What is The Kalergi Plan?

The book 'Practical idealism' is finally available in English on Amazon. I have read the PDF document already but there is a flaw in it. The first 30-40% is a correct translation but the rest is unreadable - it starts with remark that the remaining part has been machine-translated and you can hardly understand the ideas and thoughts of the author. Anyway, it seems to me that after reading the whole thing in proper translation it won't be possible to deduce what we are up to in this thread.

Was Kalergi's work already part of a plan? Was it meant to be a manifesto sponsored by the men behind the curtain? Or was it just a work of one schizoidal mind captured by PTBs afterwards? Think we will have to look for the answers elsewhere.

This is a quote of first English review from Amazon.co.uk:
This book was banned and little wonder why. Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi was once the darling of the liberal post-war era. He started a movement, called Pan-Europa, which aimed to create a united Europe in order to prevent a repeat of the bloodshed of the First World War. A noble aim, however at what price? If the diagnosis of a problem is incorrect, the solution offered often only makes things worse. The cure is worse than the disease.

At the heart of his diagnosis lies a fatal flaw. He truly believes that some people are better and more worthy than others. In Part One, he compares rural man with urban man. He starts by saying that “the urbanite is rational, sceptical, critical – the rural man is emotional, religious, superstitious.” Already, there are signs of the modern-day split between different world views or “psychological opposites.” Whereas this might at first appear as a balanced argument, we soon see that he not only has preferences, but a view that one side is ‘superior’ and the other ‘inferior’. He goes on to say that “usually, the rural man is a product of inbreeding, the urban man a mixed breed.” (page 26) If that is not evidence enough, he goes on to say that “the inbred man is always a one-soul person – the mixed-breed man a multi-soul person.”

So, there we have it, at its heart is a racist view of people. The superior (globalist) must laude it over the inferior (nationalist). The superior had once been the aristocracy, but this was superseded by the wealthy plutocracy. Wealth must rule and the poor must obey and be ruled.

I always believed that democracy was the governing principle in European countries. That is why we fought Hitler, to prevent his dominant will from coercing us against our will as people. Obviously, Kalergi believes that we must be ruled by unelected autocrats. He views democracy as a façade that people will accept, whereas the true power of government lies with the plutocracy.

Kalergi’s vision of creating a united Europe is a worthy ideal. Like many ideals however, they involve subjugating many voices, even exterminating them as in every socialist vision that has ever existed. Karergi is a Marxist and his vision for peace, is peace at any price. The loss of freedom to the many is a price he is more than willing to pay. The danger is that like all Marxists, they really believe in the rightness of their cause, and are willing to adopt Machiavellian tactics to achieve their aims.

I would describe Kalergi as a peace-monger, one that Neville Chamberlain would agree with. The modern-day EU was founded on such principles, and it is little wonder why its leaders see little wrong with their vision. When the yellow-vesters protest against Macron and the British have voted for Brexit, the globalist elite are still clinging on to the Kalergi vision, and will not allow democracy to triumph. After all, democracy is a façade that ‘ruralite’ people believe in, whereas the plutocracy of the globalist elite must prevail…the peace plan born of racism, superiority and contempt for most people.
 
Thanks Tuatha de danaan to mention this Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, that i didn't know before.
So i took five minutes to make a search on him, and i found an article in french that show the other side of the coin of this kalergi's plan.
I do not have enough certainty, but if the following article is true, we are in the continuity of the programming that has ponerized noble values and ideas to distort them and deceive us.

November 24, 2015 Published by L'Imprécateur
THE SO-CALLED "KALERGI PLAN" FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF EUROPE

François Hollande declares that we are at war in the very heart of France (for a long time, but he had not yet noticed it). He decided to close the borders, announced relentless retaliation, and convened the Congress in Versailles to tell it that his relentless response consisted in a revision of the Constitution that all constitutional lawyers considered unnecessary and unrealistic (an idea of one of the enarques that advised the Elysée, no doubt).

