Twin Terror Attacks? New Year's Day 2025: Truck plows into crowd in New Orleans, Cybertruck explodes at Trump Hotel in Las Vegas

He's just shot himself with a Desert Eagle though!...

Unless he had previously duct-taped his head to the headrest, it's not going to stay upright after taking a .50 bullet, at close range, from the most powerful handgun on the market.
Maybe if he shot himself in the back of the head... I don't think anyone here has the hands on experience to say definitively, including me, but I would think if he shot himself in the head, his brains would be blown out, his head would rock, and his body would remain more or less in its normal position. This video isn't great for making comparisons (ballistic gel dummies don't replicate actual human tissue), but it gives an idea:


EDIT: Just realized you're talking about just his head specifically - I was referring to his torso. Yeah, his head would be slouched forward. My head tilts forward about 30 degrees in a similar seat, a roommate's a bit more. My resident body expert tells me a guy with a thicker build might not have as much range of motion.
 
Last edited:
Ian Carroll with an overview of the Livelsberger case so far:

I dunno, but somehow I'm starting to suspect that AI has played a major role in the construction and rollout of this very convoluted psyop.

It's Groom Lake, Nevada, AKA Area51!
Oh geeze - are they gonna somehow connect this with "aliens" next particularly with the supposed revelation of "the operational use of gravitic propulsion systems powered aircraft?" Another drop of the drip drip disclosure?!

Can't wait to see what develops next! :nuts:
 
People checked the car registries to verify the info he allegedly gave in his email. The year of his first car was wrong:


Two points in this psyop, and it definitely is a psyop:./

1) His 1st car was a 1998 Mustang… If it was really him and he said it was a 2006, then he is almost certainly doing “Under Duress Identification” - Using the wrong year would be something set up initially with an operator before deployment… I consulted on under duress ID for a major defense contractor about 25 years ago… ./

2) Interesting they sent it to Sam Shoemate. Shoemate’s are patriots and extremely trusted. The late great Walt Shoemate was one of the best SF operators in our nation’s history - Navy Seal AND Delta Force (Selection Criteria (Class) #1). I think, like you said, whoever’s running this psyop sent it to Sam because of his credibility.
 
News report on Livelsberger's mental health, pushing the PTSD angle:


"Spencer Evans, the special agent in charge of the FBI's Las Vegas Division, said investigators are looking into the suspect's mental health.

"Investigative steps have discovered and information with the Army indicates that he likely suffered from PTSD, and we are also aware that there were potential other family issues or personal grievances in his own life that may have been contributing factors,' he told reporters Friday.

"Livelsberger had been receiving mental health assistance over the last year, a U.S. official with knowledge of the investigation told ABC News."

Livelsberger's wife told investigators her husband had been out of their Colorado Springs, Colorado, residence since around Christmas after a dispute over allegations of infidelity, an official who had been briefed on the investigation told ABC News. The official added that she said her husband would not hurt anyone.

"Livelsberger was a Green Beret operations sergeant who was stationed mostly at Fort Carson, Colorado, near Colorado Springs, and in Germany, according to McMahill."

He was on approved leave from the Army at the time of his death, according to U.S. Army Special Operations Command."

Army officials said they thought Livelsberger was stable enough following his mental health treatments to go home for Christmas and his leave was approved, according to a U.S. official with knowledge of the investigation
 
FWIW, this guy has "inside sources" he uses for UFO information. So take with a grain of salt, but this is what they told him:
For anyone who wasn’t in the Space I did on this at 5 o clock, here are the main pieces of information I received.

It has been confirmed by officials within Fort Bragg that Livelsberger did write the email/manifesto.

However, his big claims pertaining to China launching drones with anti gravity technology from a Sub off the coast of the US are not accurate. My source tells me that China has no such capability, and if they did, the US wouldn’t allow them to continue the operation. I was told that China does not have a Sub capable of launching SUV sized drones, nor do they have anti gravity tech. I was told that we know this because the US keeps tabs on EVERYTHING coming out of China and this does not match anything they have or are close to having.

Why Livelsberger would say that if it wasn’t true is not clear at the moment.

Another inconsistency that was noticed was how he phrased the clearance he held. Apparently, the phrasing was incorrect and someone in his position would know that.

Lastly, this was more of an observation by my source, but he said any Green Beret that was going to make an explosive would not make something so rudimentary as was used in the explosion. He also noted that the use of a Desert Eagle handgun for a self inflicted gunshot would be completely impractical and that most veterans or active duty personnel don’t even own one. It is more of a civilian trophy case weapon in their eyes. That last part may be circumstantial, but I still found it interesting given all the facts.

