Where is Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales?

...but then, why be so sensitive about it for months?

Also, this doctor told CNN that, these days, with all the pre-screenings and blood tests people undergo, doctors don't 'discover cancer' during operations:


So... something still doesn't add up!
It's quite common to have an ovarian cyst or bowel polyp removed on the assumption it is not cancerous to then have cancerous or pre-cancerous cells found on closer examination. It even occasionally happens with an appendectomy - no one expects it up be cancer, then some dodgy cells are found on histopathology. Given they've said "preventative chemo" I suspect bowel polyp with altered cells which they think they've fully removed anyway. She's always looked extremely thin, I wonder if she has inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's or something which would put you at greater risk of bowel cancers.

I very much suspect while Charles was having his prostate shaved they spotted some tumour on the inside of the bladder - an extremely common cancer in older men which is usually very manageable. Like with prostate cancer, you very often die with it rather than of it, unless it's not been found early or you're very unlucky to have an aggressive type.
 
It's quite common to have an ovarian cyst or bowel polyp removed on the assumption it is not cancerous to then have cancerous or pre-cancerous cells found on closer examination. It even occasionally happens with an appendectomy - no one expects it up be cancer, then some dodgy cells are found on histopathology. Given they've said "preventative chemo" I suspect bowel polyp with altered cells which they think they've fully removed anyway. She's always looked extremely thin, I wonder if she has inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's or something which would put you at greater risk of bowel cancers.
It could also be one of those rare tumors that are frequently appearing after the COVID vaccine, hence the secrecy about the type of tumor. I'm thinking of a neuroendocrine small intestine tumor, where initial tests are okay and diagnosis can be made only after biopsy of the excised mass. It could also explain the weight loss. Preventive chemotherapy can be given.
 

As Princess of Wales reveals diagnosis, doctors warn of mysterious cancer ‘epidemic’​

The disease is affecting fit, younger people more often – and researchers do not yet understand why
Leading doctors have warned of a mysterious new “epidemic” of abdominal cancers in younger people.

Following the Princess of Wales’s announcement of her diagnosis on Friday, specialist clinicians have said that in recent years they have seen a significant increase in under-45s presenting with cancers typically seen in older patients.

Many are fit and outwardly healthy, prompting a scramble among scientists to establish what is causing the trend.
 
I wonder if this is an example of "struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines", since they are now struggling with their health out of sequence?

Q: I have two last questions: at one point you said to note the "struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines." Now, of course, I made the remark about usurpation of a throne, but later I realized that we don't really know what the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines really are. They don't necessarily have to do with a secular position, they could be a function. What are the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines?

A: Control.

Q: Control of what? People?

A: Close.

Q: Control of the reality in some sense?

A: Not as close.

Q: Control as in STS domination?

A: Yes.

Q: Are there any other pre-ordained activities?

A: Need there be?

Q: Okay, "struggle out of sequence." Loss of control? The royal bloodlines lose control?

A: Only when energies build prior to completion of cycle.

Q: What sign am I looking for? Struggle out of sequence... a rebellion that breaks out... a particular cycle to these events... a period of time?

A: You need to review.

Session 4 December 1999


Q: (A) Now this supernova that is supposed to explode soon, will it be soon in the sense of our SEEING it, that is the arrival of the light from this, or soon in the instantaneous sense?

A: Optically.

Q: (L) So, this supernova must have already occurred?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And where did this supernova take place?

A: No dice, baby!

Q: (L) What clue can I follow to determine which star it is?

A: Instincts.

Q: (A) But, if it already occurred, then this means that the instantaneous effects have already been felt, even if it was lesser than the optical effects. It must have been recorded by anomalous changes in genes? (L) Is that true?

A: Close.

Q: (L) So what, in the records, should we be looking for?

A: Sign of struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of Royal Blood Lines.

Q: (L) In other words, the usurpation of the blood lines?

A: Close.

Session 5 September 1998


A: Watch the skies and land and oceans.

Should we expect a supernova?
 
Might be a good question for the C’s to get the truth instead of relying on third parties with interests/motives
On the cancer issue is pretty much obvious, there is also plenty of information about Covid-19 vaccine cancer related or induced.

Regarding the video itself, images worth a 1000 words, one problem is perception/beliefs.

There is lot of speculation at X whether ther video might be generated by AI.

I had seen many.
Issues with the stripes of the sweater reflecting on the wood surface, it does reflect in a glossy varnish not in matte, I checked it at home. It looks like the bench is a matte one. There are similar benches of 3 and more people.

Other posts are related to the sweater, she used one similar 7 years ago, is not the same because the sleeve cuffs are different, there is a similar sweater at Getty Images that she used in 2019, although the colors are inverted, is blue with white stripes, although it can be changed the sleeves cuffs are folded in the video, not in the photo.

There is also the non movement of the plants of the background, maybe the BBC producers use a green screen?... I had read posts that flowers are already full of bloom this days, I cannot confirmed it.


There are posts regarding her hair, face being odd, I understand it might be due her illness condition, turbo cancers do that. Although, after seeing a lot of her images/photos, one thing that got my attention was that in mostly ones, her face is oval in the forehead area and rectangular in the video.

Other posts are related to her voice, with glitches in the video itself.

It got my attention her hair color, supposedely she change it from caramel - October 23 to, chocolate brunette without light rays in December 23, I doubt she dyed it back in 2024 due her condition. But I have my doubts because BBC producers most had use warmer filters in the video, at Getty images, either they leveled or applied other filters because her hair - and also skin/expresion is darker than the video.

Lips are not in uniform color, another post was related to the eye, it looks like her iris is coming out, but sometimes is due to the lack of quality in the video.

I am not sure if is real or not.

Someone replaced Megan's face in the video, to show how easily can be done with AI.

We are already shifting sands.

 

As Princess of Wales reveals diagnosis, doctors warn of mysterious cancer ‘epidemic’​

The disease is affecting fit, younger people more often – and researchers do not yet understand why

Make me think of this call from this virologist to his colleagues saying in substance: "Have the bravery, speak out to what you witness".

And this other one too:
 
On the cancer issue is pretty much obvious, there is also plenty of information about Covid-19 vaccine cancer related or induced.

Regarding the video itself, images worth a 1000 words, one problem is perception/beliefs.

There is lot of speculation at X whether ther video might be generated by AI.

I had seen many.
Issues with the stripes of the sweater reflecting on the wood surface, it does reflect in a glossy varnish not in matte, I checked it at home. It looks like the bench is a matte one. There are similar benches of 3 and more people.

Other posts are related to the sweater, she used one similar 7 years ago, is not the same because the sleeve cuffs are different, there is a similar sweater at Getty Images that she used in 2019, although the colors are inverted, is blue with white stripes, although it can be changed the sleeves cuffs are folded in the video, not in the photo.

There is also the non movement of the plants of the background, maybe the BBC producers use a green screen?... I had read posts that flowers are already full of bloom this days, I cannot confirmed it.


There are posts regarding her hair, face being odd, I understand it might be due her illness condition, turbo cancers do that. Although, after seeing a lot of her images/photos, one thing that got my attention was that in mostly ones, her face is oval in the forehead area and rectangular in the video.

Other posts are related to her voice, with glitches in the video itself.

It got my attention her hair color, supposedely she change it from caramel - October 23 to, chocolate brunette without light rays in December 23, I doubt she dyed it back in 2024 due her condition. But I have my doubts because BBC producers most had use warmer filters in the video, at Getty images, either they leveled or applied other filters because her hair - and also skin/expresion is darker than the video.

Lips are not in uniform color, another post was related to the eye, it looks like her iris is coming out, but sometimes is due to the lack of quality in the video.

I am not sure if is real or not.

Someone replaced Megan's face in the video, to show how easily can be done with AI.

We are already shifting sands.


There seems to be a lot of interest, questions, confusion and doubt not necessarily from me but in general I know the C’s aren’t a gossip hotline but there’s only one way I know of to possibly get a solid answer…so I suggested I have no authority on the type of questions asked and only had the opportunity to sit in on one session so it’s just a thought
 
Here are some things that bother me about the garden video, along with a few benefit of the doubt remarks:
1. The hair looks totally fake (but consistent with the common need to wear a wig at such a time).
2. The bench looks like a plastic reproduction of the classic teak original. Maybe that's what they have in their garden. But, assuming they have a full time staff of gardeners and caretakers at hand, I'd think that long term maintenance of outdoor wood furniture would not be a concern. Charles + Recycling vs Charles + Nature knows the way! Your guess is as good as mine.
3. Striped, boxy sweater would add some weight to her frame visually, so a reasonable choice. But something seems off to me about her choice of ill-fitting, faded jeans for such a somber occasion/mission. To be fair, my feelings are not facts.
4. Her Left eyebrow seems unnaturally heavy, elevated and immobile. Unusual to see such in a state of some emotional turmoil, even for one so poised. Possible that this is just a suboptimal placement of Botox on that side, plus makeup to darken suddenly sparse brows.
5. Her legs are crossed at the knee. I have NEVER seen an image of a royal lady in such a posture. OTOH, I have heard many times that once a serious malignancy has been diagnosed in someone, they often no longer give a flip about trifles of convention.
I take back what I said about NEVER. It is said to be such a violation of their rules of decorum that when MM crossed her legs at the knee in public, it made international headlines. Or maybe it was just a slow week for news. In this short video we can also see that Kate has been similarly guilty:
6. I would have thought that for such a serious press release, she would be accompanied by others, such as those closely related or primarily concerned for her and her outcome, at least to give the appearance of support (to the emotions and the story). A better (more typical) play of something like this would be to have her husband alongside, then perhaps an immediate family member (like mom) and an involved health provider available for later discussion, with vague and scripted Q&A for a few carefully selected press insiders.
7. I have seen some videos which detail marginal glitches in the scene, such as of hair and eye movement anomalies. It's entirely possible that such content is troll-created, as CGI can be a sharp knife that cuts both ways.
8. The body frame and proportions appear consistent with KM to my eye. I can't speak to her hand and body mannerisms here, beyond saying that she looks unusually stiff, except for the unusually tight yet expressive hand movements. I'd need to examine old footage to see what might be a baseline for her mannerisms. I'm not going to speculate here about my gut feeling on the meaning of all this, but I do have a strong one.
9. She looks pale and like she's lost a lot of weight. I would have expected her appearance to be health-enhanced with makeup and perhaps more flattering (even if padded) attire, even if done digitally. If this is the best they can do, she must be ill indeed. That comment assumes that all the stuff we see is manipulated, which may not be the case.

Information I'm interested in getting:
A: Can an ornithologist with expertise in birdsong please identify the species singing in the soundtrack here? Then, are these species common in this area and active at this time? Are their songs consistent with the time of day and year?
B: Can a horticulturist with connections get us an accurate map of recent plantings in that particular garden? Are the blossoms and foliage on display consistent with that particular week at that particular locale?
C: Can an expert in photographic lighting analyze the scene for us? To me, it looks like morning light, but somewhat warmer and less soft, with a lot of fill lighting.

When the story came out, I was trying to think of what kind of surgery might entail such a long hospitalization. Transplant surgery? Whipple procedure? Serious intra- or post-op complication like an uncontrolled bleed, aspiration pneumonia, infection, gut ischemia? There are many possibilities for a devastatingly bad outcome.
 
There seems to be a lot of interest, questions, confusion and doubt not necessarily from me but in general I know the C’s aren’t a gossip hotline but there’s only one way I know of to possibly get a solid answer…so I suggested I have no authority on the type of questions asked and only had the opportunity to sit in on one session so it’s just a thought
It would be a lot easier and quick but, I think we still need to scrutinize more, better the information/video/images available in this case.

Just saw your post @Yupo. Good, the more, the better. We need different points of view.

Someone found that particular sweater.
Point for the IA theory and point for the human version.

The detail of the garment, you can see that it was folded and not hung for a long time, being folded the sleeve looks lñpaper like, doesn't have the curvature of other garments with striped sleeves. The flatten visual of the garment is odd in the video.

Is it possible that she wore the same garment? Very possible. That it was possible that they had taken that set of photos or video to do the AI? yes, that too.

It had happen to me with that kind of garments, and I've learned and I don't fold it again, I hang it up after it's been washed so the fold can't be seen.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240324_104247.jpg
    Screenshot_20240324_104247.jpg
    195.5 KB · Views: 22
It would be a lot easier and quick but, I think we still need to scrutinize more, better the information/video/images available in this case.

Just saw your post @Yupo. Good, the more, the better. We need different points of view.

Someone found that particular sweater.
Point for the IA theory and point for the human version.

The detail of the garment, you can see that it was folded and not hung for a long time, being folded the sleeve looks lñpaper like, doesn't have the curvature of other garments with striped sleeves. The flatten visual of the garment is odd in the video.

Is it possible that she wore the same garment? Very possible. That it was possible that they had taken that set of photos or video to do the AI? yes, that too.

It had happen to me with that kind of garments, and I've learned and I don't fold it again, I hang it up after it's been washed so the fold can't be seen.
Pretty normal for people to fold, rather than hang sweater-type knits. Their shape can be easily distorted by the weight of hanging. Even Velveen knits (a wool/rayon blend like St John uses for their suits and dresses) can get ruined by long-term hanging.
 
Back
Top Bottom