What you all still don't seem to understand is that IT WAS LAURA WHO POSTED/COMMENTED/WROTE AN ARTICLE about Xinoehpoel and Sollog... NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! And since that article was publicly available and not within a private forum where the public had to register view it, nor were there any requirements to understand the PURPOSE of "this forum" to respond to it, or was anything in this forum specifically posted in the article that i saw, I was merely responding to the basics of that article and added some comments as it pertained to XIN and Sollog since it appeared the AUTHOR of it and those who read that authors article were in this forum. THATS WHY I PICKED THIS SITE. You also ask if I know anything about this site and its purpose... Yet I didn't know it was a requirement to post here commenting on an article that was written about "us". Had I come
here to post on any other subject other than that topic, then i'd understand the attacks I've gotten. So far, I see no reason for me to understand the "purpose" here in order to discuss what LAURA decided to write about on her own. HER ARTICLE technically invited a potential response by those she was criticizing and writing about since it obviously showed HER LACK of understanding or ignorance about a subject she went outside this forum to DISCUSS and write about. To me, its becoming more and more apparent that Laura and the members here are far more biased than I first thought... once again the topic of sollog and xin seems to produce and follow the same but extreme pattern of hostility, ignorance, lack of understanding and controversy.
oh well... my bad. sorry to bother and intrude.
NMRK
here to post on any other subject other than that topic, then i'd understand the attacks I've gotten. So far, I see no reason for me to understand the "purpose" here in order to discuss what LAURA decided to write about on her own. HER ARTICLE technically invited a potential response by those she was criticizing and writing about since it obviously showed HER LACK of understanding or ignorance about a subject she went outside this forum to DISCUSS and write about. To me, its becoming more and more apparent that Laura and the members here are far more biased than I first thought... once again the topic of sollog and xin seems to produce and follow the same but extreme pattern of hostility, ignorance, lack of understanding and controversy.
oh well... my bad. sorry to bother and intrude.
NMRK
Namaste said:L9 said:Since I know more about this subject and issue than anyone else due to my years of research from the beginning back in 1995 and direct involvement in supporting sollogs writings since then, I'll reply and ask you some questions since it appears you either know very little about sollog and this subject, or have a bias.
Ok doo, you are the expert, and we know very little about this subject.
Have-you read The "Ultimate Truth" ?
Have-you an idea of the purpose of this forum?
L9 said:TRANSCRIPT FROM WHERE AND WHEN??????????????? theres no CONTEXT whatsoever.
You come here , you say that you are an expert and you do not know anything about the C's and the transcript.
And you can not read the date 11142001???????
L9 said:TOTALLY FALSE... Leo Phoenix had no connection to sollog whatsoever other than another Fan who supported him as I did and do.
You mean Fan as in FANATIC. And we know what fanatics are able to do and the way they think?
L9 said:Perhaps you've heard of the RA material then... Sollogs knowledge and source is far beyond even that source or Density.
Ok doo again, he is far beyond RA and the 6 Density. 9, 10, 15 density, who knows?
Again you have no idea what is the purpose of this forum?
L9 said:and when you've done a full investigation into sollogs writings from an unbiased and objective perspective, you'll see the truth that most can't or are too afraid to consider.
You said that you were a fan. I doubt that a fan is able to see objectively the truth.
L9 said:and led to my decision to become one of his most supportive fans.
Again you say fan - well, fan = fanatic. What a way to be objective?
Maybe you are not at the right place.
It is not a "fan" forum