In An Unspoken Voice - Peter Levine

In this video, Peter Levine talks about the different types of memory and uses examples from his therapy and study to explain them. He also explores inter-generational memories and gives some examples.

44mins
The video isn't showing here but can be seen by following the link in the above.
 
Peter Levine and Thomas Huebl (who works more with collective trauma rather than individual) discuss healing trauma and spiritual growth:

- healing trauma is not spiritual growth, but it can open pathways to it.
- trauma doesn't necessarily have memories associated with it, but it does have symptoms. Working with symptoms may help to recover specific memory, but can vary in the time it takes to get to it if at all.
- perception of time is different where there are unhealed traumas.
- healing trauma is one thing, but changing the associated personality can be a lifetimes work.
- uses an analogy of waves created when a bunch of pebbles are dropped into water and where the waves intersect is where the trauma response is and there is blocked energy disrupting connectedness with self and others. Healing trauma allows the wave to move on unimpeded.
- discussion on collective trauma and how the narratives may be different, but the trauma is pretty much the same.

53mins

Thanks for sharing. I've added a few additional notes as that was an interesting talk. Never heard of Thomas Heubl before.

- Trauma, at the deepest level, is not being able to be in the here and now and can be seen as, or looked at like a wave, whose energy has gotten stuck in traumatic events where that motion is locked/blocked and needs to be released.
- For those who are traumatized, meditation can be hanging around in dissociated spaces and that’s not what you want because in the dissociated space, we are not able to evolve our energy. Our energy can only evolve when it’s connected. When there is disconnection, there is no movement.
- Daily experience is our practice time. Inappropriate relations creates a lot of trauma, so appropriate relations are healing and one of the fundamental spiritual practices.
- They talked about Contraction and Expansion – Light and Darkness – has to be held together. Because it’s not all light and that’s one of the gifts that trauma transformed, offers. You learn how to hold polarities in experiencing the non-dualities of existence.
- Working with the core and essence of trauma, the person is eventually able to say I’m alive and I’m here, I’m alive and I’m real. So the process of becoming more alive and more embodied is - at a minimum - a life's work.
- The past is not what happened yesterday, the past is what has stayed from yesterday and has gotten stuck.
- Question about cycles, healings, dimensions of patterns IRT trauma: Somebody who is stuck in the fixity/grip of trauma, wherever they look, every person they meet, every relationship, they are banging into their trauma. As you work on it for a while, that sharpness starts to smooth out so that you are eventually able to rub up against it but move along and through it.
-Healing is about developing relational capacities enough to create an environment of healing
-Answer to a question about how to handle someone who doesn’t want to let go of their trauma: To transform trauma is easy, to transform a personality takes a lifetime
- Why does it take so long to remember non-verbal trauma? The word memory is used in a narrow way. The types of memory involved in trauma cannot be remembered in the same way a declarative memory can. They are remembered not as memories as we normally think of it, but as reaction patterns in the body and emotions that erupt seemingly out of nowhere.
- Know how to meet and bring those unconscious memories into greater consciousness which can be formed into a healing narrative/make sense of it.
- If someone can help you track sensations, you’ll eventually be able to access these memories.
- Q: How to know if the trauma is personal or tapping into the collective? A: Doesn’t matter. Do you have to have a memory to work on it? No, everyone has a symptom, behaviour or haunting and that’s all you need (to work on it). Start with your pain and symptoms, what’s close to home and work out from there. When you are more stable, becoming more aware of the world and the collective.
- Lot’s of discussion of surfing on the energy of the moment. You’re not interpreting but rather observing how it flows. That’s the best tracker to unravel the question between individuals and collective issues. Need to work on yourself before working on the generational. Sometimes, individual trauma can be entangled with a generational process but that’s more complex.
- Trauma is primordial and the key is being able to feel those sensations and emotions as gently as possible, the trick being having our frontal cortex alive and working, receiving it’s information from the senses within the body. Allows us to have enough distance to not dissociate or suppress them – the most primitive and the most conscious held together.
 
Thanks Turgon, I was still sorting out some thoughts on this material and:

Why does it take so long to remember non-verbal trauma? The word memory is used in a narrow way. The types of memory involved in trauma cannot be remembered in the same way a declarative memory can. They are remembered not as memories as we normally think of it, but as reaction patterns in the body and emotions that erupt seemingly out of nowhere.
- they mention procedural memory and seem to draw a something out that has stuck in mind. That is that procedural memory can be what we refer to as flashes of images. Next that the flash of image can be disconnected from or perceived to be separate from patterns of bodily symptoms or emotional reactions as you say.

