Griller
The Force is Strong With This One
I've been a fan of all unexplained phenomena and conspiracy theories and such. I wholeheartedly believe in the importance of finding out the real state of these things and wish people will keep doing it. Having said that, there's been one thing that's been on my mind for a good while now....
If you're not into reading long posts, I've stated my short two-sentence simple version in the end of this post. I intentionally put it in the end to not spoil the reading for those who might wish to read the whole thing. A big part of this is just a rant of how I feel, but I think one can derive some good even from that. At the very least, I did my best to make it a constructive rant.
All this talk about 9/11, JFK, conspiracies and such. They themselves were terrible things to have happened. From what I heard from my parents, JFK sounded like a very kind and gentle yet brave man, a very rare man to rise to such position where it might be possible to change things for the better on a bigger scale. The wars and unexpected attackls directly against civilians, I call them that now since I don't want to divert from the topic with the whole argument of what was the truth behind those terrorist or false flag operations, it's beside the point now and there's more than enough arguing about that already elsewhere. Whatever force is behind these things, we ought to fight it not just verbally but in other means too. Why so?
The problem of just verbal fight
First of all, all the research on things like 9/11 has it's place and people have done a good job about them, and I urge people to keep doing so and spreading the information in a conscious manner and giving the listerner an actual choise of listening or not listening and respecting that choise. It's important and it's no minor thing. To go out and shout things is not good, but going out and asking if the person would like to hear what you have to say is not bad in itself. If you don't come back to harass the person after the person first rejected you, at least. This is just my view and you can argue it, but if you do so keep in mind that even people who are wrong about things have a mind of their own and you should not disregard that and veil your words to something like "O'm just saying" or "just a friendly arvice" or anything like that. It's an excuse for pushing your agenda, no matter how good agenda it is, in insincere ways. Do not be insincere, because that is the very nature of the game that PTB plays.
That's a load off my mind. Now, to the point why it is so important that you keep your resaerch and info spreading up, is because the people will react to it and some may come to seek further information and do research of their own. New minds may open new points. If no one had bothered to do these things, we would be totally oblivious of things like dangers of GMO, additive foods, industrial tobacco (yeah I believe pure tobacco isn't bad but I still resent much industrial things), overly poisonous pest deterrents like roundup aka. agent orange, and such.
But what good does that research actually do? It may one day become so public and so accepted that even the legistlators can not ignore it and their hand will be forced to right the wrong. The public may become aware enough to avoid those things, okay. The government or whoever did it may lose it's trust and be forced to step aside no matter how much they tamper the elections. Okay. All of these are okay, but what is not okay is relying solely on them, because they all require a bigger amount of people to act, lest they're usually more or less powerless words for the time being. That doesn't make those words any less important, but at least for me it means that if there's something else we can do without unreasonable effort, we should do it.
Other solutions
There are those. Permaculture is my favourite one, but there's a reason to it. Before I was aware of this permaculture, natural farming, I did some research on alternate monetary system since it's the money that controls us. All in all, while the alternate systems didn't seem too bad, there was one flaw in each one of them: to get the system really going, you had to get a food producer or two to use that system, and this is where I realised it'd be beneficial if instead of advocating these system I'd become a food producer. There was one major problem though, oil. To farm a field you need a tractor, lest it's a real, real drudgery for that amount of food. Didn't seem like a good option, so I turned my attention to the oil and food thing for a while, even though it seemed like beside the point at that time. Watching BBC-owned document "A Farm for the Future" gave me something to go on with, even though I was reserved against this permaculture thing. But the more resaerch I did on the subject, the more real it seemed. It's been about three months since I first heard about it and I'm now more convinced than ever. So what am I doing here writing about this instead of doing more research on the matter? Because I feel people should start doing what I did, start taking their life into their own hands instead of being just verbal about it, with all due respect.
So, what if you can take life into your hands, to produce your own electricity and food and have no loans to pay? What then? At least then you're not so compelled to make physical donations aka. work for the system that works against you and me and against it's users. The system is playing aikido with us and it's winning. It'll keep winning if you don't do anything physical just as you can't win a real-life fight with just talking yourself out of it when you're being beaten senseless by an aikido professional. Permaculture, natural farming, is called aikido with nature for a reason, so I say lets give them back some aikido!
But I must confess, that permaculture and self-sufficiency are just parts of the solution, and you might not necessarily need them in the manner than I'm gonna use them. Still, one should not disregard what they can give, and I hope professionals from those fields will rise to give people the tools to pull themselves from the system. Still, if societal changes at a larger scale are not made, the anomalies in the current system, anomalies like the whole large-scale representative democracy, keep pushing us back. The smaller scale you're allowed to decide on, and the more you move towards direct democracy instead of representative democracy, the less room there is for deception if you ask me. Of course there's always room for that, but when you vote for how things should be, not for who should decide how things should be, there's no room for err if you've given time and a comprehensive yet simple-language unbiased study on the matter.
One way to act to make things better in the perspective of the aforementioned democracy issue is to get a lot of people together and move to a certain area and work towards gaining more autonomy in that area. That's a concrete way that has direct influence, even if it does require more people to do it. Small-scale direct democracy.
There's a whole lot more injustices and anomalies that are waiting to be fixed in this society that one can not fix alone, if you ask me. That is why it's important to work together and keep the verbal fight up. Still, ask yourself if it's really all you can do, or more importantly all that needs to be done. After all, we priorise our use of time based on how important we see things.
Short version
Verbal fight, reserach and spreading information and such are not bad in themselves if you do them with a conscience, without resorting to any form of mental violence of sorts. Yet if you think that's all it takes, you're walking on a thin ice, because words themselves can not change a thing if they're not acted upon. Tools for action: self-sufficiency -> permaculture, direct small-scale democracy.
