Why is Putin silent on pre-Sochi bombings? - Recent bomb attacks in Russia

I find it interesting, that

_http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/business/2013/12/syria-russia-sign-offshore-oil-deal.html

Russia signed a deal with Syria to explore Syrian offshore oil and gas. The deal’s benefits are more than economic. It was signed a month after Syria encouraged its Russian ally to explore in Syria’s safe waters and break the oil sanctions imposed on Syria.

On Dec. 25, Damascus and Moscow signed a deal to explore for oil and gas in Syrian territorial waters, where the size of the reserves are undetermined. The two sides agreed on a 25-year deal, funded by Moscow, which will recoup its costs if oil is found, as is likely.

The deal on “oil exploration, development and production in Syrian territorial waters” was signed at the Ministry of Oil and Mineral Resources in Damascus between the Syrian government, represented by the Syrian Oil Minister Suleiman al-Abbas and the General Petroleum Corporation, and the Russian Soyuzneftegaz company. ...

According to the oil minister, the deal was signed after “long months of negotiations,” and that signing it “in the current circumstances was a major challenge.” He believed that the agreement was “a sign of continued cooperation between the two peoples and governments of Syria and Russia,” adding that the initial discoveries are “encouraging.”

Could it have anything to do with the recent events in Volgograd?
 
This Russian blog talks about an article posted in Al Akhbar on 31 of December 2013
_http://postskriptum.me/2013/12/31/butin-11/2/
(though I couldn't find it on their English site. Maybe in Arabic? _http://al-akhbar.com/)
where they talk about a connection between the terror attacks in Volgograd and Putin "snatching" Ukraine from the west, including his lack of cooperation when it comes to Syria and Iran. It also happened after the progress that Russia made toward Geneva II Middle East peace conference, and after Russian demands to stop weapons contraband to Syrian extremists. They also mention Prince Bandar, and that Putin made sure to let him know where he draws the line, and that attacks on Russian soil are considered as crossing that line. The translation also says that everything can happen now, but what is for sure, that the world should follow Russian idea, and the idea is fight (war) against terrorism. And that Putin isn't kidding when it comes to security of his country.

Also there is this article that talks about Iran accusing Prince Bandar of masterminding the late November 2013 bomb attack on the Iranian Embassy in Beirut:
_http://www.ibtimes.com/bandar-bin-sultan-saudi-arabias-playboy-prince-behind-bomb-attacks-lebanon-1524980

And the last paragraph of the article says the following:

As a final note, some Iranians also accused Bandar of complicity in the recent bombings in Volgograd in southern Russia, which killed 14 people. The Iranian.com website, citing reports from the Middle Eastern news agency Al Monitor, claimed Bandar has demanded Russian President Vladimir Putin withdraw his support for Assad’s regime in Syria in exchange for certain concessions with respect to the Sochi Winter Olympics. “I can give you a guarantee [that we will help] protect the Winter Olympics next year,” Bandar allegedly told Putin, adding, “The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us.” The implication was that if Putin did not pull back, Bandar (or his proxies) would escalate the Chechens' war against the Russian state.

Which is similar to SOTT analysis.
 
Here, I found the article in Arabic
_http://www.al-akhbar.com/node/197933
And here is its translation to English, which isn't very good, judging by how Google translated the title and "Putin isn't kidding" (as "Putin rarely marble-faced kids when it comes to the security of his country and its interests ..."). But it's still possible to get the gist of it.
_https://translate.google.by/translate?hl=ru&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.al-akhbar.com%2Fnode%2F197933
 
Keit said:
And the last paragraph of the article says the following:

As a final note, some Iranians also accused Bandar of complicity in the recent bombings in Volgograd in southern Russia, which killed 14 people. The Iranian.com website, citing reports from the Middle Eastern news agency Al Monitor, claimed Bandar has demanded Russian President Vladimir Putin withdraw his support for Assad’s regime in Syria in exchange for certain concessions with respect to the Sochi Winter Olympics. “I can give you a guarantee [that we will help] protect the Winter Olympics next year,” Bandar allegedly told Putin, adding, “The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us.” The implication was that if Putin did not pull back, Bandar (or his proxies) would escalate the Chechens' war against the Russian state.

Which is similar to SOTT analysis.

Good analysis Keit. I'm of the same idea that Prince Bandar might be involved in the recent attacks together with Mossad. The recent rapprochement between the two countries wouldn't discount that possibility as Saudi Arabia and Israel are the ones who are losing the most from Russia defending Syria and the US improving relations with Iran.

_http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25083894

Israeli-Saudi rapprochement

This highlights two interesting trends. First, Saudi and Israeli perceptions are increasingly converging, despite the fact that Riyadh does not even recognise Israel as a state.

Second, US allies are increasingly convinced that US-Iran co-operation will inevitably come at Arab and Israeli expense - a view that will harden if Iran is now included in US and Russia-led peace talks for Syria.

How can these countries respond? Israeli officials have warned that they are not bound by the terms of the deal - an implicit threat that the military option remains on the table - and Saudi officials intimate that they can procure a nuclear weapon for themselves from Pakistan.

Neither of these steps is likely for the duration of this interim deal. As Israel's former army intelligence chief Amos Yadlin put it: "In the coming six months the legitimacy of an attack will diminish".

But the US and Israel have previously co-operated on cyber-attacks against Iran, and Israel is widely believed to have assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists. Such covert action should not be ruled out, though it would anger Washington and all those who negotiated this agreement.

If a longer-term settlement does not follow, and Iran renews its nuclear expansion, then the risk of Israeli airstrikes will grow significantly.

It is implausible that Saudi Arabia will offer direct military assistance to any Israeli attack, as Britain's Sunday Times newspaper suggested this month, but it might secretly grant over-flight rights to Israeli bombers.

Saudi-Israeli intelligence contact is also likely to flourish, particularly as the two countries look for any sign that Iran is cheating on the deal. But neither country can afford to push the US too far away.

The Geneva agreement is a modest step that leaves much work still to be done. But for some of America's allies, it is a troubling sign of things to come. Their priority will be to ensure that this nuclear thaw does not now turn into a regional realignment.
 
What I find odd, but I don't know if they are related are also the recent bomb attacks in Beirut (one today, one last week) and the strange dead of the Palestinian ambassador Jamal al-Jamal in Prague yesterday, who was allegedly killed by opening a safe which contained a bomb. At least for Beirut it goes about the support of Syria.
 
Usually the adage applies to 'nip it in the bud' before it blooms, of course, this applies to both sides of the equation. Gorbachev could have done so and didn't, which allowed all that followed, for better and for worse... like a chess match, no? Putin seems to be facing the same type of idiots that pushed Truman to nuc Japan... just to see how it went. Boys and their toys and if WW2 and the Cold War set any example, it seems that major powers don't get involved unless their own welfare is on the line, then they act as if forced to do so, and preferably in their neighbors's backyard, front yard, any yard but their own. Signing treaties seems just part of the usual puppet show amongst these types and is only taken seriously when a weak opponent is involved. When major powers act, then the game changes, but until then Israel has already shown their hand in their expression of 'regret' soon after the event, something I haven't seen reported on from the House of Saud. Seems this game of F U Buddy is well underway, and like Turkey, Iraq, et al, The House of Saud should know that they are expendable pieces on the chessboard, but the mere threat being made public is a sign that they simply don't know, and maybe it's better that way? We could ask Saddam, but....

'If you give them an inch, they'll take a mile'. Seems the Saudi's have gone stupid and could be next, and if they expect any real help from the state of Israel when the game goes to the major leagues, they haven't studied their history very well and are in need of a remedial lesson or two. Perhaps this is the usual result of the ponerization process? So it can't be helped. As a staunch defender of his country against 'terrorists', Putin can no doubt 'assist' the Arabs on the peninsula in a 'defensive' action against Al Qaeda forces threatening and invading their lands. Usually a press release or two before the force majeure is enacted with or without the assistance of local uniforms of the land, who know when to act and when not to. Perhaps the feelers are going out now, or Putin is waiting for the next situation to develop as an excuse for assistance? Or he's unsure of how truly idiotic his opponents are as the noose tightens. It seems from recent American statements and actions that the Saudi's are being prepared as a sacrifice... perhaps the Israeli's seek a different role this time around? Just my impression, but Putin's hand is being forced, so it's not surprising that he hasn't responded quickly, it's been awhile since their troops have gone abroad, unlike our own here in the States and we don't care about 'victory', as creating chaos is what we do best, and that seems to be 'victory' to our 'leaders' today, so Putin is up against the usual psycho idiots with WMD, and depending upon how well informed he is, he has to measure this in context to the situation of the planet.

Of course, Putin could just wait a little longer and let our market collapse factor into the equation, but by then, we might be looking for more distraction as well. One simple way is the usual intimidation tactic that Caesar used so often, taking high level prisoners, such as this Saudi intel chief who's made the threatening statements. Most likely others, perhaps members of the royal family could be invited for an indefinite stay? Perhaps an engineered coup de etat engenders the need for the royal family to seek safety? Depending upon the situation, Putin may have to insist. Idiotic as the Saudi move is, if it is theirs of course, it seems they have overstayed their welcome and are being isolated like Mr. Erdogan in Turkey et al. They are simply no longer needed as the game reaches it's climax. My guess, is that they, or their 'friends' will strike again and perhaps soon, as they don't seem to know when to stop and perhaps addiction is taking hold and the rest of the family doesn't have any ties that bind the intel chief? This type of addiction seems to be showing up all over the world. No one is stopping all the world's useful idiots, who have a license to lie, cheat, steal and kill.
Either way, Putin will most likely be forced to act, the question seems to be how, publicly or privately. The House of Saud looks very vulnerable and seems to think they could pick up and seek safety with their riches, but the whole Iranian scenario from the past should show them that isn't likely. They remind me so much of the useful idiots like Saddam. Yes, like our own, they can be very dangerous, but very predictable. Putin will be forced to act, it's just the nature of the game and these psychos playing it. They don't know when to stop until forced to do so. Isn't that the nature of STS?
 
Possibility of Being said:
I find it interesting, that

_http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/business/2013/12/syria-russia-sign-offshore-oil-deal.html

Russia signed a deal with Syria to explore Syrian offshore oil and gas. The deal’s benefits are more than economic. It was signed a month after Syria encouraged its Russian ally to explore in Syria’s safe waters and break the oil sanctions imposed on Syria.

On Dec. 25, Damascus and Moscow signed a deal to explore for oil and gas in Syrian territorial waters, where the size of the reserves are undetermined. The two sides agreed on a 25-year deal, funded by Moscow, which will recoup its costs if oil is found, as is likely.

The deal on “oil exploration, development and production in Syrian territorial waters” was signed at the Ministry of Oil and Mineral Resources in Damascus between the Syrian government, represented by the Syrian Oil Minister Suleiman al-Abbas and the General Petroleum Corporation, and the Russian Soyuzneftegaz company. ...

According to the oil minister, the deal was signed after “long months of negotiations,” and that signing it “in the current circumstances was a major challenge.” He believed that the agreement was “a sign of continued cooperation between the two peoples and governments of Syria and Russia,” adding that the initial discoveries are “encouraging.”

Could it have anything to do with the recent events in Volgograd?

Interesting too is the "Levant Basin", covers both Israel and Syria - serious business for both parties and Syria would need good friends to ensure they are not pushed aside. I'm sure slant drilling is being looked at:

Back in April I wrote that the United States Geological Survey (USGS) released a report that the Levant Basin contains 1.689 billion barrels of undiscovered oil and 122.4 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas. The Levant Basin lies both onshore and offshore and includes most of middle and northern Israel and coastal Lebanon and Syria. The basin includes the exploration areas of Noble Energy offshore and Zion Oil & Gas onshore.
[...]
TOTAL VALUE – LEVANT BASIN $716,759,000,000.00

See here for map and article: _http://www.oilinisrael.net/tag/levant-basin
 
voyageur said:
Interesting too is the "Levant Basin", covers both Israel and Syria - serious business for both parties and Syria would need good friends to ensure they are not pushed aside. I'm sure slant drilling is being looked at:

Back in April I wrote that the United States Geological Survey (USGS) released a report that the Levant Basin contains 1.689 billion barrels of undiscovered oil and 122.4 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas. The Levant Basin lies both onshore and offshore and includes most of middle and northern Israel and coastal Lebanon and Syria. The basin includes the exploration areas of Noble Energy offshore and Zion Oil & Gas onshore.
[...]
TOTAL VALUE – LEVANT BASIN $716,759,000,000.00

See here for map and article: _http://www.oilinisrael.net/tag/levant-basin

And the Saudis just pledged $3bn to the Lebanese army to counter the rise in power of Iran and Syria in the region. This money has to be spent on French rather than American weaponry which IMO shows increased Saudi relations with European countries which are ever more dependent on Middle Eastern oil & gas.

It seems to me that Saudi Arabia, along with its neighboring countries and Israel are beginning to understand that American support is waning as the US is starting to reduce its dependence from Arab oil which is prompting them to take a more active role in imposing their rule in the region to ensure their own continuity and survival. The recent "donation" made to Lebanon would also support this idea.
 
Eboard10 said:
Novus ordo seclorum said:
This were a false flag attacks aimed at similar goals as were after 9/11. Tighter controls, something like patriotic act in Russia.

I honestly don't think that staging terrorist attacks 6 weeks before the Winter Olympics, a major event for Russia, would have been in the interest of the government as it will now discourage tourists from going.

I would be more inclined to think that this was the work of outside forces (and possibly also internal) trying to send Putin a message maybe in relation to the current situation in Syria and the Middle East.

Will be interesting to see how Putin is going to react to this and whether there will be any change in policy in the coming weeks or months which may reveal more about the motives and likely players behind the attacks.

Plumb bob (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plumb_bob) said to me that Russians staged attacks for similar goals as 9/11.
Also, who would expect that Russians would before olympic games do false flag attacks, so it adds a bit of credibility to official story (terrorists).
 
Saker presents a unique perspective on the world. I recommend his work on Putin and Russia.

http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2013/12/double-bombing-in-volgograd-first.html

"In the short term, the Russian public needs to be openly told that terrorism cannot be eradicated, that this is a pipe dream cooked up by dishonest politicians. But if no nation or government can really eradicate terrorism, one can learn how to live with it. After all, the actual amount of victims of terrorism is extremely small, far less than, say, road accidents. The real power of terrorism resides in the psychological effect it has not on its direct victims, but on those who witness it. As soon as the general public accepts the notion that even if terrorists attack can be brought down to a minimum, some will always remain possible, terrorism will lose its real force. Terrorism can either be accepted as a fact of life, or a nation can be drawn in an endless spiral of futile counter-terrorist measures which are far more damaging than the terrorism which triggered them.

Does Russia really want to become a terrified and paranoid Fascist state like the USA? Or does it prefer to accept the fact that terrorism will never be "defeated" and keep on living as best as can be in an always dangerous world?"

Best wishes to Laura and family.....bob kay
 
Novus ordo seclorum said:
Plumb bob (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plumb_bob) said to me that Russians staged attacks for similar goals as 9/11.
Also, who would expect that Russians would before olympic games do false flag attacks, so it adds a bit of credibility to official story (terrorists).

Not sure what you mean with your first sentence...could you please elaborate?

If you consider that the government came out with a statement saying that the Volgograd blasts used the same template as other major terrorist attacks, when the media had already blamed the local North Caucasian militant groups for the bombings, this suggests that Russia is pointing the finger at the usual suspects.

http://www.sott.net/article/271315-Volgograd-blasts-follow-same-template-as-US-Syrian-Afghan-attacks-MOSSAD-CIA

While I am not discounting the possibility that this may be an internal job, I just don't see any evidence that would lead me to think so. That's why it's important to observe Russia's next moves in terms of both domestic and foreign policy changes. If the only thing that comes out of this is a Russian Patriot act and a retaliation against the North Caucasian region, then I will definitely consider that possibility. Just my take on it.
 
Imho, in light of this incident happening so soon after Bandar's implied threat, it seems pretty obvious that this was a Saudi/Mossad operation.
Although I tend to think that Obama is smart enough to realize that this was a really stupid move by the Saudis and Israelis. It's seems almost like an act of desperation to tweak the Russian bear's nose, especially when the bear's handler is Putin.
 
Back
Top Bottom