Was the earthquake in Japan induced?

From Jim Mccanney website : _http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/

i personally am considering the possibility that the japan earth quake was man induced by nuclear blasts under the ocean ... the ocean surface features point to this ... what or who is next ??? jim mccanney
 
Nuclear charges are indeed a possibility for inducing earthquakes and tsunamis when put along the fault lines at the right places at the right moments. However, their seismic signature is distinct and should have been seen by Russian and Chinese institutes. In the 80's the soviets put a few H-charges under the ocean in order to cause a huge tsunami over the North American continent in case of a nuclear war. This solution is old, but risky. The only reason to provoke an earthquake somewhere would be to avoid having it elsewhere, but controlling the distribution of faultline instabilities is so tricky that the outcome is uncontrollable anyway. When you try to control nature you end up with a big slap on your face.
 
mkrnhr said:
Nuclear charges are indeed a possibility for inducing earthquakes and tsunamis when put along the fault lines at the right places at the right moments. However, their seismic signature is distinct and should have been seen by Russian and Chinese institutes. In the 80's the soviets put a few H-charges under the ocean in order to cause a huge tsunami over the North American continent in case of a nuclear war. This solution is old, but risky. The only reason to provoke an earthquake somewhere would be to avoid having it elsewhere, but controlling the distribution of faultline instabilities is so tricky that the outcome is uncontrollable anyway. When you try to control nature you end up with a big slap on your face.

Exactly. Messing with the Ring of Fire is probably not a good idea. I don't know if the PTB are that stupid, but they could be.

If the controllers did the Haiti EQ, and the others followed from that, well, I dunno. They may have taken a tiger by the tail.
 
Laura said:
mkrnhr said:
Nuclear charges are indeed a possibility for inducing earthquakes and tsunamis when put along the fault lines at the right places at the right moments. However, their seismic signature is distinct and should have been seen by Russian and Chinese institutes. In the 80's the soviets put a few H-charges under the ocean in order to cause a huge tsunami over the North American continent in case of a nuclear war. This solution is old, but risky. The only reason to provoke an earthquake somewhere would be to avoid having it elsewhere, but controlling the distribution of faultline instabilities is so tricky that the outcome is uncontrollable anyway. When you try to control nature you end up with a big slap on your face.

Exactly. Messing with the Ring of Fire is probably not a good idea. I don't know if the PTB are that stupid, but they could be.

If the controllers did the Haiti EQ, and the others followed from that, well, I dunno. They may have taken a tiger by the tail.

Well it sure took the focus away from the Middle East since. The crumbling of Japan economy will benefice the U.S. and what and who else. The "handler" of this world are looking crazier and bolder every day. Look at the gulf of Mexico situation and how the health of it population is no concern for them and how they handle it. Earth change may be the occasion they were waiting for to use some of their "toys". What ever catastrophe is needed or war to push the population to accept a new world order, they will do. They want us on our knee is what they want. But as you wrote Laura, if it is them, they may have a tiger by the tail.
 
Just to note that Uranus entered Aries on March 12th. In my opinion this is a very powerful astrological influence that will bring more violent (Aries) changes (Uranus). Again, everything is connected.
 
Possibility of Being said:
Just a quick reminder that today (15 March), there was an alignment Elenin-Earth-Sun which according to McCanney can cause a serious disturbance in our solar system, including the Earth. It seems possible that such effects can begin a few days earlier, when the bodies are close to be aligned.

FWIW

I second that. In astrology it is in the build-up that all the action happens.
 
observer said:
Just to note that Uranus entered Aries on March 12th. In my opinion this is a very powerful astrological influence that will bring more violent (Aries) changes (Uranus). Again, everything is connected.

I agree, observer.
And adding to that mix, soon Mars will join Uranus, and Mars with Uranus is very volatile. (The applying date for Mars in Aries to Uranus in Aries is 3 April. Mars remains in Aries til 11 May.)
:O Oh jeez, add to that Pluto in a square (tension) to Mars in Aries-- Mars applying to exact degree (7) 8-11 April.
 
SolarMother said:
observer said:
Just to note that Uranus entered Aries on March 12th. In my opinion this is a very powerful astrological influence that will bring more violent (Aries) changes (Uranus). Again, everything is connected.

