L9 said:
Since I know more about this subject and issue than anyone else due to my years of research from the beginning back in 1995 and direct involvement in supporting sollogs writings since then, I'll reply and ask you some questions since it appears you either know very little about sollog and this subject, or have a bias.
You are still not making any sense L9.
Your first statement to this board was:
L9:
On the anniversary of the 9/11 I thought it might be fitting to say hello to all on this site and give my regards to Laura who was among the very few i've seen that covered the story of Xinoehpoel respectfully and objectively.
This does not make any sense. Continuing to ignore this fact just makes your continuation of posting even more contradictory and reveals a lack of psychological understanding on your part.
Perhaps you can point out what you mean by "Laura who was among the very few i've seen that covered the story of Xinoehpoel respectfully and objectively." ???
What coverage are you talking about? The only coverage I am aware of (and it could be that I am not aware of something Laura has written in this regard), the only coverage I am aware of points to the fact that Sollog / Xinoehpoel is viewed as part of the pathological evil.
In your opening statement:
"was among the very few i've seen that covered the story of Xinoehpoel respectfully and objectively", one would have to conclude that what you so highly approve of is this:
I don't think that we necessarily have to think that he is an "insider" in the 3rd density conspiracy. But that he is a "contactee" of those forces behind it, who are pulling the strings from some deep level of reality, is evident. In this sense, this is a clue to the hyperdimensional reality behind all the manipulations of our world. It is, indeed, the "signature" or "sign" of the forces of darkness that, in their hubris, they are compelled to identify themselves.
I have placed in bold the comments of "X" as well as certain subject headers and/or dates of note. I have underlined a couple of things that I think are particularly interesting. So, from the beginning, as you start reading, keep in mind that this is a member of the conspiracy. Note carefully everything he says, even if it is a bit disorienting to try to read a series of emails posted to a newsgroup without reading all the other responses. For the most part, the posts he is responding to are included at the bottom of his own comments, though in some cases, he interlines his responses.
Notice how he "plays" with his prey - see how he hates Christians and casts aspersions on Moslems. And most of all, see how he promotes "Sollog" as "God." Here, he is joking. But there is a certain cunning seriousness behind the jokes. This is a very sick person. And there are a lot more of them. And then note his final fling at the Moslems - the most revolting remark intended to be totally sacreligious to any worshipper of Allah.
This would lead readers here to conclude that the objectivity praise you are giving concurs with the evaluation that these are very sick pathological personalities who are in the scheme with the forces of darkness.
Yet your line of posting is that it makes you sad that darkness incarnate does not get recognition?
Do you see how this is confusing. It makes it appear as if you yourself are a bit discordant psychologically with yourself. I mean which is it? Do you approve and agree that Sollog / Xinoehpoel is part of the forces manipulating people and if so then none of your post makes any sense.
Here's the contradiction - Sollog / Xinoehpoel is evil and darkness - Sollog / Xinoehpoel is great I am here to promote him???
Another possibility is that your opening statement was just your own psychological manipulation that is seen over and over on this board by trolls with an agenda.
It goes like this:
1) Say something nice to appeal to readers that makes them lower their guard, say something to gain confidence (flattery, the con).
2) Proceed with your agenda once the bait is offered and the hook is set.
3) Be selective - do not answer questions and contradictions that you are caught in. Ignore them. Continue with you agenda as someone is bound to not see the psychological tricks and all can just be built on utilizing this selectivity.
You have ignored the request to post in the Intro area and tell us something about yourself. To be clear you did not entirely ignore it, you just used another psychological manipulation. You posted what is in effect [I will answer you over here], pointing back to this thread. And you have not answered anything of that request to introduce yourself, tell us something about you, perhaps provide your understanding of the psychological processes involved in this current reality. Although it is becoming apparent that you know how to use psychological methods to serve what you want.
Back to this
lnine:Since I know more about this subject and issue than anyone else due to my years of research from the beginning back in 1995 and direct involvement in supporting sollogs writings since then, I'll reply and ask you some questions since it appears you either know very little about sollog and this subject, or have a bias.
There is no sense in responding to this. It is obvious that this is a manipulation to further your agenda. It is just the display of a chest puffer, selectively ignoring to answer for his own contradictions and continuing with the hook to impose his agenda on others.
Nice psychological dig at demeaning the audience and elevating your own greatness.
Yes the bias and identification is very easy to spot.
L9 said:
Here is a transcript dealing with Sollog :
TRANSCRIPT FROM WHERE AND WHEN??????????????? theres no CONTEXT whatsoever.
This just shows you know zero about this site and zero about Laura. It is more evidence that your opening paragraph was just a psychological manipulation, basically lies to flatter and put at ease and slip in your agenda.
L9 said:
11142001 session said:
Q: Was this guy writing these posts on the newsgroups the same as Sollog, the so-called prophet?
A: Yes.
TOTALLY FALSE... Leo Phoenix had no connection to sollog whatsoever other than another Fan who supported him as I did and do.
You are just looking more silly. Selectively ignoring and continuing your agenda.
L9 said:
11142001 session said:
Q: Is he involved with the Israelis?
A: No.
Q: How did he know about this event?
A: Fourth Density STS contact.
ARE YOU SPEAKING ABOUT SOLLOG OR LEO? because they aren't the same person... And WHO is making these assumptions that his knowledge/source comes from STS contact? Perhaps you've heard of the RA material then... Sollogs knowledge and source is far beyond even that source or Density.
This is incomprehensible. You agreed that the Sollog / Xinoehpoel personalities was handled objectively and now you are arguing against that objectivity. Which lie are we to believe?
This just shows you know zero about this site and zero about Laura.
You are just looking more silly. Selectively ignoring and continuing your agenda.
L9 said:
11142001 session said:
Q: Is this another instance of when they can be stunningly accurate when they choose?
A: Yes.
Q: So, this guy was not an insider in the plot?
A: No.
VERY TRUE... Leo received a warning about the event exactly as he explained... a "voice" whispered in his "head" and was directed or MOVED to give the warning... Clearly a very unique pyschic experience to have been chosen as a vehicle to bring a warning about the biggest event in modern history.
Not a unique psychic experience. Many evil forces manifest as such. In fact if you knew something about this site and Laura you might be aware that direct contact like this has a high probability of being either corrupt or a direct manipulation from hypothesized hyperdimensional realms (and not the good guys).
You are still selectively ignoring and continuing your agenda.
You are still showing you know zero about this site and zero about Laura.
L9 said:
11142001 session said:
Q: Well, I find that hard to believe.
A: Patience.
Q: Was he being set up to look accurate so people would buy into his rant?
A: Yes.
Whats meant by "SET UP"? by whom? to buy WHAT RANT? anyone with a BRAIN who looks at the FACTS surrounding that event and in the warning he gave, will see it wasn't a coincidence and also what its purpose was... and when you've done a full investigation into sollogs writings from an unbiased and objective perspective, you'll see the truth that most can't or are too afraid to consider.
Not having the slightest clue as to what this is just shows:
You know zero about this site and zero about Laura and is more evidence that your opening paragraph was a psychological manipulation to attempt to get your foot in the door an do as you please, impose your agenda.
You are arguing against the objectivity you praised. You make no sense.
L9 said:
11142001 session said:
Q: Well, Sollog did predict that this would happen in 1997. But then, then, the guy on the newsgroup predicted that something was going to happen in seven days... That was bizarre. He didn't say what, but the message was headed with 9/11. If he had known what was going to happen, I think he would have at least hinted.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE FULL CONTEXT AND READ ABOUT SOLLOG INDEPTH, HE DIDN'T NEED TO SAY "EXACTLY" WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. thats the most important portion so few GET or want to accept.
Until you can answer to your contradiction and apparent deceptions, you are talking to yourself here, arguing against that which you found objective in your opening statement.
L9 said:
11142001 session said:
(A) But that would be too dangerous for him.
A: Yes. More like a miss.
True seers on the highest of levels prognosticating events against their NATION know or have learned about PERSECUTION.
Until you can answer to your contradiction and apparent deceptions, you are talking to yourself here, arguing against that which you found objective in your opening statement.
I like the little psychological pity me persecution bit though, nice touch. Poor forces of darkness, pity pity.
L9 said:
THE WARNING LEO GAVE and HOW HE GAVE IT WAS GENIUS when you look at the context and understand it was intended only to be fully understood by TRUTH SEEKERS on Higher Frequencies and consciousness... from that perspective, it was crystal clear that Leo's warning was talking about the attack on the WTC... sure it would have been so much more satisfying for him to have been able to describe what was to happen in DETAIL... but the SOURCE that conveyed the information had a reason for not giving it in the way most might want or expect. A similar situation occurred back in 1997 with Sollogs prediction of DIANAS death... something which convinced me Sollog was for real and led to my decision to become one of his most supportive fans.
Until you can answer to your contradiction and apparent deceptions, you are talking to yourself here, arguing against that which you found objective in your opening statement.
It would appear you are selectively continuing with your agenda.
Nice psychological technique there - "
it was intended only to be fully understood by TRUTH SEEKERS on Higher Frequencies and consciousness"
You still show you do not have a clue of what this site is about or Laura.
L9 said:
11142001 session said:
Q: How did they get those guys to agree to fly those buildings into those planes and commit suicide?
A: Mind control.
One of the biggest mysteries that may never be fully understood or exposed is whether mind control was involved in moving "middle eastern men" accused of the deed to fly the planes into the tower.... OR were the planes even the same planes that were supposedly hi jacked....
regarding that though,,, what is CLEAR is that NO PLANE hit the pentagon and THE TOWERS didn't collapse because of being HIT by PLANES
It was a MISSLE on the pentagon and CONTROLLED DEMOLITION that took down the 3 WTC TOWERS
EOS
Until you can answer to your contradiction and apparent deceptions, you are talking to yourself here, arguing against that which you found objective in your opening statement.
It would appear you are selectively continuing with your agenda. Trying to force an audience into your agenda when it is perfectly clear that you do not have a clue as to who that audience is.
Why did you pick this site?
It seems pretty clear that your praise of objectivity was just a psychological ploy, for when pieces of that objectivity are posted, you don't even know what it is. Your responses show you haven't even got a clue what the sessions are, you have no idea about the psychological research many people here work in, you have no idea about the research carried on regarding all the monotheistic religions and their origins, or the dozens of other things researched here.
So this all comes off as someone just praticing psychological techniques of manipulation to hopefully impose their agenda on an audience.