dannybananny
Jedi Council Member
Associated Press, 11.20.09, 07:33 AM EST
ROME -- A Vatican researcher claims she has found a nearly invisible text on the Shroud of Turin and says the discovery proves the authenticity of the artifact revered as Jesus' burial cloth.
The claim made in a new book by historian Barbara Frale drew immediate skepticism from some scientists, who maintain the shroud is a medieval forgery.
Frale, a researcher at the Vatican archives, says the faint writing emerged through computer analysis of photos of the shroud, which is not normally accessible for study.
Frale says the jumble of Greek, Latin and Aramaic includes the words "Jesus Nazarene" and mentions he was sentenced to death. She believes the text was written on a document by a clerk to identify the body and the ink then seeped into the cloth.
This is so fake that my head hurts.
Doesn't it seems little subjective that reasercher that is funded by Vatican is exploring it, of course that he will make any evidence that will prove that it belonged to "Jesus" because church has very big interest to make evidence that their religion is "true".
Why would they use three languages to write his name?
One possibility is also that that men was a real person and was named Jesus but he wasn't the Jesus that Bible talks about. They could use name Jesus that belongs to some dead men and give it to the real "Jesus" and use it as the evidence to support their religion.
ROME -- A Vatican researcher claims she has found a nearly invisible text on the Shroud of Turin and says the discovery proves the authenticity of the artifact revered as Jesus' burial cloth.
The claim made in a new book by historian Barbara Frale drew immediate skepticism from some scientists, who maintain the shroud is a medieval forgery.
Frale, a researcher at the Vatican archives, says the faint writing emerged through computer analysis of photos of the shroud, which is not normally accessible for study.
Frale says the jumble of Greek, Latin and Aramaic includes the words "Jesus Nazarene" and mentions he was sentenced to death. She believes the text was written on a document by a clerk to identify the body and the ink then seeped into the cloth.
This is so fake that my head hurts.
A Vatican researcher
Doesn't it seems little subjective that reasercher that is funded by Vatican is exploring it, of course that he will make any evidence that will prove that it belonged to "Jesus" because church has very big interest to make evidence that their religion is "true".
But why not ask if he was writing the real truth or someone told him to write that.She believes the text was written on a document by a clerk to identify the body and the ink then seeped into the cloth.
Frale says the jumble of Greek, Latin and Aramaic includes the words "Jesus Nazarene" and mentions he was sentenced to death.
Why would they use three languages to write his name?
One possibility is also that that men was a real person and was named Jesus but he wasn't the Jesus that Bible talks about. They could use name Jesus that belongs to some dead men and give it to the real "Jesus" and use it as the evidence to support their religion.
Last edited by a moderator: