Mountain Crown said:
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but by the standards of the field, Mr. Potts has not proven himself as an operatic tenor. The lack of operatic material on the CD is not surprising. Hype him as having talent for pop music, but when such ado is made out of such obvious lack of vocal capability and knowledge of style, it is insulting to those who have dedicated years of hard work to the craft.
Identification is an interesting and powerful thing, isn't it?
I think this is precisely the point.
This kind of genius is as common as dirt, as John Taylor Gatto had said. There are so many, many people who can sing like that, or better. My own great-grandmother had a supremely powerful voice; she was a total natural, never had a lesson in her life. I can just see her with her "babushka" kerchief over her gray hair on that video, instead of Potts, bringing down the house.
Yet, most of these people had never "proven themselves". In fact, they had never celebrated or expressed their talent, because the ugly truth is that the psychopathic world doesn't need their music, doesn't need their voices. The abysmal state of mass music education, and the extreme melodic and harmonic poverty of pop-music is just one symptom of it.
For these people to come out and sing, after lifetime of pain, disregard, bullying and self-doubt, is a great achievement -- and THAT'S what the crowd is responding to. To the fact that it's ONE OF US out there, singing his\her guts out, that they CAN, and so we remember that WE CAN too.
Identification is a powerful thing indeed, and it could be harnessed and used to do something creative, but can also dampen creativity and bring out resentment -- depends on what you identify with.
I have been following Susan Boyle's story and have noticed a pattern in the negative reactions to the story. They all have to do with the way the episode was managed on TV. How it was "fake, all planned out, of course they knew it in advance and we were duped; her voice is ordinary and she is ordinary, she just makes for a cute TV episode etc.".
I have not listened to Mr. Potts' CD, but the critique of it, if that's indeed so, follows the same pattern. In an ideal world, Mr. Potts would have taken lessons and polished his voice after winning the show, and embarked on his dream career. In an even more idea world, he would have done it even without going on the show.
In our world, he cut a CD "as is" and as soon as he could, to capitalize on his fame and the audience sympathy. I am sure this was indeed the best for him. This is the way to get into the celebrity and showmanship-oriented music world. CDs, world tour, tv appearances, the movie in the works. IN short, he is not that different from those who have "proven themselves". He just jumped to the end of the line fast, due to a stroke of luck.
The point is, it's what you SEE that counts. And IMO there is something really powerful in the original key event of a regular guy\gal getting on the stage and singing with their true God-giving voice, against all odds and all prejudice. That's the kernel of it. The hype, the planning, the smug monkeys behind the stage, the lack of truly operatic material on the debut CD -- that, on the grand scheme of things, is the shaft to be separated and thrown up in the wind, to be blown away.
osit