Vitamin K injection

aragorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Hi,

my wife is giving birth to our first child any time now (estimated time two weeks from now), and we're wondering about the vitamin K they give babies. Here in Finland you can refuse the injection if you really insist, but I've learned that one must be very careful they don't give it anyway - they do it so quickly etc.

I understand that the vitamin is pretty much needed to prevent hemorrhagic disease, and it's possible to give it orally also. I've done a lot of reading on the internet to understand the pros and cons, but since time is getting short I thought I'd ask you guys of your opinions and experiences regarding this.

In Finland they use the usual injection which is: Konakion® Novum by Roche. It contains (at least) the following ingredients:

- 2 mg of phytomenadione in 0.2 mL of clear bile acid/lecithin mixed-micelle (MM) solution
- glycocholic acid, sodium hydroxide, lecithin, hydrochloric acid, water for injections

Doesn't sound to good. Could anyone with "proper" knowledge or expertize comment on this?

From one site I found also this:

Roche's vitamin K product KONAKION contains ingredients such as phenol (carbolic acid-a poisonous substance distilled from coal tar), propylene glycol (derived from petroleum and used as an antifreeze and in hydraulic brake fluid) and acetic acid (an astringent antimicrobial agent that may drastically reduce the amount of natural vitamin K that would have otherwise been produced in the digestive tract). As reported in the PDR and as published in the IM vitamin K packet inserts for Merck, Roche and Abbott, "Studies of carcinogenicity, mutagenesis or impairment of fertility have not been conducted with Vitamin K1 Injection (Phytonadione Injection, USP).
(_http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/VitaminK.html)

So we're probably going to decide against it, but are we being too paranoid? Any help appreciated.
 
Hi Aragorn. I know very little about this subject (I wasn't even aware that newborns had this problem), so I had a look on the internet to see what I could find. This site looks intersting. Lots of good information. I figure information is the best thing to have before making any decision. :) Its a bit long and I haven't included the references.

http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/fullhtml/jointk.htm

NHMRC said:
Joint statement and recommendations on Vitamin K administration to newborn infants to prevent vitamin K deficiency bleeding in infancy
National Health and Medical Research Council
Paediatric Division of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
Australian College of Midwives Inc

These guidelines were endorsed at the 137th Session of Council, 13 October 2000 and re-issued at the 160th session of Council, 8 March 2006.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Commonwealth of Australia October 2006
ISBN 0 642 45067 6

This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from AusInfo. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 1920, Canberra ACT 2601.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contents

Methods
Background
Diagnosis
Classification
Prophylaxis
Effectiveness of prophylaxis
Effectiveness of the new Konakion MM Paediatric (mixed micellar) preparation
Issues
Recommendations
References


In December 1999 the Australian Drug Evaluation Committee (ADEC) approved the application by Roche Australia to register Konakion MM Paediatric, a new formulation of vitamin K (phytomenadione) containing 2 mg in 0.2 ml, for intramuscular (IM) and oral use. In this mixed micelles formulation naturally occurring substances sodium glycocholate (bile acid) and lecithin generate a stable colloidal micellar system capable of solubilizing the fat-soluble vitamin K in an aqueous medium.

The active ingredient, phytomenadione (vitamin K1) has been marketed in Australia since the 1950s as a cremophor formulation for IM injection, Konakion 1 mg/ 0.5 ml, also containing propylene glycol, phenol and polyethylated castor oil. These latter components have been associated with anaphylaxis following IV use and local irritation when given IM. In 1992 Golding reported an association between intramuscular (but not oral) use of the cremophor formulation and childhood cancer. Subsequent studies of better methodological quality have not confirmed this, although a consistent small but non-significant trend towards an increased incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia remained (reviewed by Von Kries 1998, Wariyar et al 2000). Although not licensed for oral use, the cremophor formulation has been used when parents do not wish their infant to receive an intramuscular injection. Gastrointestinal irritation has been a problem with oral use. The production of the cremophor formulation has ceased.

The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) was requested to:

review research published since 1994 on the efficacy, safety and bioavailablity of the new vitamin K formulation, Konakion MM Paediatric when given orally or intramuscularly,

consider the different needs of formula and breast fed infants for the administration of vitamin K,

consider if a requirement for booster doses of vitamin K will have implications for the NHMRC Australian Standard Vaccination Schedule,

prepare advice for health care workers and parents on the need and schedule for vitamin K administration,

recommend areas for further research.

A multidisciplinary Working Party was formed to address these issues.