So, where does this leave us? Despite some of those claiming the contrary, we now know for certain that he did write the email. Though, not everything in the email was true or phrased correctly, according to my source. And the evidence given towards a suicide seems to be very suspect.

Based on this current information and the info already out, I’ll leave it up to you to decide what to make of it all and I’ll continue to stay on top of it and update when/if I have something new. Thanks.
 
Gary from Paramount Tactical had Green Beret Nap Time to talk about some of the weird inconsistencies and the latest developments:


Topics covered in the first hour: the tattoo pictures, the Signal number changing, no Green Berets own Desert Eagles, would make a better explosion, the different "manifestos" seem written by different people, poor tradecraft using phone, Gary also thinks he looks alive in the recent video, absurdly low quality of pics and videos released (officially and unofficially), absurd placement of passport in back of truck for official photo, Matt's friend being approached by a spoofed account to try to get him to say Matt was suicidal, the longer message allegedly found on the phone in the truck sounds like something a Green Beret like Matt would write, doesn't seem likely that a guy like this would have USAP access.
 
After Wednesday’s attack in which a white pickup truck sped down New Orleans’ iconic Bourbon Street, killing 14 people, locals and visitors alike might wonder what security measures are in place to prevent a similar horrific situation from unfolding on the Las Vegas Strip.

Following vehicular terrorist attacks around the world and a Strip car ramming that injured three dozen pedestrians in December 2015, Clark County moved to make the tourist corridor safer by installing thousands of steel posts that dot Las Vegas Boulevard.

In 2018, the county began installing 6,000 bollards
along the Strip, at a cost of about $40 million so far. Each weighs more than half a ton and is able to withstand a head-on collision from a 15,000-pound vehicle traveling 50 mph, according to officials. They are also there to prevent vehicles from jumping onto the sidewalks on any given day.

“As new development comes to the resort corridor, any plans that alter the current pedestrian protection will be required to include pedestrian protection measures in their design,” a Clark County spokesperson said in an email Friday.

Unlike Las Vegas’ bollards, New Orleans’ are removable, according to the Associated Press. Some were being replaced at the time of the attack, leaving security gaps.

Then, hours after the French Quarter attack, a Cybertruck carrying fireworks and fuel detonated outside Las Vegas’ Trump International hotel, according to the Metropolitan Police Department, prompting initial concerns that the Cybertruck blast had been a possible terrorist attack.

The Tesla vehicle’s lone occupant, Matthew Livelsberger, 37, had fatally shot himself in the head. Sheriff Kevin McMahill said investigators believe the detonation and suicide were simultaneous. Police were investigating a letter Livelsberger purportedly sent in which he said his actions weren’t a terrorist attack, but a “wake up call.”

Seven other people suffered minor injuries in the blast.

In hours and days after the two incidents, FBI officials said New Orleans attacker, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, had acted alone and aligned himself with the Islamic State group, and that there didn’t appear to be any evidence of any link between that attack and the Cybertruck blast. Authorities also said they hadn’t seen any evidence of a connection between Livelsberger and a terrorist organization.

‘The world is not a safe place’

Amanda Bellarmino, an assistant professor at UNLV’s William F. Harrah College of Hospitality, said making the resorts even safer is a challenge that executives should continually address. Guests should also pay attention to things that don’t seem normal, she said.

“Hotels and casinos should definitely have contingency plans for terrorist attacks, and most probably do,” Bellarmino wrote in an email to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

She added: “I believe that we are still a very safe destination, but the world is not a safe place. All of us should be cautious and report anything we see that is suspicious.” 🤔🐁

Before police disclosed Livelsberger’s purported letter, Bellarmino said: “I think that the Cybertruck incident implies that the driver was unable to drive into the crowds as our city had the proper precautions to prevent him from driving into the crowds on the Strip.”

During New Year’s Eve festivities each year, a portion of Las Vegas Boulevard is closed to vehicular traffic as tens of thousands of people descend on the Strip. Thousands more revelers ring in the new year at downtown Las Vegas’ Fremont Street Experience, where roads that intersect with the canopy are also closed.

Metro and its local, state and federal law enforcement partners guard the celebrations with a plethora of staff and technology, and officials said they expected over 400,000 people to come out for New Year’s celebrations on the Strip and in downtown Las Vegas.

‘Work diligently together’

Las Vegas spokesperson Jace Radke said the city did not want to disclose specific details about its security precautions “for obvious reasons.” He noted, however, that the city has increased safety improvements like large concrete bollards at pedestrian areas.

