Zapper - weak electric current - does it really work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter schriss
  • Start date Start date
All zappers have two basic shortcomings by design.

- They deliver a week electric current, which travels the path of least resistance, which is in most cases the surface of tissues. They cannot penetrate deep tissues and are not ideal for internal organs. I would not expect that a zapper would be able, as an example, to do a liver cleanse.

- The frequencies are preset. Most zappers have only one, so there is no possibility to adjust the frequency to a specific microorganism. The producers and also the late Hulda Clark claim, that this is not so important, as the square waves of a zapper would produce so many harmonics, that they could still destroy many microorganisms. I think the jury is still out on this. As far as I remember, our forum moderator Data used one. Maybe he has something to say about it.

As for the ultimate zapper, I cannot judge its quality. What is interesting, in any case, it that they offer something like a three month trial period. This would at least limit your risk.
 
Mgse said:
I'm about to buy a zapper and found this model "The Ultimate Zapper" made by Ken Presner (_http://zap.intergate.ca/). Has someone bought it ? If yes, can you share your experience with it. I really welcome anyone who bought a zapper to give their opinions about the model, manufacturer and results.

Thank you.

Hi Mgse,

I will encourage you to do a search on the forum in using the word "zapper".

You will have many results and it should give you an idea about the use of a zapper.
 
Thanks broken.english.

According to Hulda Clark zapping does not kill shielded organisms such as those that may be in the middle of your stomach or intestines. The electricity travels along the stomach or intestine wall, not through their contents. Parasites might also come from a few far away places that are hard to reach by the zapper's electrical current. The inside of your eyeball, the testicle, the interior of gallstones, the middle of a tooth abscess or the bowel contents are such places. The zapper current, because it is high frequency, prefers to “go around” these items, rather than through them. But with repeated zapping, and herbal parasite treatment, you can decimate them, too, and stop reinfecting the rest of your body. From what I have read so far the most important thing prior to zapping or herbal treatment is to detoxify your body of heavy metals, such as mercury (amalgam fillings, lab environment, fish or seafood that contains high levels), lead (acetate in paint or for covering the sour taste of turned wine, water pipes, food containers) and aluminum (baking powder, antacids, antiperspirants, pots and pans, immunizations). In the Baker's book "Detoxification and Healing" he mentions that aluminum is biochemically attracted to stick to the phosphates that form an active part of our DNA. Even though lead and mercury are heavy and sticky, they do go through a process of turnover, in which appropriately sticky chelators, such as DMSA, can grab them in midair and send them off for detoxification. Not so with aluminum. Once it sticks to DNA it is there until the death of the cell carrying the DNA.

The Croft "Terminator" Zapper comes with the orgone component which at this point I know nothing about the orgone energy and thus by providing an extra "good feeling" is just for marketing purposes. The "good feeling" may also come from eliminating the metals and parasites from your body too.
 
Thanks, Gandalf. I did. I thought that one thread with information about the zappers in use by our forum members can be used as a guideline in the parasite cleansing.
 
I bought an Ultimate Zapper last year and did not receive what was ordered. The seller insisted it was. When I told him the item in my hand was markedly different from the website photo he proceeded to argue, lie, abuse, rant and rave at me in numerous private emails. I gave up, and posted valid anonymous complaints on consumer complaint sites. When he found one he retaliated by illegally posting my personally identifiable information. That borders on identity theft -- when a business misuses customer information and violates customer privacy. The seller/inventor shows poor self-control and judgment. Whatever he says is somehow his personal 'truth' yet much of what he says is plagiarized, cut and pasted so the credibility of genuine thinkers, inventors, authors is trashed when he's done. He even plagiarized my emails to turn his offenses around and promote himself. I found him to be bombastic, inauthentic and scurrilous. I have compassion for him as I would any unbalanced individual. Couldn't use his junky-looking product since interacting with the vendor was so personally dangerous and, by extension, who knows what harm is come by from using an unidentifiable unit. There are a number of reputable zappers to look into. My old Clark and Auto-Zaps have been excellent, reliable and problem-free. Herbs, along with zapping can really 'enliven' the whole process! Best luck.
 
Hi spunky,

Welcome to our forum. :)

We recommend all new members to post an introduction in the Newbies section telling us a bit about themselves, how they found the cass material, and how much of the work here they have read.

You can have a look through that board to see how others have done it.
 
I bought Ken Presner's Ultimate Zapper (UZ) in Sept., 2011. His website claims it is the best zapper in the world.

1. After only a few months of usage, 4 crocodile
clips of the 2 wires connecting handholds and footpads lost their gripping ability and the clips are so loose that they disconnect with handholds/footpads easily. Unfortunately, I forgot to read the fine prints at the time of purchase that wires and clips aren't covered by warranty (my
fault).

2. Same problem (but less so) for the crocodile clips that
are attached to the wires coming out of the main unit. I asked Ken Presner what
I should do about this and he responded by saying, "You can secure them with
rubber bands." I let you judge his product and attitude.


I am sure Ken Presner knew about the problem with crocodile clips fo years. Yet he has made no
remedy for this basic design flaw and has not warned purchasers of this problem,
which is bound to occur within a few months with usage.


3. Ken Presner claims his AC adapter is of high quality. I can't disprove this.
However, the adapter is made in China!!! How does he know it is of high quality
if he has no say in what is being produced in the Chinese factory (he is just a
negligible client of the factory unless he buys tens of thousands of AC adapters
a year)? Worse still, he had the audacity to charge $39.95 for my international
AC adapter, which he procures for only a few dollars at most!!! So much
overpriced!!!

My conclusion: See _http://paradevices.com/ultimate_zapper_cheaply_made.html
to get an idea of how much is being put into the product. Read the crocodile clip
problem that I and others have and issue of overpriced AC adapter.
Parazapper, a competitor of UZ, is right that UZ is well overpriced. The basic unit (without
footpads) should be priced well under $99. The current price of $199.95 is
robbery!!! In any case, the claim of being the best zapper is a plain lie (how can a zapper be best if a component fails to function after only a few months and this part isn't covered by warranty?) and don't buy UZ unless the design has changed so that no crocodile clips are used.
 
Hi hunhung,

Welcome to our forum. We suggest that all new members post a short introduction in the Newbies section telling us a bit about themselves, how they found the forum etc. You can take a look in that board to see how others have done it.
 
hunghung said:
I bought Ken Presner's Ultimate Zapper (UZ) in Sept., 2011. His website claims it is the best zapper in the world.

Any zapper just generates an electrical square wave (switch on/off pattern) with a certain frequency and variable amplitude. This is as simple as it can get in terms of electronic devices. Claiming that something like that is "the best in the world" is a bit of a stretch, and is like saying that a specific water pot is the best in the world.. Yes, there might be differences in manufacturing quality or design, but all of them will heat the water in the same way.
 
Hi. I'm a newbie here and not sure if I am doing this right.

I have a few Questions about Zappers in general and about my zapper.

First: When I am holding the handholds I understand that the current travels from pos. hold to neg. hold. Is this correct?

Can someone tell me where the current travels through the body starting from the pos. handhold? Does it travel along the arms under the skin and down the body to the legs and feet? or just across the chest to the other arm?

2nd: would adding footholds have better results?

3rd: I have Ken Presner's 'Ultimate Zapper' and wondering if the clip-ons actually do work well enough as long as they keep their original tension. It seems to make more objective sense that the soldered on wires would work better.
And would copper handholds work better than these stainless steel ones that came with it? :/
 
Roland Lindgren said:
First: When I am holding the handholds I understand that the current travels from pos. hold to neg. hold. Is this correct?

Yes, but positive and negative sides switch several hundred times per second, so the current flows back and forth. The alleged purpose is to create 'resonance' with parasites/bacteria/virii to disable them (like a certain frequency of sound may break a glass window).

Roland Lindgren said:
Can someone tell me where the current travels through the body starting from the pos. handhold? Does it travel along the arms under the skin and down the body to the legs and feet? or just across the chest to the other arm?

Current (negatively charged electrons) travel the shortest path from negative to positive, i.e. from handhold to handhold. Parts of your body that are not in between the handholds won't be affected as much.

Roland Lindgren said:
2nd: would adding footholds have better results?

I guess it depends what you want to accomplish.

Roland Lindgren said:
3rd: I have Ken Presner's 'Ultimate Zapper' and wondering if the clip-ons actually do work well enough as long as they keep their original tension. It seems to make more objective sense that the soldered on wires would work better.
And would copper handholds work better than these stainless steel ones that came with it? :/

The electrical connection of all wires will only have a few Ohm. Your body however has a few hundred thousands Ohm (from arm to arm about 500000), so the actual material or connection type on the Zapper is more or less irrelevant compared to the large resistance of the body.
 
"Parts of your body that are not in between the handholds won't be affected as much.">>

Sounds like IF it works it MIGHT kill pathogens in the arms and across the chest but not in the head or below the chest.

Do you think then that using handholds AND footholds together would likely cause more current to flow through the body from feet up to chest zapping more pathogens?

It sounds like you have a pretty good grasp of the electronics involved.

Your time and energy are much appreciated.
 
Hi Roland,
Welcome to the forum. We encourage new members to post an introduction in the newbies board . You can take a look at topics in that board to see how others have done it.
 
Roland Lindgren said:
Do you think then that using handholds AND footholds together would likely cause more current to flow through the body from feet up to chest zapping more pathogens?

I guess it is most effective in between the handholds, wherever you attach them. A Zapper does not magic, it is just physics/electronics and microbiology.
 
Hi Roland
A question you may wish to consider whilst reading over the diet and health threads is what are you trying to fix?
Zappers where tried some years ago by the members here along with many different diets, supplements and devices. In the end the consensus among what where some individuals with chronic health conditions is that correct diet has the most positive effect. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom