UK : Jersey abuse inquiry a 'shambles'

Ocean

The Living Force
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20081112/tuk-jersey-abuse-inquiry-a-shambles-6323e80.html


UK : Jersey abuse inquiry a 'shambles'


The £4.5 million Jersey child abuse inquiry has been branded a "shambles" as a police chief was suspended for his role in a discredited murder investigation.


Graham Power, the most senior officer in the force, was suspended after Deputy Chief Officer David Warcup rubbished evidence collected and said there were no suspicious deaths at former children's home Haut de la Garenne.

"There is no suggestion there has been murder or any bodies destroyed," said Mr Warcup, in his first press conference since taking control of the inquiry.

The comments sparked a political row on the island, with Deputy Andrew Lewis, the home affairs minister, attacking officers' conduct as he confirmed Mr Power was suspended. Announcing an independent investigation would be launched, he said: "It is evident that we didn't receive all the information about the historic abuse inquiry that we should have received, and that some aspects of this critically important police investigation have not been conducted properly."

Both Mr Power and his former deputy Lenny Harper denied any wrongdoing throughout their investigation. Mr Power marched into BBC Radio Jersey's studios to deny any wrongdoing. He said: "I strenuously deny any wrongdoing and will rigorously contest any allegations in respect of my role."

Mr Harper, who led the investigation until his retirement in August, was left "stunned" by some of the comments.

Chief Minister Frank Walker revealed more than £1.5 million was "unnecessarily" spent on digging up the site as he spoke of his concern about the damage the scandal had done to the island's reputation.

Mr Walker, who said the total cost of the investigation stood at £4.5 million, added: "I am disappointed to learn that the investigation has not been undertaken in the manner in which it should have been. It would appear there have been certain sums of money that did not need to have been spent."

In a dramatic U-turn, Detective Superintendent Michael Gradwell, the man who is now leading the investigation, categorically dismissed many of the findings of Mr Harper's investigation.

Police revealed that remains found at the former home were almost all animal bones, and that only three were "possibly human", which dated from between 1470 and 1670. The new investigation team also said there was "nothing suspicious" about items found in cellars beneath the building, which included 65 milk teeth.

**************

The above story is a 'shambles'

See here :-

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/150302-I-have-known-about-Jersey-paedophiles-for-15-years-says-award-winning-journalist

'I have known about Jersey paedophiles for 15 years,' says award-winning journalist
 
Did we expect otherwise? Another cover-up in process...
 
Laura said:
Did we expect otherwise? Another cover-up in process...

Felt a mix of dispair, heartache and rage when I heard this, but then came to the same conclusion....I don't know if its just because of my interaction with SOTT, but to me the cover up seems completely blatant!

The article I heard on the radio all but suggested that the evidence was (without using the words themselves) 'planted'. That the skull fragment was a piece of Victorian coconut and the fragments of bones where animal bones.
Well gee, they obviously didn't know how to do any of this forensic stuff all along! *sarcasm*
 
...he spoke of his concern about the damage the scandal had done to the island's reputation.
..

Here is the proof, osit, that a cover-up was indeed attempted.

Can't put the tourists off with the truth, now can we!
 
Heres a video done my an investigator about this case, for anyone thats still intrested in it.

Check out the clay figure outside the house 18:40 in. Unreal. :O


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lq6lJsBz9UY


Edit - Spelling.
 
I actually came across this vid about 2 months ago. While Maloney is a bit over the top with his presentation, he has his reasons to be emotional about the subject and I thought he had heart. There are people who have been trying to get this information out and have had a difficult time doing so. I appreciated the guts he showed in trying to tackle the subject in his own way.

What I found most interesting were the reactions garnered when he was attempting man on the street interviews. They basically ranged from anger to "I don't want to talk about it". If I remember correctly, he's done more than one of these videos.

added: the figures he shot were bizarre indeed!
 
Back
Top Bottom