I think I've seen this disconnect and it's resolution. In a group setting, that didn't include somatic experiencing in a big way that I was aware of, there was an ambulance officer/paramedic.

His wife's complaint was that he was a reactive hot head when they were working on a project together on the farm and it frightened her to the point that she would cry.

His immediate thought that he could recall from emotional patterns was, if I remember correctly, was that he was the youngest sibling and the only boy and his older sisters were nasty to him, but since he was a boy he didn't feel supported in the family because he was supposed to man up and take it on the chin.

In some of the stories that they related in the group, they mentioned minor injuries like that he had skinned his knuckle. Given his profession it would be reasonable that injuries and blood might trigger him so it was decided to follow that to see what turned up.

He was instructed to do some deep breathing and relax and pay attention to any images that come to mind and was told that the images may not have any emotional content, that they may just be pictures in his mind.

What he described was that as a little kid - didn't specify age - he was in a farm accident where his throat was cut and his jugular vein severed and the image flash was of being in an ambulance being furiously worked on to prevent him from bleeding out.

Thing is his response as he related that story was to sigh, and relax as he said something along the lines of 'ah, so that's it. The other thing is that this seems to be a significant story, but he didn't think it was significant enough - or didn't make connections between that experience and his recent emotional reactions. Could be that his story about the relations in his family also had an impact or something. Could also be that he thought that the situation with his farm accident as a kid had been resolved and no longer had and impact on emotional reactions and bodily symptoms - he survived it after all.

The interesting thing about his sigh is that in this thread on the book Accessing the healing power of the vague nerve the exercises given to stretch the vagus nerve and are held until there is a sigh, cough or yawn. So maybe the signs of resolution in the emotions and body can be that subtle.

Not sure if I'm on track with this, just trying to tease out procedural memory specifically and the disconnect in general.
 
made a lot of sense as to how trauma effects us in so many ways and stores itself in our body, as a continuous state of 'holding' - so that the energy is never released or processed so that we can eventually move on from it and continue forward in life.
I have a question for you guys who are better versed in his method. Let's say someone has experienced trauma and is triggered by a noise. They start to shake and feel the urge to curl up in a corner for safety. From my understanding of Peter Levine's approach, the idea is to allow the body to respond naturally in order to feel safe and to release trapped energy. However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?

For example, curling up in a corner signals to the body that the situation is indeed dangerous (the body is in a closed and protective position). But if, when triggered, a person consciously (cognitively) recognizes that they aren't in any danger and chooses to respond differently such as sitting upright in an open position in a chair while allowing the shaking, it can help retrain the body to understand that the noise (trigger) is not a threat.

But I think this is probably what Peter Levine tries to achieve, to first release the energy by following the body's natural response and to then learn to adopt a different behavior to signal to the body that the situation is safe despite the fear someone may feel initially.
 
I have a question for you guys who are better versed in his method. Let's say someone has experienced trauma and is triggered by a noise. They start to shake and feel the urge to curl up in a corner for safety. From my understanding of Peter Levine's approach, the idea is to allow the body to respond naturally in order to feel safe and to release trapped energy. However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?

I guess the simplest measure would be to ask 'what is the fruit?' Is the person in question increasing capacity to hear the noise with diminishing trigger response intensity or regularity, or is the trigger response staying the same or increasing in intensity or regularity?
 
However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?
Trauma Release Exercises (David Bercelli) stipulate that a person processing trauma through tremor is safe provided they do not dissociate. This means that it is best someone is supervised so they can be brought back to full consciousness if they start dissociating. TRE also recommends no more than 10 minutes of tremoring, two times per week.

I have observed my cat after experiencing trauma, she started to shake when I applied reiki. I stayed with her until it fully resolved and then she slept. So she knew she was safe. I think it is very important to release the energy whilst being conscious that is what is happening and being conscious of feeling safe. Being present in the moment of safety is the safeguard.
 
Last edited:
I have a question for you guys who are better versed in his method. Let's say someone has experienced trauma and is triggered by a noise. They start to shake and feel the urge to curl up in a corner for safety. From my understanding of Peter Levine's approach, the idea is to allow the body to respond naturally in order to feel safe and to release trapped energy. However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?

For example, curling up in a corner signals to the body that the situation is indeed dangerous (the body is in a closed and protective position). But if, when triggered, a person consciously (cognitively) recognizes that they aren't in any danger and chooses to respond differently such as sitting upright in an open position in a chair while allowing the shaking, it can help retrain the body to understand that the noise (trigger) is not a threat.