-Mikko Saari, Finland
If you're not into reading long posts, I've stated my short two-sentence simple version in the end of this post. I intentionally put it in the end to not spoil the reading for those who might wish to read the whole thing. A big part of this is just a rant of how I feel, but I think one can derive some good even from that. At the very least, I did my best to make it a constructive rant.
All this talk about 9/11, JFK, conspiracies and such. They themselves were terrible things to have happened. From what I heard from my parents, JFK sounded like a very kind and gentle yet brave man, a very rare man to rise to such position where it might be possible to change things for the better on a bigger scale. The wars and unexpected attackls directly against civilians, I call them that now since I don't want to divert from the topic with the whole argument of what was the truth behind those terrorist or false flag operations, it's beside the point now and there's more than enough arguing about that already elsewhere. Whatever force is behind these things, we ought to fight it not just verbally but in other means too. Why so?
The problem of just verbal fight
First of all, all the research on things like 9/11 has it's place and people have done a good job about them, and I urge people to keep doing so and spreading the information in a conscious manner and giving the listerner an actual choise of listening or not listening and respecting that choise. It's important and it's no minor thing. To go out and shout things is not good, but going out and asking if the person would like to hear what you have to say is not bad in itself. If you don't come back to harass the person after the person first rejected you, at least. This is just my view and you can argue it, but if you do so keep in mind that even people who are wrong about things have a mind of their own and you should not disregard that and veil your words to something like "O'm just saying" or "just a friendly arvice" or anything like that. It's an excuse for pushing your agenda, no matter how good agenda it is, in insincere ways. Do not be insincere, because that is the very nature of the game that PTB plays.
That's a load off my mind. Now, to the point why it is so important that you keep your resaerch and info spreading up, is because the people will react to it and some may come to seek further information and do research of their own. New minds may open new points. If no one had bothered to do these things, we would be totally oblivious of things like dangers of GMO, additive foods, industrial tobacco (yeah I believe pure tobacco isn't bad but I still resent much industrial things), overly poisonous pest deterrents like roundup aka. agent orange, and such.
But what good does that research actually do? It may one day become so public and so accepted that even the legistlators can not ignore it and their hand will be forced to right the wrong. The public may become aware enough to avoid those things, okay. The government or whoever did it may lose it's trust and be forced to step aside no matter how much they tamper the elections. Okay. All of these are okay, but what is not okay is relying solely on them, because they all require a bigger amount of people to act, lest they're usually more or less powerless words for the time being. That doesn't make those words any less important, but at least for me it means that if there's something else we can do without unreasonable effort, we should do it.
Other solutions
There are those. Permaculture is my favourite one, but there's a reason to it. Before I was aware of this permaculture, natural farming, I did some research on alternate monetary system since it's the money that controls us. All in all, while the alternate systems didn't seem too bad, there was one flaw in each one of them: to get the system really going, you had to get a food producer or two to use that system, and this is where I realised it'd be beneficial if instead of advocating these system I'd become a food producer. There was one major problem though, oil. To farm a field you need a tractor, lest it's a real, real drudgery for that amount of food. Didn't seem like a good option, so I turned my attention to the oil and food thing for a while, even though it seemed like beside the point at that time. Watching BBC-owned document "A Farm for the Future" gave me something to go on with, even though I was reserved against this permaculture thing. But the more resaerch I did on the subject, the more real it seemed. It's been about three months since I first heard about it and I'm now more convinced than ever. So what am I doing here writing about this instead of doing more research on the matter? Because I feel people should start doing what I did, start taking their life into their own hands instead of being just verbal about it, with all due respect.
So, what if you can take life into your hands, to produce your own electricity and food and have no loans to pay? What then? At least then you're not so compelled to make physical donations aka. work for the system that works against you and me and against it's users. The system is playing aikido with us and it's winning. It'll keep winning if you don't do anything physical just as you can't win a real-life fight with just talking yourself out of it when you're being beaten senseless by an aikido professional. Permaculture, natural farming, is called aikido with nature for a reason, so I say lets give them back some aikido!
But I must confess, that permaculture and self-sufficiency are just parts of the solution, and you might not necessarily need them in the manner than I'm gonna use them. Still, one should not disregard what they can give, and I hope professionals from those fields will rise to give people the tools to pull themselves from the system. Still, if societal changes at a larger scale are not made, the anomalies in the current system, anomalies like the whole large-scale representative democracy, keep pushing us back. The smaller scale you're allowed to decide on, and the more you move towards direct democracy instead of representative democracy, the less room there is for deception if you ask me. Of course there's always room for that, but when you vote for how things should be, not for who should decide how things should be, there's no room for err if you've given time and a comprehensive yet simple-language unbiased study on the matter.
One way to act to make things better in the perspective of the aforementioned democracy issue is to get a lot of people together and move to a certain area and work towards gaining more autonomy in that area. That's a concrete way that has direct influence, even if it does require more people to do it. Small-scale direct democracy.
There's a whole lot more injustices and anomalies that are waiting to be fixed in this society that one can not fix alone, if you ask me. That is why it's important to work together and keep the verbal fight up. Still, ask yourself if it's really all you can do, or more importantly all that needs to be done. After all, we priorise our use of time based on how important we see things.
Short version
Verbal fight, reserach and spreading information and such are not bad in themselves if you do them with a conscience, without resorting to any form of mental violence of sorts. Yet if you think that's all it takes, you're walking on a thin ice, because words themselves can not change a thing if they're not acted upon. Tools for action: self-sufficiency -> permaculture, direct small-scale democracy.
-Mikko Saari, Finland