[top]

Methods

The Working Party had two face to face meetings and two teleconferences. The detailed submission to ADEC by Roche Australia for the licensing of Konakion MM Paediatric was made available. In addition a systematic literature search was undertaken of MEDLINE (1994-2000) and the Cochrane Library for reports on the incidence of vitamin K deficiency bleeding and effectiveness of different forms of prophylaxis. This was supplemented by a search for unpublished, ongoing or planned studies through contact with Roche Australia and international experts in the field. The experts included Drs Shearer, Tripp, McNinch and Hey in the UK, Sutor and Von Kries in Germany and Greer in the USA.

A five week phase of full public consultation was undertaken following NHMRC endorsement of the Joint Statement and Recommendations as interim guidelines. The Working Party met to review the guidelines in light of the consultation submissions received.

[top]

Background

The term Îhaemorrhagic disease of the newbornâ was first used in 1894 (Townsend 1894) to describe bleeding in the newborn, which was not due to traumatic birth or to haemophilia. Later many cases were found to be associated with vitamin K deficiency. The term Îvitamin K deficiency bleedingâ (VKDB) has now been adopted (Sutor et al 1999). This is preferred since not all bleeding in the newborn is due to vitamin K deficiency and bleeding due to this cause is not confined to the newborn.

Vitamin K occurs in two forms, vitamin K1 whose source is dietary intake and vitamins K2 (menaquinones) that are produced by gut bacteria. All newborn infants have a relative vitamin K deficiency at birth (Shearer 1992). Vitamin K1 crosses the placenta poorly resulting in low fetal plasma concentrations of the vitamin, with a 30:1 maternal-infant gradient. After birth vitamin K status is related to dietary intake, being determined by the volume of milk ingested and the amount of vitamin K1 in the milk. Symptomatic VKDB can be precipitated in the first week of life by delayed or inadequate early feeding, or can occur later in the first six months as a result of inadequate oral absorption of vitamin K1. Human breast milk contains relatively low concentrations of vitamin K1 (1 to 2 µg/1), whereas infant formula milks are by law supplemented with additional vitamin K1 to a minimum concentration of 30 µg/1. Therefore exclusively breast-fed infants are at increased risk of developing VKDB, unless supplemental vitamin K is administered. Cholestatic liver disease also impairs absorption of vitamin K1 and increases the risk of VKDB. Hepatic menaquinones (vitamins K2) protect adults and older infants from developing VKDB even in the presence of vitamin K1 deficiency. Vitamins K2 cannot be detected in the livers of newborn infants but gradually accumulate in the first few months of life. The source of vitamins K2 in young infants is from synthesis by gut flora. Until adequate stores of hepatic menaquinones have accumulated young infants remain susceptible to the occurrence of VKDB.

[top]

Diagnosis

VKDB includes spontaneous or excessive induced bleeding (eg venipuncture or surgery) at any site associated with decreased activity of the vitamin K dependent coagulation factors (II, VII, IX and X) with normal activity of vitamin K independent factors, fibrinogen levels and platelet count (Sutor et al 1999). Confirmation of the diagnosis requires that the coagulation disorder is rapidly reversed following vitamin K administration and that other causes of coagulopathy are excluded.

[top]

Classification

VKDB is classified into early, classical and late, based on the age of presentation (Sutor et al 1999, Von Kries 1999).

Early VKDB, occurring on the first day of life, is rare and confined to infants born to mothers who have received medications that interfere with vitamin K metabolism. These include the anticonvulsants phenytoin, barbiturates or carbamazepam, the antitubercular drugs rifampicin or isoniazid and the vitamin K antagonists warfarin and phenprocoumarin. The reported incidence in infants of mothers who have received such medications without vitamin K supplementation is between 6 and 12 per cent (reviewed by Sutor et al 1999).

Classical VKDB occurs from one to seven days after birth and is more common in infants who are unwell at birth or who have delayed onset of feeding. Bleeding is usually from the umbilicus, gastrointestinal tract, skin punctures, surgical sites and uncommonly in the brain. The incidence reported in the literature is variable, with rates of 0.25 to 1.5 per cent in early reports of both sick and well infants to 0 to 0.44 per cent in recent reviews predominantly of well infants. There is considerable uncertainty about the true rates of classical VKDB since full diagnostic criteria outlined above were seldom met.

Late VKDB occurs from eight days to six months after birth, with most presenting at one to three months. It is almost completely confined to fully breast-fed infants. About half of the infants have underlying liver disease or occasionally other malabsorptive states. Serious intracranial haemorrhage occurs in about 30 to 50 per cent. Other sites of bleeding include skin, gastrointestinal tract, umbilicus or surgical sites. About 30 per cent have minor bruising or other signs of coagulopathy (warning bleeds), preceding the serious haemorrhage. Infants at risk may have signs of predisposing cholestatic liver disease such as prolonged jaundice, pale stools, and hepatosplenomegaly. The rate of VKDB in infants without prophylaxis has been reported as between five and 20 per 100,000 births. The mortality is about 30 per cent (Loughnan and McDougall 1993).

[top]

Prophylaxis

In Australia prophylaxis with a single IM injection of 1 mg Konakion (cremophor) was introduced in the early 1970s. This was initially given to Îsickâ infants such as those born preterm or following perinatal asphyxia, and later became routine for all infants.

At present over 95 per cent of approximately 260,000 newborn infants born in Australia each year receive IM vitamin K (cremophor formulation) prophylaxis at birth, most of the remainder receive either oral prophylaxis with repeated doses of the same formulation and a small number receive no prophylaxis (Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit - unpublished). In 1994 the NHMRC recommended that all infants should receive prophylaxis and that the IM route was preferred for reliability of administration. Prophylaxis has been recently reviewed (Brousson et al 1996, Cornelissen et al 1997, Sutor et al 1999, Von Kries 1999) and these studies underpin the statements below.

[top]

Effectiveness of prophylaxis

There are no randomised-controlled trials that adequately address the effectiveness of prophylaxis in preventing VKDB. The results of surveillance systems in different countries, including Australia, have been used to infer effectiveness by recording the type of prophylaxis used in reported cases of VKDB (Cornelissen et al 1997).

Early VKDB can appear at birth and so it has been recommended that women who are taking medication known to interfere with vitamin K metabolism should receive 20 mg of vitamin K daily for at least two weeks before birth. Further, newborn infants born to such mothers should have intramuscular vitamin K immediately after birth (Fetus and Newborn Committee 1988).

Classical VKDB is virtually eliminated by the administration of a single dose of vitamin K given by any route on the day of birth.

Late VKDB in the first six months of life is the main concern because, although rare, bleeding can be serious and life threatening and the incidence varies with different regimens of prophylaxis. Cornelissen et al (1997) and Von Kries (1999) summarised the results from different countries using various methods of administration. A single IM injection of 1 mg of Konakion (cremophor) has been the most reliable and effective form of prophylaxis with rates of less than 0.3 per 100,000 births reported. Regular oral dosing such as 25 µg daily (Netherlands) or 1 mg weekly (Denmark) requires parental diligence but is as effective as a single IM (cremophor) dose at birth. Formula feeding also supplies a regular dose and late VKDB is very rare in such infants.

Where the intended regimen is three oral doses of Konakion cremophor (usually on day one, later in the first week and at four to six weeks, the reported rates per 100,000 births have been 2.6 (Germany) and 2.5 (Australia). The rate for infants actually receiving the full course is lower at 1.8 and 1.5 respectively. In Germany an increased dose of Konakion cremophor to 2 mg at the three times was associated with a lower rate of 0.9 per 100,000 births (Von Kries 1999). A single oral dose of 1 to 2 mg of Konakion cremophor at birth is less effective, although the onset appears to be delayed (Loughnan and McDougall 1993) with reported rates per 100,000 births varying from 1.5 in the UK and Germany to 4.5 in Denmark and 6.5 in Switzerland.

Effectiveness of the new Konakion MM Paediatric (mixed micellar) preparation

Intramuscular injection of 1 mg of Konakion MM in adults results in a slow rise in blood vitamin K levels suggesting a depot effect. In newborns a similar depot effect has been observed although this has only been studied in the first eight hours after injection. Tween vitamin K1 formulation is used in a single IM dose in the USA and has a similar initial pharmacokinetic profile to that of Konakion MM following IM injection in adults. After a single IM dose of a Tween preparation of vitamin K1, adequate vitamin K1 levels at 56 days are found in about 70 per cent of infants (Greer et al 1998). The relationship between blood levels and risk of bleeding are unclear. The effectiveness of IM Konakion MM or the Tween formulation in preventing late VKDB is not known.

Konakion MM is well absorbed orally. With three single doses (administered at days one, seven and 30) blood levels of vitamin K1 are adequate in 89 per cent at 56 days (Greer et al 1998). Proteins that accumulate in the blood when there is a deficiency of vitamin K (PIVKAs) were not detected in the 79 infants who received oral prophylaxis with Konakion MM.

The only data on effectiveness of oral Konakion MM comes from Switzerland where since 1995, 93 per cent of infants have received it by this route. The intended regimen was two oral doses of 2 mg, the first on day one and the second on day four. Three years of surveillance data reported by Schubiger et al 1999 found one case of classical VKDB and 11 definite cases of late VKDB in 247,000 cases. Nine of these 11 were found to have underlying liver disease. Of the remaining two, one had no prophylaxis and the other had the recommended two oral doses.