We are told that he has finally understood that by opening the doors of immigration wide he has also opened France to Islamist terrorists, we are delighted to see him in general from the Armies. It was a misunderstanding. Just out of Congress, he announced that France would welcome 30,000 more "refugees" by the end of its five-year term! As General Dourakine said, "A two-footed donkey can become a general and remain a donkey".

It is wrong to believe that François Hollande's perseverance in making mistakes is free or the result of the self-adoration of his intelligence, which he believes is very great. In fact, it is only the hubbub of supranational institutions with little visibility, often partially drowned by Freemasonry, such as the New World Order, Trilateral, Bilderberg, FAF*, etc. In addition to controlling global finance, they have in common the implementation of the Kalergi Plan for Europe.

When we know this plan, the whole societal policy, miserable (deliberately bringing misery) and immigrationist of the two Dutch governments can be explained. The European press will not tell you about it, it is a secret of European-German-French states of which Angela Merkel is the project manager in Europe, with her secretaries the former President of the European Commission Van Rompuy and his successor Jean-Claude Juncker. In 2010, Mrs Merkel was awarded the first prize of the European Company Coudenhove-Kalergi, then in 2012 to Von Rompuy and in 2014 to Juncker.
A prize highly sought after by the globalized super-elite. What the hell is this about?

Count Richard Nikolaus Enjiro von Coudenhove-Kalergi is a half-breed of Austrian father and Japanese mother, born in Tokyo in 1894, who studied brilliantly and conceived the idea of a Europe of Nations in the 1920s
. He is the true founding father of Europe, long before Jean Monnet, Robert Schumann and their successors. They took up almost in extenso the ideas he published in his books: the common market, the common agricultural policy, the single currency... promising but forgetting those that hindered them: common taxation, social harmonisation, the European Defence Community, among others, which they feared would make them lose part of their power over the peoples and hinder their personal enrichment.

Forgotten today, Coudenhove-Kalergi was once very famous and listened to by many Heads of State. He was even nominated several times for the Nobel Peace Prize. In 1939 he proposed a project for a Europe whose main lines are: a Europe where the peoples would be on an equal footing; a Europe where they would be sufficiently united to be able to stand up to the other three blocs, the USA, the USSR and China; going beyond simple economic and monetary union; with a strong common army that would have facilitated the cultural diversity of the white European peoples, Christians of Greco-Roman culture; guaranteeing the independence and integrity of all the associated States (Europe of the Nations); developing a European mystique based on: a) European classical culture, b) Christian faith, c) the conception of the honour of medieval knights. "Just as in every living being the body is shaped by the soul, so the body of Europe will only be born under the impulse of a European spirit".

And he insists: Europe must be a predominantly white, Christian Europe: a Christian social and humanitarian trend, a Christian faith supported by a heroic and chivalrous spirit, so that it can resume its role at the head of the planet (L'Europe de demain, Conference of 17 May 1939 at the Hotel Ambassadeur in Paris). This definition of a Europe of Nations, bringing together the white European peoples of Christian civilisation, excluding the communist and Muslim countries, has angered the European left-wing. They hated Coudenhove-Kalergi until they found a way to get his project back to make a plan that was totally diverted from the original, a frighteningly racist plan that is wrongly attributed to Kalergi. They even accused him of Nazism, even though he was married to a Jewish woman, hated by Hitler, and fled the Hitler regime in late 1939 by taking refuge in the United States until he returned to France at the end of 1945.

In 1966, at the 10th Pan-European Congress in Vienna, he expressed his disappointment at the direction taken by the emerging Europe, the functionalisation of the Council of Europe and the European Parliament, the need for a common foreign policy in order to stand up to the United States so that it could stop lagging behind the United States and NATO, whose restructuring he called for, and a strengthening of intra-European technological cooperation to make Europe the world's leading economic power. He died shortly after in 1972.

Let us remember that it was the era of the "Europe of the Six" to which the peoples were very much in favour in this version proposed by Coudenhove-Kalergi, which resulted in the unequalled prosperity of the Glorious Thirty (1946-1976) and peace, or the absence of wars, in this non-communist (no Eastern Europe) and non-Muslim (no Macedonia, Albania, Croatia, Kosovo) Europe. Moreover, Coudenhove-Kalergi admits to doubting the willingness of the leaders of the time to move towards a Europe of Nations.

As soon as Kalergi died (in 1972)
, the European Commission undertook, in 1973, to enlarge the Europe of the Six (which worked so well), by recruiting new countries, until it reached today's 28, and this Europe which works so badly that a majority of Europeans no longer want it.

It was not long after, in 1978, six years after Coudenhove-Kalergi's death, that the Kalergi Plan appeared, which some people tried to trace back to 1922, while Coudenhove-Kalergi's first book, Paneuropa, was published in 1923. He is attributed the Kalergi Plan. It bears his name, but it can be assumed that it is a forgery and that the authors have sought to use his fame to conceal their neo-Nazi project. Indeed, the drafters of the Plan rely mainly on his book Praktisher idealismus, but when you have read this book, you quickly realize that in the Kalergi Plan you will only find truncated quotations, taken out of context, without direct references and that it goes totally against the philosophy of the father of the Europe of Nations.

Indeed, according to the so-called Kalergi Plan, Europe would only be the first step towards a world government under American authority, exactly the opposite of what Kalergi wanted. To achieve this "New World Order", we need a super-elite and people-livestock submissive to poverty and disciplined by constraint (of the pure Orwell) still exactly the opposite of what Kalergi taught all his life, which promoted the Swiss democratic and economic model. And it is here, in this project of a new world order, that we find the European model that Angela Merkel wants to build with obstinacy, with the support of the European Commission chaired by Juncker, and the collaboration of Holland.

The latest drafts of the Kalergi Plan squarely make it the Plan of the New World Order, which wants the disappearance of races until the very word is erased (it is done, at least in Larousse!) to arrive at a single species, monochrome, mestizo and bastardised, dominated by the super elite, the latter being reduced to socialists and Jews who would alone have the nationality of the New World Republic, the people remaining stateless so that they forget the word "Fatherland" in time to come.

In the latest version of the Kalergi Plan, it would be necessary, in order to submit the European peoples, to have a German-French duo that would impose its will on other countries. The peoples of the Old Continent should be replaced by a kind of sub-humanity resulting from racial mixing by crossing the European peoples with Asians, Arabs and Blacks, to create a multi-ethnic herd without specific qualities and easy to dominate for the ruling elite. "The man of the future will be of mixed blood. The future Eurasiato-Negroid race, very similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the multiplicity of peoples. And again: "abolish the right to self-determination of peoples and, successively, eliminate nations by using separatist ethnic movements and mass allogenic immigration <...> promote deviant sexuality, homosexuality (marriage for all) and paedophilia (via teachers), and destroy the traditional family (harm the Manifes Pour Tous) <...> take control and buy the docility of the press by purchasing the shares (Bergé, Niel, Pigasse, etc.)) and by subsidizing them <...> playing on the humanitarian fibre to raise taxes, ruin the conservative classes and justify restrictions on freedoms (Intelligence Act)", etc.

Today we could add "play on the green fibre to raise taxes"!

Do not look for any further explanations for the statements made by JC Juncker, the new President of the European Commission, who says he is "disappointed" that the peoples refuse to accept and finance the torrent of "refugees"...

"We must not let ourselves be blinded by populist thinking <...> It is our duty to welcome them" (Holland);
"We have the challenge of mixing and we will meet it" (Sarkozy);
"We can welcome 800,000 refugees this year" (Merkel);
"I am determined to find collective solutions to meet this immense challenge" (Valls);
"I have decided to welcome 30,000 more" (Holland);
"The real question is whether or not we are ready to continue our tradition of welcoming and in particular to the Muslim community. I, of course, answer yes to this question" (Juppé);
"What people need to develop everywhere is birth control AND mixed (interracial) marriages, with the aim of creating a single race in a single world and dependent on a central authority" (G. Brock Chisholm, former Director of the Islamic Organization for Medical Sciences, WHO).

