Tucker Carlson interviews & ideologies

[iamthatis]

Anybody know anything about this? Fake news by RT?

Trump kicks Tucker Carlson out of MAGA​

Uh, oh.. :-o

What is happening with Trump? There are raging contradictions between his original statements and the above.

So, if our originally hopeful American Hero leader, who survived the assassination producing a heroic photo, is making his original follower react to him like this, what is next for America? Election-meddling producing another Biden-style Pedo Regime Round Two?

After this will the American Public go into Shocked Silence Mode; or Civil War or what? :-o

Yeah, Trump's original MAGA messaging had an inherent internal contradiction that was out of touch with reality. America's actual 'greatness' was based on its hegemony after WWII, which involved overthrowing uncooperative foreign governments and cracking open their landbases and populations for exploitation by American corporations, the petrodollar, control over the Middle East, endless money printing and debt spending, offshoring production and hollowing out the economy, becoming the world's biggest consumer market, mass slaughter and mayhem around the world, financial parasitism, etc., etc., all which provided for a high American standard of living.

Trump's MAGA plan was reasonable, and that's why I think people like Tucker were fully on board - no more foreign wars, take care of the woke mind virus and illegal immigrant invasion at home, re-vamp the American industrial base, and use protective tariffs, all designed to secure Uncle Sam's place (at the top, hopefully) in a multipolar reality. This all turned out to be impossible, because it was going to basically remove everything that made America 'great' in the first place. The MAGA plan would've made American morally acceptable, but probably would've caused some sort of cultural and economic crisis as the Empire contracted - or would've gotten him/his family killed via a third assassination attempt for disobeying his PTB handlers. So he was in a tight spot - damned if you do, damned if you don't.

And now he's having a tantrum and 'kicking Tucker out of MAGA', just like he vented his frustrated ego on Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie, some of the few sane people of conscience with a broad public reach in America. I think the USA might be headed for a collapse similar to the one suffered by the USSR in the 90's - not a civil war, but a serious breakdown. At that point, or even now, I don't see Tucker or anyone else with a functioning brain really giving a damn if they have Trump's personal seal of approval or not. Why should they, given what he's turning into?

 

[Alejo]

anyone else with a functioning brain really giving a damn if they have Trump's personal seal of approval or not. Why should they, given what he's turning into?

yes, he's unsupportable these days.

 

[Voyageur]

Building on this (cross posting) earlier interview, Tucker brings on Carrie Prejean Boller from Trump's Religious Liberty Commission (she 'was' a commissioner).

This has to do with censorship on steroids, pushed by Paula White (bat S... crazy) and the nucleolus controlling Trump, who had appointed her. It is an important interview (IMO):

Does the Christian catechism require loyalty to Benjamin Netanyahu? Apparently it does, as Carrie Prejean Boller learned the hard way.
Carrie Prejean Boller has been boldly standing for truth since 2009. Almost 20 years later here she is, the same girl, still standing. More bold than ever. Unwilling to compromise her Christian beliefs for a temporal position, even one appointed by the President of the United States.

What becomes clear, OSIT, is that these defective nuclei who were doing this to her from the inside are being managed from the usual from the outside.

 

[Voyageur]

No prediction, just a thought relating to the recent Trump (at least in his name) canning of Carrie's Commission on the U.S. Religious Liberty Commission, that people like Paula White and other cronies might suddenly suggest a replacement for the now vacated seat to that of one CEO Erika Kirk.

That would never be suggested, would it?

Strange things happen these days.

Edit: word

 

[Benjamin]

No prediction, just a thought relating to the recent Trump (at east in his name) canning of Carrie's Commission on the U.S. Religious Liberty Commission, that people like Paula White and other cronies might suddenly suggest a replacement for the now vacated seat to that of one CEO Erika Kirk.

That would never be suggested, would it?

Strange things happen these days.

Hmm. I had a similar thought after learning of Erika's new appointment. I wondered if she had become a liability so she was being quietly moved out of the spotlight. Perhaps a story they might use could be she was thrust into the role as CEO of TPUSA to steer the ship but she never had time to grieve for Charlie so will take a leave of absence.

 

[Ennio]

The following two videos are superb discussions Tucker had with Bret Weinstein. One is posted to Tucker's channel, and the second part presented on Bret Weinstein's Dark Horse channel, but both taped in Tucker's studio. Its clear that the two of them have great respect and regard for each other, and part of that comes out in what they were willing to discuss.

Like Tucker, Weinstein's points of view in regards to Israel and the US's war in Iran, and Netanyahu's behavior in particular, are presented very reasonably and rationally. No surprise there, but its this level of discourse that is exactly what makes them so "dangerous" to the narratives that have gone in to selling this war, and what drives so many in the Zionist establishment crazy.

What was an especially good insight was their shared view of the inevitable backlash against Israel, the Zionist cause, and jews in general. That the insane levels of violent aggression, belligerence, and arrogance on display "in defense of jews" - will be the exact cause of greater anger and perhaps danger to all jews (regardless of political leanings), and something horrific happening on a wider more societal scale probably. The only other pundit I have heard express this was Clif High who said that he'd warned his Jewish friends of something like this occurring.

On a lighter but no less relevant note, I especially enjoyed hearing Tucker and Weinstein reflecting on their upbringing, thought processes, and values they were raised with. In doing so, they were not only sharing their views of unfolding events, but were sharing observations about themselves as the observers. Those parts of the discussion are especially valuable, imo, because they demonstrate a level of self-awareness that rarely enters the conversation of world events. But that somehow results in making their perspectives and points of view even more transparent, or pure, for lack of a better word.

Sadly, but something many if us may be all-too-familiar with, to one degree or another, both shared how their respective paths towards truth-telling, as they see it, has also cost them dearly - in the form of verbal attacks and ostracization from people they considered friends (and sometimes family). It was a reminder that, while these two are very strong, intelligent, and courageous individuals, they are both also, at the end of the day, people with hearts like anyone else with good will and a deeply insightful sense for what's truly in the best interest of people. But, as one of them commented at one point, not everyone actually wants the truth.

 

[SlipNet]

I listened to both podcasts last night @Ennio, and I agree, very insightful commentary from both. You can see that classic example of like minds communing for the greater good in their conversations. Tucker in particular is always very careful in how he phrases his criticisms, mindful of how his enemies can easily distort and damage his honest critique. I didn't know much about Bret before, and was happy to see he's got a fine understanding of the current woes. I was of the opinion that we really need Jews to step up and join the fight, and what with his brother Eric entering the fray on UFOs, the Weinstein brothers are a fine addition to the vanguard. These two videos are essential viewing for anyone who's interested in getting deeper into the world situation, and no doubt they will reach many people who have thus far been perhaps a little hesitant to look deeper into the world's problems.

 

[Andrian]

The following two videos are superb discussions Tucker had with Bret Weinstein. One is posted to Tucker's channel, and the second part presented on Bret Weinstein's Dark Horse channel, but both taped in Tucker's studio. Its clear that the two of them have great respect and regard for each other, and part of that comes out in what they were willing to discuss.

Like Tucker, Weinstein's points of view in regards to Israel and the US's war in Iran, and Netanyahu's behavior in particular, are presented very reasonably and rationally. No surprise there, but its this level of discourse that is exactly what makes them so "dangerous" to the narratives that have gone in to selling this war, and what drives so many in the Zionist establishment crazy.

What was an especially good insight was their shared view of the inevitable backlash against Israel, the Zionist cause, and jews in general. That the insane levels of violent aggression, belligerence, and arrogance on display "in defense of jews" - will be the exact cause of greater anger and perhaps danger to all jews (regardless of political leanings), and something horrific happening on a wider more societal scale probably. The only other pundit I have heard express this was Clif High who said that he'd warned his Jewish friends of something like this occurring.

On a lighter but no less relevant note, I especially enjoyed hearing Tucker and Weinstein reflecting on their upbringing, thought processes, and values they were raised with. In doing so, they were not only sharing their views of unfolding events, but were sharing observations about themselves as the observers. Those parts of the discussion are especially valuable, imo, because they demonstrate a level of self-awareness that rarely enters the conversation of world events. But that somehow results in making their perspectives and points of view even more transparent, or pure, for lack of a better word.

Sadly, but something many if us may be all-too-familiar with, to one degree or another, both shared how their respective paths towards truth-telling, as they see it, has also cost them dearly - in the form of verbal attacks and ostracization from people they considered friends (and sometimes family). It was a reminder that, while these two are very strong, intelligent, and courageous individuals, they are both also, at the end of the day, people with hearts like anyone else with good will and a deeply insightful sense for what's truly in the best interest of people. But, as one of them commented at one point, not everyone actually wants the truth.

I've watched Tucker's podcast yesterday, totally agree, it's worth watching for the open, intelligent and courageous talk between Bret and Tucker.

Around the end of the podcast, Bret mentions indirectly that he's a bit worried about being taken care of one way or another (that is, censored, demonized or worse) by speaking out against certain entitieZ. Which reminds me of the famous quote:

"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act"

Nowadays, the real heroes are those who are defending the truth, refusing to get sidetracked or stampeded by the manipulations of the PTB while remaining true to their true nature.