What is going on????

zyad1802

The Force is Strong With This One
Dear Moderator/supervisor

My post "Islam is the final testament" was posted in Religion section, but move to "baked noodles" then again moved back to religion

section. It has many replies on my post that I was answering them in turns.

But now I discovered that the post has been moved yet again to "baked noodles" for no apperant reason nor notification.

My question is what is going on? I want it to be in religion section

Can any body answer me please??
 
Zyad I am not a moderator or supervisor but I can tell you that answer to your questions lies in the following question:

Did you take time to familiarize yourself with Forum rules and guidelines before you started posting ?

FYI writing with caps on or in bold in the forum media equals shouting! Why would you start shouting in someone's house as soon as you enter?
 
Just above this thread
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,13777.0.html
 
zyad said:
Dear Moderator/supervisor

My post "Islam is the final testament" was posted in Religion section, but move to "baked noodles" then again moved back to religion

section. It has many replies on my post that I was answering them in turns.

But now I discovered that the post has been moved yet again to "baked noodles" for no apperant reason nor notification.

My question is what is going on? I want it to be in religion section

Can any body answer me please??

Umm I believe a reason was given by Laura (page 6)

As the thread is devoid of any serious research, I'm moving it back to Baked Noodles and closing it. Sheesh!
 
Sometimes what we want and what we get aren't the same thing.

This forum is not for debating.

Forum Guidelines: To create an environment for the stimulation, development and then the alignment of objective consciousnesses as defined and described by the Cassiopaeans with the able help of Georges Gurdjieff, Mouravieff, Castaneda, and many other sources available to us. The foundation of this forum is The Cassiopaean Experiment, the layout of the rooms is generally modelled after the work of Gurdjieff and Mouravieff, the decor and details are filled in by Castaneda and many modern psychological studies.

Study these works, then come back to us to discuss religion, if, by then, you still feel you have something worthwhile to add.
 
zyad said:
...My question is what is going on? I want it to be in religion section

Can any body answer me please??[/b]

I think that has been answered fairly well. It's not precisely the way I would have handled it, but then it's not my forum. If you feel like there is still anything you might learn here, study the forum guidelines and see if there is a way to approach it within that framework. If your goal is only to "teach" then there is no point, but I do believe that a teacher with no need to learn is quite worthless.

If you wish to receive my reply to your earlier questions, contact me through my website/FaceBook page. I had no way to send it to you.
 
Megan said:
If you wish to receive my reply to your earlier questions, contact me through my website/FaceBook page. I had no way to send it to you.

Megan, I'm rather astounded that you are inviting zyad to contact you privately. You might want to re-think that considering all available evidence, not to mention that it goes against the guidance repeatedly given on this forum. It might be very wise for you to stop and examine your thinking across the board here, because something is definitely off.
 
Zyad - AND OTHERS - when you have finished reading the recommended works that I listed in the now closed thread, and then want to discuss the topic intelligently, feel free to do so. It is simply beyond absurd for ya'll to be talking about these people behind religions and the religions that were created around "seed ideas of people" for political purposes as though they had anything to do with spirituality other than duping people. Another book to read would be Schumaker's "The Corruption of Reality" and "Homer's Odyssey and the Ancient Near East."
 
anart said:
Megan, I'm rather astounded that you are inviting zyad to contact you privately. You might want to re-think that considering all available evidence, not to mention that it goes against the guidance repeatedly given on this forum. It might be very wise for you to stop and examine your thinking across the board here, because something is definitely off.

I have a sense of something being off, too, but I don't have a lot of time to consider it right at the moment. I have no intention of engaging in offline debate, religious or otherwise. I don't have time for it even if I were interested. But I had promised a reply and I wasn't able to do what I said I would do.
 
Megan said:
I have a sense of something being off, too, but I don't have a lot of time to consider it right at the moment. I have no intention of engaging in offline debate, religious or otherwise. I don't have time for it even if I were interested. But I had promised a reply and I wasn't able to do what I said I would do.

Well, when you get a chance, maybe bring it up in the swamp if you want to? - I'm a little concerned about you since this is unusual.
 
anart said:
Well, when you get a chance, maybe bring it up in the swamp if you want to? - I'm a little concerned about you since this is unusual.

It's OK, I'm not going to flip out. I've seen it happen enough times over the last 9 years, though. I was already thinking of posting something when I have a clear stretch of time to do that. Thanks.
 
Back
Top Bottom