Tucker Carlson interviews & ideologies

[Ben]

Well, he’s done it. He’s asked the question you „can’t ask“.
And as usually he’s done a really good job of it. He even gets close to identifying support for Isreal as an insane ideology (like wokeism).
He takes the Christian line through it all.

This was really good from Tucker, full of righteous anger. The interesting part was the interview with Francesca Albanese (UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories). She describes her experience of being sanctioned by the US for her crime of exposing the financial interests behind the Israeli genocide, rather than the Israeli government itself ( which is a common enough stance right now). The conversation comes very close the truth - Israel and the US are part of a system (she refers to it as an algorithm). They are not competing each other as separate governments, they are united against ordinary people. It's one step away from describing a one world government, at least for Western interests. Very good interview.

 

[Voyageur]

Tucker interviewed Matt Walsh, which was an interesting exchange, an overall a good exchange and worth watching, particularly where Matt knows he has his feet in both conservative camps and has no idea what can be done as it is broken.

Matt takes pains to describe how he has friends on both sides (does not name names, but one knows), and when people come out to ask him to support one or the other's position, he can't violate friendships, he says - which gets into meanings. Now Tucker does not hold that exactly, he calls a spade a spade, and Matt does, too, yet only to a point. What is that point? It seems to be Zionism and the butchering of the Palestinian people locked in their prison. Tucker was more than explicit, and Matt took the I don't care default (the default being, not caring about Israel as it is a different country).

Walsh sums up conservatism in terms of importance:

1. the believe in objective truth
2. Identity as in a nation
3. Family and
4. Marriage (the foundation of family)

Tucker boils it down to 2 of 4.

Prior to this, both get into the subject of insanity (their words), which brought to the world mass hyper gender transitioning and mutilation, and doctors (dishing out covid toxin, cheerleading abortions and the harvesting of their parts without even a funeral, and MAiD with the harvesting of their organs), all in a medical framework that has captured society. This has gone beyond the slippery evil slope, that once adopted how do you stop it, and where does it next go when incorporated in medical practices (not said was law). Matt speaks of (paraphrasing) "...they have to be very indifferent to human life, which is evil..." Agree, IMO.

That last comment struck me going back to the "I don't care" comment on the what's going on over there in juxtaposition, because Tucker kept reminding him of the abject murder of it all in Gaza. So, when it suits Matt, one thing is evil, and if not, he goes to the default.

One may see why Matt does not want to make the one side, along with his so-called friends (who are all in), angry with him, so it is somewhere between strategic enclosure and simply being worried, perhaps frightened even - but one can't know his mind here.

They both bring up when discussing the above, or at least Tucker does, on Canada being the absolute worst of them all. My perspective is limited to Canada, and yet I have to agree, our leaders have lost their minds, and more scary, are so may people that blindly follow, but not all. Tucker quipped, that maybe we should invade... Well, Canada appears to be lost, so at this point either the U.S. or Russia might help.

Matt Walsh Responds to Demands to Disavow His Allies, and How to Resolve the Right-Wing Civil War​

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-matt-walsh-2

 

[Cosmos]

Tucker interviewed Matt Walsh, which was an interesting exchange, an overall a good exchange and worth watching, particularly where Matt knows he has his feet in both conservative camps and has no idea what can be done as it is broken.

Matt takes pains to describe how he has friends on both sides (does not name names, but one knows), and when people come out to ask him to support one or the other's position, he can't violate friendships, he says - which gets into meanings. Now Tucker does not hold that exactly, he calls a spade a spade, and Matt does, too, yet only to a point. What is that point? It seems to be Zionism and the butchering of the Palestinian people locked in their prison. Tucker was more than explicit, and Matt took the I don't care default (the default being, not caring about Israel as it is a different country).

Walsh sums up conservatism in terms of importance:

1. the believe in objective truth
2. Identity as in a nation
3. Family and
4. Marriage (the foundation of family)

Tucker boils it down to 2 of 4.

Prior to this, both get into the subject of insanity (their words), which brought to the world mass hyper gender transitioning and mutilation, and doctors (dishing out covid toxin, cheerleading abortions and the harvesting of their parts without even a funeral, and MAiD with the harvesting of their organs), all in a medical framework that has captured society. This has gone beyond the slippery evil slope, that once adopted how do you stop it, and where does it next go when incorporated in medical practices (not said was law). Matt speaks of (paraphrasing) "...they have to be very indifferent to human life, which is evil..." Agree, IMO.

That last comment struck me going back to the "I don't care" comment on the what's going on over there in juxtaposition, because Tucker kept reminding him of the abject murder of it all in Gaza. So, when it suits Matt, one thing is evil, and if not, he goes to the default.

One may see why Matt does not want to make the one side, along with his so-called friends (who are all in), angry with him, so it is somewhere between strategic enclosure and simply being worried, perhaps frightened even - but one can't know his mind here.

They both bring up when discussing the above, or at least Tucker does, on Canada being the absolute worst of them all. My perspective is limited to Canada, and yet I have to agree, our leaders have lost their minds, and more scary, are so may people that blindly follow, but not all. Tucker quipped, that maybe we should invade... Well, Canada appears to be lost, so at this point either the U.S. or Russia might help.

Matt Walsh Responds to Demands to Disavow His Allies, and How to Resolve the Right-Wing Civil War​

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-matt-walsh-2

I‘m almost through it and it is well worth the watch. Other than Walsh obviously trying hard to mince his words and not talk freely about one big elephant in the room, namely, the assassination of Kirk and generally the Israel thing, it was quite interesting. I have to say though that it is getting quite frustrating to hear people so much in self censorship mode that a free flow of ideas and discussions is prevented. Luckily though people like Tucker and especially Owens are breaking out of that artificial world of „you can’t openly and freely talk“.