[top]

Issues

The following issues were addressed by the Working Party when forming their recommendations:

The IM route of administration has been the preferred one in Australia. Use of the Konakion cremophor formulation has been shown to be effective in preventing late VKDB but will no longer be available in Australia by about October 2000. At present there are no data on the effectiveness of Konakion MM. A Tween preparation of vitamin K1 with absorption characteristics similar to Konakion MM is used in the USA and a single IM dose is recommended. The New Zealand draft recommendation is for a single IM dose of Konakion MM, and this is their preferred method of prophylaxis.

Oral prophylaxis can be as effective as IM but requires daily or weekly dosing.

There is not likely to be sufficient compliance to recommend this in Australia. Even with a two or three dose regimen there is significant non-compliance, as the Swiss case has demonstrated.

The new formulation is not presented in a user-friendly way. Intramuscular administration requires a 1 mg dose in a 0.1 ml volume of injection (half that in the ampoule) increasing the risk of dosage error. This problem is magnified for very pre-term infants who would receive 0.5 mg in 0.05 ml. For oral use, glass ampoules are not user friendly for parents. This creates important practical issues in regard to the third oral dose that will need to be considered on a local level. The Working Party has made this concern clear to the manufacturer.

As the duration of effect of oral or IM Konakion MM is not known, the Working Party considered the suggestion of a booster oral dose of 2 mg being given with the first immunisation. The purpose of this eight-week dose would be to prevent a small number of cases presenting late (about 12 per cent present beyond eight weeks of age). Data from Switzerland (Schubiger et al 1999) suggest that most of these late presenting cases will have associated liver disease and cholestasis.

Although there is one published report by Amedee-Manesme et al (quoted by Von Kries 1999), of good oral absorption of Konakion MM in the presence of cholestasis, this was in only three infants and a dose of 20 mg was used. An unpublished study of the effects of 2 mg given orally to a larger group of infants with cholestasis suggests that it is poorly absorbed (Shearer ö personal communication). Since a dose of 2 mg of oral vitamin K1 is unlikely to be effective in infants with cholestasis, and late presenting VKDB following prophylaxis is rare in healthy infants, the Working Party have not recommended routine administration at eight weeks of age. The administration of this fourth oral dose of Konakion MM should remain a discretionary issue for the parent and the clinician.

The amount of vitamin K1 in breast milk can be increased by maternal intake of supplemental vitamin K1 (Greer 1999). No data were found as to the effectiveness of this possible form of prophylaxis. The members of the working party were concerned that women might be discouraged from breastfeeding. Due to the large benefits both for the mother and infant the Commonwealth Government is committed to protecting, promoting and supporting exclusive breast feeding for at least the first four to six months of life (NHMRC 1996).

The advantage of IM administration is that no subsequent dosage is required. The advantage of oral administration in three doses is that it is non-invasive and that if 100 per cent compliance is achieved it may be almost as effective as IM administration.

There may be difficulty ensuring repeated oral doses of vitamin K in certain circumstances. Health Services need to take this into account when developing local protocols.

[top]

Recommendations

1. All newborn infants should receive vitamin K prophylaxis.

2. Healthy newborn infants should receive vitamin K either:

by intramuscular injection of 1 mg (0.1 ml) of Konakion MM at birth. This is the preferred route for reliability of administration and level of compliance.

Or


as three 2 mg (0.2 ml) oral doses of Konakion MM, given at birth, at the time of newborn screening (usually at three to five days of age) and in the fourth week. The last dose is not required in infants predominantly formula fed. It is imperative that the third dose is given no later than four weeks after birth as the effect of earlier doses decreases after this time. Undertaking this form of prophylaxis requires that the parent accepts responsibility and that clinicians support and advise them in the administration of the third dose.

If the infant vomits or regurgitates the formulation within one hour of administration, the oral dose should be repeated. If at the time any oral dose is to be given the infant is sick, vomiting or unable to take it by mouth, then medical advice should be sought as to whether the intramuscular preparation should be given.
3. Newborns who are too unwell and are unable to take oral vitamin K (or whose mothers have taken medications that interfere with vitamin K metabolism) should be given 1 mg of Konakion MM by intramuscular injection at birth. A smaller intramuscular dose of 0.5 mg (0.05ml) should be given to infants with a birth weight of less than 1.5 kg.

4. Parents should receive written information during the antenatal period about the importance of vitamin K prophylaxis, and the options of oral or intramuscular prophylaxis. Health practitioners and institutions should ensure that appropriate informed consent procedures are in place and are followed.

5. A mechanism should be in place to ensure that the decision made antenatally about the method of prophylaxis is communicated to staff caring for the mother during childbirth and post-natally.