I agree, observer.
And adding to that mix, soon Mars will join Uranus, and Mars with Uranus is very volatile. (The applying date for Mars in Aries to Uranus in Aries is 3 April. Mars remains in Aries til 11 May.)
:O Oh jeez, add to that Pluto in a square (tension) to Mars in Aries-- Mars applying to exact degree (7) 8-11 April.

Charts for 4/4/11 and 4/11/11 looks very volatile. Notice that Neptune is entering Pisces on April 5th. This is in effect till August, but nonetheless I think it will bring brief change of mass consciousness.
 
Speaking of astrology (I'm a novice) has anyone done a chart for around the time when Elenin will be approaching, passing and leaving the position of the earth (late Oct - Nov)? Any indications to what might potentialy be "in the air" at that time?
 
Ivecky said:
Speaking of astrology (I'm a novice) has anyone done a chart for around the time when Elenin will be approaching, passing and leaving the position of the earth (late Oct - Nov)? Any indications to what might potentialy be "in the air" at that time?

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/225704-Comet-Elenin-Update-
 
mkrnhr said:
Nuclear charges are indeed a possibility for inducing earthquakes and tsunamis when put along the fault lines at the right places at the right moments. However, their seismic signature is distinct and should have been seen by Russian and Chinese institutes. In the 80's the soviets put a few H-charges under the ocean in order to cause a huge tsunami over the North American continent in case of a nuclear war. This solution is old, but risky. The only reason to provoke an earthquake somewhere would be to avoid having it elsewhere, but controlling the distribution of faultline instabilities is so tricky that the outcome is uncontrollable anyway. When you try to control nature you end up with a big slap on your face.

Nuclear charges are not need to induce an earthquake, there's another technology: the Pavlowsky machine based on MHD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics). JPP describe it on his French site: http://www.jp-petit.org/Divers/Armes_sismiques/Armes_sismiques1.htm. However it's certainly a prehistoric technology regarding what the PTB certainly know.

There's this sentence at the top of JPP page:
Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations.It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our[counterterrorism] efforts.

Secretary of Defense William Cohen
at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.

As someone say before, the earthquake happened a 11. It's disturbing.
 
Laurentien said:
Well it sure took the focus away from the Middle East since.

...where the US and friends are about to bomb Libya:

Libya crisis: Britain, France and US line up for air strikes against Gaddafi

_http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/17/libya-no-fly-zone-united-nations
 
Kniall said:
Laurentien said:
Well it sure took the focus away from the Middle East since.

...where the US and friends are about to bomb Libya:

Libya crisis: Britain, France and US line up for air strikes against Gaddafi

_http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/17/libya-no-fly-zone-united-nations

Not only Libya, look at what is going on in bahrain. What does the PTB do? The earthquake definately took the attention away but they are in a hard place, I had a conversation about this with some person the other day and after the conversation it transpired that regime change is not what is wanted because they can't control who will come in. So far the status quo in countries like libya and bahrain suits western countries because they together with the leader control everything in the country and the citizens get next to nothing in comparison. But USA has to be seen atleast to stand for democracy and therefore has to support the rebels and protesters, atleast by words if not action. Maybe the whole ploy, is to buy enough time for the governments to stamp down on the rebellion. Maybe they have been given like a deadline where they have to quench the rebellion or else... Psychpaths must be getting really worried, they are losing control and they dont know how to regain it, you can't rule a country with no people, the mask is slowly coming off...

I cannot believe what I have seen here

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/225990-Bahrain-police-killing-people-by-drive-by-shootings

These people are getting really desperate to do this. It is soon turning out to be us(normal human beings) vs them(psychopaths)... Maybe natural disasters will intervene.. If an earthquake like the one that hit japan hits america, I doubt they'll care about what is going on in the middle east anymore...
 
I'm curious to see if this has anything to do with or is going to effect that huge crystal off the coast of Japan that the C's mentioned.
 
Stones said:
I'm curious to see if this has anything to do with or is going to effect that huge crystal off the coast of Japan that the C's mentioned.

I had the same thing in mind.

Laura said:
19 November 94

Q: (L) Besides the crystal in the Bermuda Triangle, are any of the others still active?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Does the government know about them?
A: Semi.
Q: (L) Where are the others located?
A: Off Japan; in Brazil; in Ural mountains of Russia; North and South Poles.
Q: (T) Are the ones on the Moon and Mars active also?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Are they responsible for any of the earthquakes like the one in Japan?
A: Yes.
 
Back
Top Bottom