Tucker Carlson interviews & ideologies

I guess we shouldn't be surprised, Cruz is a pure blooded Neocon, and he and others like him are risking their seats after posing as America First alongside Trump, I guess that is why this Senator agreed to sit down with Carlson, a PR attempt to convince the MAGA base that its in their best interest to offensively go after Iran. It failed miserably.

His appeal to his 'Christian faith' and tying it up with his allegiance to Israel, trying to downplay his relationship with AIPAC, we have seen it all before and is all so tiresome at this point, people resonated with America First because they are all hurting and this BS is not working anymore.
 
His appeal to his 'Christian faith' and tying it up with his allegiance to Israel, trying to downplay his relationship with AIPAC, we have seen it all before and is all so tiresome at this point, people resonated with America First because they are all hurting and this BS is not working anymore.
I just realized, he is the person he describes AIPAC to be, an American invested in Israeli-American relations, in truth, him and all others in the same boat are just lobbyist that work for the US government.
 
I’ve seen what Cruz and others like him have been saying and doing over the years and I would say that there is a high probability that the key problem isn’t just naivety and delusions...

A panful watch, and by now Cruz would have been onto Carlson due to many of his resent interviews, such as the interview with survivors of the U.S. Liberty. Carlson knows well what happened, and that is just one dot. Cruz knew what he was getting into and was armed a bit, and Carlson had to know where things would likely go.

As for what you said 'over the years,' indeed he was all those things.
Never trusted that slime bag.

Ditto.
 
Something with Mr. Tucker Carlson still puzzles me , watching him defer to the official myth of 911 , it happened recently with Scott Horton and previously with Dan Caldwell , there's certainly other interviews when he does it as well , when interviewing Clayton Morris , Mr. Clayton mentions that 911 was a false flag , but the conversation quickly moves on. Is Tucker still playing the dis-info shill / agent part ?, despite not being officially part of the machine , it would be easy given his background to consider it so , but what is mentioned of him in the transcripts would not make it as a clear cut interpretation of this as such , character flaw , and or , fear of losing part of his audience or potential interviewees ? ( hm, maybe I've answered my own question ..)
 

Tucker's second interview with Darryl Cooper (Martyr Made). For anyone who listened to the Epstein series of Martyr Made, the first hour and a half of this will be quite familiar. The same details of the case are here, nothing much new, describing the mountain of circumstantial evidence and coincidences which point to the coverup of a hugely important blackmail operation at the highest levels.

Where it gets really interesting is the final hour or so, where Darryl's description of the situation touches very close to the core idea of political ponerology. These are questions which he asked on his own podcast - what is wrong psychologically with our leaders and the circles they seem to run in? Now this intersects with Tucker's input about the spiritual nature of the phenomenon, which approaches the subject of hyperdimensional evil. For this reason it's an important discussion, reaching a potentially large audience, getting closer than most to the 'topic of topics'.
 
I'm almost finished with the above interview with Darryl. What keeps running around in my head was something I heard on the SOTT podcasts. I don't remember which one it was, but the it was the idea was that the Cathars didn't want to bring children into this world. At the time, I thought that was a bit extreme - now, not so much. Funny how they were obliterated from history.
Ferdinand,
With hair up-staring – then like reeds, not hair –
Was the first man that leaped; cried ‘Hell is empty
And all the devils are here.’

(Ariel, Act 1 Scene 2)
 
Where it gets really interesting is the final hour or so, where Darryl's description of the situation touches very close to the core idea of political ponerology.
Thank you, Ben, for your summary and as a consequence, I listened to the last hour, which was great. Tucker is visibly shaken by realising the all pervasiveness of the pedophilia thing. Pizzagate and Podestra is also mentioned with their perverse pedophilic 'art'.
Harrison has gone into the pedophilia subject in his recent substack article It's Darker Than You Can Imagine where he also points to a previous article of his, detailing the Franklin scandal. The Franklin Cover-up
That last case was just one of many cases which have popped up in recent years and where the perpetrators of pedophilia have walked free and where the scandals have been buried and ignored.
 
Tucker is visibly shaken by realising the all pervasiveness of the pedophilia thing. Pizzagate and Podestra is also mentioned with their perverse pedophilic 'art'.

All the more shocking when we know that Tucker is aware that, proudly displayed on his neighbour's wall, was art depicting something similar to his own terrifying experiences. As referred to in the C's session:

(Ennio) Tucker recently stated in an interview that he woke up one night over a year ago in pain to find claw marks on his ribs and shoulder. Whatever happened, his wife and four dogs, all light sleepers, slept through the attack or event that caused the injuries. The alleged attack, whatever it was, seemed to have a deep enough effect on him that he started reading scripture.

I experienced something similar myself though it left no physical traces and I had more awareness of such things - but it was still deeply disturbing.
 
Back
Top Bottom