6. Hospitals should have written protocols for medical and nursing staff to administer prophylactic vitamin K to infants. These should include that it be routine practice to record the date, dose and method of administration in the infantâs personal health record.

7. Child health workers and parents should be aware that unexplained bleeding or bruising in infants is uncommon and should be promptly investigated and treated. Information on unexplained bleeding should be included in the general information given to parents antenatally.

8. Further research should be undertaken into the implementation strategies for oral Konakion MM and for the efficacy of Konakion MM by any route. The possibility of prophylaxis via maternal supplementation to enhance levels of vitamin K in breast milk should also be investigated.

9. The Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit should be supported to continue monitoring the incidence of VKDB.

These recommendations will be reviewed as further information becomes available.

The Konakion MM Paediatric Product Information is currently being updated to reflect the Joint Statement and Recommendations.

The NHMRC has developed information for parents.

These guidelines were endorsed at the 137th Session of Council, 13 October 2000
 
aragorn said:
So we're probably going to decide against it, but are we being too paranoid? Any help appreciated.
My wife and I are also expecting a baby in October. We have decided against all vaccinations. Search the sott news database on vaccines for lots of information. In particular, read this article. Anyway, Mercola.com has a good article on Vitamin K and you can also check out the vaclib.org web site for lots of good articles.

Here's the Mercola article:

Vitamin K at Birth: To Inject or Not



By Linda Folden Palmer, DC

Newborn infants routinely receive a vitamin K shot after birth in order to prevent (or slow) a rare problem of bleeding into the brain weeks after birth. Vitamin K promotes blood clotting. The fetus has low levels of vitamin K as well as other factors needed in clotting. The body maintains these levels very precisely.1 Supplementation of vitamin K to the pregnant mother does not change the K status of the fetus, confirming the importance of its specific levels.

Toward the end of gestation, the fetus begins developing some of the other clotting factors, developing two key factors just before term birth.2 It has recently been shown that this tight regulation of vitamin K levels helps control the rate of rapid cell division during fetal development. Apparently, high levels of vitamin K can allow cell division to get out of hand, leading to cancer.

What's the Concern?

The problem of bleeding into the brain occurs mainly from three to seven weeks after birth in just over five out of 100,000 births (without vitamin K injections); 90 percent of those cases are breastfed infants3 because formulas are supplemented with unnaturally high levels of vitamin K. Forty percent of these infants suffer permanent brain damage or death.

The cause of this bleeding trauma is generally liver disease that has not been detected until the bleeding occurs. Several liver problems can reduce the liver's ability to make blood-clotting factors out of vitamin K; therefore extra K helps this situation. Infants exposed to drugs or alcohol through any means are especially at risk, and those from mothers on anti-epileptic medications are at very high risk and need special attention.

Such complications reduce the effectiveness of vitamin K, and in these cases, a higher level of available K could prevent the tragic intracranial bleeding. This rare bleeding disorder has been found to be highly preventable by a large-dose injection of vitamin K at birth.

The downside of this practice however is a possibly 80 percent increased risk of developing childhood leukemia. While a few studies have refuted this suggestion, several tightly controlled studies have shown this correlation to be most likely.4,5 The most current analysis of six different studies suggests it is a 10 percent or 20 percent increased risk. This is still a significant number of avoidable cancers.6

Apparently the cell division that continues to be quite rapid after birth continues to depend on precise amounts of vitamin K to proceed at the proper rate. Introduction of levels that are 20,000 times the newborn level, the amount usually injected, can have devastating consequences.

The Newborn's Diet

Nursing raises the infant's vitamin K levels very gradually after birth so that no disregulation occurs that would encourage leukemia development. Additionally, the clotting system of the healthy newborn is well planned, and healthy breastfed infants do not suffer bleeding complications, even without any supplementation.7

While breastfed infants demonstrate lower blood levels of vitamin K than the "recommended" amount, they show no signs of vitamin K deficiency (leading one to wonder where the "recommended" level for infants came from). But with vitamin K injections at birth, harmful consequences of some rare disorders can be averted.

Infant formulas are supplemented with high levels of vitamin K, generally sufficient to prevent intracranial bleeding in the case of a liver disorder and in some other rare bleeding disorders. Although formula feeding is seen to increase overall childhood cancer rates by 80 percent, this is likely not related to the added vitamin K.

The Numbers

Extracting data from available literature reveals that there are 1.5 extra cases of leukemia per 100,000 children due to vitamin K injections, and 1.8 more permanent injuries or deaths per 100,000 due to brain bleeding without injections. Adding the risk of infection or damage from the injections, including a local skin disease called "scleroderma" that is seen rarely with K injections,8 and even adding the possibility of healthy survival from leukemia, the scales remain tipped toward breastfed infants receiving a prophylactic vitamin K supplementation. However, there are better options than the .5- or 1-milligram injections typically given to newborns.

A Better Solution

The breastfed infant can be supplemented with several low oral doses of liquid vitamin K1 (possibly 200 micrograms per week for five weeks, totaling 1 milligram, even more gradual introduction may be better). Alternatively, the nursing mother can take vitamin K supplements daily or twice weekly for 10 weeks. (Supplementation of the pregnant mother does not alter fetal levels but supplementation of the nursing mother does increase breastmilk and infant levels.)

Either of these provides a much safer rate of vitamin K supplementation. Maternal supplementation of 2.5 mg per day, recommended by one author, provides a higher level of vitamin K through breastmilk than does formula,10 and may be much more than necessary.

Formula provides 10 times the U.S. recommended daily allowance, and this RDA is about two times the level in unsupplemented human milk. One milligram per day for 10 weeks for mother provides a cumulative extra 1 milligram to her infant over the important period and seems reasonable. Neither mother nor infant require supplementation if the infant is injected at birth.11

The Bottom Line

There is no overwhelming reason to discontinue this routine prophylactic injection for breastfed infants. Providing information about alternatives to allow informed parents to refuse would be reasonable. These parents may then decide to provide some gradual supplementation, or, for an entirely healthy term infant, they may simply provide diligent watchfulness for any signs of jaundice (yellowing of eyes or skin) or easy bleeding.

There appears to be no harm in supplementing this vitamin in a gradual manner however. Currently, injections are provided to infants intended for formula feeding as well, although there appears to be no need as formula provides good gradual supplementation. Discontinuing routine injections for this group alone could reduce cases of leukemia.

One more curious look at childhood leukemia is the finding that when any nation lowers its rate of infant deaths, their rate of childhood leukemia increases.12 Vitamin K injections may be responsible for some part of this number, but other factors are surely involved, about which we can only speculate.

Dr. Linda Folden Palmer consults and lectures on natural infant health, optimal child nutrition and attachment parenting. After running a successful chiropractic practice focused on nutrition and women's health for more than a decade, Linda's life became transformed eight years ago by the birth of her son. Her research into his particular health challenges led her to write Baby Matters: What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Caring for Your Baby. Extensively documented, this healthy parenting book presents the scientific evidence behind attachment parenting practices, supporting baby's immune system, preventing colic and sparing drug usage. You can visit Linda's Web site at www.babyreference.com.


The Danger of Vaccines

Dr. Mercola Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Administering vitamin K to newborns becomes an even greater issue when you consider the source. The vitamin K injections administered by hospitals to newborns are synthetic and may contain benzyl alcohol as a preservative.

The only known reported cases of vitamin K toxicity result from having used this synthetic form.

It certainly seems wise to instead use an oral form of liquid vitamin K, gradually supplemented with several low doses as discussed in the above article. The ideal form to use would be a high-quality vitamin K1, or phylloquinone, which is found naturally in plants. The vitamin K that I recommend is the natural vitamin K1 and it comes in a liquid form for a very reasonable price.

Please note that pregnant and nursing mothers should avoid vitamin K supplemental intakes higher than the RDA (65 mcg) unless specifically recommended and monitored by their physician.

Related Articles:

Seven Reasons to Breastfeed Your Child That You Need to Know

20 Percent of Pregnant Women Suffer From Depression

How the Cord Clamp Injures Your Baby's Brain

Letter From Parents to Their Doctor on Their Upcoming Delivery

Skin-to-Skin Contact With Mom Helps Newborns

More Than 300,000 Newborns Get Mercury From Fish Every Year

Notes

1.

L.G. Israels et al., "The riddle of vitamin K1 deficit in the newborn," Semin Perinatol 21, no. 1 (Feb 1997): 90-6.
2.

P. Reverdiau-Moalic et al., "Evolution of blood coagulation activators and inhibitors in the healthy human fetus," Blood (France) 88, no. 3 (Aug 1996): 900-6.
3.

A.H. Sutor et al., "Late form of vitamin K deficiency bleeding in Germany," Klin Padiatr (Germany) 207, no. 3 (May-Jun 1995): 89-97.
4.

L. Parker et al., "Neonatal vitamin K administration and childhood cancer in the north of England: retrospective case-control study," BMJ (England) 316, no. 7126 (Jan 1998): 189-93.
5.

S.J. Passmore et al., "Case-control studies of relation between childhood cancer and neonatal vitamin K administration," BMJ (England) 316, no. 7126 (Jan 1998): 178-84.
6.

E. Roman et al., "Vitamin K and childhood cancer: analysis of individual patient data from six case-control studies," Br J Cancer (England) 86, no. 1 (Jan 2002): 63-9.
7.

M. Andrew, "The relevance of developmental hemostasis to hemorrhagic disorders of newborns," Semin Perinatol 21, no. 1 (Feb 1997): 70-85.
8.

E. Bourrat et al., "[Scleroderma-like patch on the thigh in infants after vitamin K injection at birth: six observations]," Ann Dermatol Venereol (France) 123, no. 10 (1996): 634-8.
9.

A.H. Sutor, "Vitamin K deficiency bleeding in infants and children," Semin Thromb Hemost (Germany) 21, no. 3 (1995): 317-29.
10.

S. Bolisetty, "Vitamin K in preterm breast milk with maternal supplementation," Acta Paediatr (Australia) 87, no. 9 (Sep 1998): 960-2.
11.

K. Hogenbirk et al., "The effect of formula versus breast feeding and exogenous vitamin K1 supplementation on circulating levels of vitamin K1 and vitamin K-dependent clotting factors in newborns," Eur J Pediatr 152, no. 1 (Jan 1993): 72-4.
12.

A. Stewart, "Etiology of childhood leukemia: a possible alternative to the Greaves hypothesis," Leuk Res (England) 14, nos. 11-12 (1990): 937-9.
 
Hi
I wrote something about this in the film review of "Bug" thread.

My son was given konakion at birth , and even though I was present at the birth I was not sharp enough to notice that they had given him it untill after the event. I was a little annoyed at this to say the least , and I got a bad feeling from it.

I was not aware that this would happen.

From what I have read on this so far , the trials have not really been trials , meaning konakion / injected vitamin k has had no real research done on it.

Some reports , in the link i posted in anothe thread for example , the same one given above says that in the long run it probably causes more harm than good. If not in the link mentioned I can retrace my steps and find a proper link.

As Ruth said its all about information and reading , then making your own decisions regarding it.
 
Thanks guys for the info. I'll keep reading... One thing's for sure, we'll not give any (other) vaccinations to our new born. And after the first two years or so we'll consider and investigate carefully every new vaccination they suggest we should give. Apropos, do you think the baby could be traumatised by the needle piercing to the skin? I think it could, and that's another reason not to give the vitamin K by injection, I hear myself reasoning...
 
So much to do with health is a calculated risk anyway. What 'works' for some people may not 'work' for others. Currently, we have a health situation where interventions are the norm rather than the exception. All ages are having these interventions too. Who can say they don't know of anybody who, if it wasn't for modern medicine, would not be alive today if they hadn't had an intervention? Our life expectancy has also changed and in many cases our health may be severly compromised had nature been 'left to take its course'. A person must really weigh up all the risks versus benefits when they make a descision.

Its funny, but the expectations many people have of science and its effect on the health system are sometimes quite unrealistic. They expect there should be a 'magic pill' for everything. Strange.

If you're going to be raising children, I would also recommend that you try to build a good immune system and not provide an environment which is too sterile. But then again, if a child has a genetic propensity towards something, there's no guarantee of anything.
 
Okay, still no baby...

But I've kept reading about vitamin K until my eyes hurt. There are loads of "scientific" articles that have no proper footnotes of their sources. So I've ruled those out. There's unfortunately poor access to the primary sources, the actual studies, if one is not a licensed doctor. You need a password etc. to gain access to those databases. Or is there a way to access these? One of the best and well sourced articles I found was this:

_http://www.vaclib.org/basic/vitamin-k.htm

Vitamin K:controversy? what controversy?
By Karin Rothville DipCBEd.
CONCLUSION

It would seem an anachronism that babies are born with a deficiency of such an essential vitamin and require supplementation. In fact, although there have been many studies on differing aspects of vitamin K prophylaxis, there has only been one[39] on the possible reasons for and the advantages (if any) of the physiological levels of vitamin K in newborns.

The risks of prophylaxis for the majority of babies who are at low risk of HDN are also not understood. As plasma vitamin K levels in newborns reach 300 times normal adult levels for oral and almost 9000 times for IM vitamin K [47], some research needs to be done on the effects this may have. Studies have shown that physiological levels of vitamin K maintain a careful balance between coagulation and anti-coagulation and we have no idea what the effects of upsetting that delicate balance would be.