Councilwoman Victoria Seaman told the Review-Journal Friday that she’s confident with Metro’s and the city’s department of public safety preparations for special events.

“Unfortunately, other events, such as the current tragedy in New Orleans and the Trump hotel, can teach us more about prevention,” she said in a statement. “I believe that elected officials and law enforcement can work diligently together to continue to keep our city safe.”

Seaman said she would rather see officials be proactive instead of reactive.

Two Strip tragedies

The county took action after Paris Morton — previously known as Lakeisha Holloway — drove onto a sidewalk in front of Paris Las Vegas and Planet Hollywood Resort days before Christmas 2015, killing an Arizona woman.

Prosecutors accused Morton of intentionally driving up the sidewalk while impaired on marijuana. After going through multiple competency evaluations, she’s scheduled to go to trial later this year on charges that include murder and attempted murder.

A decade earlier, a California man mowed down 14 people with a Buick sedan near the old Bally’s resort, now the Horseshoe Las Vegas. Three tourists were killed.

Stephen Ressa, who told police he thought the victims were “demons” who were trying to kill him, is serving a 100-year prison sentence.

Metro and the county also work with private resort security so there is patrolling and enforcement coverage, and to ensure quick response times and medical services, according to the county.

Pedestrians can mostly only cross the boulevard on bridges.

“This partnership has been highlighted in the quick response times by both (Metro) and (the fire department) during recent high-visibility incidents such as the truck explosion and the stabbing incident that occurred in 2022,” the county said in a statement, “though these are just two examples of what is a routine response to those in need.”

Metro and the Nevada Resort Association, an advocacy group for the gaming and resort industry, supported and “worked closely” to implement the bollards.

“Protecting employees and visitors is always the resort industry’s highest priority,” said Virginia Valentine, the association’s president and CEO in a statement. “Our members have robust protocols in place to ensure a safe environment, including security and surveillance measures which are unseen by the public or are kept confidential for maximum effectiveness.”

Valentine added: “Bollards were immediately embraced by our members, some of whom had already added protective barriers into their hardscaping, Clark County and (Metro).”

This wasn’t the first time officials took action locally following high-profile tragedies. After the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 that killed 168 victims, the federal government built a new courthouse downtown with a blast-resistant curtain wall — a first at the time.

The building opened in 2000.

In a press conference Wednesday, McMahill was also asked if police need to reexamine security procedures after the Cybertruck blast.

“We were very successful the night before. I’m surprised this happened, to be quite frank with you, and that’s certainly something we’re going to have to look at,” McMahill said. The sheriff also said Thursday that he’s “confident in the safety of the safety of our community as we move forward.”

If you’re thinking about suicide, or are worried about a friend or loved one, help is available 24/7 by calling or texting the Lifeline network at 988. Live chat is available at 988lifeline.org. Additionally, the Crisis Text Line is a free, national service available 24/7. Text HOME to 741741.

Contact Ricardo Torres-Cortez at rtorres@reviewjournal.com. Review-Journal staff writer Richard N. Velotta contributed to this story.
Screenshot 2025-01-04 at 14-49-47 RT (@RT_com) _ X.png




Interesting @ -4:19:26 a wee bit long. But they are concerned about where it is going in the long run.
 
FWIW, this guy has "inside sources" he uses for UFO information. So take with a grain of salt, but this is what they told him:
He also noted that the use of a Desert Eagle handgun for a self inflicted gunshot would be completely impractical and that most veterans or active duty personnel don’t even own one.
He's behind the news on this one: The ATF reported three days ago that Livelsberger purchased the weapons found in the Cybertruck, including the Desert Eagle, in Colorado the day before he set off:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said the guns were traced back to Livelsberger, who lawfully purchased them on Dec. 30.
...which, as Ian Carroll pointed out, should ordinarily have meant he'd have to wait 3 days, per Colorado gun laws, before taking possession of them. So "most veterans don't even own one" is irrelevant.
 
Maybe if he shot himself in the back of the head... I don't think anyone here has the hands on experience to say definitively, including me, but I would think if he shot himself in the head, his brains would be blown out, his head would rock, and his body would remain more or less in its normal position. This video isn't great for making comparisons (ballistic gel dummies don't replicate actual human tissue), but it gives an idea:


EDIT: Just realized you're talking about just his head specifically - I was referring to his torso. Yeah, his head would be slouched forward. My head tilts forward about 30 degrees in a similar seat, a roommate's a bit more. My resident body expert tells me a guy with a thicker build might not have as much range of motion.
They've clearly stated, at the outset, and have not yet 'altered the fact', that Livelsberger is supposed to have died from a headshot... which is why, they said, they couldn't initially ID him:

“Complicating this identification of this individual, we also discovered through the coroner’s office that the individual had sustained a gunshot wound to the head prior to the detonation of the vehicle. One of the handguns was found at his feet inside of the vehicle,” [Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Sheriff Kevin] McMahill said.
Now review what a headshot with a Desert Eagle PRIOR to the detonation of the Cybertruck should leave his head looking like:

Desert Eagle_power.jpg
 
He's behind the news on this one: The ATF reported three days ago that Livelsberger purchased the weapons found in the Cybertruck, including the Desert Eagle, in Colorado the day before he set off:


...which, as Ian Carroll pointed out, should ordinarily have meant he'd have to wait 3 days, per Colorado gun laws, before taking possession of them. So "most veterans don't even own one" is irrelevant.
I've seen several Green Berets make the same point, which is just that it is odd behavior. They're not saying he didn't have it, or buy it, just that it is an out-of-character choice for a Green Beret to make, in their experience.
 
Now review what a headshot with a Desert Eagle PRIOR to the detonation of the Cybertruck should leave his head looking like:

View attachment 104790
Reread my previous post. Ballistic gel dummies do NOT replicate what happens to human bodies, and can't be used as direct comparisons. They do not replicate actual skin, tissue, and bone, and can't be used to predict terminal ballistics. That said, depending on where he is supposed to have shot himself, it's possible that his head should have been more deformed than it looks in the video. We'll need new and/or better video evidence and photographs to know for sure.

All that said, I don't know why you chose that part of the video for a screenshot. Here is what the dummy looks like after being shot in the forehead with a hollow point round by the Desert Eagle:

Screenshot 2025-01-05 at 1.54.14 PM.png

Your screenshot shows the dummy after the initial shot, plus being shot in the side of the head with the Magnum 500 (which is more powerful, according to this guy), again with a hollow point.

Police are saying he put the gun in his mouth and the bullet exited the left side of his head. If we get a first or second generation copy of the video, we may be able to see whether or not an exit wound is visible. It doesn't look like there is one in the current low quality video, but that could just be a result of the crappy video compression.
 
Another thing to look for if we get better quality images: if he shot himself at the angle suggested by police, then the bullet should have hit the interior of the truck somewhere on the driver's side. So it should have either gone through a window, or hit the interior. I'd think that would at least make a dent on the bullet proof exterior. So if that is lacking in future images, it would add a point on the "he didn't shoot himself in the head" side of the equation.

Also, this guy whose vids I posted on the drone thread things that despite the triple compression on the video, there's enough there to suggest he WAS moving in the moments before the explosion. Personally, I'd hold out for a better quality video, but FWIW:

 
All that said, I don't know why you chose that part of the video for a screenshot. Here is what the dummy looks like after being shot in the forehead with a hollow point round by the Desert Eagle:
I didn't watch the video in its entirety, just skipped to what I assumed was 'the result of a dummy being shot point blank in the head with a .50 cal bullet'.

So... should we assume, for future analyses, that those YT vids of dummy shots are unreliable for gauging what guns/bullets/ranges actually do to the human body?

Also, FWIW, I turned off 'safesearch' and did image searches for autopsy photos of .50 cal headshots... and the heads are all essentially turned thoroughly mushy. 🤮
 
Last edited:
I didn't watch the video in its entirety, just skipped to what I assumed was 'the result of a dummy being shot point blank in the head with a .50 cal bullet'.

So... should we assume, for future analyses, that those YT vids of dummy shots are unreliable for gauging what guns/bullets/ranges actually do to the human body?
That's what I've heard pros say. They may sometimes be accurate, but the explanation I've heard given is that human tissue has qualities that can't be replicated, or at least isn't replicated, by this gel. The gives a good idea of the relative power of bullets, but not necessarily their effects on human bodies. My guess, based on limited knowledge, is that the dummies may give a basic idea, but they probably wouldn't be admissible in court as evidence for the reasons above.
Also, FWIW, I turned off 'safesearch' and did image searches for autopsy photos of .50 cal headshots... and the heads are all essentially turned thoroughly mushy. 🤮
Thanks for the warning! One thing to check on those images is whether they were shot with a rifle or a handgun. Rifles have a much higher muzzle velocity and thus are more damaging. Also, the precise location of the bullet entry, if that's available (or determinable). Depending on which tissues the bullet passes through, it might cause more or less damage. I listened to an interview last year with a combat vet describing bullet wounds. He said sometimes a small caliber bullet will tear someone to pieces, and sometimes a 50 cal will go right through them without leaving much external damage.
 
Back
Top Bottom