trendsetter37
The Living Force
The Unified Field Theory. This all came to me a month ago at work. I am posting it here for critique and or possible revision. I am in no way saying this is the end all be all, but I do feel like this concept is very compelling to say the least.
Quotes:
Gurdjief? There are three forces in the universe. Active, Passive, and neutralizing. We are 3rd force blind. (Would the third force in this case be a reference to gravity, which we seem to be very ignorant of at this point in humanity.)
A: All in nature seeks balance
A: And this, my dear, is another example of gravity as the binder of all creation...”The Great Equalizer!”
I would like to begin this post with a few quotes for the C’s.
A: All in nature seeks balance
A: And this, my dear, is another example of gravity as the binder of all creation...”The Great Equalizer!”
(I know that those quotes by themselves are out of context but work with me here)
Note that I do not claim that this explains everything. I am simply here to share my thoughts, network, and at the very least have someone pick out how it is incorrect or off base. I have systematically applied it to many examples of “known” forces in nature and so far I have somehow been able to explain, to myself anyways, how they work alongside this simple notion. Balance.
So a few weeks ago I was taking my morning smoke break away from the lab. I recently found that there are a chain of three ponds that fill into one another and was delighted to have a peaceful place that was quiet so that I could just observe. This area is surrounded by trees and other assorted wildlife. But I digress...
So i’m sitting there watching the uppermost pond flow into the lower pond. This prompts me to think about electric potentials and how they always attempt to balance each other. A few days earlier I watched this video on electrostatics and potentials.
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/electricity-and-magnetism/v/electrostatics--part-1---introduction-to-charge-and-coulomb-s-law
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/electricity-and-magnetism/v/electrostatics--part-2
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/electricity-and-magnetism/v/electric-potential-energy
This very same concept was manifesting here as well. Potentiality where gravity is concerned seems to take the form of different distances from the center of the earth. An object that resides at a greater distance from the ground (and inherently a greater distance from the center of the earth) has a greater gravitational potential. This shouldn’t be confused with the quantitative force of gravity acting at such a point but rather the speed at which the object could obtain before it met the ground. In this instance an object 50 meters above the ground could reach a faster velocity upon hitting the ground than something say 1 meter from the ground. Ergo object A (50 meters above) would have a greater potential “ for high velocity” if you will.
It appears as though the force we call gravity is simply the equalizer or the tendency to produce a “neutralizing force” that would strive to balance the polarities. It will of course choose the most efficient route to accomplish this task.
This realization left me in a bit of a daze because it was so simple. I then systematically began to go through all of my classes and attempted to refute this hypothesis. Which I still am saying is a hypothesis by the way.
The next force I applied this to was osmotic force.
Figure 1
In Figure 1 we have an example of osmotic equilibrium. The left picture represents an unbalanced state, but after a certain amount of time water or particles will flow through the barrier so that they are balanced. This always takes place if there is permeable barrier displacing two different concentrations of solutions. In this example the force that is observed is referred to as osmosis but it could very well be a form of gravity at work since after all it is “The Great Neutralizer!”. Have you ever noticed that when you swim in the ocean you do not shrivel opposed to taking a long shower or bath?
Why were the Pyramids or Circular/spiral Megaliths so pervasive?
So naturally I turn to gravity on the earth. I’ve always wondered why gravity, as it was taught to me, was always seen as the weaker force. Some scientist did postulate that it could be stronger in another dimension. But do we even have to go that far? If gravity, which can also be electric or contain polarities by nature, is simply concentrated elsewhere how could this coincide with the UFT? This is where parabolic algebra and the concept of balance could possibly provide a workable explanation.
Figure 2
In figure 2 we have a parabolic mirror. This shape is important because it has the ability to focus force, light, or heat on a singular focal point; more specifically it could simultaneously focus a majority of light, force, or heat on a central focal point while simultaneously letting some pass through its parabolic boundary ( depending on the material ), which could result in a perceived divergent effect (weakening) of the initial energy.
In other words the focal point would contain the focused or convergent concentration of said medium or force whereas the opposite side, circumference, or outer perimeter would witness the divergent effects of whatever force is being focused at the focused point. In short, the focal point would contain a concentration of “matter” while the anti-focal point/outer-perimeter would contain the force in a highly dissipated state. If you take this contrast of concentration in its most simplest terms, it could loosely be described as a binary or artificial polarity. Concentrated force versus dissipated force. What makes this possible is the geometry involved.