But I think this is probably what Peter Levine tries to achieve, to first release the energy by following the body's natural response and to then learn to adopt a different behavior to signal to the body that the situation is safe despite the fear someone may feel initially.

My understanding of it is that it isn't always so straight-forward as "just curl in corner and feel the panic", that's why usually they recommend to do it with someone who can notice if there is release or just reinforcement, and I'm not sure if the people who work with this method are always aware of the difference, unfortunately.

For example, there's also the very important concept of titration and/or pendulation. That makes it easier to make sure it is not reinforcement. For example, the person may be asked to allow a bit of curling and shaking, and then, come back to a grounding position that brings a sense of safety, then back again to a little bit of shaking and curling, and so on and so forth. This would allow the person to experience a sense of resource as an anchor, which would allow them to explore the trauma reaction with that anchor to safety. In a way is like knowing that you can be OK too, and bringing that sense of 'okayness' when exploring the uncomfortable. The idea is also to grow the capacity for handling those uncomfortable sensations, not to just go there without having that capacity first. So usually there's a lot of 'resourcing' done first, which is, growing the sense of being able to handle uncomfortable feelings before diving into them to 'release' them.

Other examples are some exercises that Peter Levine talks about in his books which are for example, to push away (a wall, but it can also be a person who is holding their ground as the idea is not to push them violently but just experience the strength of pushing away), and to run in place (can be sitting down and just move the legs as if you are running). So, these exercises are intended to release but not so much in a 'curling' and defenceless sort of way, but more to activate the natural need to escape or to push someone away from you, which is often what was thwarted when there was trauma (the ability to defend yourself or run away). Here, the intention is to activate the inner strength and agency. For example: Curling is more of paralyzing motion (immobilization) and the idea is to try to break free from that paralysis by activating the mobilization that was thwarted and that is usually what remains stored in the body and needs release.
 
Trauma Release Exercises (David Bercelli) stipulate that a person processing trauma through tremor is safe provided they do not dissociate. This means that it is best someone is supervised so they can be brought back to full consciousness if they start dissociating. TRE also recommends no more than 10 minutes of tremoring, two times per week.

I have observed my cat after experiencing trauma, she started to shake when I applied reiki. I stayed with her until it fully resolved and then she slept. So she knew she was safe. I think it is very important to release the energy whilst being conscious that is what is happening and being conscious of feeling safe. Being present in the moment of safety is the safeguard.

I don't know anything about TRE, though I've heard that TRE is a bit different than Levine's approach because it puts arbitrary limits on what the body should do to to release. Maybe it's more regimented in that way? There's an emphasis on shaking in TRE, and a certain limited amount of shaking, as you say. I'm imagining someone is doing a somatic exercise, and there is something that the body wants to release - but they've already used up their shaking time. Does the therapist get them to stop somehow? Why?

I have a question for you guys who are better versed in his method. Let's say someone has experienced trauma and is triggered by a noise. They start to shake and feel the urge to curl up in a corner for safety. From my understanding of Peter Levine's approach, the idea is to allow the body to respond naturally in order to feel safe and to release trapped energy. However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?

For example, curling up in a corner signals to the body that the situation is indeed dangerous (the body is in a closed and protective position). But if, when triggered, a person consciously (cognitively) recognizes that they aren't in any danger and chooses to respond differently such as sitting upright in an open position in a chair while allowing the shaking, it can help retrain the body to understand that the noise (trigger) is not a threat.

But I think this is probably what Peter Levine tries to achieve, to first release the energy by following the body's natural response and to then learn to adopt a different behavior to signal to the body that the situation is safe despite the fear someone may feel initially.

From my not-really-an-expert perspective, I'd say it depends in large part where the person is in the therapeutic process. If they're in the early stages, and haven't gained the knowledge of their nervous system, nor developed the adequate awareness necessary to feel powerful feelings and process them without getting swept away by them, they can probably be re-triggered. In large part they get triggered by being triggered. I know that's how it was for me, even though I thought I knew what was going on and what to do. Kinda hilarious how hard I fought against healing. But also not very hilarious because the fear was there because I was quite sure I was dying.

Anyways, if the person has learned to orient, pendulate and titrate, they can can curl up in fear due to the loud noise without reinforcing the fear or being newly traumatized by staying connected to the present moment and their body, as this is the means by which the trauma is released. So long as they are grounded in awareness and knowledge and are dedicated to focusing on building nervous system capacity day by day, it works. This commitment and attitude are key, as sometimes people take years to heal.