Now, who had the idea of this Kalergi Plan, of which Covenhove-Kalergi is not the author and which he would have rejected with horror? At the beginning, there is Sigrid Hunke, a neo-Nazi activist, former mistress of Himmler and friend of the great Nazi mufti of Jerusalem. She married Walter Hallstein. Law professor W. Hallstein was a member of several Nazi organizations in the Reich, but not a member of the Nazi party, which allowed him to get away with it without much damage after the war. He became the first President of the European Commission in 1958. In 1960, Sigrid Hunke-Hallstein wrote a book The Sun of Allah Illuminates the West, which serves as a reference for all gogos like Jack Lang who argue that Europe owes a lot to the Arab-Muslim civilization. In this book, she suggests that as many Muslim Arabs as possible be reintroduced into Europe to mix European peoples.

It's not the Kalergi Plan yet, but it comes to that.

Sigrid and her husband made an intense promotion in European circles of the ideas that would later become the Kalergi Plan, which had already been outlined in the Hallstein Plan for a Federal Europe (1965), which Kalergi, a supporter of the Europe of the Christian Nations, denounced and which led Charles De Gaulle to jump. The European socialist politicians who were committed to the Plan waited until Kalergi died in 1972 to recruit among the European elite, drowning the European company Coudenhove-Kalergi and creating in 1978 the famous Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize that Raymond Barre was the first to receive, then people like Mitterrand's friend Helmut Kohl, Ronald Reagan, and finally Angel Merkel, van Rompuy and Jean-Claude Juncker. They used the drafting skills of several enarques to finalize the modalities of action.

François Hollande is a strong supporter of the Plan, as well as Valls and Macron who were instructed in Bilderberg to support it. If Sarkozy also supports him, it is because the Le Siècle club of which he is a member, as well as many people around him at UMP-LR, convinced him that it was in his interest.

It is said on many websites so similar to each other (even Dieudonné's!) that it seems that the copied and pasted have worked like a charm, that the Kalergi Plan for the decline of Europe through the replacement and mixing of its population, was prepared by think tanks based in the United States. This is completely false, a simple cover-up, it is a co-production of the Franco-Germanic elite seduced by the idea of keeping power hereditarily by the Muslim-style submission of the peoples of Europe, a mixed mass of workers**.

Rather, the American plan is to take advantage of the side effects of this plan, because it helps, through the massive migration of Arab populations to Europe, to destabilize the States of the Arab-Muslim world, a destabilization on which the United States relies to take direct or indirect control, via Iran and Saudi Arabia, of its energy wealth.

The Americans are not in favour of a forced mixing of the European peoples who, they believe, will weaken their productive capacity and economic exchanges, exchanges from which they hope to be the winners. Moreover, as they are not sure of the success of the Kalergi Plan carried by Merkel-Holland, which they feel is somewhat neo-Nazi and could provoke a revolt by the peoples, they prefer to let them bear the responsibility if it fails.
DeepL.
StackPath
I'm glad to find this thread again, to correct my post, if it looks like a duck, walks and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, even a mixed-race duck.
And I have a preference for this version: What did the subatomic particle say to the half-breed duck? Quark quark...
 
Coudenhove-Kalergi European prize

Here is the in english written text at the German Gov site, about Cancellor Agela Merkel received the prize in 2010. In 2008 it went to the former Polish Foreign Minister and (2010) Secretary of State in the Polish Government, Władysław Bartoszewski

 
The Charlemagne Prize honors exceptional work performed in the service of European unity. According to its bylaws, it is given to public figures or bodies ‘distinguished by their outstanding work toward European unity or cooperation between its states.’ The contribution, as Kurt Pfeiffer emphasized, can be ‘made in the areas of literature, science, economics or politics.’

Of course, the Charlemagne Prize quickly developed into a pre-eminently political award. Accordingly, politicians dominate the long list of recipients. These are the people who most often work toward integration—and who are able to exercise a political influence.

The list of recipients clearly reflects the unification process. The founding fathers of the EC were honored, along with the important architects of today’s Union, the proponents of initial expansions, and the representatives of the democratic movement in Central and Eastern Europe.

A "fine" line-up of laureates for the Charlemagne Prize, the first being Count Richard Nikolaus of Coudenhove-Kalergi.
Lauréats
 
Back
Top Bottom