Q: (A) Okay. That answered my question. So, we are using the same thing, but for you it is more adequate or so. Now, I want to ask about mathematical modelling of gravity. The gravity that we know about is modelled by geometry of a curved space. Is the gravity that you are talking about, which is an expansion of this concept, capable of being modelled in a similar way: by geometry?
A: Geometry is the correct model.
For example what if the concentration or focal point was being and the circumference or the parabola (and beyond) could be termed as theoretical non-being. Gravity being the neutralizing force would bring those two states together to form balance. Since the paraboloid is only one half of a sphere I would expect the force to move in one direction, or cycle perhaps.
Since there is a substantial lack of data one would need to witness the mechanics of this idea in nature. In effect, through making objective observations one could use these observations as a standin for laboratory data.
I mean seriously, how do you discover if something works or ponder a new idea without inspiration from nature or other means?
In fact Leedskalnin supposedly made his realization from observing nature. So where does that leave us. I think that for too long solving the UFT has been left to academia but what if we began to network about this as a group in STO manner? This is my attempt with this post.
I have several other instances that could be explained by this same rule of gravity being defined as the balancing force of the cosmos.
In the figure above you can see that there is a parabola surrounding the pituitary gland. The C’s have mentioned that this small organ is our extension into 4th Density. If this is in fact the case could it be that the concentration of all the neural activity of your brain is parabolically concentrated at the focal point in your head? The pituitary gland is conveniently located at such a point. What if a concentration of consciousness induces this? Think about the implications of technology and or artificially intelligent computer hubs...these thoughts are a bit disconcerting to me because I am not sure that our morality has advanced as much as our technology.
Pyramids and circular/spiral megaliths also follow this same geometry. In algebra if you extend past the focal point you create a triangle or pyramid, effectively creating the geometry required to induce a gravitational or balancing force...Hmmm what do you guys think?
I have some other comments and notions but I would rather ask you guys and get a brainstorm going than me just rambling so I will end here
other examples include
bernoulli’s principle
Tree’s extracting nutrients from the ground
In the example of the tree you can somewhat visualize how the one way movement of force would cause the water to easily migrate upwards (against the earth’s gravity and without too much energy expenditure) with the help of the geometric unbalanced caused by its growth pattern. This pattern is pretty ubiquitous where trees are concerned..
My favorite is magnetism and high voltages but I will withhold that part until the thread develops further.
Quotes:
Gurdjief? There are three forces in the universe. Active, Passive, and neutralizing. We are 3rd force blind. (Would the third force in this case be a reference to gravity, which we seem to be very ignorant of at this point in humanity.)
A: All in nature seeks balance
A: And this, my dear, is another example of gravity as the binder of all creation...”The Great Equalizer!”
I would like to begin this post with a few quotes for the C’s.
A: All in nature seeks balance
A: And this, my dear, is another example of gravity as the binder of all creation...”The Great Equalizer!”
(I know that those quotes by themselves are out of context but work with me here)
Note that I do not claim that this explains everything. I am simply here to share my thoughts, network, and at the very least have someone pick out how it is incorrect or off base. I have systematically applied it to many examples of “known” forces in nature and so far I have somehow been able to explain, to myself anyways, how they work alongside this simple notion. Balance.
So a few weeks ago I was taking my morning smoke break away from the lab. I recently found that there are a chain of three ponds that fill into one another and was delighted to have a peaceful place that was quiet so that I could just observe. This area is surrounded by trees and other assorted wildlife. But I digress...
So i’m sitting there watching the uppermost pond flow into the lower pond. This prompts me to think about electric potentials and how they always attempt to balance each other. A few days earlier I watched this video on electrostatics and potentials.
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/electricity-and-magnetism/v/electrostatics--part-1---introduction-to-charge-and-coulomb-s-law
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/electricity-and-magnetism/v/electrostatics--part-2
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/electricity-and-magnetism/v/electric-potential-energy
This very same concept was manifesting here as well. Potentiality where gravity is concerned seems to take the form of different distances from the center of the earth. An object that resides at a greater distance from the ground (and inherently a greater distance from the center of the earth) has a greater gravitational potential. This shouldn’t be confused with the quantitative force of gravity acting at such a point but rather the speed at which the object could obtain before it met the ground. In this instance an object 50 meters above the ground could reach a faster velocity upon hitting the ground than something say 1 meter from the ground. Ergo object A (50 meters above) would have a greater potential “ for high velocity” if you will.