Side note, I've also been learning that shaking itself isn't required. Sometimes it's just a subtle head movement, a tingle in the arm, an itch on the neck, a holding of the breath, etc., that can unlock something quite deep, with no shaking necessary.
 
I have a question for you guys who are better versed in his method. Let's say someone has experienced trauma and is triggered by a noise. They start to shake and feel the urge to curl up in a corner for safety. From my understanding of Peter Levine's approach, the idea is to allow the body to respond naturally in order to feel safe and to release trapped energy. However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?
What @iamthatis said.:-D

Also, I started watching Irene Lyon videos today (The Nervous System Expert) and perhaps some of her videos could be useful for you to watch?

What was an eye-opener to me was that trauma release doesn't necessarily involve shaking or trembling. It can be felt in all kinds of ways. We can feel hot or cold, and so on. It is a very individual thing, that is what I learnt from her videos.

I just watched this one and it basically explains what iamthatis wrote:

I watched this one, too, which might be helpful:

Here is a thread about her:

 
Last edited:
However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?
Have you had a chance to review Irene Lyon's work? She details ways of working through involuntary fears in the body, especially if talk therapy isn't enough to get through to help someone at the somatic level. Slow, gradual movements, tracking the shifts and sensations in the body and especially, going slow with this work allows the prefrontal cortex to become active enough to process these shifts and changes in the nervous system responses without being overwhelmed and reinforcing the trauma. Like iamthatis said, shaking isn't always necessary, but more so subtle changes.
 
Last edited:
I was thinking a bit more about the question of re-triggering or reinforcing fear to see if I could make sense of it to myself. Kinda hard to put it all into words, but here goes.

When going through a somatic trauma release, it was eye-opening to learn the difference between healthy resourcing and defensive accommodations. Resources are consciously identified beforehand as safe and comforting. They could be a memory, an image, a prayer, a sacred object - that kind of thing. They are also understood to be temporary points of rest or safety, with the intent to 'go back in' when the system is ready. Defensive accommodations are generally a response to the survival energies themselves when they get overwhelming. The goal is to numb, block, or avoid the trauma.

So let's say in Scenario A, someone is in the midst of an episode - maybe they've heard a loud noise (acute shock trauma) and this has triggered an implicit childhood memory (developmental trauma). They instinctively curl up in fear - but when they do so, they know to maintain a grounded connection with the environment, the safety of the here here and now, which gives the system a green light to express. They also maintain a connection with the peaceful, still part of themselves that witnesses everything without judgment. In other words, allowing, but non-identifying, with the turmoil. It's a matter of letting go, but also a gentle holding of oneself with love.

If it gets too much, resourcing could mean a temporary swing in awareness away from the sensations, and focusing on the resource - a prayer, a memory, an image, or a safe place in the body, the sensation of the feet on the ground, reminding the self that the body is safe in the present moment, and that this too shall pass. This builds trust within the psyche, especially when doing little doses at a time at first - the system realizes that 'we can do this'. After a rest, they can swing their attention 'back in'. Generally, people can get to the point where they hold the turmoil, the resource, and the environment in their awareness simultaneously. When it's over, sometimes there's a feeling of freshness, and sometimes a feeling of been dragged by a truck through a field of rocks. For me there's generally a sense of completion either way. The next time it happens, the thought 'we can do this', already proven, is reinforced.

In Scenario B, someone hears a loud noise and the shock triggers a childhood memory. They instinctively curl up in fear - but when they do so, they panic internally, and identify with the reaction. This is paired with the thought that 'something is desperately wrong here', that it is a problem needing a solution - NOW! The response is to not let go, but fight what is happening, following old familiar neural pathways that didn't allow the trauma to express in the first place. The cortex goes into overdrive looking for the 'solution', AKA one of their defensive accommodations - which I think is also an attempt to love and care when it's all just too much to handle.

My common defensive accommodations were to generate a cascade of thought to ignore the turmoil, put on a guided meditation and bliss out, go for a walk, read-read-read, or go to sleep. Other defensive accommodations could be more destructive, like eating junk food, promiscuity, taking a sedative, cutting, using weed or alcohol, etc. Even 'good' things, like journalling, having a smoke, doing pipe breath, a cold water plunge - anything to stop the feelings - can be defensive accommodations. The main thing is that in Scenario B, it's already a bit too much from the beginning, and the trauma can stay stuck inside with these palliative responses. The next time it happens, the fearful thought 'something is desperately wrong here' can kick in and the fight starts all over again.

So yeah, from the outside, Scenario A and B can both look the same - someone curls over in fear in reaction to a loud noise, and then after a brief vacation in hell, they eventually get up and get on with their day. The difference is that one person has let go of some of their 'allostatic' trauma load, but the other has not, and may have even increased it. These two examples are admittedly too black-and-white, but it's a bit beyond me to trace out all the nuances.

Defensive accommodations are also very important. This term has been developed to replace the more judgmental ones like 'maladaptive reactions', etc. Some degree of dissociation is definitely warranted when the hell of the past spills out into the present. Knowing when one has had too much and stopping is 100% okay. The idea is to start where you are, and move slowly away from the usual tendencies to try to palliate in Scenario B, avoid the destructive defensive accommodations, and ease into fully facing the darkness with intentional suffering, as in Scenario A.
 
I have a question for you guys who are better versed in his method. Let's say someone has experienced trauma and is triggered by a noise. They start to shake and feel the urge to curl up in a corner for safety. From my understanding of Peter Levine's approach, the idea is to allow the body to respond naturally in order to feel safe and to release trapped energy. However, how would you determine whether you're allowing the body to heal or whether you're unintentionally reinforcing fear?

I'd like to address your question as a real-life case, not a theoretical one, so it would be helpful to know if this is something that happens to you or someone else. It would also be helpful to know a little about the circumstances in which it occurs.

When I connect with the image of someone trembling in a corner, I see a person with an overwhelmed nervous system (outside its window of tolerance), who has experienced an inescapable attack (real or imagined).

This goes beyond an incomplete defense response and extends to hypertonic freezing (overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system), like a vehicle with the brake and accelerator pressed to the floor simultaneously.

In these circumstances, the accumulated energy will not be discharged. For the energy of an incomplete defense response to be released, it first needs to be thawed. Thawing requires time and space in safety and in the presence of oneself (awareness of bodily sensations).
 
I've been wondering about my daily shaking. It's been happening for years now, is distinctly uncomfortable and debilitating, and at times completely overwhelming. I've been using the Somatic Experiencing approach for a while now, and am improving my efficacy in it, but there is a question in my mind - how long do I have to do this? How much trauma is stored in me? How long do I have to be so disabled? I have heard that some people need 18 months and some 7 years in order to reach a state of cellular safety. Even then, some expierenced veterans in this approach still feel trauma release after 10 years. So I remind myself of all this when I get impatient and frustrated and feel like I don't want to live anymore. And of course, I make a practice of allowing the feelings, and surrounding them with love and all that.

But still, I wonder, sort of in line with Oxajil's question above, whether or not I am reinforcing neural circuitry - do the tremors originate from some form of physiological issue that is not associated with the trauma? I apparently have a genetic connective tissue disorder and my MRI showed brain lesions - can Levine's approach heal these? Neurons that fire together wire together. In chronic pain, focusing on the pain itself can sensitize the body and brain to the pain, which can cause it to be reinforced. Does sitting with the sensations in the way described by Lyon and Levine allow trauma to release in all cases? Does it sometimes 'wire in' the tremors or dystonia? Is there another therapeutic approach that could be used in conjunction with SE therapy to actively engage new circuitry in a more targeted way? Would this be a helpful addition to the somewhat more passive SE 'allowing/sensing' method?

On that note, I am reading a book by Dr. Jaoquin Farias and it may present a more active approach. Not sure, it's above my neuroscience knowledge to compare the two approaches. He writes the story of using what seems to be both a passive (sensing/feeling) and active (movement) approach in his recovery from major surgery - an approach that has helped many of his patients heal from their shaking using the neuroplasticity of movement. I also found it to be a clear and concise refresher regarding what happens in the brain during shock. It may also be helpful to read for anyone who is undergoing major surgery, or who will have a loved on doing so. His story begins with his response to his diagnosis of cancer:

IN A MOMENT I said goodbye to the doctors and nurses at the clinic. I walked 25 meters and broke down in tears. Just a bit after that, walking became difficult. I was having trouble moving my left leg. I started to limp, and in less than a hundred meters, I felt like I was going to fall to the floor. Abdominal spasms made it difficult for me to walk upright. I leaned against a bench, my crying intensified, and I began to hyperventilate. People walking by were looking at me. They spoke to me, but I did not answer.

My level of emotional response raised again. A woman stopped and asked me if I needed help. I spoke to her for several minutes, answering in short sentences. I remember that she asked mewhat had happened, and my answer was not particularly articulate. I was having trouble thinking about the past or the future. My brain had anchored itself in the present, trapped in desperate emotions. I felt intense nausea, but not the kind that induced vomiting. It was something different. I had a sensation of pressure in my chest. I thought I might be having a heart attack.

DISCONNECTED After about 45 minutes, the autonomic response suddenly calmed; my breathing returned to being unrushed. I felt released, as if now free from my emotions. I felt a strange sensation of peace. My sense of time had been affected. The two hours I walked seemed quite brief. My short-term memory wasn’t working well. I had the strange feeling of not belonging to my surroundings, as if disconnected. The people around me seemed alien, as if they weren’t part of my world, as ifthere were two parallel realities: theirs and mine.

The right hemisphere of the brain is in charge of processing experiences in the present and negative emotions. It was as if some circuits in my right hemisphere had disconnected, producing a strange experience of disassociation for me. My prefrontal lobes were suffering from distress, which had inundated me, and in order to overcome it, I needed to disconnect myself so the pain would cease. My prefrontal functions were affected and were leaving me hanging in a state of altered perception. My brain had closed in on itself. My right hemisphere, responsible for integrating me into the surrounding environment, had disconnected essential circuits.

The right hemisphere processes interior as well as exterior space. I was not aware of my emotions that had brought me back to a state of calm by disconnecting. The pain was not mine and neither was the space around me.My brain had produced a great quantity of endorphins which had relaxed me, as if I were thinking less, and my muscles relaxed, producing a sensation of walking as if floating in water. That night at home, the feelings of fear returned. I couldn’t sleep and my thermoregulation was not working right, I couldn’t regulate my core temperature I was feeling cold in a very hot room. I was very aware that the fear could kill me much more easily than the tumor I was confronting could.

The date for my surgery was set the following day. Three weeks later a biopsy would be performed, and I would know if I was facing a thymoma and life expectancy of 10 years or more—or the opposite, an advanced carcinoma or lymphoma which would require a more aggressive treatment with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. I spent the next three weeks preparing myself physically for theoperation. I was in good spirits during the day, but after 7 in the evening, I tended to have panic attacks and I could not stop crying.

THE NEXT PHASE A month later I had the surgery to remove the tumor. The surgery carried with it the risk of breaking the capsule that surrounded the tumor, spreading its content to the pleura and mediastinum. The removal of the tumor was a complicated procedure. It measured 9 centimeters in diameter and was in a space as small as the mediastinum anterior, placing force on the left lung to make room for it. After four hours of surgery, the lung collapsed.

Waking Up

Minute One: I woke up. I felt an intense pain in the thorax. My left lung had lost its elasticity. My entire body was paralized. I couldn’t move a muscle.It was as if I had been shot in my left lung. I could not inhale. The muscles used for exhalation were contracted, and inhalation was accomplished by great force, producing a deep pain I had never before experienced. The entire left side of my body was contracted, as if it were protecting itself from the intense aggression it had experienced during surgery. It was not obeying my orders.

I could only take superficial breaths, a second of inhalation and a second of exhalation, which required so much force on my part, it distressed me greatly. I was able to talk to the surgeon for a moment, and I described to him the muscles that were spastic in my back and in my hand. He told me this should not be happening and that it might be a response to the aggressive surgical procedure. After an hour, I was moved to the nursing floor. I was lying in the bed with a drain in the lung, when the sedatives took effect.

Three hours later, my breathing becamevery difficult. A very young nurse who was on the night shift came to me and said, “You are very tense. You have to move even if it hurts.” That very simple and direct advice opened my eyes. I had no other choice than to stimulate my breathing on my own. I checked to see which muscles I could move, and found that I could only move my head a bit and the fingers on my right hand. The left side of my body was in spasm, an intense and painful contraction. My muscles were heavily contracted from my shoulder to my toes. I had to use the same system that I had designed for my generalized dystonia patients, but this time on my own body.

I began to make pendulating movements, increasing their range bit by bit, when I felt my muscles relax a little. The process was very painful and let loose a strong autonomic and emotional response. After 15 minutes of trying, I was able to unblockmy first movement. I could slowly open and close my left hand. I added rhythmic contractions of my breathing muscles. I used inhalation to stretch my back muscles bit by bit, millimeter by millimeter. After an hour, I could bend both elbows, and the pain decreased.

Hour Three: I tried to connect with my pectoral muscles on both sides. The right responded with difficulty, the left had no strength. It trembled or did not respond at all. Some of the thoracic nerves had been cut. The muscles had been separated, detached during surgery, but not cut. They could contract and relax, but my nervous system refused to use them. I was aware that my recuperation would only be possible with a neural regeneration. Before I could recuperate functionality, I had to be able to make that happen.I could wait for the regeneration of my tissues to take place before I began my movement rehabilitation, but I knew that I should not do that. If I began exercising, accomplishing what I could, I would guide the regeneration of tissues, the processes of neuroplasticity, and in the end, tone the desired muscles. My recuperation would need directing, which was provided by the movements I made. Movement is the means of driving a recuperation and assisting lymphatic, immunologic, circulatory, and respiratory function.

I took my left hand in my right and moved it slightly, progressively increasing the range. When I found the point in my range where I experienced pain and a defensive spasm was produced, I stopped and tried to relax.

Hour Four: My range had greatly increased, but there were still points where the system was blocked. My left arm wouldn’t even slightly pass the area damaged by the surgery.I began to work on my serratus and latissimus dorsi muscles, the two muscles most contracted as a consequence of the surgery. I exercised: anteversion, abduction and adduction of the left shoulder with the help of the right arm. I felt an intense, incapacitating trembling.

Hour Five: I was able to initiate active movement of my left shoulder, with a very limited but progressing range. My arm would move only a few millimeters, but it was a big improvement. My body began to respond. My breathing progressively became easier, but the pain was still intense. I was able to sleep for an hour, but it was from exhaustion.

Hour Seven: I felt the need to stand, but the nurses wouldn’t allow it. After 6 hours I was allowed to sit up, which facilitated the draining.I began exercises with the spirometer, but I could not make the spheres rise. Trying to increase my exhalation pressure caused a cutting pain that produced a spasm in my back and chest. 24 hours after surgery The drain was removed and the pain was greatly reduced. They allowed me to get up. I took a few very slow steps, which radically improved my situation. I began to unblock the flow of chi in my hips with my right hand. I could not get even 10 centimeters close to the surgical incision with my other hand because it caused trembling in my entire body. My chi was making irregular movements, like never before. My bladder meridian was blocked. I worked on reinitiating the chi flow through the meridian. That night I noticed an unblocking of the stomach and bladder meridians: They were working at 150 percent.

Day Three: I was able to walk better and was able to unblock the flow of chi from the surgery site, but I had no feeling in the pectorals. Even the nipples had no feeling. My brain wasn’t processing my left pectoral as part of me. I felt a deep sadness as if in a duel with the part of me that had been removed. I remembered that the thymus (the gland that had been removed) was considered in some cultures to be the seat of the soul or the seat of the heart’s energy. I gently began to stimulate the skin to regain sensation in my chest, with no immediate progress.

My left arm now had improved mobility, but the dystonia was clear. There was great tension and great resistance to movement. I discovered something interesting. My left arm, which I could not move intentionally, regained movement when it repeated a movement made by the right. I was aware that I was confronting a cortical issue and that I needed to get over a dystonia of the left arm. By copying the movement of the right, I was able to increase my anteversion range a little.

Day Five: I no longer needed analgesics during the day. I felt very tired, but I was able to sleep in a seated position. I had gone more than four days without sleeping. Day Six: I regained partial feeling in the skin of the nipple and pectoral areas, accompanied by paresthesia. I felt odd pains when I touched those areas, as if there were tiny pieces of glass under the skin. I stimulated the area with a soft sponge, which produced an autonomic response or great stress, dizziness, and a strange pain of neurologic origin. The left pectoral continued to be disconnected. The post-surgery scars were a bit infected, which kept me from exercising much due to the pain caused by stretching the area. I took it easy for a while.I was able to unblock the gallbladder meridian using chi gong. The surgery had also affected the flow in the kidney, pericardium and lung meridians. I needed to activate the left kidney, which had become hypoactive after the surgery.

Day Ten: The site of the surgery regained feeling, which brought with it a dull internal pain, and what looked like subconscious memories of the assault during the surgery. These could have been real memories or ones produced from fear, but they affected me the same way. I needed to include more daily meditation to control the circular thoughts about the surgery.

REHABILITATION A month after the surgery, my left lung was working again and breathing was less painful, but my respiratory system was not working sufficiently. If I didn’t pay attention to it, my breathingbecame blocked. My breathing was quite superficial, making it difficult for me to walk without tiring. I frequently woke up during the night forcefully inhaling through my mouth, feeling suffocated. I was aware that I needed to relearn how to breathe. I made myself a strict plan for recovery that included hours of daily breathing exercises. The rehabilitaion of my arm was not a priority at that moment. I needed to reestablish my breathing first. I soon learned that I was mistaken. Without the use of my left arm, I lost a valuable assistant in the functioning of my left lung. I needed to rehabilitate both at the same time.

I worked for hours in front of a mirror, trying to have my left arm copy the movements of my right. Supination of my left arm was difficult. Abduction and anteversion were limited. I could not surpass more than 20 percent of the range of movement.How could I assist my body to relearn how to breathe? The first step required identifying when I blocked my breathing and reacting at the very first moment, not allowing the cease of respiratory flow. I studied the movements of the torso and arms that might help me force respiration that was not produced on a pulmonary level. It needed to be respiration initiated externally, with the superficial muscles stimulating the deeper ones. That worked. My lung reacted to the movement.

Without the help of the left arm, my first step was to use movements of the trunk and the hips to assist in achieving quiet inhalations and exhalations. I choreographed circular motions that combined hip flexions and extensions with trunk flexions and extensions. I always worked with music, as the rhythm helped me keep the movements smooth. It became clear to me that I needed to smoothly connect movements. This dance-like characteristic of the exercises had a powerful effect on my nervoussystem, which allowed me to increase the range of movement and the levels of stretching much more when the motions were rhythmic and smooth.

Three Months Later: I noticed a great change in mobility in my left arm. During these months of rhythmic working in front of the mirror, I was able to regain 80 percent of the range of movement for all motions of my left arm. My breathing was still stiff, but it no longer stopped. It had returned to feeling like an automatic process that no longer required my attention. The pain in my left thorax continued, but I accepted it as part of a process of change.Many of the patients who had thoracic surgery which cut the intercostal nerves experienced paresthesia or chronic pain for many months after the operation. Many need to take analgesics on a regular basis. In my case, I opted for neuroplasticity. I needed to modify my pain threshold in the hypersensitive affected area. If I touched my right pectoral, I felt the contact and the temperature of my hand. If I touched my left pectoral, during the first weeks, I felt nothing. I had lost almost all of the feeling in that area.

After the third week, the feeling began to return, along with the pain. It was a pain that was very characteristic of neurologic injuries. It felt as if there were tiny pieces of glass under the skin that were cutting me and causing a dull pain. That pain made me uneasy. The feeling was not only in the pectoral. The worst part was not the pain but the sudden active state I felt come over my nervous system and my kidneys every time I touched those areas. The slightest brush against the area made me overreact.My body wanted to avoid contact there. It was clear to me that I had to begin a process of desensitizing it. In the present condition, the lightest touch produced pain. In order to induce desensitization, I used my hands.

Every day I lightly touched the area, without pressure. If I could not stand the feeling more than a few seconds, I stopped, and when it felt better, I reinitiated the stimulation. By doing this, I was intermittently stimulating the nerve endings on the left side of my thorax. In a few days, I felt the pain change. It felt different: from broken glass it became a type of strange itching pain, but only when I pressed the muscle against my ribs or touched the exterior muscle attachments. Taps to the area with my hands, even light ones, were unbearable, but with practice I decreased the sensitivity to a point where I could softly slap or press the musculature producing only slight discomfort.

Six Months Later: My body wanted to avoid contact there. It was clear to me that I had to begin a process of desensitizing it. In the present condition, the lightest touch produced pain. In order to induce desensitization, I used my hands. Every day I lightly touched the area, without pressure. If I could not stand the feeling more than a few seconds, I stopped, and when it felt better, I reinitiated the stimulation. By doing this, I was intermittently stimulating the nerve endings on the left side of my thorax. In a few days, I felt the pain change. It felt different: from broken glass it became a type of strange itching pain, but only when I pressed the muscle against my ribs or touched the exterior muscle attachments. Taps to the area with my hands, even light ones, were unbearable, but with practice I decreased the sensitivity to a point where I could softly slap or press the musculature producing only slight discomfort.

In six months I was able to reorganize my paresthesia on the left side of the thorax with regular stimulation. The pain disappeared and only reappeared from time to time for short periods. After more than 400 hours of practice, I regained complete movement in the left arm. The range of movement in the shoulder was 100 percent in anteversion and retroversion abduction-adduction. The flexion-extension of the elbow, the pronosupination and the movement of the fingers were also working correctly. During the following months, I had to do daily stretches to maintain that state of muscular function. As the months continued to go by, I began to feel completely normal.

So there's something different here than allowing the body to move - active engagement with the moving centre, or the motor centre in the prefrontal cortex to wire new connections. Not sure if I'm making too much of the passive/active distinction, but that's how it seems to me at this time. FWIW.
 
Back
Top Bottom