If we talk about interests, what are the interests of the EU to accept refugees?lux said:Well, casper, they fight them. They are corrupt and influential, they prefer to dump the problem on the shoulders of other countries and EU. And don't want stand up for the true Arabs and Semites. They don't see interest in this.
Here we can then talk about a kind of racism, why the UN does not respond, the UN only come warnings and remarks to the EU not taking sufficient to assist in the acceptance of refugees, on the other hand is not one word not mentioned gulf countries that would also could receive the refugees.griffin said:It isn't necessary to ask the Cs this question. The answer is obvious in light of the countries' cultures.
Syria is a predominently Shia Muslim country, whereas Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the Gulf monarchies are Sunni Muslim countries. Both Shia and Sunni fundamentalists regard the other sect as heretical.
There's also the fact that Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states are financing the ISIS/ISIL/Daesh terrorists in Syria and Iraq that the Syrian refugees are fleeing.
casper said:If we talk about interests, what are the interests of the EU to accept refugees?lux said:Well, casper, they fight them. They are corrupt and influential, they prefer to dump the problem on the shoulders of other countries and EU. And don't want stand up for the true Arabs and Semites. They don't see interest in this.
Here we can then talk about a kind of racism, why the UN does not respond, the UN only come warnings and remarks to the EU not taking sufficient to assist in the acceptance of refugees, on the other hand is not one word not mentioned gulf countries that would also could receive the refugees.griffin said:It isn't necessary to ask the Cs this question. The answer is obvious in light of the countries' cultures.
Syria is a predominently Shia Muslim country, whereas Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the Gulf monarchies are Sunni Muslim countries. Both Shia and Sunni fundamentalists regard the other sect as heretical.
There's also the fact that Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states are financing the ISIS/ISIL/Daesh terrorists in Syria and Iraq that the Syrian refugees are fleeing.
Is the reason only in faith, or is there another reason why they do not want?
Perhaps the fear of possible terrorist attacks?
PS:I just read that Israel refuses to accept refugees for fear of terrorist attacks and because they want to protect themselves from illegal migration.
casper said:PS:I just read that Israel refuses to accept refugees for fear of terrorist attacks and because they want to protect themselves from illegal migration.
Imagine this situation, power ISIL "cleanse" Syria of the "unfit" people and coming to the border with Turkey (11 million refugees were displaced in Europe),what if ISIL go on?Seaniebawn said:I'd tend to agree griffin, I don't think it's anything to do with richer "Muslim" countries and like you said the gulf states along with the US and their EU vassals are the ones financing and giving logistical support to the extremism eating up the middle east at the moment, the people on the ground know it, the western powers know it, it seems like the people in the west are the last to catch on, not all Muslim countries are the same, most are progressive, but the ones we support are ideological identical to ISIS. I see no contradiction in the actions by the west or the gulf states.
Nienna said:casper said:PS:I just read that Israel refuses to accept refugees for fear of terrorist attacks and because they want to protect themselves from illegal migration.
Seriously? It never stops amazing me how the zionists keep using the same old excuses. Especially when the zionists and their IDF and police forces are terrorists, and the Jews did take away Palestine from the Palestinians. I guess it's the case of fearing that others will do to you what you did to others. Or, psychopaths project what they do onto others.
casper said:Imagine this situation, power ISIL "cleanse" Syria of the "unfit" people and coming to the border with Turkey (11 million refugees were displaced in Europe),what if ISIL go on?Seaniebawn said:I'd tend to agree griffin, I don't think it's anything to do with richer "Muslim" countries and like you said the gulf states along with the US and their EU vassals are the ones financing and giving logistical support to the extremism eating up the middle east at the moment, the people on the ground know it, the western powers know it, it seems like the people in the west are the last to catch on, not all Muslim countries are the same, most are progressive, but the ones we support are ideological identical to ISIS. I see no contradiction in the actions by the west or the gulf states.
Would then the Turks should go into exile, followed by the Greeks ...
What needs to happen for the world to say: enough?
Nienna said:casper said:PS:I just read that Israel refuses to accept refugees for fear of terrorist attacks and because they want to protect themselves from illegal migration.
Seriously? It never stops amazing me how the zionists keep using the same old excuses. Especially when the zionists and their IDF and police forces are terrorists, and the Jews did take away Palestine from the Palestinians. I guess it's the case of fearing that others will do to you what you did to others. Or, psychopaths project what they do onto others.
Benjamin Netanyahu is apparently "forgot" events from not so long ago that happened to his people.
I do not understand the question, what is not clear, can you explain?Seaniebawn said:What do you mean when you say enough ?
casper said:I do not understand the question, what is not clear, can you explain?Seaniebawn said:What do you mean when you say enough ?
link:Nienna said:casper said:PS:I just read that Israel refuses to accept refugees for fear of terrorist attacks and because they want to protect themselves from illegal migration.
Seriously? It never stops amazing me how the zionists keep using the same old excuses. Especially when the zionists and their IDF, Mossad and police forces are terrorists, and the Jews did take away Palestine from the Palestinians. I guess it's the case of fearing that others will do to you what you did to others. Or, psychopaths project what they do onto others.
No. When I wrote:Seaniebawn said:casper said:I do not understand the question, what is not clear, can you explain?Seaniebawn said:What do you mean when you say enough ?
Sorry do you mean if isis doesn't stop, will we have refugees coming from Greece, turkey etc.
To which countries ISIL must "progress", without anyone to stop? When someone would say: enough?casper said:What needs to happen for the world to say: enough?
casper said:To which countries ISIL must "progress", without anyone to stop? When someone would say: enough?
Where is the UN with its " blue helmets", or the Peace Corps?
casper said:PS:I just read that Israel refuses to accept refugees for fear of terrorist attacks and because they want to protect themselves from illegal migration.
Weakening of Europe will come to the disintegration of Europe, while ISIL will be extended.Gawan said:casper said:To which countries ISIL must "progress", without anyone to stop? When someone would say: enough?
Where is the UN with its " blue helmets", or the Peace Corps?
The UN is also just a tool of the puppet masters and does only act when commanded or when the damage is already done which was created by the psychopaths in power first hand. And one strategy of the PTB is also to weaken Europe with the victims of war and creating refugees. At least it was stated in one article of voltaire.net and would fit the profile psychopaths.
I think it's a matter of hatred, not zero empathyOxajil said:As for those MidEast countries not letting refugees in, in addition to what others have said, I'd think it's because they have absolutely zero empathy.
I just read them, thanks for the link. Qute fromOxajil said:Also, casper if you haven't already, have you read these two articles yet? They've helped me understand things better.
http://www.sott.net/article/301180-Dead-migrants-and-psychopaths-in-positions-of-power
http://www.sott.net/article/301150-Blowback-on-a-NATO-beach