Web Bot Future Predictions - August looks bad

domivr said:
rs said:
An aside, when you discuss "time loops" you do not mean literal closed causal loops, right? [Think: "Groundhog Day" only where each day is literally the same.] Instead do you mean something like the background rhythm to music? The drum track "loops" but its exact meaning at any point in the song depends on what the other instruments are doing. In other words the loop is like a rhythm or frequency instead of a literal closed causal loop in time where you literally start out in the exact same conditions?
There is also the spiral which loops around an axis (like DNA). If you project it on a plane perpendicular to it's spiral axis you get a closed loop.
Interesting. Usually, I try to stay as objectively close to a common consensus as possible, but I guess I'll go out on a limb, and a bit farther from the box, at least to share some subjective thoughts (if you'll permit me to ramble a bit).

I think temporal loops are like background track loops, in the the sense that they carry the variations of events (temporal melodies) in a cyclic fashion. These background loops probably have a certain perturbation. Even given the variances in event-structures (time is never precisely repetitive, osit), the loops do not seem to be precisely ordered, and may have more of a chaotic nature (in terms of temporal attractors).

Even so, these loops would be stable within certain limits, unless severe perturbing forces are at work. Although temporal interference in the event-structure signal seems to be feasable within the bounds of cyclic carriers, to strongly perturb the carrier itself would require much stronger interference.

If there was only one such source of interference (say of entropic alliance), the temporal cycle would have correspondingly decayed after severe disruption already. If 4D entropic influences would prevail, carrier disruptions would probably have occured to a greater extent than they have. We have noticed a lot of fear-mongering peaking, and then levelling off over recent years. A collective state of prolonged fear may provide a conduit for entropic tampering of the temporal carriers.

On the other hand, the human collective system system seems very stressed, emotions are running high, and at the same time it is relatively stable (in relation to the corresponding fear-mongering). The likelihood is not low that a temporal driving force is at work to move the system to greater complexity, and the entropic influence is at odds with this. One may consider this as a clash of opposing probability fronts in the domain of the cyclic temporal carrier we call the sequence of events.

The two influences are obviously intelligent, and the non-entropic driver seems to conduct into this temporal system without violating free will, while the entropic carrier only needs compatible to it psychic states to ground through into (required portions of) the collective 3D conduit system.

Apparently the various stimulations of overt collective fear have not been working, and a different tactic may be attempted, similar to what happened prior to 9-11: chronic stress at relatively moderate to high levels (compared to generating specific panic-inducing rumours), followed by an accumulation of entropic force and a discharge event that comes as a "surprise" to most people.

Something may very well happen in the latter days of summer. The atmosphere feels different than in it has in recent years. There was fear, as there is now, but the influences seemed more brazen, relying more on brute force infiltrations, while this time there seems to be more deliberate calculation involved.

At the same time, the perterbations from influences that are opposite to "negative" ones seem to have more access than before, partly because the temporal system and (some) humans are adapting to former entropic "hits" by generating more complex responses, partly because the planet itself is adapting as well in its own way.

So these predictions, I think indicate collective response to an attempted disruption in progress, building its perturbing force to a saturation mark that may hit up to a month before the fall equinox. Because of the large number of variables involved, this can result in the outcome predicted by web.bot, it can be absorbed as the temporal system (like the earth axis wobble in another thread) reaches a new state of equilibrium, or a new state of equilibrium can be reached after a period of turbulence that will be disruptive and/or locally disastrous, but not along the lines entropic causalities would prefer.

Being a geographic area under a lot of psychic stress, with many of the population acting as entropic conduits, North America, and in particular the US, is vulnerable. Even so, the system is incredibly complex, and entropic influences (although they refuse to believe this) have lost the element of surprise they had in the past (emerging networking and idea exchange has much to do with this).

It's worth keeping an eye on this, in any case.
 
EQ said:
It's worth keeping an eye on this, in any case.
This may be completely unrelated, but over the past six months, the small town I live in has erected - every three or four square blocks - enormous speakers, on top of metal poles that are twice as tall as street lamps. The speakers themselves are about 8 feet tall and black, with six black horn looking things one on top of the next. They are very noticeble and also have solar power panels on them. Well, this morning, I heard outside my house an electronic version of Westminister Abbey's chimes - like the sound that Big Ben makes, only electronic - this odd 'tune' was followed by a very clear, male voice being broadcast over these speakers that simple said, "this is a test of the emergency broadcast system" - followed by what I assume was the same phrase, in Spanish.

It was a bit surreal - mostly because of the electronic tune associated with it and the extraordinary clarity of the broadcast voice. I realize that this is just an updated version of the old civil defense horn, but, I have to tell you, it was darn creepy - it sounded like the guy was standing in front of my house, it was so clear.
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3518857.stm

"Talking" lampposts are warning south Londoners to be wary of muggers in an unusual scheme to tackle street crime.

There was also mention of some loudspeakers a la v for vendetta style being put up around London but I can't find the link.
 
Does anyone on the forum knows what is the accuracy of the predictions WebBot project?
I read that in 2010, the accuracy of this method was around 40-50%, depending on the interpretation. Apparently, Clif High is constantly improving the methodology and perhaps the recent reports accurate !?
 
casper said:
Does anyone on the forum knows what is the accuracy of the predictions WebBot project?
I read that in 2010, the accuracy of this method was around 40-50%, depending on the interpretation. Apparently, Clif High is constantly improving the methodology and perhaps the recent reports accurate !?
I have no idea as to the accuracy, but long ago I subscribed to his reports for a year. I did not renew because the predictions were like reading Nostradamus, very "clear" in retrospect... If you are very ambiguous in your forecast, you can claim credit for pretty much any outcome. As the great philosopher Yogi Berra said: "it is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future."
 
rs said:
casper said:
Does anyone on the forum knows what is the accuracy of the predictions WebBot project?
I read that in 2010, the accuracy of this method was around 40-50%, depending on the interpretation. Apparently, Clif High is constantly improving the methodology and perhaps the recent reports accurate !?
I have no idea as to the accuracy, but long ago I subscribed to his reports for a year. I did not renew because the predictions were like reading Nostradamus, very "clear" in retrospect... If you are very ambiguous in your forecast, you can claim credit for pretty much any outcome. As the great philosopher Yogi Berra said: "it is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future."
Thank you for your response, I wonder, because the WEB BOT project dedicated to collecting and grouping data with the help of computers and software, but I think in this case is important and interpretation by man. It is known that few of us can observe one and the same image or event and each of us will experience or interpret in a different way, so that we do have a pretty strong subjective component.
 
casper said:
rs said:
casper said:
Does anyone on the forum knows what is the accuracy of the predictions WebBot project?
I read that in 2010, the accuracy of this method was around 40-50%, depending on the interpretation. Apparently, Clif High is constantly improving the methodology and perhaps the recent reports accurate !?
I have no idea as to the accuracy, but long ago I subscribed to his reports for a year. I did not renew because the predictions were like reading Nostradamus, very "clear" in retrospect... If you are very ambiguous in your forecast, you can claim credit for pretty much any outcome. As the great philosopher Yogi Berra said: "it is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future."
Thank you for your response, I wonder, because the WEB BOT project dedicated to collecting and grouping data with the help of computers and software, but I think in this case is important and interpretation by man. It is known that few of us can observe one and the same image or event and each of us will experience or interpret in a different way, so that we do have a pretty strong subjective component.

Yes, I agree with you assessments, we do not need Cliff High to inform us things are going nuts in every way really fast. Heck, all we need to do is pay attention to what is happening.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom