Why are you single?

[TOTEM36]

Q: (L) OK, is it a correct point of reference that Wanderers are
individuals who feel alienated in the world system?
A: Yes but they can partially adapt.
Q: (L) OK, do they also sometimes have physical...
A: Revulsion to physicality.
Q: (T) Revulsion to physicality? They don't like physicality? But
they're here! (J) Just because they're here, they don't have to like it!
(L) OK, is that always a clue?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Anything else about them that... (J) Wait, I have another
question. Revulsion to physicality, does that refer to a dislike of the
fact that in 3rd density is all physical and it's fixed, as opposed to
upper densities, where there's variability?
A: 3rd density is not "all" physical.
Q: (L) Well, there's spiritual... (J) I understand that, but the physical
body itself, is fixed. (L) Well, I don't think that's what they're getting
at... (J) That's what I'm asking. (L) I think that what they're getting at
is like a fine division between somebody who focuses on physical
sensation as opposed to spiritual or mental or emotional sensation
as being the point of reference.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And this is something that I was reading in this book the other
day, that he talks about, the body is animal, and the soul is spirit. He
says that animal people just seek animal experiences, and they
glorify them, and they stimulate their physical emotions.
A: 3rd density natives tend to concentrate and to an extent, revel, in
the physical.
Q: (T) And boy, they're reveling right now! (L) Yes. (T) There's major
reveling going on. And it's intensifying every day. (J) I think the point
that I was trying to make was having to stay in 3rd density, would
they miss the variability of physicality? (L) Well, Wanderers,
remember, are 6th density beings.
A: The lack.
Q: (T) The lack of physicality?
A: Yes. Is missed.
Q: (L) They miss the lack of physicality. (J) Right. Exactly. (L) They
miss the lack of physicality. (J) OK, that was what I was getting at. I
just didn't say it right.
A: Not so much "miss," as much as difficulty of adjustment.
Q: (J) Yes, like if you went blind, you'd miss being able to see, etc...
(T) If you had the freedom of non-physicality, being limited, you'd
miss the non-physical.
A: Latter
:) :)

100% hit

why could i never find that during my searches? it must have been only recently re-edited or something?

Thanks again probetheus!!

 

[probetheus]

anytime!
:)

 

[Ðekel]

wow

probetheus,

growing up, physicality somehow 'didn't make sense' to me.
it's not that i have ever been 'repulsed' by it per say.. but i distinctly remember being in the shower and washing myself thinking;
'this is the whole thing ?' - meaning, human bodies seemed small to me, or rather, lacking in extra functions.
what kind of functions, i cannot say specifically.

so what does it mean if someone can relate to this transcript portion ?

it sort of reminds me of douglas adam's 'Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' in which he describes mice as being only the protrusion into 3D of huge, multi-dimensional beings that were actually conducting an experiment on scientists..

 

[probetheus]

wow

probetheus,

growing up, physicality somehow 'didn't make sense' to me.
it's not that i have ever been 'repulsed' by it per say.. but i distinctly remember being in the shower and washing myself thinking;
'this is the whole thing ?' - meaning, human bodies seemed small to me, or rather, lacking in extra functions.
what kind of functions, i cannot say specifically.

so what does it mean if someone can relate to this transcript portion ?

Hi transientP!

Some times ago, I was asking myself something like that too and then I came to conclusion that I can`t know for sure am I wanderer (if you were thinking something like that) but I can always try to do my best and always act from my heart.

Please don`t get me wrong, I`m not trying to be smart but I think that no one could claim something like ... yea sure, sure, you are fifth or sixth density wanderer, no doubt about that. Of course, you could be the wanderer but who could know that for sure. You know yourself the best and the closest answer you could get is if you answer that for yourself.
:) :)

 

[Foxx]

wow

probetheus,

growing up, physicality somehow 'didn't make sense' to me.
it's not that i have ever been 'repulsed' by it per say.. but i distinctly remember being in the shower and washing myself thinking;
'this is the whole thing ?' - meaning, human bodies seemed small to me, or rather, lacking in extra functions.
what kind of functions, i cannot say specifically.

so what does it mean if someone can relate to this transcript portion ?

it sort of reminds me of douglas adam's 'Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' in which he describes mice as being only the protrusion into 3D of huge, multi-dimensional beings that were actually conducting an experiment on scientists..

I would suggest caution for the potential ego-traps that such thinking/identifying can have. Regardless of one's "past", The Work is what counts.

 

[Ðekel]

Foxx

yes, i understand that.
i don't feel that relating to that transcript is a 'good' thing or a 'bad' thing.
there's no credit to be had just by feeling a certain way. and feeling a certain way is temporary.

i guess i realized after my post that asking

so what does it mean if someone can relate to this transcript portion ?

is a bit childish, because it could mean anything to anyone and ultimately it doesn't mean anything in particular.
:)

i think this also ties in with the original subject of the post-
in a relationship we sometimes create an image of the other person that we would like to believe is them, while disregarding other aspects of them or of the interaction. any person could be anything to anyone..

i get a feeling i may be babbling now..
:/

 

[Foxx]

Foxx

yes, i understand that.
i don't feel that relating to that transcript is a 'good' thing or a 'bad' thing.
there's no credit to be had just by feeling a certain way. and feeling a certain way is temporary.

i guess i realized after my post that asking

so what does it mean if someone can relate to this transcript portion ?

is a bit childish, because it could mean anything to anyone and ultimately it doesn't mean anything in particular.
:)

i think this also ties in with the original subject of the post-
in a relationship we sometimes create an image of the other person that we would like to believe is them, while disregarding other aspects of them or of the interaction. any person could be anything to anyone..

i get a feeling i may be babbling now..
:/

:)

 

[cubbex]

wow

probetheus,

growing up, physicality somehow 'didn't make sense' to me.
it's not that i have ever been 'repulsed' by it per say.. but i distinctly remember being in the shower and washing myself thinking;
'this is the whole thing ?' - meaning, human bodies seemed small to me, or rather, lacking in extra functions.
what kind of functions, i cannot say specifically.

so what does it mean if someone can relate to this transcript portion ?

Hi transientP!

Some times ago, I was asking myself something like that too and then I came to conclusion that I can`t know for sure am I wanderer (if you were thinking something like that) but I can always try to do my best and always act from my heart.

Please don`t get me wrong, I`m not trying to be smart but I think that no one could claim something like ... yea sure, sure, you are fifth or sixth density wanderer, no doubt about that. Of course, you could be the wanderer but who could know that for sure. You know yourself the best and the closest answer you could get is if you answer that for yourself.
:) :)

Is not just that we can't certainly know that, but that we can be as dumb as an onion.

Posted by: hallowed

That section is really evocative. There was another classic quote that i cant remember if it was from Laura herself, or Cass or Ra. but someone said that wanderers or T.P.'s hate the physical??, or are disgusted/reviled by the physical?? something like that. I have never been able to find it again using the search function. It must have been a 'comment' within a text somewhere? I personally have always found the idea of one relationship really scary, but useful if you are using it as a mirror.

perhaps, you had this in mind...

The Law of One, Book I, Session 12

Questioner: Do many of these Wanderers have physical ailments in this
third-density situation?

Ra: I am Ra. Due to the extreme variance between the vibratory distortions of third density and those of the more dense densities, if you will,
Wanderers have as a general rule some form of handicap, difficulty, or
feeling of alienation which is severe. The most common of these difficulties
are alienation, the reaction against the planetary vibration by personality
disorders, as you would call them, and body complex ailments indicating
difficulty in adjustment to the planetary vibrations such as allergies, as you
would call them.

So that's it... I knew there was a reason why I was always sick when I was kid, until I got a cigarette at my mouth and why I was at one step to schizophrenia.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you asked yourself, why this thing of getting a partner and romance is so important to humanity? I mean where's the secret, why it's like the second most important thing after breathing?

You know, on operant conditioning the 4 primary reinforcements are: sex, water, food and sleep. The fifth one should be love.

 

[Bim]

Aaah this question :P

Yeah, i hear this one quite a lot; i think i'm up to a point where i'm almost numb to it, although at times it really bothers me when people make it seem like there's something really wrong with me because i'm single.

I get the "Oh but you're so pretty; surely you can get a man" . It doesnt matter if i try to explain i actually want to be single right now (it's almost scary how comfortable i am single ), people just cant handle it. I just think it's a rude question to ask to be honest; i mean you dont hear me asking them why they're married to that douche bag who treats them horribly .. maybe i should just to get them to shut up ;D

At this point i'm fine with people thinking i'm weird; hopefully that means they'll just leave me alone to my "weirdness" and go bug someone else