unexplained phenomenoms revealed by FBI

[Possibility of Being]

My guess is that it was bolded because it was meant to be a headline. There is no rule or guideline against bolding, as long as it's reasonable. Seems like you are bothered by it but that's not bronz's fault. No reason he should have to feel bad because you were triggered by it.

PS: my intend was not to make him feel bad. my intend was to help him to see his potential leak of critical thinking.

If that was the case than there was a discrepancy between your intention and your acting; I don't think your post was helpful. I also have a hard time to understand, what bronz's bolding has to do with critical thinking or lack of such. Could you elaborate?

Sometimes we unwillingly/unconsciously focus on others' possible mistakes so to avoid seeing them in ourselves. There is a feeling of being 1) right and 2) a good observer that usually accompanies this kind of avoidance. But for an attentive self-observer, that feeling itself is a red flag which also makes it easier to recognize s/he is entering such a phase. Perhaps something to look into?

 

[Cosmos]

My guess is that it was bolded because it was meant to be a headline. There is no rule or guideline against bolding, as long as it's reasonable. Seems like you are bothered by it but that's not bronz's fault. No reason he should have to feel bad because you were triggered by it.

PS: my intend was not to make him feel bad. my intend was to help him to see his potential leak of critical thinking.

If that was the case than there was a discrepancy between your intention and your acting; I don't think your post was helpful. I also have a hard time to understand, what bronz's bolding has to do with critical thinking or lack of such. Could you elaborate?

I assumed because he bolted his post and another before, that he could have been in a emotional state when he posted them.
and such emotional postings are often guided with a leak of critical thinking and blindness because of your emotional state in that moment.
(I my self had/have sometimes problems with this too (maybe here too?))
and olso because of my interaction with him here (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=22695.msg245368#msg245368).
and his post here: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=18088.msg250015#msg250015

Sometimes we unwillingly/unconsciously focus on others' possible mistakes so to avoid seeing them in ourselves. There is a feeling of being 1) right and 2) a good observer that usually accompanies this kind of avoidance. But for an attentive self-observer, that feeling itself is a red flag which also makes it easier to recognize s/he is entering such a phase. Perhaps something to look into?

yes definitely something to look into for me !

 

[bronz]

My sorry for Bolding it was ment to be just headline with possible suggestion for digging the truth out, due to my believe that is not disinformation. Because first FBI revile the documents than debunkers claim it all a planed hoax.
But after reading Your posts Pashalis I don't feel good anymore. I'm afraid it was planed attack on me and not the first one.
I think you need to resist and fight for those emotional acting and internal forces that are over you.

 

[Possibility of Being]

My sorry for Bolding it was ment to be just headline with possible suggestion for digging the truth out, due to my believe that is not disinformation. Because first FBI revile the documents than debunkers claim it all a planed hoax.
But after reading Your posts Pashalis I don't feel good anymore. I'm afraid it was planed attack on me and not the first one.
I think you need to resist and fight for those emotional acting and internal forces that are over you.

Hey bronz, no need to be sorry, really, you didn't do anything wrong in your post. As Heimdallr said, there are no strict rules about bolding so just use your common sense. However, it's usually recommended to write a little bit on posted links, like what your own take on it is or what the linked material is about; you might want to keep it in mind for future posting.

Concerning Pashalis and his alleged attack, I wouldn't focus on it that much; he said he had had no bad intention and like us all, he is here to learn, I believe. If that's the case, let's wait and see how he handles this little lesson. But since we're going off topic, I'd suggest to leave it as it is and if you wish to discuss it further, just create a new thread. :)

FWIW

 

[Kolnikov]

Hello there
Taking apart some differences about bold /not bold, here is some interesting:

_http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/ufo/index.shtml

You see, first, FBI, and NOW NSA!!-nor less- declassifying UFO documents...
Isn't it a bit -or more than a bit- weird?
Regards

 

[Guardian]

FBI records

Some interesting declassified FBI memo's about UFO .

_http://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=flying+saucers

 

[Vulcan59]

Hi Guardian,

There was already a topic discussing these declassified FBI memo's. Post merged. :)

 

[Guardian]

Hi Guardian,

There was already a topic discussing these declassified FBI memo's. Post merged. :)

Thanks! Sorry I didn't search the url first