production).
  4. The countries most dependent on Middle East resources — Japan, China, India, South Korea, Europe — are also the biggest holders of US Treasuries.
  5. If these countries now need American resources to survive, they can't dump US debt — the $39T Ponzi scheme continues indefinitely because America holds the resource leverage.

JP Morgan has stated that by mid-April the world will run out of oil if the war continues.

Water as stability indicator: North America and Russia have abundant fresh water = most resilient regions. Africa, Europe, Middle East, Southeast Asia = conflict-prone due to water scarcity. China sits on Tibetan plateau water that India and Southeast Asia depend on — potential flash point if drought hits and China hoards.


The Technate vs. The Third Rome

Jiang frames this as America mirroring Russia's strategy:

Russia — The Third Rome (Dugin's Vision)

Based on Alexander Dugin's 1996 Foundations of Geopolitics. The argument: the liberal unipolar moment will fade because secularism, individualism, and liberalism are anti-human — they break apart community. Western civilization will collapse on its own values.

Russia's job:
  • Stay coherent — unify through nationalism and religion
  • Industrialize for war (Russian military industry now dominates civilian industry and the trend is accelerating)
  • Control Ukraine = one-third of world's carbohydrates + major energy exports via Black Sea
  • Build alliances (Japan, Vietnam, India, Iran) as a trading bloc
  • Wait while everyone else falls apart

The Ukraine invasion was NOT a response to NATO. It was implementation of this grand vision — build a war economy, control food/energy, and survive the coming collapse better than anyone else. Russia now produces its own drones domestically (previously dependent on Iran) and can export them to Iran to fight the Americans.

America — The Technate

Trump's mirror response. Greenland, Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, Cuba, Colombia, Panama aren't random provocations — they're all pieces of a self-sufficient North American fortress. Two oceans for defense, infinite resources, manufacturing reshored.

The "Greater North America" map Hegseth presented IS the Technate.

Trump's provocations decoded:
  • Greenland → Denmark conflict = Arctic resources + strategic position
  • Canada threats = oil reserves (3rd largest globally)
  • Venezuela takeover (January) = world's largest oil reserves
  • Cuba, Honduras, Nicaragua, Colombia, Mexico = completing the perimeter
  • All part of "everything north of the equator, from Greenland to Ecuador, from Alaska to Guyana"

The World Order Transition

New World Order (Bush, Sep 11 1991)Trump World Order
EconomyFinance (Wall Street = center of world)Resources + manufacturing
CultureSecular multiculturalism / consumerismChristian nationalism
SecurityPax Americana (US defends all)MAGA / Fortress America

Bush's three pillars: America as financial capital (offshore manufacturing, focus on Wall Street) + secular multiculturalism (forget borders/identity, unite through consumerism) + global domination (America guarantees world peace, destroys challengers).

Trump's inversion: Finance → resources/manufacturing. Multiculturalism → Christian nationalism ("love of the white race, nation, and God"). Pax Americana → national rejuvenation (MAGA = rebuild manufacturing, exploit God-given resources, every American gets a decent life).

Why the System Was Going to Collapse Anyway

Post-WWII: America lent money to Europe/Japan → they bought American manufactured goods → good for America.

Over time: Americans got lazy → shifted manufacturing to Europe/Japan (especially Germany) → then to China → America became consumer of last resort, spending more than it made.

China: "Let me do all the work cheaply, and I'll lend you the money to do it." Result: America became lazy, indebted, corrupt. Massive inequality → political corruption → oligarchy (not democracy). American people got pissed → elected Trump.

Trump recognized intuitively: this system cannot hold. It's a house of cards, a Ponzi scheme. The question isn't if it collapses but when — and who benefits from the collapse. Trump's answer: control the collapse so his coalition benefits. Two power bases: Christian evangelicals (Israel supporters) + AI/Silicon Valley (counter-elite vs. old finance elite = "elite overproduction" dynamic).

The Convergence Methodology

Jiang explicitly states his analytical framework: when eschatological/religious, geopolitical/economic, and historical vectors all align on the same event, prediction confidence is high. He acknowledges he can't pinpoint exact timing but can identify players and trajectory with high confidence.

His argument: religious narratives (Esther/Persia, eschatology) are "long-lost memories of our ancient past told through myths." Geopolitics drives historical forces. When all three factors converge on the same event, the event is near-certain.

Key Takeaways
  1. The Iran war is designed to collapse Middle Eastern oil — not win territory
  2. Global resource dependency shifts to North America and Russia — both benefit
  3. Europe, East Asia, and the developing world get squeezed into dependence on US/Russian resources
  4. $39T US debt becomes sustainable because resource-dependent nations can't dump Treasuries
  5. The Technate (Greater North America) and Third Rome (Russia) are mirror strategies for surviving global systemic collapse
  6. Trump is either the worst president in history (conventional view) or the greatest (if the goal was always controlled demolition of the American empire to rebuild on resource/manufacturing foundations)
  7. Both Putin and Trump have concluded the current system is collapsing regardless — the only question is who manages the decline to their advantage
 
Interesting lecture by Jiang Xueqin about Trump. The general idea is “what if Trump wants to accelerate the fall of the American Empire to have greater control over the process?” It’s kind of 3.5‑D chess, but an interesting thought process to consider.
This is why I personally think that Prof Xuequin is a bit overrated. He does say some interesting things, but then he says some others that seem totally unlikely to me. Coincidentially, I was just thinking the following right before reading this post:

Seeing how Trump, Hegseth, Rubio, et al have behaved during the Iran war, it seems obvious to me that human error, wishful thinking, stupidity and other personal motives (e.g. blackmail, threats, bribery, etc) are very real things which do shape global politics. But people like the good Prof Xuequin will insist that it's all 'game theory', therefore assuming there is always a rational player on the table. Often there is, but not always! Taken to the extreme, you can see how we'll end up assuming that Trump is playing 4D chess every time he does something 'weird' (often lately), which doesn't ring true to me. Rather, he got himself in trouble big time because he listened to the wrong advice. Or because he is being blackmailed with threats, which is what the Cs have said. And those pulling his strings are making mistakes due to wishful thinking (again, as the Cs said).

That's just my opinion. I do like the Prof and I've learned a couple of things from him - I just don't think he is as insightful as many think these days.
 
Some people are starting to suspect he's suffering from dementia. It could be like an induced frontotemporal or vascular dementia which is on the stroke spectrum. On the same lines as the Retired Air Force general McCasland that went missing and which the Cs said that he went mad.

(Gaby) William Neil McCasland, retired commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, was last seen on February 27th 2026. He walked out of his Albuquerque home and into the Sandia Mountain foothills. He left his phone. Left his glasses. Left his wearable devices. Took a gun and his wallet. What happened to him?

A: Driven to madness.

Q: (L) Okay, so you think that he maybe went out and shot himself?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Was he driven to madness by some kind of beaming technology of the human variety?

A: Yes


Q: (L) So they were beaming shit into his head.

March 9, 2024

Q: (Joe) What are the chances of Trump being assassinated this year?

A: Possible made to look natural event.

Q: (Gaby) Like a heart attack.

A: Stroke.
 
This is why I personally think that Prof Xuequin is a bit overrated. He does say some interesting things, but then he says some others that seem totally unlikely to me.
Yeah, I wanted to bring this up because it aligns well with the introduction of the economic control grid they're rushing to pass. The US has a $10 trillion debt wall it needs to roll, so the scenario that it tries to blow up the Middle East, lock the Eurozone and Japan into their resources and reprice the debt (say, two cent for dollar), as both the Eurozone and Japan will have to swallow it, feels like a maneuver they might want to pull. China, as one of the biggest US creditors will get hit severely. Trump's naming of Bin Salman, saying he might "kiss his ass," is also a reckless signal that he doesn't care about "old deals". I mean, at one diplomacy level, is there anything more humiliating than this? One thing for sure - they need to move quite fast.
 
This is why I personally think that Prof Xuequin is a bit overrated. He does say some interesting things, but then he says some others that seem totally unlikely to me. Coincidentially, I was just thinking the following right before reading this post:

Seeing how Trump, Hegseth, Rubio, et al have behaved during the Iran war, it seems obvious to me that human error, wishful thinking, stupidity and other personal motives (e.g. blackmail, threats, bribery, etc) are very real things which do shape global politics. But people like the good Prof Xuequin will insist that it's all 'game theory', therefore assuming there is always a rational player on the table. Often there is, but not always! Taken to the extreme, you can see how we'll end up assuming that Trump is playing 4D chess every time he does something 'weird' (often lately), which doesn't ring true to me. Rather, he got himself in trouble big time because he listened to the wrong advice. Or because he is being blackmailed with threats, which is what the Cs have said. And those pulling his strings are making mistakes due to wishful thinking (again, as the Cs said).

That's just my opinion. I do like the Prof and I've learned a couple of things from him - I just don't think he is as insightful as many think these days.
Yeah, I also don't think that Trump is playing 4D chess but the observation that the oil infrastructure in the US and Russia is not affected while the supply from the middle east is disrupted seems to be somewhat valid. Maybe somebody up there, higher than Trump, planned for the destruction caused by the war in Iran to leave the US on top.

Of course, as you say, even if that's the plan, whether it will work it's doubtful. For one thing, the flow of oil to US' enemies in Asia has not stopped, as far as I know. Also, I think Prof. Xuequin is probably wrong that Europe and Asia will be dependent on the US for oil. There was that article that Aeneas brought up and was posted on SOTT a few weeks ago which explained that refineries are designed for one specific type of oil and if you lose that specific supply then it's most likely gone for good. So, I don't see the leverage that the countries holding US debt will not dump it because they need US oil.
 
This is why I personally think that Prof Xuequin is a bit overrated. He does say some interesting things, but then he says some others that seem totally unlikely to me.

As much as I like Prof. Jiang, especially his "Civilization" series, he is a bit like a newbie when it comes to "conspiracy theories": excited and lacking discernment IMO. And he may be becoming a victim of his sudden popularity allowing himself to be carried away beyond his expertise, of some kind of a commentators' boom, so to say, as Prof. Finkelstein recently pointed.

Here is one Professor's take on the other Professor (Jiang) - criticism delivered with apparent sympathy:

 
Back
Top Bottom