The number of children currently developing cancer during childhood is much higher than the number developing a life threatening or permanently disabling problem as a result of late onset HDN. The risk of childhood cancer is estimated to be 1.4 per 1000, from the 1970 British cohort. If IM vitamin K caused cancer, there would be 100 extra cases of cancer per case of HDN prevented.[16] This could mean that giving IM vitamin K to every baby would be doing more harm than good.[36]

The decision rests on parents' shoulders - the link between intramuscular vitamin K and childhood cancer has not been definitively proved, nor has it been completely disproved. It may be that an oral regimen as suggested by Tripp and McNinch[71] could be the answer to the dilemma. If this is the case, then Roche needs to be lobbied to make the European preparations available in New Zealand. In the meantime, the choice is between no vitamin K, with the mother being aware of her dietary intake of vitamin K, an oral regimen or the intramuscular formulation.

Sources (for this excerpt):

16) Darlow B. and Nobbs P. The neonatal vitamin K debate: IM vs. oral: two views. New Ethicals May 1993:11-18.

36) Hey, Edmund. Vitamin K - the debate continues. MIDIRS 1998;8(2):234-6.

39) Israels l, Friesen E., Jansen A. and Israels E. Vitamin K1 increases sister chromatid exchange in vitro in human leukocytes and in vivo in fetal sheep cells: a possible role for 'vitamin K deficiency' in the fetus. Pediatr Res 1991;30:550-3.

47) McNinch A, Upton C, Samuels M et al. Plasma concentrations after oral or intramuscular vitamin K1 in neonates. Arch Dis Child 1985;60:814-818.

71) Tripp J and McNinch A. The vitamin K debacle: cut the Gordian knot but first do no harm. Arch Dis Child 1998;79:295-299
I also appreciated this - should I say more "philosophical" - article:

Vitamin K - An Alternative Perspective
_http://www.aims.org.uk/Journal/Vol13No2/vitk.htm

This paragraph really nailed it:
'Fact' 1: All babies are born with low levels of vitamin K.

'Low' in relation to whom? If all babies have low levels, then who has the 'normal' levels against which this is measured? Well, believe it or not, only adults are perceived by the medical profession to have normal levels of vitamin K. Yet there is a big gap between noticing that babies have relatively lower levels than adults and deeming this a pathological condition which needs routine treatment.

Babies also have large heads relative to adults, but this is not perceived as pathological. This is deemed a good thing, because the human brain needs to be large at birth. Why is the fact that relative vitamin K levels differ between newborn and adult perceived as pathological?

Philosophically, the question is raised that, if all babies have what is perceived as a 'low' level of vitamin K, then in reality this must be the 'normal level' of vitamin K for babies to have. Even if proponents of vitamin K think that this is 'too low' a level for some reason, they should say this, rather than telling women their baby is deficient in an essential substance. Otherwise, this just reinforces the idea that women are relatively inefficient at making babies and need to be supplemented by the skills and technology of hospitals and doctors.
So we have decided to refuse the injection and use the oral administration. But in case there's complications, such as a section, the injection will become an option because of it's more immediate effect. And there's of course many stories about how the injections are given in secret, despite of the parents refusal. So I'll be watching carefully what they do. ;)

I'll let you know how it went, keep my fingers crossed...
 
aragorn said:
... There's unfortunately poor access to the primary sources, the actual studies, if one is not a licensed doctor. You need a password etc. to gain access to those databases. Or is there a way to access these? ...
When the source is a journal, I have had luck occasionally with finding it at the local university library. (I check online first to make sure they have that journal.)
 
Hi,

I just wanted to bring some closure to this thread I started by telling you that I'm now a very happy father of a healthy baby boy. :D

The labour was prolonged with some complications, so we decided to let the midwife give the vitamin K by injection, because the major overdose of the vitamin (by injection it is ca 9000 times the normal "adult" level) seemed like a smaller risk factor than the possible bleeding due to the rough way he came to this world (vacuum assisted delivery). Our midwife was very nice tough; she had prepared the oral dosages in advance according to my instructions...which we didn't need however.

Our baby boy is now one month and two days old and he seems very healthy and lively. Maybe I'll pick up the reading about vitamin K when we'll have the next one ;)

I was also happy to notice that I could focus through the hole labour procedure without dissociating in any way. And I was really on the "first row" - I was holding my wifes other leg the whole time she was "pushing" because the leg holder was broken! Okay enough details...I was just happy that the work I've been doing with my body therapist (it's called Bioenergetic therapy - I'll maybe write about it in detail some other time) had released enough trauma to let me focus at this wonderful occasion.

One last remark. Seeing the wonder of birth of my child really made me feel small compared to nature. I know that I must do a lot more work to get to the knowledge level I imagined I was at - I know nothing! I feel that I must read and learn some more before posting any silly posts around here - thank you for your patience with me so far.

Time to change diapers...
 
I appreciate this discussion, and I will be seeking oral supplements rather than a shot for vitamin K.
 
Back
Top Bottom