It appears as though the force we call gravity is simply the equalizer or the tendency to produce a “neutralizing force” that would strive to balance the polarities. It will of course choose the most efficient route to accomplish this task.
This realization left me in a bit of a daze because it was so simple. I then systematically began to go through all of my classes and attempted to refute this hypothesis. Which I still am saying is a hypothesis by the way.
The next force I applied this to was osmotic force.
Figure 1
In Figure 1 we have an example of osmotic equilibrium. The left picture represents an unbalanced state, but after a certain amount of time water or particles will flow through the barrier so that they are balanced. This always takes place if there is permeable barrier displacing two different concentrations of solutions. In this example the force that is observed is referred to as osmosis but it could very well be a form of gravity at work since after all it is “The Great Neutralizer!”. Have you ever noticed that when you swim in the ocean you do not shrivel opposed to taking a long shower or bath?
Why were the Pyramids or Circular/spiral Megaliths so pervasive?
So naturally I turn to gravity on the earth. I’ve always wondered why gravity, as it was taught to me, was always seen as the weaker force. Some scientist did postulate that it could be stronger in another dimension. But do we even have to go that far? If gravity, which can also be electric or contain polarities by nature, is simply concentrated elsewhere how could this coincide with the UFT? This is where parabolic algebra and the concept of balance could possibly provide a workable explanation.
Figure 2
In figure 2 we have a parabolic mirror. This shape is important because it has the ability to focus force, light, or heat on a singular focal point; more specifically it could simultaneously focus a majority of light, force, or heat on a central focal point while simultaneously letting some pass through its parabolic boundary ( depending on the material ), which could result in a perceived divergent effect (weakening) of the initial energy.
In other words the focal point would contain the focused or convergent concentration of said medium or force whereas the opposite side, circumference, or outer perimeter would witness the divergent effects of whatever force is being focused at the focused point. In short, the focal point would contain a concentration of “matter” while the anti-focal point/outer-perimeter would contain the force in a highly dissipated state. If you take this contrast of concentration in its most simplest terms, it could loosely be described as a binary or artificial polarity. Concentrated force versus dissipated force. What makes this possible is the geometry involved.
Q: (A) Okay. That answered my question. So, we are using the same thing, but for you it is more adequate or so. Now, I want to ask about mathematical modelling of gravity. The gravity that we know about is modelled by geometry of a curved space. Is the gravity that you are talking about, which is an expansion of this concept, capable of being modelled in a similar way: by geometry?
A: Geometry is the correct model.
For example what if the concentration or focal point was being and the circumference or the parabola (and beyond) could be termed as theoretical non-being. Gravity being the neutralizing force would bring those two states together to form balance. Since the paraboloid is only one half of a sphere I would expect the force to move in one direction, or cycle perhaps.
Since there is a substantial lack of data one would need to witness the mechanics of this idea in nature. In effect, through making objective observations one could use these observations as a standin for laboratory data.
I mean seriously, how do you discover if something works or ponder a new idea without inspiration from nature or other means?
In fact Leedskalnin supposedly made his realization from observing nature. So where does that leave us. I think that for too long solving the UFT has been left to academia but what if we began to network about this as a group in STO manner? This is my attempt with this post.
I have several other instances that could be explained by this same rule of gravity being defined as the balancing force of the cosmos.
In the figure above you can see that there is a parabola surrounding the pituitary gland. The C’s have mentioned that this small organ is our extension into 4th Density. If this is in fact the case could it be that the concentration of all the neural activity of your brain is parabolically concentrated at the focal point in your head? The pituitary gland is conveniently located at such a point. What if a concentration of consciousness induces this? Think about the implications of technology and or artificially intelligent computer hubs...these thoughts are a bit disconcerting to me because I am not sure that our morality has advanced as much as our technology.
Pyramids and circular/spiral megaliths also follow this same geometry. In algebra if you extend past the focal point you create a triangle or pyramid, effectively creating the geometry required to induce a gravitational or balancing force...Hmmm what do you guys think?
I have some other comments and notions but I would rather ask you guys and get a brainstorm going than me just rambling so I will end here
other examples include
bernoulli’s principle
Tree’s extracting nutrients from the ground
In the example of the tree you can somewhat visualize how the one way movement of force would cause the water to easily migrate upwards (against the earth’s gravity and without too much energy expenditure) with the help of the geometric unbalanced caused by its growth pattern. This pattern is pretty ubiquitous where trees are concerned..
My favorite is magnetism and high voltages but I will withhold that part until the thread develops further.
